Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: the radiologist's role.

In recent decades, the dreaded adverse effect of bisphosphonates, osteonecrosis of the jaw, has been widely reported and described in detail. Osteonecrosis of the jaw consists of the destruction of part of the maxilla as a consequence of these antiresorptive drugs. In recent years, new drugs that can also cause osteonecrosis of the jaw (e.g., some monoclonal antibodies or antiangiogenic drugs) have come on the market. For this reason, the term "bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw" has been replaced with "medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). This review aims to describe the radiologic characteristics of MRONJ that, although nonspecific, radiologists need to recognize in the appropriate clinical context.

Brain CT requests from emergency department: Reality.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the most common reasons for requesting brain CT studies from the emergency department and to calculate the prevalence of urgent acute pathology on this population group. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed brain CT studies requested from the emergency department during October and November 2018. We recorded the following variables: age, sex, reason for requesting the study, CT findings, use of contrast agents and reasons for using them, and, in patients who had undergone previous head CT studies, whether the findings had changed. SPSS was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: A total of 507 urgent brain CT studies were done (41.4% in men, 58.6% in women; mean age, 65.4±20 years). The most common reason for requesting the study was head trauma (40.5%); only 15.6% of these studies showed acute posttraumatic intracranial lesions. The second most common reason was focal neurologic symptoms (16%); only 16% of these studies showed recent ischemic infarcts or acute bleeding. No pathological findings were reported in 43.2% of the studies. The most common abnormal finding was ischemic lesions in small vessels (20%). Space-occupying lesions (both benign and malignant) were found in 3.9% of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Most brain CT studies requested from the emergency department showed no findings that would modify the management of the patient. Overuse of urgent brain CT increases the radiology department's workload and exposes patients to radiation unnecessarily.

[Valuation of automatized ASPECTS as an artificial intelligence tool in daily clinical]. / Valoración del ASPECTS automatizado como herramienta de inteligencia artificial en la práctica clínica diaria.

AIMS: To evaluate an automated ASPECTS (ASPECTS-a) software against two radiologists' reading of CT scans requested from the Emergency Department. Describe the most frequent failures of the ASPECTS-a. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All the cranial CT Scans requested by the Emergency Department in one month were collected. The following data were recorded: age, sex, the reason for requesting the study, and imaging findings. A program was used that provides an ASPECTS score automatically. Subsequently, 2 radiologists independently reviewed all of the studies and provided the visual ASPECTS (ASPECTS-v). In case of discrepancy, a new reading was made by consensus. RESULTS: A total of 295 brain CT scans (45.1% male) with a mean age of 65 ± 20.0 years were included. 91.8% were interpreted as ASPECTS-v 10 in both cerebral hemispheres by both readers. ASPECTS-a scored 45% with ASPECTS 10 in both cerebral hemispheres. In 152 (51.5%) the ASPECTS-a and the ASPECTS-v did not coincide. The causes of the discrepancy were mainly due to segmentation errors (usually due to asymmetric atrophies). Most of the segmentation errors were located in the head of the caudate nucleus, observed in 60 studies. CONCLUSIONS: ASPECTS-a is a powerful and helpful tool, but human supervision is always necessary, particularly in groups of patients with pre-existing brain changes.

TITLE: Valoración del ASPECTS automatizado como herramienta de inteligencia artificial en la práctica clínica diaria.Objetivos. Evaluar un software del Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) automatizado (ASPECTS-a) frente a la lectura de dos radiólogos en las tomografías computarizadas (TC) solicitadas desde el servicio de urgencias. Describir los fallos más frecuentes del ASPECTS-a. Material y métodos. Se recogieron las TC cerebrales solicitadas por el servicio de urgencias en el período de un mes. Se registraron los siguientes datos: edad, sexo, motivo de solicitud del estudio y hallazgos en la prueba de imagen. Se utilizó un programa que proporciona una puntuación del ASPECTS automáticamente. Posteriormente, dos radiólogos examinaron de forma independiente todos los estudios y realizaron un ASPECTS visual (ASPECTS-v). En caso de discrepancia, se hizo una nueva lectura en consenso. Se compararon los resultados del ASPECTS-a con el ASPECTS-v. Resultados. Se realizaron un total de 295 TC cerebrales urgentes con una edad media de 65 ± 20 años. El 91,8% lo interpretaron los dos lectores como ASPECTS 10 en ambos hemisferios cerebrales. El ASPECTS-a puntuó el 45% con ASPECTS 10 en ambos hemisferios cerebrales. En 152 (51,5%), el ASPECTS-a y el ASPECTS-v no coincidieron. Las causas de la discrepancia fueron fundamentalmente por errores en la segmentación (generalmente por atrofias asimétricas). La mayor parte de los errores en la segmentación se localizaban en la cabeza del núcleo caudado, lo que se observó en 60 estudios. Conclusiones. El ASPECTS-a es una herramienta potente y de gran ayuda, pero siempre es necesaria una supervisión humana, particularmente en grupos de pacientes con cambios cerebrales preexistentes.

Brain CT requests from emergency department: reality. / Tomografía computarizada cerebral solicitada desde Urgencias: la realidad.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the most common reasons for requesting brain CT studies from the emergency department and to calculate the prevalence of urgent acute pathology on this population group. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed brain CT studies requested from the emergency department during October and November 2018. We recorded the following variables: age, sex, reason for requesting the study, CT findings, use of contrast agents and reasons for using them, and, in patients who had undergone previous head CT studies, whether the findings had changed. SPSS was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: A total of 507 urgent brain CT studies were done (41.4% in men, 58.6% in women; mean age, 65.4±20 years). The most common reason for requesting the study was head trauma (40.5%); only 15.6% of these studies showed acute posttraumatic intracranial lesions. The second most common reason was focal neurologic symptoms (16%); only 16% of these studies showed recent ischemic infarcts or acute bleeding. No pathological findings were reported in 43.2% of the studies. The most common abnormal finding was small vessel disease (20%). Space-occupying lesions (both benign and malignant) were found in 3.9% of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Most brain CT studies requested from the emergency department showed no findings that would modify the management of the patient. Overuse of urgent brain CT increases the radiology department's workload and exposes patients to radiation unnecessarily.

Inner ear MRI: is it always useful to manage intravenous contrast? / Resonancia magnética de conducto auditivo interno: ¿es siempre útil administrar contraste intravenoso?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the added value of administering intravenous contrast (IVC) routinely to the MRI of patients with audiovestibular symptoms in the assessment of a neuroradiologist and a resident. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study including patients who had an inner ear MRI for two months. Two radiologists reviewed independently and blinded the images. A first assessment was made analyzing just the sequences acquired without contrast and then a second evaluation of all the sequences, including post-contrast T1 sequences. The interobserver correlation and the correlation between MRI findings and the reason for requesting the study were calculated. RESULTS: 40 patients were included. The range age was 36-80 years. The most frequent reason for request the MRI was hearing loss (52.5%). Neuroradiologist without IVC found 82.5% of extraotic pathology and 17.5% of otic pathology, highlighting the neurinoma of the VIII pair (7.5%); ossifying labyrinthitis, retrofenestrated otosclerosis and cholesteatoma. After IVC administration, findings were similar. The resident identified otic pathology in 5% in baseline sequences and 20% using CIV. The interobserver correlation using IVC was excellent (0.97), but weak without IVC (0.52). There was a correlation between the reasons for request the MRI and the findings in the ears, both in protocols without IVC (p = 0.004) and in protocols with IVC (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Inner ear MRI without contrast gives relevant information to assess audiovestibular symptoms. The use of IVC increases the degree of confidence in a novel radiologist, while in the expert its use is less relevant. A protocol should be proposed in which gadolinium is used in selected patients.