Utilidad del panel FilmArray® BCID en la detección de bacteriemia: estudio multicéntrico latinoamericano / Usefulness of the FilmArray® BCID panel in the detection of bacteremia: Latin American multicenter study

Resumen Los objetivos de este estudio fueron determinar el desempeño del panel BCID de FilmArray® y establecer el impacto de estos resultados en el tratamiento antimicrobiano de pacientes con bacteriemia en 11 hospitales de Latinoamérica. Se incluyeron 397 episodios de bacteriemia y se documentaron 551 microorganismos aislados de hemocultivos. La identificación microbiana fue correcta en el 91,4% (504/551) de los aislados y en el 98,6% (504/511) si se consideran solo los microorganismos incluidos en el panel BCID. La sensibilidad en la detección de los genes mecA, vanA/B y blaKPC fue del 100% y la especificidad fue del 97%, 100% y 99,6% respectivamente. La notificación temprana del resultado permitió cambios terapéuticos en 242 episodios (60,9%). El panel BCID es un método confiable y rápido para la detección de mecanismos críticos de resistencia y de los microorganismos más frecuentemente aislados de bacteriemias y permite la optimización temprana del tratamiento antimicrobiano.

Abstract The objectives of this study were to determine the performance of the BCID panel and to establish the impact of these results on the antimicrobial treatment of patients with bacteremia in 11 hospitals in Latin America. Three hundred and ninety-seven episodes of bacteremia were included and 551 microorganisms isolated from blood cultures were documented. Microbial identification was correct in 91.4% (504/551) of the isolates and in 98.6% (504/511) if only the microorganisms included in the BCID panel are considered. The sensitivity in the detection of the genes mecA, vanA/B and blaKPC was 100% and the specificity was 97%, 100% and 99.6% respectively. Early notification of the outcome allowed therapeutic changes in 242 episodes (60.9%). The BCID panel is a reliable and rapid method for the detection of critical resistance mechanisms and of the microorganisms most frequently isolated from bacteremia and it enables early optimisation of antimicrobial treatment.

Resumo Os objetivos deste estudo foram determinar o desempenho do painel BCID do FilmArray® e estabelecer o impacto desses resultados no tratamento antimicrobiano de pacientes com bacteremia em 11 hospitais da América Latina. Trezentos e noventa e sete episódios de bacteremia foram incluídos e 551 microrganismos isolados de hemoculturas foram documentados. A identificação microbiana foi correta em 91,4% (504/551) dos isolados e em 98,6% (504/511) considerando apenas os microrganismos incluídos no painel BCID. A sensibilidade na detecção dos genes mecA, vanA/B e blaKPC foi de 100% e a especificidade foi de 97%, 100% e 99,6% respectivamente. A notificação precoce do desfecho permitiu mudanças terapêuticas em 242 episódios (60,9%). O painel BCID é um método confiável e rápido para a detecção de mecanismos críticos de resistência e dos microrganismos mais frequentemente isolados da bacteremia e permite a otimização precoce do tratamento antimicrobiano.

MRSA dynamic circulation between the community and the hospital setting: New insights from a cohort study.

Dissemination of methicillin-resistant-Staphylococcus aureus/(MRSA) is a worldwide concern both in hospitals [healthcare-associated-(HA)-MRSA] and communities [community-associated-(CA)-MRSA]. Knowledge on when and where MRSA colonization is acquired and what clones are involved is necessary, to focus efforts for prevention of hospital-acquired MRSA-infections. METHODS: A prospective/longitudinal cohort study was performed in eight Argentina hospitals (Cordoba/ October-December/2014). Surveillance cultures for MRSA (nose-throat-inguinal) were obtained on admission and at discharge. MRSA strains were genetically typed as CA-MRSAG and HA-MRSAG genotypes. RESULTS: Overall, 1419 patients were screened and 534 stayed at hospital for ≥3 days. S. aureus admission prevalence was 30.9% and 4.2% for MRSA. Overall MRSA acquisition rate was 2.3/1000 patient-days-at-risk with a MRSA acquisition prevalence of 1.96% (95%CI: 1.0%-3.4%); 3.2% of patients were discharged back to community with MRSA. CA-MRSAG accounted for 84.6% of imported, 100.0% of hospital-acquired and 94% of discharged MRSA strains. Most imported and acquired MRSA strains belonged to two major epidemic CA-MRSA clones spread in Argentina: PFGEtypeI-ST5-IVa-t311-PVL+ and PFGEtypeN/ST30-IVc-t019-PVL+. CONCLUSIONS: CA-MRSA clones, particularly ST5-IV-PVL+ and ST30-IV-PVL+, with main reservoir in the community, not only enter but also are truly acquired within hospital, causing healthcare-associated-hospital-onset infections, having a transmission capacity greater or similar than HA-MRSAG. This information is essential to develop appropriate MRSA infection prevention-control programs, considering hospital and community.