Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev Med Interne ; 42(9): 625-632, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33676780

RESUMO

The management of acute pancreatitis is now fairly codified, with specific recommendations developed by expert groups. These recommendations deal in particular with the minimum initial assessment, recognized severity scores, initial medical management with hyperhydration, preventive anticoagulation, early refeeding, delays in imaging and management of complications. In this work, we have tried to bring together the various recommendations, articles and studies dealing with this subject, based more particularly on European recommendations, in order to guide the management of acute pancreatitis in current practice.


Assuntos
Pancreatite , Doença Aguda , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Humanos , Pancreatite/diagnóstico , Pancreatite/epidemiologia , Pancreatite/terapia
2.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 20(1): 153, 2020 May 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32410595

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal stents have several well-known respiratory complications, including aspiration pneumonia, fistula and airway compression. However, bilateral vocal cord paralysis has rarely been described. METHODS: We describe two patients who presented with refractory dysphagia due to malignant proximal oesophageal strictures. Both received palliative treatment consisting of fully covered self-expandable metal stents that were placed across the strictures. RESULTS: Both patients developed inspiratory stridor and acute hypoxemic respiratory failure shortly after the stent was placed. Flexible bronchoscopy revealed vocal cord paralysis in paramedian position, potentially due to extrinsic compression of the posterior branch of the recurrent laryngeal nerve following the progressive opening of the esophageal prosthesis. One patient recovered after the stent was removed. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral vocal cord paralysis is a rare but potentially fatal complication of proximal esophagus stenting.


Assuntos
Endoscopia/efeitos adversos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Stents Metálicos Autoexpansíveis/efeitos adversos , Paralisia das Pregas Vocais/etiologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Esofágicas/complicações , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Estenose Esofágica/etiologia , Estenose Esofágica/cirurgia , Evolução Fatal , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Crohns Colitis ; 13(9): 1121-1130, 2019 Sep 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30785181

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Standard high-volume polyethylene glycol [PEG] bowel preparations [PEG-4L] are recommended for patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] undergoing colonoscopy. However, low-volume preparations [≤2 L of active volume] are often used in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the various bowel preparations for patients with IBD, including low-volume preparations. METHODS: We conducted a French prospective multicentre observational study over a period of 1 month. Patients aged 18-75 years with IBD with an indication of colonoscopy independent of the study were enrolled. The choice of the preparation was left to the investigators, as per their usual protocol. The patients' characteristics, disease, and colonoscopy characteristics were recorded, and they were given self-reported questionnaires. RESULTS: Twenty-five public and private hospitals enrolled 278 patients. Among them, 46 had a disease flare and 41 had bowel stenoses. Bowel preparations for colonoscopy were as follows: 42% received PEG-2L, 29% received sodium picosulfate [Pico], 15% received PEG-4L, and 14% had other preparations. The preparation did not reach the Boston's score efficacy outcome in the PEG-4L group in 51.2% of the patients [p = 0.0011]. The preparation intake was complete for 59.5% in the PEG-4L group, compared with 82.9% in the PEG-2L group and 93.8% in the Pico group [p < 0.0001]. Tolerability, as assessed by the patients' VAS, was significantly better for both Pico and PEG-2L compared with PEG-4L, and better for Pico compared with PEG-2L [p = 0.008; p = 0.0003]. In multivariate analyses, low-volume preparations were independent factors of efficacy and tolerability. Adverse events occurred in 4.3% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Preparations with PEG-2L and Pico were equally safe, with better efficacy and tolerability outcomes compared with PEG-4L preparations. The best efficacy/tolerance/safety profile was achieved with the Pico preparation.


Assuntos
Catárticos , Colonoscopia/métodos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/diagnóstico , Polietilenoglicóis , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Catárticos/administração & dosagem , Catárticos/efeitos adversos , Citratos/administração & dosagem , Citratos/efeitos adversos , Colite Ulcerativa/diagnóstico , Colonoscopia/efeitos adversos , Doença de Crohn/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Compostos Organometálicos/administração & dosagem , Compostos Organometálicos/efeitos adversos , Picolinas/administração & dosagem , Picolinas/efeitos adversos , Polietilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Polietilenoglicóis/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...