Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Perioper Med (Lond) ; 10(1): 6, 2021 Feb 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33622393

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain after breast surgery (CPBS) has a disabling impact on postoperative health status. Mainly because of the lack of a clear definition, inconsistency does exist in the literature concerning both the actual incidence and the risk factors associated to CPBS. The aim of this prospective, observational study is to describe the incidence of and risk factors for CPBS, according to the definition provided by the IASP taskforce. The impact of CPBS on patients' function and quality of life is also described. METHODS: Women aged 18+ undergoing oncological or reconstructive breast surgery from Jan until Apr 2018 at the Breast Unit of Careggi Hospital (Florence, Italy) were prospectively observed. Postoperative pain was measured at 0 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 3 months (CPBS) after surgery. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors were compared in CPBS and No-CPBS groups through multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among the 307 patients considered in this study, the incidence of CPBS was 28% [95% CI 23.1-33.4%]. Results from the logistic regression analysis suggest that axillary surgery (OR [95% CI], 2.99 [1.13-7.87], p = 0.03), preoperative use of pain medications (OR [95% CI], 2.04 [1.20-3.46], p = 0.01), and higher dynamic NRS values at 6 h postoperatively (OR [95% CI], 1.28 [1.05-1.55], p = 0.01) were all independent predictors for CPBS. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic pain after breast surgery is a frequent complication. In our cohort, long-term use of analgesics for pre-existing chronic pain, axillary surgery, and higher dynamic NRS values at 6 h postoperatively were all factors associated with increased risk of developing CPBS. The possibility to early detect persistent pain, particularly in those patients at high risk for CPBS, might help physicians to more effectively prevent pain chronicisation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT04309929 .

2.
PLoS One ; 5(6): e11241, 2010 Jun 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20574527

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The endothelin B receptor (ET(B)R) promotes tumorigenesis and melanoma progression through activation by endothelin (ET)-1, thus representing a promising therapeutic target. The stability of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1alpha is essential for melanomagenesis and progression, and is controlled by site-specific hydroxylation carried out by HIF-prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) and subsequent proteosomal degradation. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here we found that in melanoma cells ET-1, ET-2, and ET-3 through ET(B)R, enhance the expression and activity of HIF-1alpha and HIF-2alpha that in turn regulate the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in response to ETs or hypoxia. Under normoxic conditions, ET-1 controls HIF-alpha stability by inhibiting its degradation, as determined by impaired degradation of a reporter gene containing the HIF-1alpha oxygen-dependent degradation domain encompassing the PHD-targeted prolines. In particular, ETs through ET(B)R markedly decrease PHD2 mRNA and protein levels and promoter activity. In addition, activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-dependent integrin linked kinase (ILK)-AKT-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is required for ET(B)R-mediated PHD2 inhibition, HIF-1alpha, HIF-2alpha, and VEGF expression. At functional level, PHD2 knockdown does not further increase ETs-induced in vitro tube formation of endothelial cells and melanoma cell invasiveness, demonstrating that these processes are regulated in a PHD2-dependent manner. In human primary and metastatic melanoma tissues as well as in cell lines, that express high levels of HIF-1alpha, ET(B)R expression is associated with low PHD2 levels. In melanoma xenografts, ET(B)R blockade by ET(B)R antagonist results in a concomitant reduction of tumor growth, angiogenesis, HIF-1alpha, and HIF-2alpha expression, and an increase in PHD2 levels. CONCLUSIONS: In this study we identified the underlying mechanism by which ET-1, through the regulation of PHD2, controls HIF-1alpha stability and thereby regulates angiogenesis and melanoma cell invasion. These results further indicate that targeting ET(B)R may represent a potential therapeutic treatment of melanoma by impairing HIF-1alpha stability.


Assuntos
Endotelina-1/farmacologia , Subunidade alfa do Fator 1 Induzível por Hipóxia/metabolismo , Melanoma/patologia , Pró-Colágeno-Prolina Dioxigenase/antagonistas & inibidores , Animais , Fatores de Transcrição Hélice-Alça-Hélice Básicos/metabolismo , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Antagonistas do Receptor de Endotelina B , Endotelina-1/metabolismo , Endotelina-1/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Hidroxilação/efeitos dos fármacos , Subunidade alfa do Fator 1 Induzível por Hipóxia/química , Prolina Dioxigenases do Fator Induzível por Hipóxia , Masculino , Melanoma/irrigação sanguínea , Melanoma/genética , Melanoma/metabolismo , Camundongos , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologia , Neovascularização Patológica/tratamento farmacológico , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinases/metabolismo , Pró-Colágeno-Prolina Dioxigenase/genética , Pró-Colágeno-Prolina Dioxigenase/metabolismo , Regiões Promotoras Genéticas/genética , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinases/metabolismo , Estabilidade Proteica/efeitos dos fármacos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-akt/metabolismo , Receptor de Endotelina B/metabolismo , Transdução de Sinais/efeitos dos fármacos , Especificidade por Substrato
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...