External fixation about the elbow: Indications and long-term outcomes.

Background: Operative management is often required for fractures of the elbow, with treatment goals aiming to restore stability, reduction, and early range of motion. The purpose of this study was to determine risk factors for necessitating the application of an external fixator, and to compare range of motion and functional outcomes between patients who required an elbow external fixator to those who did not. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that patients who require an external fixator will have worse elbow range of motion and functional outcomes when compared to those who did not. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective study of 391 patients who presented at a Level-I trauma center between March 2011 and January 2021 for operative management of a fracture/fracture-dislocation of the distal humerus (AO/OTA 13A-C) and/or proximal ulna and/or radius (AO/OTA 21A-C). A primary analysis was performed to determine risk factors for necessitating the application of an external fixator. A secondary analysis was performed comparing elbow range-of-motion and functional outcomes between cases and controls. Results: 391 patients were identified; 26 required external fixation (cases) and 365 did not (controls). Significant risk factors for necessitating placement of an external fixator included large BMI (OR = 1.087, 95 % CI = 1.007-1.173, p = 0.033), elbow dislocation (OR = 7.549, 95 % CI = 2.387-23.870, p = 0.001), open wound status (OR = 9.584, 95 % CI = 2.794-32.878, p < 0.001), and additional non-contiguous orthopaedic injury (OR = 9.225, 95 % CI = 2.219-38.360, p = 0.002). Elbow ROM was poorer in the external fixator group with regards to extension (-15°), flexion (+19.4°), and pronation (+14.3°) (p < 0.05). In addition, those who did not need external fixation had better functional scores (+20.4 points MEPI) (p < 0.05). Discussion: The use of external fixation about the elbow is associated with significantly worse initial injuries and results in poorer outcomes. These results can be used to inform the surgeon-patient discussion regarding treatment options and expected functional outcomes. Level of evidence: III.

Home discharge location is safest following fracture of the hip.

PURPOSE: To determine the factors associated with discharge location in patients with hip fractures and whether home discharge was associated with a lower readmission and complication rate. METHODS: Hip fracture patients who presented to our academic medical center for operative management of a hip fracture were enrolled into an IRB-approved hip fracture database. Radiographs, demographics, and injury details were recorded at the time of presentation. Patients were grouped based upon discharge disposition: home (with or without home services), acute rehabilitation facility (ARF), or sub-acute rehabilitation facility (SAR). RESULTS: The cohorts differed in marital status, with a greater proportion of patients discharged to home being married (51.7% vs. 43.8% vs. 34.1%) (P < 0.05). Patients discharged to home were less likely to require an assistive device (P < 0.05). Patients discharged to home experienced fewer post-operative complications (P < 0.05) and had lower readmission rates (P < 0.05). Being married was associated with an increased likelihood of discharge to home (OR = 1.679, CI = 1.391-2.028, P < 0.001). Being enrolled in Medicare/Medicaid was associated with decreased odds of discharge to home (OR = 0.563, CI = 0.457-0.693, P < 0.001). Use of an assistive device was associated with decreased odds of discharge to home (OR = 0.398, CI = 0.326-0.468, P < 0.001). Increases in CCI (OR = 0.903, CI = 0.846-0.964, P = 0.002) and number of inpatient complications (OR = 0.708, CI = 0.532-0.943, P = 0.018) were associated with decreased odds of home discharge. CONCLUSION: Hip fracture patients discharged to home were healthier and more functional at baseline, and also less likely to have had a complicated hospital course. Those discharged to home also had lower rates of readmission and post-operative complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Regional Anesthesia Is Safe and Effective for Low-Energy Tibial Plateau Fractures.

The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of peripheral nerve blocks in the operative management of tibial plateau fractures is associated with improved outcomes when compared with the use of spinal and general anesthesia. Over a period of 16 years, 132 patients who underwent operative repair for a low-energy tibial plateau fracture and had at least 12 months of follow-up met the inclusion criteria and formed the basis of this study. Patients were grouped into cohorts based on the anesthetic method used during surgery: peripheral nerve block in combination with conscious sedation or general anesthesia (BA), general anesthesia alone (GA), or spinal anesthesia alone (SA). Outcomes were assessed at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Length of stay was greatest in the GA cohort (P<.05), and more patients in the BA cohort were discharged to home (P<.05). Patients in the GA cohort had the highest pain scores at 3 months and 6 months (P<.05). Patients in both the SA and BA cohorts had better Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment scores at 6 and 12 months when compared with the GA cohort (P<.05). Although knee range of motion did not differ among the three cohorts at 3 months, it did differ at 6 months and 12 months postoperatively, with those who had a preoperative nerve blockade (SA and BA) having the greatest knee range of motion (P<.05). Regional anesthesia was safe and was associated with lower pain scores in the early postoperative period and greater knee range of motion and functional outcome scores in the late postoperative period. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(6):358-364.].

Fractures of the Proximal Ulna: A Spectrum of Injuries and Outcomes.

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of radial head/ neck injury in association with proximal ulna fractures. Methods: Between 2006 and 2020, 107 patients presented to our academic medical center for treatment of a proximal ulna fracture and were enrolled into an IRB-approved database. Radiographs, injury details, and surgical interventions were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified as having an isolated proximal ulna fracture (PU), a PU fracture with an associated radial head dislocation (M-D), or a Monteggia fracture with an associated radial head fracture (M-V). Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed at follow-up to determine what differences exist between fracture patterns. Statistics were generated using Chi-squared tests for categorical variables and one-way ANOVA tests for numerical variables. Results: While all patients ultimately healed, time to radiographic healing in the PU cohort was shorter at 3.57 ± 1.7 months when compared to the M-V cohort (5.67 ± 3.8 months) (p < 0.05). At follow-up, patients in the M-V cohort had poorer elbow pronation and supination when compared to the PU and M-D cohorts (p < 0.05). Patients within the PU cohort had fewer complications than those in the M-D and M-V cohorts (p < 0.05). No differences were found between the three cohorts in regard to rates of reoperation, non-union, wound infection, and nerve compression (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The Monteggia fracture with a concomitant radial head/neck fracture is a more disabling injury pattern when compared to an isolated proximal ulna fracture and Monteggia fracture without an associated radial head/neck fracture.

The Lateral Femoral Cutaneous and Over the Hip (LOH) Block for the Surgical Management of Hip Fractures: A Safe and Effective Anesthetic Strategy.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy of regional anesthesia with sedation only for a variety of hip fractures using the newly described lateral femoral cutaneous with over the hip (LOH) block. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Orthopedic specialty hospital. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: 40 patients who presented between November 2021 and February 2022 for fixation of OTA/AO 31.A1-3 and 31.B1-3 fractures. Matched cohorts of 40 patients who received general anesthesia and 40 patients who received spinal anesthesia for hip fracture fixation were also used. INTERVENTION: Operative fixation under LOH block and sedation only. The LOH block is a regional hip analgesic that targets the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, articular branches of femoral nerve, and accessory obturator nerve. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Demographics, intraoperative characteristics, anesthesia-related complications, hospital quality metrics, and short-term mortality and reoperation rates. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients (40 each: general, spinal, and LOH block) were compared. The cohorts were similar in age, race, body mass index, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, trauma risk score, ambulatory status at baseline, fracture type, and surgical fixation technique performed. Physiologic parameters during surgery were more stable in the LOH block cohort ( P < 0.05). Total OR time and anesthesia time were the shortest for the LOH block cohort ( P < 0.05). Patients in the LOH block cohort also had lower postoperative pain scores ( P < 0.05). Length of hospital stay was the shortest for patients in the LOH block cohort ( P < 0.05), and during discharge, patients in the LOH block cohort ambulated the furthest ( P < 0.05). No differences were found for anesthesia-related complications, palliative care consults, major and minor hospital complications, discharge disposition, reoperation and readmission rates, and mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: The LOH block is safe and effective anesthesia for the treatment of all types of hip fractures in the elderly patients requiring surgery. In addition, this block may decrease postoperative pain and length of hospital stay, and allow for greater ambulation in the early postoperative period for patients with hip fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Approach variation affects outcomes after operative repair of lateral tibial plateau fractures.

PURPOSE: To determine if the type of approach used for treatment of lateral split-depression tibial plateau fractures affects clinical outcome and complications rate. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 169 patients who presented between 01/2005 and 12/2020 to a Level-I trauma center for operative management of an isolated lateral Schatzker II tibial plateau fractures (AO/OTA Type 41B3.1) treated through a single anterolateral approach: a 90-degree "L" (L), longitudinal vertical (V), or "lazy S" (S). Postoperative radiographic, clinical, and functional outcomes were assessed at 3, 6, 12 months, and beyond. RESULTS: Average time to radiographic healing was longer in the S incision cohort (p < 0.05). Furthermore, patients within the S incision cohort developed more postoperative wound complications at follow-up when compared to those within the L and V incision cohorts (p < 0.05). Additionally, reoperation rates were greater in the S incision cohort (p < 0.05). Lastly, on physical examination of the knee, patients within the S incision cohort had significantly poorer knee range of motion (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that skin incision type in the anterolateral approach to the proximal tibia has an association with outcomes following operative repair of tibial plateau fractures. The information from this study can be used to inform surgeons about the potential complications and long-term outcomes that patients may experience when undergoing operative repair of a tibial plateau fracture through a specific incision type. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Surgeon Volume Impacts Outcomes Following Ankle Fracture Repair.

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of surgeon volume on outcomes following ankle fracture fixation. Methods: Over 7 years, 362 patients who met inclusion criteria (>18 years with rotational ankle fractures) were identified and treated by orthopaedic surgeons at several hospitals within an academic medical center and were retrospectively reviewed. Surgeons that completed less than 24 ankle fixations per year (<90th percentile) during the study period were classified as low-volume (LV) and surgeons completing 24 or more ankle fixations per year (>90th percentile) were classified as high-volume (HV). Chart review was conducted to gather data regarding perioperative, radiographic, inpatient, and long-term outcome data (average 12-month follow-up). Results: One hundred thirty-four patients (37.0%) were treated by LV surgeons and 228 (63.0%) were treated by HV surgeons. Although both cohorts had a similar breakdown of fracture patterns (P = .638), the LV cohort had a greater incidence of open fractures (P = .024). No differences were found regarding wait time to surgery, surgery duration, and LOS. Radiographically, more patients in the HV cohort achieved anatomic mortise after surgery (96.5% vs 89.6%, P = .008). Patients in the LV cohort took longer to heal radiographically (4.27 ± 2.4 months vs 5.59 ± 2.9 months, P < .001), and also had higher rates of reoperation and hardware removal (P < .05). Lastly, all cost variables were lower for high-volume surgeons (P < .05). Conclusion: In this single-center study, we found that patients treated by LV surgeons took 30% longer to heal radiographically and had greater reoperation rates than those treated by HV surgeons. Additionally, patients treated by high-volume surgeons had more anatomic postoperative radiographic ankle mortise reductions and was less cost-effective than when performed by high-volume surgeons. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

The effect of COVID-19 on adult traumatic orthopedic injuries: a database study.

PURPOSE: This study compares orthopedic injuries, procedures, and hospital outcomes of patients presenting to trauma centers in Pennsylvania before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A retrospective review of adult patients presenting to hospitals with Pennsylvania Trauma Systems Foundation (PTSF) designations was performed. All patients 18 years of age and older who presented with orthopedic injuries were included. Demographic information, injury and hospital stay details, and mortality were reviewed. Data were compared between the cohorts of patients presenting during April 2020 (COVID cohort) and April 2017, April 2018, and April 2019 (pre-COVID cohort). RESULTS: Overall, 14,858 patients were reviewed, and 9427 patients were included in this study. There were fewer orthopedic injuries (4868 vs. 6603 yearly mean) in the COVID cohort which led to fewer procedures (1763 vs. 2329 yearly mean). The COVID cohort had a significantly shorter mean hospital length of stay compared to the pre-COVID cohort (4.7 days versus 5.2 days, p = 0.01). A higher mortality rate was seen in the COVID cohort (n = 115, 6.1%) compared to the pre-COVID cohort (n = 305, 4.0%; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The characteristics of orthopedic injuries sustained by patients presenting to trauma centers during the COVID pandemic were not different from prior to the pandemic. However, there were decreases in the number of orthopedic injuries and procedures accompanied by a 50% increase in mortality seen in these patients during the pandemic. Resources should be appropriately marshalled to prevent rises in-hospital mortality for patients with orthopedic trauma treated during a pandemic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The Effect of COVID-19 on Pediatric Traumatic Orthopaedic Injuries: A Database Study.

INTRODUCTION: Stay-at-home orders and other social distancing restrictions had a profound effect on the lives of children during the pandemic. This study characterizes pediatric orthopaedic injuries and in-hospital outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic and compares them with pre-COVID patterns. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric patients presenting to hospitals with Pennsylvania Trauma Systems Foundation designations was performed. All patients younger than 18 years who presented with orthopaedic injuries were included. Patient demographics, injuries, hospital stays, and mortality were compared between the COVID and pre-COVID cohorts. RESULTS: Overall, 1112 patients were included. During the pandemic, more injuries occurred at home (44.7% versus 54.9%, P = 0.01) and fewer at sporting areas, parks, and pools (7.8% versus 1.6%, P < 0.01) as well as at schools (3.4% versus 0.5%, P = 0.03). Injuries caused by child abuse were more prevalent during the pandemic (5.6% versus 11.0%, P < 0.01). Finally, the COVID cohort had a longer mean hospital length of stay (3.1 versus 2.4 days, P = 0.01), higher mean number of ICU days (1.0 versus 0.7 days, P = 0.02), and higher mortality rate (3.8% versus 1.3%, P = 0.02). DISCUSSION: Pediatric patients sustained injuries in differing patterns during the pandemic, but these led to worse hospital outcomes, including higher mortality rates.

Diltiazem Does Not Prevent Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Thoracoscopic Lobectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower rates of adverse events compared to thoracotomy. Despite this, postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) occurs in at least 10% of patients. Our objective is to determine if prophylaxis with diltiazem significantly reduced POAF events. METHODS: Patients without prior history of atrial fibrillation who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy from 2007 to 2016 at one institution were analyzed in a retrospective cohort study utilizing a prospective database. Patients treated from 2007 to 2012 received no prophylaxis. Patients treated after 2012 received diltiazem postoperatively. All patients were monitored with continuous telemetry postoperatively. Multivariate direct logistic regression was performed to determine independent predictors of POAF. We report adjusted odds ratios and accompanying 95% confidence intervals, with P < 0.05 denoting statistical significance. RESULTS: The final regression model included 416 patients (52 with POAF, 364 without). In univariate analysis, the variables of body mass index and history of congestive heart failure, diabetes, or hypertension, and prophylaxis status did not meet inclusion criteria. Age, gender, history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, and vascular disease were included. Only ages 65 to 74 (P = 0.03) and ≥75 (P = 0.02), compared to <65, were statistically significant predictors of POAF. Adjusted odds ratios of ages 65 to 74 and ≥75 were 2.88 and 2.62, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Diltiazem prophylaxis did not significantly reduce POAF incidence following thoracoscopic lobectomy. Further study is warranted since POAF remains an unwanted source of morbidity and cost for lobectomy patients.