Technical Performance of a 430-Gene Preventative Genomics Assay to Identify Multiple Variant Types Associated with Adult-Onset Monogenic Conditions, Susceptibility Loci, and Pharmacogenetic Insights.

DNA-based screening in individuals without known risk factors potentially identifies those who may benefit from genetic counseling, early medical interventions, and/or avoidance of late or missed diagnoses. While not currently in widespread usage, technological advances in genetic analysis overcome barriers to access by enabling less labor-intensive and more cost-efficient means to discover variants of clinical importance. This study describes the technical validation of a 430-gene next-generation sequencing based assay, GeneCompassTM, indicated for the screening of healthy individuals in the areas of actionable health risks, pharmaceutical drug response, and wellness traits. The test includes genes associated with Mendelian disorders and genetic susceptibility loci, encompassing 14 clinical areas and pharmacogenetic variants. The custom-designed target enrichment capture and bioinformatics pipelines interrogate multiple variant types, including single nucleotide variants, insertions/deletions (indels), copy number variants, and functional haplotypes (star alleles), including tandem alleles and structural variants. Validation was performed against reference DNA from three sources: 1000 Genomes Project (n = 3), Coriell biobank (n = 105), and previously molecularly characterized biological specimens: blood (n = 15) and saliva (n = 11). Analytical sensitivity and specificity for single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were 97.57% and 99.99%, respectively, and for indels were 74.57% and 97.34%, respectively. This study demonstrates the validity of an NGS assay for genetic screening and the broadening of access to preventative genomics.

Knowledge and opinions regarding BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing among primary care physicians.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) testing is standard for individuals with personal and/or family history suggestive of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. The indications for testing have been expanding. To accommodate the need, incorporation of cancer genetic services into the practice of non-genetic healthcare providers should be considered. We carried out a survey to evaluate the knowledge and opinions regarding BRCA1/2 testing among primary care providers. The survey was sent to 245 Obstetrics/Gynecology and 97 Family Medicine physicians in the UPMC network. Eighty-six completed the survey between July 2015 and September 2015. The average correct responses to knowledge questions was 73%. A few respondents reported being completely confident, and ~50% reported being somewhat confident, in providing BRCA1/2-related information. Respondents selected genetic specialists and oncologists as the most qualified to provide cancer genetic services. Several perceived barriers and motivating factors to the implementation of BRCA1/2 testing in primary care were identified. The findings from this study suggested that primary care providers were not uniformly ready to provide BRCA1/2 genetic testing. Availability of professional society guidelines and evidence of testing's usefulness might motivate the incorporation of BRCA1/2 genetic testing into primary care practices. These findings would help guide future educational efforts to promote provision of cancer genetic services by non-genetic professionals.