The effect of tablet computer-based telemonitoring added to an established telephone disease management program on heart failure hospitalizations: The Specialized Primary and Networked Care in Heart Failure (SPAN-CHF) III Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Mobile health applications are becoming increasingly common. Prior work has demonstrated reduced heart failure (HF) hospitalizations with HF disease management programs; however, few of these programs have used tablet computer-based technology. METHODS: Participants with a diagnosis of HF and at least 1 high risk feature for hospitalization were randomized to either an established telephone-based disease management program or the same disease management program with the addition of remote monitoring of weight, blood pressure, heart rate and symptoms via a tablet computer for 90 days. The primary endpoint was the number of days hospitalized for HF assessed at 90 days. RESULTS: From August 2014 to April 2019, 212 participants from 3 hospitals in Massachusetts were randomized 3:1 to telemonitoring-based HF disease management (n = 159) or telephone-based HF disease management (n = 53) with 98% of individuals in both study groups completing the 90 days of follow-up. There was no significant difference in the number of days hospitalized for HF between the telemonitoring disease management group (0.88 ± 3.28 days per patient-90 days) and the telephone-based disease management group (1.00 ± 2.97 days per patient-90 days); incidence rate ratio 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.43-1.58; P = .442). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of tablet-based telemonitoring to an established HF telephone-based disease management program did not reduce HF hospitalizations; however, study power was limited.

Impella 5.5 Support Beyond 50 Days as Bridge to Heart Transplant in End-Stage Heart Failure Patients.

Prolonged mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for severe left ventricular dysfunction in cardiogenic shock as a bridge to heart transplantation (HTx) generally requires a surgical procedure. Typically, a surgically implanted temporary extracorporeal left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is chosen because of superior flow and durability compared with a percutaneously delivered endovascular LVAD (pVAD). However, compared with its predecessors, the Impella 5.5 trans-valvular pVAD provides higher hemodynamic support and features improved durability. Here, we present four successful cases with prolonged Impella 5.5 support as a bridge to HTx, with a mean support duration of 70 days (maximum 83 days). These cases highlight several potential benefits of Impella 5.5. The minimally invasive implantation procedure of the device reduces bleeding, decreases the postoperative recovery period, and enables early patient ambulation to reduce physical deconditioning before HTx surgery. Furthermore, Impella 5.5 adequately unloads the left ventricle and provides hemodynamic support to maintain end-organ function to further optimize hemodynamics before HTx. The evolution of Impella 5.5 technology may provide an alternative bridging strategy to traditional surgically implanted temporary MCS in select cases.

Association between postoperative hemodynamic metrics of pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dysfunction and clinical outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation.

BACKGROUND: While preoperative hemodynamic risk factors associated with early right heart failure (RHF) following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery are well-established, the relationship between postoperative hemodynamic status and subsequent outcomes remains poorly defined. METHODS: We analyzed adult CF-LVAD patients from the STS-INTERMACS registry surviving at least 3 months without evidence of early RHF and with hemodynamic data available at 3 months after LVAD implant. The association between metrics of RV afterload and function and the subsequent risk of death, right heart failure (RHF), gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), or stroke were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: Among 1,050 patients with available 3-month hemodynamics, pulmonary hypertension was common, with 585 (55.7%) having mPAP ≥ 20 mm Hg and 164 (15.6%) having PVR ≥ 3 WU. Pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi, HR 0.62 per log-increase for values < 3, 95% CI 0.43-0.89) and PVR (HR 1.19 per 1 WU-increase for values > 1.5 WU, 95% CI 1.03-1.38) were independently associated with the composite of death or RHF. Postoperative RAP (HR 1.18 per 5 mm Hg increase, 95% CI 1.04-1.33), RAP:PCWP (HR 1.46 per log-increase, 95% CI 1.12-1.91), and PAPi (HR 0.76 per log-increase, 95% CI 0.61-0.95) were each associated with GIB risk. Postoperative hemodynamics was not associated with stroke risk. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamic metrics of postoperative RV dysfunction and elevated RV afterload are independently associated with RHF, mortality and GIB. Whether strategies targeting postoperative optimization of RV function and afterload can reduce the burden of these adverse events requires prospective study.

Accuracy of echocardiographic estimations of right heart pressures in adult heart transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of right atrial pressure (RAP) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) is critical in the management of heart transplant recipients. The accuracy of echocardiography in estimating these pressures has been debated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the correlation and agreement between echocardiographic estimations of right heart pressures with those of respective invasive hemodynamic measurements by right heart catheterization (RHC) in adult heart transplant recipients. METHODS: This is a prospective evaluation of 84 unique measurements from heart transplant recipients who underwent RHC followed by standard echocardiographic evaluation within 159 ± 64 min with no intervening medication changes. The relationship between noninvasive pressure estimations and invasive hemodynamic measurements was examined. RESULTS: Mean RAP was 7 ± 5 mmHg and mean PASP was 33 ± 8 mmHg by RHC. There was no significant correlation between echocardiographic estimation of RAP and invasive RAP (Spearman's rho = -0.05, p = .7), and no significant agreement between these two variables (weighted kappa = -0.1). There was a modest correlation between echocardiographic estimation of PASP and invasive PASP (r = .39, p = .002). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of 2.1 ± 9 mmHg (limits of agreement = -15 to 20 mmHg). CONCLUSION: In heart transplant recipients, there is no significant correlation or agreement between echocardiographic RAP estimation and invasively determined RAP. Noninvasive PASP estimation correlates significantly but modestly with invasively measured PASP. Further refinement of echocardiographic methods for assessment of RAP is warranted in this unique patient population.

Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device as a Bridge to Heart Transplantation Under the New Donor Heart Allocation System.

The new donor heart allocation system prioritizes candidates supported by temporary devices. However, waitlist and posttransplant outcomes in candidates with durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) remain to be elucidated. The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for adults listed from October 2015 to March 2020 for a single-organ, first-time heart transplant (HTx) with a durable LVAD. Waitlist removal within 1 year because of death or clinical deterioration and HTx was analyzed using competing risks regression. Candidates who underwent HTx within 1 year of listing were identified for examination of post-HTx survival using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. Compared with candidates listed under the old system (n = 2,122), candidates listed under the new system (n = 1,562) were slightly younger ( p = 0.04) but had higher body mass index ( p < 0.01). Those listed under the new system were significantly less likely to experience waitlist removal because of death or clinical deterioration (subhazard ratio [HR] 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.90) but were also less likely to undergo HTx (sub-HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.998). Those who survived to HTx were more likely to experience death or need for re-HTx within 1 year of HTx under the new system (adjusted HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.11-2.03). Candidates with durable LVAD experience favorable waitlist outcomes under the new allocation system, although those who undergo HTx may be at increased mortality risk. Thus, candidates with a durable LVAD should be carefully selected for HTx listing under the new allocation system.

Immunosuppression and Heart Transplantation.

Since the first human heart transplant in 1967, immense advancements have been made in the field of immunosuppression. This chapter provides an in-depth analysis of the use of immunosuppressive agents in heart transplant recipients. Evidence regarding maintenance immunosuppressive regimens, the efficacy of induction immunosuppression and corticosteroid weaning, as well as the use of distinct immunosuppression regimens within select patient populations is summarized. This chapter helps elucidate the data regarding contemporary protocols in cardiac transplantation.

Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device Versus Intraaortic Balloon Pump as a Bridge to Transplant.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation (HTx) candidates supported by Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) or intraaortic balloon pump (IABP), who demonstrate evidence of cardiogenic shock, may qualify for waitlist status 2 without exception under the new donor heart allocation system. However limited data comparing Impella versus IABP as a bridge to HTx exist. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for adults listed and/or transplanted between January 2014 and February 2020. Temporal trends regarding Impella and IABP use were analyzed using the Royston trend test and χ2 test. Waitlist mortality was examined using Fine-Gray competing risks analysis. Post-HTx 180-day survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Impella use increased from 0.2% in 2014 to 2.6% in 2020 (P < .01) and from 0.4% to 2.2% (P < .01) under the new allocation system. IABP use increased from 4.9% in 2014 to 27.6% in 2020 (P < .01) and from 6.7% to 26.6% (P < .01) under the new allocation system. Post-HTx survival was similar between groups (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.38-1.78) despite more preoperative ventilation (3.6% vs 1.1%, P = .01) and higher model for end-stage liver disease excluding international normalized ratio scores (12.4 vs 9.5, P < .01) among Impella-supported recipients. Under the new system Impella-supported candidates were at higher risk of waitlist delisting compared with IABP-supported candidates (subhazard ratio, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.19-4.92). CONCLUSIONS: Post-HTx survival is comparable between Impella-supported and IABP-supported recipients despite worse preoperative profiles among Impella-supported recipients. Higher risk of waitlist delisting among Impella-supported candidates under the new allocation system requires close attention.

Factors associated with neutropenia post heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Neutropenia is a serious complication following heart transplantation (OHT); however, risk factors for its development and its association with outcomes is not well described. We sought to study the prevalence of neutropenia, risk factors associated with its development, and its impact on infection, rejection, and survival. METHODS: A retrospective single-center analysis of adult OHT recipients from July 2004 to December 2017 was performed. Demographic, laboratory, medication, infection, rejection, and survival data were collected for 1 year post-OHT. Baseline laboratory measurements were collected within the 24 hours before OHT. Neutropenia was defined as absolute neutrophil count ≤1000 cells/mm3. Cox proportional hazards models explored associations with time to first neutropenia. Associations between neutropenia, analyzed as a time-dependent covariate, with secondary outcomes of time to infection, rejection, or death were also examined. RESULTS: Of 278 OHT recipients, 84 (30%) developed neutropenia at a median of 142 days (range 81-228) after transplant. Factors independently associated with increased risk of neutropenia included lower baseline WBC (HR 1.12; 95% CI 1.11-1.24), pre-OHT ventricular assist device (1.63; 1.00-2.66), high-risk CMV serostatus [donor positive, recipient negative] (1.86; 1.19-2.88), and having a previous CMV infection (4.07; 3.92-13.7). CONCLUSIONS: Neutropenia is a fairly common occurrence after adult OHT. CMV infection was associated with subsequent neutropenia, however, no statistically significant differences in outcomes were found between neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients in this small study. It remains to be determined in future studies if medication changes in response to neutropenia would impact patient outcomes.

Left thoracotomy vs full sternotomy for centrifugal durable LVAD implantation: 1-year outcome comparison post-LVAD and post-heart transplantation.

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantations have traditionally been approached through a full median sternotomy (FS). Recently, a minimally invasive left thoracotomy (LT) approach has been popularized. This study sought to compare the outcomes of FS and LT patients post-primary LVAD implantation and post-subsequent heart transplant (HT). This was a single-center retrospective study. 83 patients who underwent primary centrifugal durable LVAD implantation from January 2014 to June 2018 were included (FS, n = 41; LT, n = 42). 41 patients had a subsequent HT (FS, n = 19; LT, n = 22). Pre-operative patient demographics, intraoperative variables, post-operative 1-year survival, length of hospital stay, complications, and outcomes for LVAD implantation and following HT were analyzed. Intraoperative data showed that the LT group had a 23.4% longer mean LVAD implant surgical time (p < 0.01). One-year post-LVAD survival was similar between the two groups (p = 0.05). Complication rates, with the exception of the rate of hemorrhagic stroke (p = 0.04) post-LVAD implant were similar. One-year survival post-HT was similar between groups (p = 0.35). Complication rates and mean length of hospital stay were also similar (p = 1.0) post-HT. Our study demonstrated that LT approach does not negatively affect post-LVAD implantation or post-HT outcomes. Further, larger studies may determine more detailed effects of LT approach.

Understanding Longitudinal Changes in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

BACKGROUND: Elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is common in patients with advanced heart failure. PVR generally improves after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, but the rate of decrease has not been quantified and the patient characteristics most strongly associated with this improvement are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 1581 patients from the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support registry who received a primary continuous-flow LVAD, had a baseline PVR of ≥3 Wood units (WU), and had PVR measured at least once postoperatively. Multivariable linear mixed effects modeling was used to evaluate independent associations between postoperative PVR and patient characteristics. PVR decreased by 1.53 WU (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-1.79 WU) per month in the first 3 months postoperatively, and by 0.066 WU (95% CI 0.060-0.070 WU) per month thereafter. Severe mitral regurgitation at any time during follow-up was associated with a 1.29 WU (95% CI 1.05-1.52 WU) higher PVR relative to absence of mitral regurgitation at that time. In a cross-sectional analysis, 15%-25% of patients had persistently elevated PVR of ≥3 WU at any given time within 36 months after LVAD implantation. CONCLUSION: The PVR tends to decrease rapidly early after implantation, and only more gradually thereafter. Residual mitral regurgitation may be an important contributor to elevated postoperative PVR. Future research is needed to understand the implications of elevated PVR after LVAD implantation and the optimal strategies for prevention and treatment.

Discovery of non-HLA antibodies associated with cardiac allograft rejection and development and validation of a non-HLA antigen multiplex panel: From bench to bedside.

We analyzed humoral immune responses to nonhuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) after cardiac transplantation to identify antibodies associated with allograft rejection. Protein microarray identified 366 non-HLA antibodies (>1.5 fold, P < .5) from a discovery cohort of HLA antibody-negative, endothelial cell crossmatch-positive sera obtained from 12 cardiac allograft recipients at the time of biopsy-proven rejection. From these, 19 plasma membrane proteins and 10 autoantigens identified from gene ontology analysis were combined with 48 proteins identified through literature search to generate a multiplex bead array. Longitudinal sera from a multicenter cohort of adult cardiac allograft recipients (samples: n = 477 no rejection; n = 69 rejection) identified 18 non-HLA antibodies associated with rejection (P < .1) including 4 newly identified non-HLA antigenic targets (DEXI, EMCN, LPHN1, and SSB). CART analysis showed 5/18 non-HLA antibodies distinguished rejection vs nonrejection. Antibodies to 4/18 non-HLA antigens synergize with HLA donor-specific antibodies and significantly increase the odds of rejection (P < .1). The non-HLA panel was validated using an independent adult cardiac transplant cohort (n = 21 no rejection; n = 42 rejection, >1R) with an area under the curve of 0.87 (P < .05) with 92.86% sensitivity and 66.67% specificity. We conclude that multiplex bead array assessment of non-HLA antibodies identifies cardiac transplant recipients at risk of rejection.

Comparing inpatient costs of heart failure admissions for patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction with or without type 2 diabetes.

Both heart failure (HF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) account for major healthcare expenditures. We evaluated inpatient expenditures and cost drivers in patients admitted with HF with and without DM. METHODS: We created a retrospective cohort of acutely decompensated HF patients, using linked data from cost accounting systems and electronic medical records. We stratified patients by LVEF into reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, LVEF ≤40%) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, LVEF >40%) groups and by DM status at admission. RESULTS: Our population had 544 people: 285 HFrEF patients (43.5% with DM) and 259 HFpEF patients (43.6% with DM). Patients with HFrEF and DM had the longest hospital stay (5.10 ± 5.21 days). Patients with HFrEF and DM had the highest hospitalization cost ($11 576 ± 15 818). HFrEF and HFpEF patients with DM had the highest cost, and cost per day alive was highest for HFpEF patients with DM [$3153 (95% CI 2332, 4262)]. CONCLUSION: Overall cost was higher for patients with DM, whether or not they were admitted with acute HF due to HFrEF or HFpEF. Cost per day alive for patients with DM continued to exceed corresponding costs for patients without DM, with HFpEF patients with DM having the highest cost.

Timing and Trends of Right Atrial Pressure and Risk of Right Heart Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

BACKGROUND: Elevated right atrial pressure (RAP) is associated with poor outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. However, the optimal time for RAP measurement and the importance of resolution of right heart congestion prior to LVAD implantation remain unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 134 consecutive LVAD recipients from our institution. Congestion was defined as RAP ≥ 14 mmHg and was assessed at hospital admission and implant. The primary outcome was death or right ventricular assist device (RVAD) implantation. When stratified by congestion status at admission, congested and non-congested patients had similar event-free survival rates (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6-2.6). However, when stratified at implant, congested patients had a higher rate death or RVAD implantation (HR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.1-5.6). Patients were then divided into 4 groups based on their trajectory of congestion status: no congestion, resolved congestion, new congestion, or persistent congestion. Patients with no congestion and resolved congestion had similar outcomes, whereas patients with persistent congestion had a markedly increased rate of death or RVAD implantation (HR: 3.1, 95% CI: 1.3-7.6). CONCLUSION: RAP at LVAD implantation is more strongly associated with postoperative outcomes than admission RAP. Patients not responsive to decongestive therapies, with persistently elevated RAP, represent a high-risk cohort for adverse outcomes following LVAD implantation.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement of a Bicuspid Aortic Valve in a Heart Transplant Recipient.

Patients with heart transplants who present with severe aortic stenosis may be deemed high-risk surgical candidates due to immunosuppression and multiple comorbid conditions. Appropriately selected patients may be successfully treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Two-year outcomes and cost for heart failure patients following discharge from the hospital after an acute heart failure admission.

BACKGROUND: Follow-up costs among heart failure (HF) patients place a heavy burden on healthcare. We sought to quantify follow-up costs after a HF hospitalization, as well as, length of stay (LOS), time to readmission and mortality for patients with preserved (HFpEF) versus reduced (HFrEF) left ventricular ejection fractions. METHODS: We developed a retrospective cohort of consecutively admitted acutely decompensated HF patients who had at least 1 follow-up visit. We extracted baseline clinical data from electronic medical records, and collected follow-up data on number of readmissions, length of stay, mortality over a 2-year period, and cost data from our hospital's accounting system. Kaplan-Meier curves and log rank tests were used to evaluate survival and time to first readmission in the two HF groups. RESULTS: Our study included 444 patients, of whom 224 (51%) had HFrEF. Patients with HFrEF compared to HFpEF had higher median total costs per month alive during the 2-year follow-up period ($1684 vs. $1496, p = 0.02), and median inpatient costs per month alive ($1368 vs. $991, p = 0.03). HFrEF patients had higher total mean LOS per month alive post index hospitalization discharge (1.6 vs 1 days, p = 0.003). Similarly, HF related mean LOS per month alive was higher for HFrEF patients than for HFpEF patients (1.3 vs 0.3 days, p = 0.003). Patients with HFrEF had a trend for shorter time to first readmission and survival compared to those with HFpEF. CONCLUSIONS: At 2 years following their index HF admission, patients with HFrEF have higher costs and longer LOS compared to HFpEF patients.

A case series: the outcomes, support duration, and graft function recovery after VA-ECMO use in primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation.

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a rare complication associated with high mortality after heart transplantation, which may require veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support. A standardized definition for PGD was developed by the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation in 2014. Due to limited reports using this definition, the detailed outcomes after VA-ECMO support remain unclear. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed our single-center outcomes of PGD following VA-ECMO support. Between September 2014 and August 2018, 160 patients underwent heart transplantation in our single center. Nine PGD patients required VA-ECMO support, with an incidence of 5.6%. Pre-operative recipient/donor demographics, intra-operative variables, timing of VA-ECMO initiation and support duration, graft function recovery during 30 days after heart transplant, VA-ECMO complications, and survival were analyzed. The indication for VA-ECMO support was biventricular failure for all nine patients. Six patients had severe PGD requiring intra-operative VA-ECMO, while two patients had moderate PGD and one patient had mild PGD requiring post-operative VA-ECMO. All cohorts were successfully decannulated in a median of 10 days. Survival to discharge rate was 88.9%. One-year survival rate was 85.7%. Left ventricular ejection fraction recovered to normal within 30 days in all PGD patients. Our study showed VA-ECMO support led to high survival and timely graft function recovery in all cohorts. Further larger research can clarify the detailed effects of VA-ECMO support which may lead to standardized indication of VA-ECMO support for PGD patients.

Antibody-mediated rejection 16 years post-cardiac transplantation: a case report of an uncommon late presentation in a middle-aged woman.

BACKGROUND: Very late antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in heart transplant patients (over 10 years post-transplant) is very rare. It is associated with high mortality, graft dysfunction, and fulminant coronary artery vasculopathy (CAV) and should remain in the differential for patients presenting with late graft dysfunction. CASE SUMMARY: A 57-year-old woman 16 years of post-heart transplant with a previously unremarkable post-transplant course including protocol driven biopsies showing no rejection and a recent unremarkable screening nuclear stress test presented to our institution with clinical heart failure. Echocardiogram revealed graft dysfunction and endomyocardial biopsy showed no signs of cellular rejection, but evidence of AMR. The patient was treated with steroid and immunotherapy with clinical improvement but suffered several infectious complications and renal dysfunction requiring haemodialysis related to her immunotherapy treatment. Despite aggressive AMR management, donor-specific antibodies and symptoms persisted and CAV progressed. DISCUSSION: This case illustrates the poor diagnostic yield of non-invasive testing for AMR, and highlights importance to clinicians of considering AMR even if the patient over 10 years post-transplant when the diagnosis is rare.

Preimplant Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor Use Is Associated With Higher Rates of Severe Early Right Heart Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Background Early right heart failure (RHF) occurs commonly in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients, and increased right ventricular (RV) afterload may contribute. Selective pulmonary vasodilators, like phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i), are used off-label to reduce RV afterload before LVAD implantation, but the association between preoperative PDE5i use and early RHF after LVAD is unknown. Methods and Results We analyzed adult patients from the INTERMACS registry (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) who received a continuous flow LVAD after 2012. Patients on PDE5i were propensity-matched 1:1 to controls. The primary outcome was the incidence of severe early RHF, defined as the composite of death from RHF within 30 days, need for RV assist device support within 30 days, or use of inotropes beyond 14 days. Of 11 544 continuous flow LVAD recipients, 1199 (10.4%) received preoperative PDE5i. Compared to controls, patients on PDE5i had higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure (53.4 mm Hg versus 49.5 mm Hg) and pulmonary vascular resistance (2.6 WU versus 2.3 WU; P<0.001 for both). Before propensity matching, the incidence of severe early RHF was higher among patients on PDE5i than in controls (29.4% versus 23.1%; unadjusted odds ratio (OR), 1.32; 95% CI, 1.17-1.50). This association persisted after propensity matching (PDE5i, 28.9% versus control 23.7%; OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09-1.57), driven by a higher incidence of prolonged inotropic support. Similar results were observed across a wide range of subgroups stratified by markers of pulmonary vascular disease and RV dysfunction. Conclusions Patients treated with preoperative PDE5i had markers of increased RV afterload and HF severity compared to unmatched controls. Even after propensity matching, patients receiving preimplant PDE5i therapy had higher rates of post-LVAD RHF.