Improved local control in p16 negative oropharyngeal cancers with hypermethylated MGMT.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with oropharyngeal cancers that are p16 negative (p16-) have worse outcomes than those who are p16 positive (p16+) and there is an unmet need for prognostic markers in this population. O6-Methylguanine (O6-MG)-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) gene methylation has been associated with response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in glioblastoma. We sought to find if MGMT promoter methylation was associated with outcomes of locally advanced oropharyngeal and oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OOSCC) in patients treated with definitive concurrent CRT. METHODS: Patients were identified with primary OOSCC, known p16 status, retrievable pre-treatment biopsies, and at least 6 months of follow-up who received definitive concurrent CRT from 2004 to 2015. Biopsies were tested for MGMT hypermethylation (MGMT+) using a Qiagen pyrosequencing kit (Catalog number 970061). Outcomes were subsequently recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included with a median follow up of 78 (range 6-196) months. Fourteen patients (24.1%) had oral cavity cancer and 44 (75.9%) had oropharyngeal cancer. A significant difference was found for local recurrence free survival (LRFS) by combined MGMT and p16 status (p = 0.0004). Frequency of LR in MGMT+/p16+, MGMT+/p16-, MGMT-/p16+, and MGMT-p16- patients was 14.3%, 14.3%, 13.0%, and 69.2%, respectively (p = 0.0019). A significant difference was not found for distant recurrence free survival (p = 0.6165) or overall survival (p = 0.1615). LRFS remained significant on analysis restricted to oropharyngeal cancer patients (p-value = 0.0038). CONCLUSION: Patients who are p16- and MGMT+ with oropharyngeal and oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma have significantly better LC with definitive CRT than those who are p16- and MGMT-. Prospective studies are needed to verify these findings.

Custom mold applicator high-dose-rate brachytherapy for nonmelanoma skin cancer-An analysis of 273 lesions.

PURPOSE: Nonmelanoma skin cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in the United States. A modern version of surface brachytherapy, "topographic applicator brachytherapy" (TAB), can be used to treat early-stage nonmelanoma skin cancer (ES-NMSC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acute toxicity, chronic toxicity, and recurrence rates of patients with ES-NMSC treated with TAB. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2010 to 2013, 172 patients with 273 ES-NMSC tumors were consecutively treated with TAB. A custom applicator was created using a thermoplastic mold with Harrison Anderson Mick applicators. Dose fractionation schemes included 40 Gy in eight fractions delivered twice per week or 48 Gy in 16 fractions delivered four times per week. RESULTS: Of the 273 tumors treated, 23.8% were located on the nose, 54.2% were basal cell carcinoma, 76.2% were Stage I, 89.3% were treated definitively, 98.9% completed treatment, and 75.5% received 40 Gy in eight fractions. Median followup was 25.0 months (0.5-71.0 months). Maximum acute toxicity was G0, 0.4%; G1, 33.3%; G2, 48.7%; G3, 12.1%; and G4, 5.1%. Local recurrence was 4.8% at 25 months, with median time to recurrence being 9 months. There was no regional or distant metastasis documented during the followup. Chronic toxicities included erythema (4.4%), chronic ulceration (4.0%), telangiectasia (2.6%), and pigmentation changes (2.2%). CONCLUSIONS: TAB was able to provide excellent local control (95.2%) with low rates of Grades 3 and 4 toxicities for treatment of ES-NMSC. TAB is a reasonable alternative to surgical resection when there is concern of poor cosmesis/wound healing.

Intensity modulated radiation therapy after extra-pleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma is feasible without fatal pulmonary toxicity and provides good survival.

AIM: To analyze patterns of failure, toxicity, relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy following extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP). METHODS: We reviewed 18 charts of patients with MPM from 2005 to 2014 who underwent EPP followed by hemithoracic intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose delivery adhered to published lung dose constraints. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess the RFS and OS. Median survival times are reported for both RFS and OS. RESULTS: Median age was 65 years (range: 40-76 years). Chemotherapy was administered in four neo-adjuvant and seven adjuvant patients. Pathological American Joint Committee on Cancer stages II, III, IV, surgical margin, lympho-vascular space, pericardium, and chest wall involvement were seen in 3, 12, 3, 9, 7, 12 and 3 patients, respectively. The majority of the patients received 45 Gy in 25 fractions. The mean lung dose was 7.14 Gy (range: 5 Gy-9.3 Gy). The mean V20 was 2.23%. At a median follow-up of 3 years, eight patients were alive (44%); 10 experienced relapse (56%). Median RFS and OS were 24.4 months (95% CI: >16.3 months) and 38.2 months (95% CI: 17.4-78.1 months), respectively. Acute toxicities were fatigue, dermatitis, nausea, esophagitis/dysphagia, cough, and dyspnea on exertion. No grade III, IV, or fatal pulmonary toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy following EPP for MPM resulted in RFS and OS comparable to the published literature without significant toxicity.

Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Versus Cryotherapy in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: Cryotherapy and brachytherapy are definitive local treatment options for low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer. There are both prospective and retrospective data for brachytherapy, but the use of cryotherapy has been limited primarily to single-institution retrospective studies. Currently, no published evidence has compared low-dose-rate brachytherapy versus cryotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Institutional review board approval was obtained to conduct a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients treated at our institution from 1990 to 2012. For inclusion, patients must have received a prostate cancer diagnosis and have been considered to have low- to intermediate-risk disease according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. All patients received brachytherapy or cryotherapy treatment. Disease specifics and failure details were collected for all patients. Failure was defined as prostate-specific antigen nadir +2 ng/mL. RESULTS: A total of 359 patients were analyzed. The groups comprised 50 low-risk cryotherapy (LRC), 92 intermediate-risk cryotherapy (IRC), 133 low-risk brachytherapy (LRB), and 84 intermediate-risk brachytherapy (IRB) patients. The median prostate-specific antigen follow-up periods were 85.6 months (LRC), 59.2 months (IRC), 74.9 months (LRB), and 59.8 months (IRB). The 5-year biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) rate was 57.9% in the cryotherapy group versus 89.6% in the brachytherapy group (P<.0001). The 5-year bPFS rate was 70.0% (LRC), 51.4% (IRC), 89.4% (LRB), and 89.7% (IRB). The bPFS rate was significantly different between brachytherapy and cryotherapy for low- and intermediate-risk groups (P<.05). The mean nadir temperature reached for cryotherapy patients was -35°C (range, -96°C to -6°C). Cryotherapy used a median of 2 freeze-thaw cycles (range, 2-4 freeze-thaw cycles). CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study suggest that cryotherapy is inferior to brachytherapy for patients with low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Patient selection criteria for consideration of cryotherapy and brachytherapy are similar in terms of anesthesia candidacy. Therefore, cryotherapy would not be recommended as a first-line local therapy for this particular patient subset.

Single fraction spine stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy.

This study investigated a single institution's experience with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) directed stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for vertebral metastases. From 2010 to 2014, 95 lesions of spinal metastases in 73 patients were treated with SABR using VMAT. Clinical local control, pain level, and use of steroid medication were employed to evaluate treatment responses. The majority (79%) of patients were treated with a radiation dose of 20 Gy in a single fraction. However, when normal tissue constraints could not be achieved, the dose was reduced to 18 Gy (11%) or 16 Gy (8%) in 1 fraction. At the median follow up of 12.7 months (mean 18.0, range 1-56 months), clinical local control was 97% (92 out of 95). There was a mean 81% (median 100%, range 28-100%) decrease in subjective pain score. Seventy-seven percent of patients had a decrease in narcotic pain medication use. Pain was completely resolved at the treatment site for 69% (66/95) of patients. Prior to the SABR treatment, 33% (31/95) of patients had epidural extension of tumor. Among patients with epidural involvement, 45% (14/31) exhibited neurologic impairment prior to treatment. Twenty-three percent (7/31) experienced spinal cord compression. Prior to treatment, 34 patients experienced some form of neurologic impairment. Of these patients, 24% (8/34) experienced improved motor functioning; the remaining 76% (26/34) of patients' neurological dysfunction were stable. Our results indicate the SABR regimen using VMAT technique is clinically effective in achieving clinical local control and palliation. This is the first publication reporting clinical outcomes of VMAT directed SABR.

Durability of Artificial Urinary Sphincter With Prior Radiation Therapy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of prior radiation therapy on artificial urinary sphincter. METHODS: Group 1 was comprised of 63 men who underwent prior radical prostatectomy, and Group 2 was comprised of 31 men who received prior radiation therapy with or without prior radical prostatectomy. Social incontinence was defined as requiring to use > 1 pad per day and/or catheter-dependent at the time of last follow-up. RESULTS: The median age at artificial urinary sphincter placement was 71 years (interquartile range, 55-74 years). The median and mean follow-up was 62 months (interquartile range, 37-106 months) and 75 months (range, 2-205 months), respectively. At the time of last follow-up, 67% (63 of 94) of the men in the entire cohort (73% [46 of 63] and 55% [17 of 31] in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively [P = .078]) were socially continent. Sphincter revision, erosion, infection, and removal rates were 20%, 20%, 7%, and 10%, respectively, in Group 1, and 26%, 13%, 7%, and 23%, respectively, in Group 2. The differences in these rates were not statistically significant between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: We found no significant difference in functionality (incontinence rates) and outcomes (rates of sphincter revision, erosion, infection, and removal) between the 2 groups. The message for patients is that prior radiation does not significantly alter the outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter.

Bone marrow progenitors are not the source of expanding oval cells in injured liver.

Liver progenitor/oval cells differentiate into hepatocytes and biliary epithelial cells, repopulating the liver when the regenerative capacity of hepatocytes is impaired. Recent studies have shown that hematopoietic bone marrow (BM) stem/progenitor cells can give rise to hepatocytes in diseased/damaged liver. One study has reported that BM cells can transdifferentiate into liver progenitor/oval cells, but it has not been proven that the latter can repopulate the liver. To answer this question, we have lethally irradiated female DPP4(-) mutant F344 rats and transplanted them with 50 million wild-type male F344 BM cells. One month after transplantation, the recipient BM was reconstituted with male hematopoietic cells, determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction using primers for Y chromosome-specific sry gene. In addition, DPP4(+) cells, single or in clusters and predominantly in the periportal region, were detected in all liver sections of recipient rats. Animals were subjected to the following three different liver injury protocols for activation and expansion of oval cells: D-galactosamine, retrorsine/partial hepatectomy (Rs/PH), and 2-acetylaminofluorene/partial hepatectomy (2-AAF/PH). In all three models, prominent expansion and accumulation of cytokeratin 19-positive (CK-19(+)) oval cells was observed. However, most of the DPP4(+) clusters dispersed over time, and their total number decreased. Very few oval cells (less than 1%) showed double DPP4/CK-19 labeling. None of the small hepatocytic clusters in the Rs/PH or 2-AAF/PH model were comprised of DPP4(+) cells. These data demonstrate that the sources of oval cells and small hepatocytes in the injured liver are endogenous liver progenitors and that they do not arise through transdifferentiation from BM cells.