Effect of Preoperative Coronal Plane Alignment on Actual Versus Predicted Alignment Using Patient Specific Instrumentation in Total Ankle Replacement.

Alignment in total ankle replacement is important for success and implant survival. Recently there has been the introduction and adoption of patient specific instrumentation for implantation in total ankle replacement. Current literature does not evaluate the effect of preoperative deformity on accuracy of patient specific instrumentation. A retrospective radiographic analysis was performed on 97 consecutive patients receiving total ankle replacement with patient specific instrumentation to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of the instrumentation. Subgroup analysis evaluated the effect of preoperative deformity. All surgeries were performed by fellowship trained foot and ankle surgeons without industry ties to the implants used. Preoperative and postoperative films were compared to plans based on computerized tomography scans to assess how closely the plan would be implemented in patients. Overall postoperative coronal plane alignment was within 2° of predicted in 87.6% (85 patients). Similarly, overall postoperative sagittal plane alignment was within 2° of predicted in 88.7% (86 patients). Tibial implant size was accurately predicted in 81.4% (79 patients), and talus implant size was correct in 75.3% (73 patients). Patients with preoperative varus deformity had a higher difference between predicted and actual postoperative alignment compared to valgus deformity (1.1° compared to 0.3°, p = .02). A higher average procedure time was found in varus patients, and more adjunctive procedures were needed in patients with varus or valgus deformity, but these were not significant, p > .5. Surgeons can expect a high degree of accuracy when using patient specific instrumentation overall, but less accurate in varus deformity.

No Loss of Strength After Insertional Achilles Tendon Reconstruction With Single-Anchor or Double-Row Repair.

Many different types of surgical repair for insertional Achilles tendinosis have been described. Strength after surgery is an essential factor for patient function and satisfaction. A retrospective series of patients that underwent surgery for insertional Achilles tendon surgery were contacted to come in for prospective strength testing, with the tester blinded to the type of surgery performed. Thirty-seven patients came in for testing, 24 with a single-anchor repair and 13 with a double-row repair. Strength of plantarflexion was tested at 60°/s and 120°/s and was compared. First each operative leg was compared to the nonoperative leg as a control. Then the percentage change, or symmetry, from the control leg to the operative leg was compared between those with a single-anchor and double-row repair. Satisfaction was also assessed with a simple questionnaire and compared the types of repair. The results demonstrated there was no statistically significant change in strength after surgery compared to the nonoperative leg, and there was no difference in limb symmetry between types of repair. Similarly, there was no difference between the groups in satisfaction. Our study showed that there is, on average, no loss of strength after insertional Achilles tendon surgery at an average follow-up of nearly 2 years, regardless of type of repair.

The Ankle Joint: Updates on Ankle Fusion Approaches and Fixation.

Ankle fusion is a well-studied, classical procedure for conditions affecting the ankle joint, and has a long history with predictable results. Although there are many different approaches available, a few options are commonly used. The two main focuses of modern literature are on anterior plating versus traditional screw fixation, and on arthroscopic versus open techniques for fusion. This article discusses recent literature and then presents cases and techniques that are commonly used today. This includes arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis, traditional transfibular approach, anterior plating, and the indications and application of external fixation. Standard recovery and complications are discussed.

Double Row Fixation is More Costly and Does Not Have Clinical Benefit Over Single Anchor for Insertional Achilles Tendon Surgery.

Surgical repair of insertional Achilles tendinosis is indicated in the face of failed conservative measures. Several methods for this repair have been described, and the optimal method is not universally agreed upon. In addition, the cost of medical care is important, and should be considered when determining the surgical repair for each patient. The purpose of this study is to compare implant costs between a single anchor or 4 anchor, double row repair, and evaluate associated outcomes. A retrospective comparative trial was performed for this purpose. The entire study encompassed 110 patients, 78 with a single anchor repair, and 32 with a double row repair. The average implant cost of the single anchor repair was $391.18 ± $272.10 and the double row repair was $1811.2 9 ± $169.47, p < .001. The groups did not have a statistically significant difference in complications (9% with single anchor vs 6.3% with double row, p = 1.0) or revisions 6.4% with single anchor vs 3.1% with double row, p = .67). The only difference in demographics between the groups was that the single anchor group had a higher percentage of female patients (p = .04). While the double row repair has been shown to have favorable biomechanical results, the present study did not show a benefit in complications or revisions and was a more costly repair technique. Surgeons should take these findings in consideration when choosing the repair technique when surgery is indicated.

Soft Tissue Reconstruction and Osteotomies for Pes Planovalgus Correction.

The correction of the flexible pes planovalgus foot and ankle is a complicated and somewhat controversial topic. After conservative methods fail, there is a wide range of possible soft tissue and bony procedures. The appropriate work up and understanding of the pathomechanics are vital to the correct choice of procedures to correct these deformities. Once the work up and procedure selection are done, the operation must also be technically performed well and with efficiency, as most often the condition is corrected with a variety of procedures. This article discusses some of the most common procedures necessary to fully correct the pes planovalgus foot and discusses the authors' technique and pearls.

Deformity Correction of the Midfoot/Hindfoot/Ankle.

The correction of the deformed arthritic foot and ankle is a complicated and somewhat controversial topic. After conservative methods fail, there is a wide range of possible bony procedures and arthrodesis that maybe performed. The appropriate work up and understanding of the pathomechanics is vital to the correct choice of procedures to correct these deformities. Once the work up and procedure selection is done, the operation must also be technically performed well and with efficiency, as most often the condition is corrected with a variety of procedures. This article discusses some of the most common procedures necessary to fully correct deformity of the midfoot, hindfoot, and ankle. This article will also discuss the authors' technique and pearls.

Current Techniques in Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

Total ankle replacement (TAR) continues to increase in popularity as a motion-preserving option to ankle arthrodesis. TAR is indicated for primary, posttraumatic and inflammatory arthropathies as an alternative procedure to tibiotalar arthrodesis. Proper patient selection is paramount to a successful outcome in TAR. Contraindications to TAR include the presence of neuropathy, active infection, severe peripheral arterial disease, inadequate bone stock, and severe uncorrectable coronal plane deformity. This article is a brief overview of techniques and PEARLS on how to address a well-aligned ankle joint, varus deformity as well as valgus deformities as well as the authors' experience with single versus staging coronal plane deformities.

Acute Achilles Rupture Percutaneous Repair: Approach, Materials, Techniques.

Closed traumatic Achilles tendon rupture is a common injury, especially in the aging athlete. Traditionally open repair has been recognized to offer a lower rerupture rate compared with nonoperative methods but with a higher complication rate. Percutaneous repair has been described to offer the benefits of open repair while avoiding the complications. The sural nerve is potentially susceptible to injury, and specialized instrumentation has been developed to avoid this event. This article discusses several techniques of minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair. Many authors have evaluated these techniques and the results are discussed here.