Correction of underquantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 load with the second version of the Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan assay.

Initial evaluations of the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) test (CAP/CTM) demonstrated good performance but, afterwards, reports about underquantification were published. We investigated whether the problem was solved with a second version of this assay, the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 test, version 2.0 (CAP/CTM v2.0). The remaining plasma of 375 consecutive HIV-1 positive samples with a viral load of >or=4,000 copies/ml was collected in three laboratories. The samples were diluted and retested with our routine method Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 monitor test v1.5 in ultrasensitive mode (CAP/CA PHS), as well as with the CAP/CTM and CAP/CTM v2.0 tests. An absolute difference between the results of two methods of >or=0.71 log(10) copies/ml was defined as moderately discrepant, and an absolute difference of >or=0.93 log(10) copies/ml was defined as severely discrepant. In addition, criteria for considering the new methods equivalent to the routine method were formulated. (i) For CAP/CTM compared to CAP/CA PHS, 36 (9.5%) and 20 (5.3%) samples were, respectively, considered moderately and severely underquantified by CAP/CTM. The mean difference between CAP/CTM and CAP/CA PHS was -0.32 log(10) copies/ml. Eight of nineteen of the severely underquantified samples were from patients infected with HIV-1 subtype B strain. (ii) For CAP/CTM v2.0 compared to CAP/CA PHS, no sample was moderately or severely underquantified by CAP/CTM v2.0. A mean difference of 0.08 log(10) copies/ml was found with CAP/CTM v2.0 compared to CAP/CA PHS. The underquantification problem of the CAP/CTM kit was clearly demonstrated. The criteria for the equivalence of CAP/CTM v2.0 to the routine test CAP/CA PHS were fulfilled.

Cultured Kaposi's sarcoma tumor cells exhibit a chemokine receptor repertoire that does not allow infection by HIV-1.

BACKGROUND: HIV-1 is known to play a critical role in the pathogenesis of AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma (KS). However, it remains controversial whether KS cells are target cells for HIV infection. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of chemokine receptors in KS cell cultures and to determine whether these cells can be infected by HIV-1. MATERIAL AND METHODS: KS-derived cells and KS-Y1 cells were investigated using RT-PCR for the expression of CD4, CCR3, CCR5, CCR8 and CXCR4 mRNA. HIV infectivity of these cells was determined by p24 antigen and HIV-1 RNA production, as well as by HIV-1 DNA integration. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: With the exception of CCR8 which is expressed by KS-derived spindle cell cultures but not by KS-Y1 cells, unstimulated KS cells express no significant levels of CD4, CCR3, CCR5 or CXCR4 mRNA. HIV infectivity assays showed that KS cells were unpermissive to HTLVIIIB and JRFL strains. Although the expression of CXCR4 mRNA could be upregulated by interleukin-1beta, stimulation of KS cells by this cytokine did not allow infection by HIV-1. CONCLUSIONS: This shows that KS cells exhibit a chemokine receptor repertoire that does not allow infection by HIV-1. Other cell types making up KS lesions, such as inflammatory cells, are likely to represent the source of HIV-1 products cooperating to promote KS development and progression.

Prevalence of genotypic resistance among antiretroviral drug-naive HIV-1-infected patients in Belgium.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence and the evolution over time (1995-1998) of genotypic resistance to antiviral drugs in antiretroviral drug-naive HIV-1-infected patients in Belgium. DESIGN: Belgian Aids Reference Laboratories provided retrospective samples and clinical data from antiretroviral drug-naive HIV-1-infected patients who visited the hospital for the first time in 1995 (n=45), 1997 (n=75) and 1998 (n=111). Genotypic resistance to the three available classes of drugs was monitored using the Line Probe Assay (Innogenetics, Gent, Belgium). Additionally, ARMS-151 was performed for scoring multinucleoside resistance. RESULTS: The prevalence of genotypic resistance at baseline to nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) were each between 10% and 20% for 1995, 1997 and 1998 without an increasing trend over time. For NRTIs, resistance mutations were mainly related to zidovudine in 1995, whereas in 1997 and 1998 baseline resistance was scored for zidovudine, lamivudine or for both drugs simultaneously. No patients displayed the multi-nucleoside resistance Q151M mutation. Baseline resistance mutations to protease inhibitors (PIs) did not rise significantly: 4.4% in 1995, 8% in 1997 and 9.9% in 1998. When scoring any resistance-related mutation, 26.6% displayed genotypic baseline resistance in 1995, 26.6% in 1997 and 31.5% in 1998. DISCUSSION: The prevalence of genotypic baseline resistance to any drug, as scored with LiPA, in naive HIV-1 patients in Belgium is 29%, with baseline resistance mutations to one or several drugs from all available classes of antiviral drugs. The ability of LiPA to pick up minor variants could be an explanation for the higher overall prevalence we observe, when compared to recent estimates in other countries of 16.3% and 22%, which were based on sequencing methods. According to the European guidelines for resistance testing, resistance testing in Belgium before starting antiviral therapy should be considered.

Blinded, multicenter quality control study for the quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in plasma by the Belgian AIDS reference laboratories.

OBJECTIVE: In order to evaluate the interlaboratory variation of HIV-1 RNA measurements in plasma, the Belgian AIDS reference laboratories organized a blinded multicenter quality control study. METHODS: Atest panel of coded spiked HIV-1 plasma samples reflecting the dynamic range of the assay was composed and distributed. The HIV-1 RNA concentration of these samples was determined by the eight Belgian AIDS reference laboratories by means of the Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor version 1.5 assay. RESULTS: Analysis of the results demonstrated that there was little interlaboratory variation for the high concentration range (4.0-5.7 log10 copies/mL), never exceeding 0.2 log10 copies/mL. However the standard deviation for the low concentration range (2.6-3.9 log10 copies/mL) reached up to 0.22 log10 copies/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Since interlaboratory variability never reached 0.5 log10 copies/mL and each of the laboratories was able to detect four-fold differences in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, the Amplicor assay can be used in multicenter studies without a centralized analysis of samples. Furthermore, this well-characterized proficiency panel of spiked plasma samples could be used as a standard in the study of interassay comparisons.

Standardisation of primers and an algorithm for HIV-1 diagnostic PCR evaluated in patients harbouring strains of diverse geographical origin. The Belgian AIDS Reference Laboratories.

Eight Belgian AIDS Reference Laboratories established a multicentre quality control to evaluate the performance of their diagnostic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR). A set of Belgian and African HIV-1 seropositive and seronegative patient samples, collected in Belgium, and the British Medical Research Council (MRC) HIV-1 PCR reference reagent kit, containing plasmid HIV-1 DNA at several dilutions in human carrier DNA with appropriate negative controls, were tested by the laboratories. No false positive results were reported. All laboratories were able to detect one to two copies of HIV-1 DNA. Among the 17 Belgian and African HIV-1 seropositives, some laboratories reported up to four indeterminate results, mainly due to failure of the SK38-39, SK68-69 (Ou et al. (1988) Science 239, 295-297) and/or gag881-882 (Simmonds et al. (1990) J. Virol. 64, 864-872) primers and a poorly performing algorithm. Only the H1POL4235-4538 nested pol primer set, developed by one of the laboratories, correctly identified all the tested HIV-1 positive and negative samples. Consequently, the laboratories decided to evaluate these pol primers as a reference primer set and to standardise the testing algorithm. All laboratories achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 100% on testing 10 additional Belgian and African patient samples, when adapting a standardised algorithm based on three HIV-1 primer sets, one of which is the H1POL4235-4538 primer set.