Measuring operating theatre nurses' perceptions of safety culture using the SCORE questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Tackling operating theatre waiting lists may focus healthcare organisations' attention on increased productivity while downplaying safety concerns. AIM: To explore safety culture in a perioperative department from operating theatre practitioners' perspective. METHOD: Cross-sectional pen-and-paper survey among nurses in an operating theatre department in Malta using the Safety, Communication, Operational Reliability and Engagement questionnaire. FINDINGS: The response rate was 71.2% (n = 146). Engagement domains and Organisational Safety Culture domains were perceived to be at an average level, apart from Unit Leadership which was perceived to be low. Burnout domains were perceived to be high or very high. Correlation analysis showed that leaders' recognition of staff feedback and input is associated with improved safety culture perceptions. CONCLUSION: An organisational win-win situation is achievable, whereby safety culture perceptions are improved, not necessarily by decreasing job demands such as tackling waiting lists, but by recognising operating theatre staff's input and involving them in work-related decisions.

Perceived authority gradients among anaesthetic teams in Malta.

Over the decades, cases like those of Elaine Bromiley, who passed away after a 'cannot intubate, cannot ventilate' scenario, have prompted deeper analyses of team dynamics and authority gradients. It is thought that a steep authority gradient may have impeded lifesaving communication between members of the anaesthetic team, leading to her death. Using an online questionnaire, we carried out a cross-sectional observational study exploring the perceived authority gradients within anaesthetic teams in the main operating theatres at Mater Dei Hospital, Malta. Nurses were found to experience a steeper authority gradient than anaesthetists. They were less comfortable making suggestions too and also felt like the suggestions they made were less listened to by lead anaesthetists. To a lesser extent, females also experienced a steeper authority gradient. Increasing age and grade were associated with a flatter authority gradient. Further research needs to be carried out to identify the underlying reasons behind the steeper perceived authority gradient affecting nurses. Interventions are being planned to attempt to decrease the perceived authority gradient.

The effect of gum chewing on postoperative ileus in open colorectal surgery patients: A review.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative ileus is a common complication of abdominal surgery, leading to prolonged hospital stay and associated costs. Gum chewing may be a safe, cheap intervention to reduce postoperative ileus. METHODS: The aim was to investigate the effect of gum chewing on postoperative ileus in open colorectal surgery patients. A literature search was conducted between December 2018 and March 2019 on CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, Academic Search Complete, PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar. The keywords used included 'ileus', 'chewing gum', 'mastication' and 'sham feeding'. Papers had to include adults undergoing open colorectal surgery. The studies were appraised using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tools and the results summarised using a narrative review. RESULTS: A total of three systematic reviews and three randomised controlled trials were included in the study. The studies show a significant to highly significant effect of gum chewing on postoperative ileus-related outcomes. The trials however in general utilised a weak design. CONCLUSIONS: Gum chewing decreases postoperative ileus following colorectal surgery. More robust trials are required to confirm these findings. Due to the low risk of harm and cost of using gum chewing, its use is recommended even in the interim.