Acceptability and initial promise of trainings for community stakeholders serving refugee and immigrant families.

Cumulative traumatic migration experiences are compounded by escalating chronic distress related to the current sociopolitical climate for refugee and immigrant children and families. The aim of this open trial was to conduct a preliminary evaluation of You're Not Alone, a rapidly mounted, strengths-based, community-focused capacity building training initiative for stakeholders interacting with refugee and immigrant children and families in the Chicago area. Trainings, based on Trauma-Informed Care (TIC) and psychological first aid frameworks, adapted education and universal health promotion strategies for population-specific chronic traumatic stress. Two groups of participants (N = 948), who attended either mandatory (n = 659 educators) or voluntary (n = 289 community stakeholders) trainings, completed surveys at pretraining, post-training, and 6-week follow-up. Outcome indices included participant satisfaction, acceptability of training model, and changes in knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Over 90% of participants reported satisfaction and acceptability of trainings. For educators, hierarchical linear modeling analyses demonstrated significant increases in trauma knowledge, refugee and immigrant-specific knowledge, positive attitudes toward TIC over time, and a decrease in negative attitudes toward immigrants. Over 95% of participants indicated that they learned and intended to use new strategies to help serve refugee and immigrant children and families. At follow-up, over 80% of those who completed the survey had utilized at least one strategy, and over 55% indicated that they were using resources that they learned about in the training. This study demonstrates that capacity-building trainings swiftly developed and disseminated to community stakeholders can produce positive change in knowledge, attitudes, and practices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Sleep, Affect, and Emotion Reactivity in First-Year College Students: A Daily Diary Study.

BACKGROUND: Sleep is an important factor in well-being, especially during the transition to college when academic and social commitments increase. Identifying factors that contribute to poor sleep (including short duration and increased variability in duration) can support development of interventions. Affect and emotion reactivity are factors that could contribute to sleep, and have not been studied in relation to sleep variables among first-year college students during their adjustment to the college environment. This adjustment might be difficult for some students, and therefore elicit affect fluctuations that contribute to poor sleep. Alternatively, sleep could contribute to daily affect. The present daily diary study examined bidirectional relations between daily sleep and affect, as well as between emotion reactivity and sleep (duration and variability) and affect (daily and overall variability) in first-year college students. METHOD: First-year college students (n = 244; 86.1% female) completed a baseline survey including measures of emotion reactivity and anxiety and depressive symptoms, followed by 7 days of a once-per-day diary, reporting on their affect and sleep duration. RESULTS: On days when individuals reported increased sleep duration, they also tended to experience greater positive affect the following day (p = .01). Those who experienced high levels of emotion reactivity also experienced more negative affect (p < .001) and negative affect variability (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Emotion reactivity might identify college students who experience more negative affect and are possibly at risk to develop mental health disorders. The importance of sleep health should continue to be emphasized to students as they transition to college.

A Community-Based Organization Model to Promote Latinx Immigrant Mental Health Through Advocacy Skills and Universal Parenting Supports.

The unique mental health context of children in Latinx immigrant families calls for innovative community-based intervention strategies. We use an ecological public health approach to highlight the importance of community-based organization (CBO) settings, the critical role of community-based paraprofessionals (i.e., non-clinicians, near-peers) and capacity-building, and the expansion of mental health promotion strategies to include realistic, day-to-day supports for Latinx immigrant parents and families. This realigns mental health with the goals and mission of trusted spaces, like CBOs, that can offer more equitable and non-stigmatized access for Latinx immigrant families. We draw upon two strength-based and empowerment-focused interventions that utilize community-based workforces to promote positive parenting skills (Partners Achieving Student Success-PASS; Mehta et al., 2019) and self-advocacy skills (Community Advocacy Project-CAP; Sullivan & Bybee, 1999) to provide the conceptual framework for Family Mental Health Advocacy (FMHA). FMHA aligns mental health promotion with the advocacy mission of CBOs, engages CBO staff with feasible mental health "messages," and empowers immigrant parents as critical change agents in the lives of their children. We acknowledge the challenges associated with implementing mental health promotion strategies and providing workforce support, as well as the importance of local and national policy influences.

The practice of evidence-based treatments in ethnic minority youth.

Ethnic minority children continue to have substantial unmet mental health needs, and evidence-based treatments (EBTs) have proved challenging to disseminate widely among ethnic minority communities. Indeed, policy makers have made an important distinction between EBTs, interventions that have proven efficacy in clinical trials, and evidence-based practice, which involves "the integration of the best available research with clinical expertise in the context of patient characteristics, culture, and preferences." The present research evidence suggests that several interventions have been found to be effective in ethnic minority populations without a need for major adaptations of the original interventions. However, this article highlights the need to deliver evidence-based practice, which is defined as the implementation of EBTs delivered with fidelity and with the integration of important cultural systems and community factors.