Prospective analysis on carotid endarterectomy: intermediate-deep ultrasound-guided cervical blockade versus general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The best regional anesthesia plan with the best clinical results for Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has not been defined yet. METHODS: Prospective multicentric observational study of two non-randomized matched cohorts including patients undergoing elective unilateral CEA (N.=100) between January-October 2021. Main outcomes were cerebral oximetry measurements, verbal numeric pain score assessment, peripheral nerve blockades and in-hospital stay. The main objective is to compare results achieved after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed under loco-regional blockade (LRB) versus general anesthesia (GA), in terms of intraoperative hemodynamic and neurologic variability. Patients undergoing LRB were performed under ultrasound (US) guidance and mild sedation. RESULTS: The LRB and GA groups showed no differences in comorbidities and risk factors. However, there was a significant difference in the intraoperative hemodynamic behavior due to the amount of vasoactive drugs used (0% vs. 16% for phenylephrine, P=0.006). The results showed neurological stability through the cerebral oximetry measurements during the procedure except for the left hemisphere de-clamp values, which were higher in the GA group (68.7±9.9 vs. 72.7±8.8; P=0.035). There were also significant differences in the verbal pain scale scores assessed 6 hours and 12 hours after the procedure; better pain control was evidenced in the LRB group (0[0-1] vs. 1[0-3], P=0.01; 1[0.5-2] vs. 0[0-2], P=0.01). An increased transient hypoglossal and laryngeal nerves blockade was observed in the LRB group (30% vs. 4%; P<0.001). The in-hospital length of stay was longer in the GA group (77.2±36.3 hours vs. 129.1±41.1 hours; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of intermediate-deep cervical plexus blockade for CEA confers similar neurologic stability as GA does, there is a difference on the hemodynamic behaviour due to the differences in vasoactive drug consumption. Loco-regional techniques provide a better postoperative pain control and shorten in-hospital length of stay.

Mechanochemical ablation for great and small saphenous veins insufficiency in patients with type III shunt.

OBJECTIVE: the aim of this study was to assess the results of mechanochemical endovenous ablation either in the primary or recurrent saphenous vein insufficiency, including only patients with veno-venous shunt type III. METHODS: retrospective analysis of a prospective study of patients with symptomatic chronic venous insufficiency who underwent ClariVein® technique. A total of 134 saphenous veins were included between August 2017 and August 2018. Follow-up was performed by Duplex ultrasound at 1, 6 and 12 months. Primary endpoints were technical and anatomical success. Secondary endpoints were the need for further treatment of varicose collateral veins by sclerotherapy, outcomes regarding recurrent insufficiency and clinical success. RESULTS: A total of 111 great saphenous veins and 23 small saphenous veins were treated with a technical success of 95.6%. The overall anatomical success rates at 1, 6 and 12 month were 96.2%, 88.8% and 84.4%, respectively, without differences between primary and recurrent insufficiency. Deferred sclerotherapy over varicose collaterals was carried out in 28% of the patients with anatomical success. Clinical improvement was achieved in 87.3%. CONCLUSIONS: MOCA technique has proven to be an effective technique, although additional treatment over varicose collaterals could be necessary in up to one-third. Atrophy of the saphenous vein and the lack of persistent varicose collateral veins during follow-up seem to be indicators of successful therapy.