A cardiovascular clinic patients' survey to assess challenges and opportunities of digital health adoption during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 boosted healthcare digitalization and personalization in cardiology. However, understanding patient attitudes and engagement behaviors is essential to achieve successful acceptance and implementation of digital health technologies in personalized care. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to understand current and future trends in wearable device and telemedicine use in the cardiology clinic patient population, recognize patients' attitude towards digital health before and after COVID-19, and identify potential socioeconomic and racial/ethnic differences in adoption of digital health tools in a New Orleans patient population. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was distributed to Tulane Cardiology Clinic patients between September 2020 and January 2021. Basic demographic information, medical comorbidities, device usage, and opinions on digital health tools were collected. RESULTS: Survey responses from 299 participants (average age = 54 years, 50.8% female, 24.4% African American) showed that digital health use was more prevalent in younger, healthier, and more educated individuals. Wearable use was also higher among White patients compared to African American patients. Patients cited costs and technology knowledge as primary deterrents for using wearables, despite being more inclined to use wearables for disease monitoring (41%). While wearable use did not increase after COVID-19 (36.6% pre-COVID vs 35.4% post-COVID, P = .77), telemedicine use rose significantly (10.8% pre-COVID vs 24.3% during COVID, P < .0001). Patients mostly noted telemedicine's effectiveness in overcoming difficult healthcare access barriers. Additionally, most patients are in support of wearables and telemedicine either complementing or replacing routine tests and traditional clinical visits. CONCLUSION: Demographic and socioeconomic disparities negatively impact wearable health device and telemedicine adoption within cardiovascular clinic patients. Although telemedicine use increased after COVID-19, this effect was not observed for wearables, reflecting significant economic and digital literacy challenges underlying wearable acceptance.

Risk factors for acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in a population sample of predominantly African American patients with chest pain and normal coronary arteries.

BACKGROUND: We sought to investigate the relationship between echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and acute non-ST-elevation segment myocardial infarction (NSTE-MI) in patients with chest pain and angiographically normal coronary arteries. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients admitted for acute chest pain in a large urban hospital serving predominantly African American patients. RESULTS: 131 (of 700) patients had normal coronary arteries or only minimal luminal irregularities (ie, <10% luminal narrowing) on cardiac angiography and available cardiac biomarker data to define the presence or absence of MI. Mean age was 53 +/- 10 years, 76% were African Americans, 88% had a history of hypertension (49% uncontrolled) and 74% had LVH by echocardiography. Of these 131 patients, 22 (17%) had an acute NSTE-MI by creatine kinase MB criteria. The mean systolic blood pressure (BP) was significantly higher in patients with NSTE-MI compared with non-NSTE-MI group (156 +/- 30 vs 143 +/- 25 mm Hg, P=.04). Patients with NSTE-MI were more likely to have LVH (95% vs 70%, P=.03). NSTE-MI was present in 22% of patients with LVH compared with 3% without LVH (P=.02). The in-hospital course of NSTE-MI patients with LVH was not benign: 19% had persistent angina and positive stress thallium suggestive of recurrent myocardial ischemia and 48% had congestive heart failure. The results of multivariable model after adjusting for selected variables revealed that these two preexisting conditions were independently associated with NSTE-MI: LVH (OR=4.0, CI 1.06-10.05) and elevated systolic BP (OR=3.7, CI 1.01-10.64). CONCLUSION: These findings provide preliminary evidence that LVH and uncontrolled hypertension predispose to NSTE-MI in this patient group.

The prevalence of cognitive impairment among African-American patients with congestive heart failure.

This cross-sectional study sought to determine the prevalence of cognitive impairment among African-American patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). We studied 100 African-American CHF patients (aged 55-87 years) in New York Heart Association classes II-IV, who are enrolled in an ongoing, randomized, controlled trial, evaluating the effectiveness of a telemonitoring intervention to improve access to ambulatory care for heart failure patients. These CHF patients were recruited from an inner-city practice, rural physician practices and an urban physician practice in Atlanta. The Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) was used to measure cognition. Cognitive impairment was defined as a MMSE score of less than 24. The crude prevalence of cognitive impairment was 10% in this population of African Americans with CHF. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated an increase in odds of cognitive impairment with increasing age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.10 and 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.20; p=0.042]. There was no significant relationship between cognitive impairment and gender, education status, depression and severity of CHF. This study indicates that cognitive impairment is relatively prevalent among African Americans with CHF, but lower than previously reported among Caucasians with CHF.