Low platelet count at admission has an adverse impact on outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes: from the START Antiplatelet registry.

Some previous observations suggest that a low platelet count is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, most of the data come from post-hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials and from studies including thrombocytopenia developed during hospital stay. Our aim was to assess the impact of low platelet count at admission on cardiovascular outcomes and treatment approach in patients hospitalized for ACS in a current real-life setting in Italy. Patients admitted to Italian coronary care units for ACS were enrolled in the START-ANTIPLATELET registry. Baseline clinical characteristics and treatment at discharge were recorded. Patients were followed-up at 6 months, 1 year and yearly thereafter. Low platelet count was defined as a count at admission < 150 > 100 k/µl or < 100 k/µL. Among 1894 enrolled patients, 157 (8.3%) had a platelet count < 150 > 100 k/µl and 30 (1.6%) < 100 k/µl. The median follow-up was 12.3 months (0.4-50.1). patients with low platelets were older (72 ± 10.4 vs 66 ± 12.4 years, p = 0.006), more frequently males (82.9 vs 72.1%, p = 0.001), hypertensive (90.0% vs 70.4%, p = 0.03), with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) (17.1 vs 8.6%, p = 0.02), and peripheral arterial disease (11.5 vs 6.2% p = 0.01) and/or had a previous myocardial infarction (40 vs 18.7%, p = 0.008) and/or a PCI (14.6 vs 7.8%, p = 0.001) than patients with normal platelets. A slightly, but significantly, lower percentage of thrombocytopenic patients were treated with primary PCI (78.1 vs 84.4%, p = 0.04) and they were more frequently discharged on aspirin plus clopidogrel rather than aspirin plus newer P2Y12 antagonists (51.9 vs 65.4%, p = 0.01). MACE-free survival was significantly shorter in thrombocytopenic patients compared to patients with normal platelets (< 150 > 100 k/µl: 37.6 vs 41.8 months, p = 0.002; HR = 2.7, 95% CIs 1.4-5.2; < 100 k/µl: 31.7 vs 41.8 months, p = 0.01; HR = 6.5, 95% CIs 1.5-29.1). At multivariate analysis, low platelet count, age at enrollment, low glomerular filtration rate, low ejection fraction, a previous ischemic stroke and NVAF were independent predictors of MACE. A low platelet count at admission identifies a subgroup of ACS patients with a significantly increased risk of MACE and these patients should be managed with special care to prevent excess adverse outcomes.

Secondary prevention and follow-up of patients with ACS and not-at-target LDL: An Italian real-world retro-prospective analysis by the inertia group.

Background: In patients with recent ACS, the latest ESC/EAS guidelines for management of dyslipidaemia recommend intensification of LDL-C-lowering therapy. Objective: Report a real-world picture of lipid-lowering therapy prescribed and cholesterol targets achieved in post-ACS patients before and after a specific educational program. Methods: Retrospective data collection prior to the educational course and prospective data collection after the course of consecutive very high-risk patients with ACS admitted in 2020 in 13 Italian cardiology departments, and with a non-target LDL-C level at discharge. Results: Data from 336 patients were included, 229 in the retrospective phase and 107 in the post-course prospective phase. At discharge, statins were prescribed in 98.1% of patients, alone in 62.3% of patients (65% of which at high doses) and in combination with ezetimibe in 35.8% of cases (52% at high doses). A significant reduction was obtained in total and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) from discharge to the first control visit. Thirty-five percent of patients achieved a target LDL-C <55 mg/dL according to ESC 2019 guidelines. Fifty percent of patients achieved the <55 mg/dL target for LDL-C after a mean of 120 days from the ACS event. Conclusions: Our analysis, though numerically and methodologically limited, suggests that management of cholesterolaemia and achievement of LDL-C targets are largely suboptimal and need significant improvement to comply with the lipid-lowering guidelines for very high CV risk patients. Earlier high intensity statin combination therapy should be encouraged in patients with high residual risk.

A Rare Case of Isolated Right Ventricular Loeffler's Endocarditis in Primary Hypereosinophilic Syndrome.

Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a systemic disorder with various manifestations, characterized by hypereosinophilia and caused by primary or secondary conditions. Loeffler's endocarditis (LE) represents a frequent cardiac manifestation of HES, caused by infiltration of the myocardium by eosinophilic cells, which determines endocardial damage, with subsequent inflammation, thrombosis, and fibrosis of either one or both ventricles. The diagnosis of cardiac involvement is based on a multimodality approach (i.e., two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography [2D-TTE], speckle-tracking echocardiography [STE], and cardiac magnetic resonance [CMR]), with different findings depending on the stage of disease. STE may be useful in the initial phase when traditional imaging techniques may result negative, whereas CMR allows myocardial tissue characterization along with a better definition of the right ventricle. We present a rare case of LE with isolated right ventricular involvement in a patient with HES caused by chronic eosinophilic leukemia with constitutively activated fusion tyrosine kinase on chromosome 4q12, successfully treated with imatinib mesylate.

[The OIBOH Registry (Optimal Intensification therapy in a Broad Observed High risk patient population with coronary disease): an Italian observational study of secondary prevention after a coronary event during the pandemic COVID-19 outbreak]. / Il registro OIBOH (Optimal Intensification therapy in a Broad Observed High risk patient population with coronary disease): studio italiano osservazionale di prevenzione secondaria dopo evento coronarico durante la pandemia COVID-19.

Razionale. In Italia la pandemia COVID-19 ha determinato importanti riorganizzazioni logistiche nell'erogazione delle cure ospedaliere e di specialistica ambulatoriale. Ciò ha spinto clinici e decisori pubblico-amministrativi della Sanità ad adottare nuovi modelli organizzativi in molteplici scenari clinici. Materiali e metodi. Il registro OIBOH (Optimal Intensification therapy in a Broad Observed High risk patient population with coronary disease) è uno studio osservazionale "cross-sectional" condotto in vari centri italiani di cardiologia ambulatoriale per valutare durante la pandemia COVID-19 la capacità di identificare in breve tempo i pazienti ad altissimo rischio cardiovascolare residuo dopo un evento coronarico recente (<12 mesi). Successivamente alla valutazione clinica iniziale, venivano arruolati i pazienti ritenuti ad altissimo rischio, registrando le caratteristiche cliniche e di trattamento in una scheda di raccolta dati elettronica.Risultati. Al registro hanno partecipato 134 centri di cardiologia ambulatoriale che hanno arruolato 1428 pazienti su 3227 esaminati fra quelli che avevano avuto accesso ad una visita cardiologica durante la pandemia nel periodo ottobre 2020-marzo 2021. Il criterio di arruolamento era costituito dall'aver avuto una diagnosi di coronaropatia confermata angiograficamente negli ultimi 12 mesi, per sindrome coronarica acuta (SCA) o cronica (SCC). La SCA come evento indice era presente nel 93% dei pazienti arruolati mentre la SCC nel 7%. L'età media era 67 ± 10 anni, il 25% era di sesso femminile. Il 96.1% dei pazienti con SCA e il 67.6% dei pazienti con SCC sono stati sottoposti a rivascolarizzazione coronarica. Il 46% e 47% dei pazienti con SCA e SCC, rispettivamente, era diabetico. Oltre il 65% dei pazienti presentava una malattia coronarica multivasale. È stata osservata una importante prevalenza di arteriopatia periferica (17.5% nei pazienti con SCA e 19.6% nei pazienti con SCC). I valori di pressione arteriosa e frequenza cardiaca risultavano ben controllati (128 ± 25.2 mmHg e 65 ± 12.3 b/min nei pazienti con SCA; 127 ± 23.4 mmHg e 67 ± 13.2 b/min nei pazienti con SCC). Viceversa, è stato riportato uno scarso controllo dei livelli di colesterolemia LDL, con un valore medio di 88.8 ± 38.6 mg/dl nei pazienti con SCA e 86 ± 36.6 mg/dl nei pazienti con SCC. Solo il 16.4% dei pazienti con SCA raggiungeva i livelli raccomandati dalle attuali linee guida europee. Nonostante l'estensivo uso di statine (>90%), si è rilevato un utilizzo limitato dell'associazione statina ad alta intensità + ezetimibe (solo il 22.4% dei pazienti). Estremamente basso è stato l'utilizzo di inibitori di PCSK9 (2.5%). La duplice terapia antiaggregante piastrinica (DAPT) è risultata complessivamente ben condotta fin dalla dimissione ospedaliera. Nei pazienti in DAPT, l'inibitore P2Y12 più utilizzato è risultato il ticagrelor alla dose di 90 mg, soprattutto dopo un evento coronarico acuto (in circa l'80% dei pazienti con SCA). Nella stragrande maggioranza dei casi (>90%) i cardiologi ambulatoriali hanno posto indicazione a prosecuzione della DAPT oltre i 12 mesi con aspirina e ticagrelor 60 mg bid. Conclusioni. La gestione del paziente con coronaropatia in fase cronica stabilizzata è molto complessa. Tale complessità logistico-gestionale si è accentuata durante la pandemia COVID-19. Il registro OIBOH ha evidenziato un'ottima capacità di identificare le problematiche clinico-prognostiche delle cardiologie ambulatoriali italiane, specie nei pazienti ad altissimo rischio residuo. Rimangono importanti aree di miglioramento come uno stretto controllo della colesterolemia LDL, mentre altre raccomandazioni delle linee guida, come la prosecuzione della DAPT con ticagrelor 60 mg oltre i 12 mesi, risultano ben applicate. L'implementazione dell'assistenza con la medicina digitale e l'intelligenza artificiale potrebbe migliorare di molto la performance dei clinici.

Effect of Body Mass Index on Ischemic and Bleeding Events in Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndromes (from the START-ANTIPLATELET Registry).

The protective effect of obesity on mortality in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients remains debated. We aimed at evaluating the impact of obesity on ischemic and bleeding events as possible explanations to the obesity paradox in ACS patients. For the purpose of this substudy, patients enrolled in the START-ANTIPLATELET registry were stratified according to body mass index (BMI) into 3 groups: normal, BMI <25 kg/m2; overweight, BMI: 25 to 29.9 kg/m2; obese, BMI ≥30 kg/m2. The primary end point was net adverse clinical end points (NACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding. In n = 1,209 patients, n = 410 (33.9%) were normal, n = 538 (44.5%) were overweight and n = 261 (21.6%) were obese. Compared to the normal weight group, obese and overweight patients had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors but were younger, with a better left ventricular ejection fraction and lower PRECISE-DAPT score. At 1-year follow-up net adverse clinical endpoints was more frequently observed in normal than in overweight and obese patients (15.1%, 8.6%, and9.6%, respectively; p = 0.004), driven by a significantly higher rate of all-cause death (6.3%, 2.6%, and 3.8%, respectively; p = 0.008), whereas no significant differences were noted in terms of myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding. When correcting for confounding variables, BMI loses its power in independently predicting outcomes, failing to confirm the obesity paradox in a real-world ACS population. In conclusion, our study conflicts the obesity paradox in real-world ACS population, and suggest that the reduced rate of adverse events and mortality in obese patients may be explained by relevant differences in the clinical risk profile and medications rather than BMI per se.

[An unusual case of Takotsubo syndrome after dipyridamole stress echocardiography]. / Uno strano caso di sindrome Takotsubo dopo eco-stress con dipiridamolo.

Takotsubo syndrome is a transient form of left ventricular dysfunction, more common in postmenopausal women, which involves left ventricular mid-apical akinesis and mimics acute coronary syndrome. It is characterized by left ventricular apical ballooning without significant coronary artery stenosis on coronary angiography. The basic mechanisms of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy are still unclear. There is some evidence that emotional, physical or pharmacological stress associated with increased catecholamine levels, coronary spasm, dynamic left ventricular obstruction, or coronary microvascular dysfunction might be involved. We describe the case of an 81-year-old woman who developed a Takotsubo syndrome only 3 h after pharmacological stress echocardiography with dipyridamole. To our knowledge, this is the first case reported in the literature in such context.

Predictors of in-hospital and long-term mortality in unselected patients admitted to a modern coronary care unit.

AIMS: Objective data on epidemiology, management and outcome of patients with acute cardiac illness are still scarce, and producing evidence-based guidelines remains an issue. In order to define the clinical characteristics and the potential predictors of in-hospital and long-term mortality, we performed a retrospective, observational study, in a tertiary cardiac centre in Italy. METHODS: One thousand one hundred and sixty-five consecutive patients, admitted to our intensive cardiac care unit (ICCU) during the year 2016, were included in the study. The data were collected from the hospital discharge summary and the electronic chart records. RESULTS: Global in-hospital mortality was 7.2%. Predictors of in-hospital mortality were age [odds ratio (OR): 2.0; P = 0.011], female sex (OR: 2.18; P = 0.003), cardiac arrest (OR: 12.21; P = 0.000), heart failure/cardiogenic shock (OR: 9.99; P = 0.000), sepsis/septic shock (OR: 5.54; P = 0.000), acute kidney injury (OR: 3.25; P = 0.021) and a primary diagnosis of acute heart failure or a condition other than acute heart failure and acute coronary syndrome. During a mean follow-up period of 17.4 ± 4.8 months, 96 all-cause deaths occurred in patients who were still alive at discharge. One-year mortality rate was 8.2%. Predictors of long-term mortality were age (hazard ratio: 1.08; P = 0.000), female sex (hazard ratio: 0.59; P = 0.022), comorbidity at least 3 (hazard ratio: 1,60; P = 0.047), acute kidney injury (hazard ratio: 3.15; P = 0.001), inotropic treatment (hazard ratio: 2.54; P = 0.002) and a primary diagnosis of acute heart failure. CONCLUSION: In our Level-2 ICCU, predictors of in-hospital and long-term mortality are similar to those commonly found in a Level-3 ICU. These data strongly suggest that ICUs dealing with acute cardiovascular patients should be reorganized with a necessary upgrading of competences and resources for medical and nursing staff.

Predictors of poor clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-obstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA).

OBJECTIVE: To assess the characteristics and prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA). METHODS: MINOCA was defined as acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with angiographic coronary stenosis <50%.Cardiomyopathies and myocarditis were - a priori - excluded from the study. Stenoses <30% were considered normal coronary arteries (NCA); stenoses ≥30% but <50% were considered mild coronary artery disease (MCAD). Patients were subdivided in 3 groups: I) NCA (0 vessels; stenosis <30%); II) 1-2 vessels showing MCAD and III) MCAD in 3 vessels or the left main stem (LMS). RESULTS: From January 2006 to December 2014, 7935 consecutive AMI patients were entered into our institutional database;150 (2%) were diagnosed as having MINOCA. At a median follow-up of 7.1 years the composite end-point (cardiovascular death, AMI or acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, stroke) occurred in 23 patients (17.4%). Survival analysis showed no differences between NCA versus MCAD (p = 0.781). When assessed by distribution of CAD, group III had a lower event-free survival compared to group I and group II, respectively 54 ±â€¯14%, 83 ±â€¯4% and 90 ±â€¯5% (p = 0.001). In a multivariate model, only 3 vessel disease or LMS involvement (HR = 23.5, 95% CI 2.59-173.49, P = 0.001) and high C-reactive protein at hospital admission (HR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.06-2.07, P = 0.005) were significant predictors of the study composite endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MINOCA, the presence of NCA or 1-2 vessel MCAD was associated with better long-term clinical outcomes compared with patients with MCAD affecting 3 vessels or the LMS. Increased CRP concentrations on hospital admission were also a marker of worse clinical outcome during follow-up.

Persistent Unexplained Dyspnea: A Case of Hepatopulmonary Syndrome.

Regarding a patient with dyspnea, the history and physical examination often lead to the correct diagnosis. In some circumstances, when more than one underlying disease is present, the diagnostic process can be more challenging. We describe an unusual case of dyspnea and persistent hypoxemia related to a hepatopulmonary syndrome in a 53-year-old patient with known heart failure and chronic liver disease. Initially managed with intravenous diuretic therapy, due to signs of lung and peripheral congestion, our patient did not improve as expected; therefore we performed more advanced studies with a chest-abdomen CT scan and a right heart catheterization. They showed, respectively, no signs of parenchymal and vasculature lung disease, a cirrhotic liver disease, splenomegaly, signs of portal hypertension, and high cardiac output with normal pulmonary vascular resistance. These results, along with the association of hypoxemia and chronic liver disease, suggested a hepatopulmonary syndrome. The diagnosis was confirmed by the demonstration of an intrapulmonary vascular dilatation with right to left shunt during a microbubble transthoracic echocardiography and a lung perfusion scan. Liver transplantation is the only successful treatment for this syndrome; however, the patient became soon unsuitable for this strategy, due to a rapid clinical deterioration.

ANMCO-SIMEU Consensus Document: in-hospital management of patients presenting with chest pain.

Chest pain is a common general practice presentation that requires careful diagnostic assessment because of its diverse and potentially serious causes. However, the evaluation of acute chest pain remains challenging, despite many new insights over the past two decades. The percentage of patients presenting to the emergency departments because of acute chest pain appears to be increasing. Nowadays, there are two essential chest pain-related issues: (i) the missed diagnoses of acute coronary syndromes with a poor short-term prognosis; and (ii) the increasing percentage of hospitalizations of low-risk cases. It is well known that hospitalization of a low-risk chest pain patient can lead to unnecessary tests and procedures, with an increasing trend of complications and burden of costs. Therefore, the significantly reduced financial resources of healthcare systems induce physicians and administrators to improve the efficiency of care protocols for patients with acute chest pain. Despite the efforts of the Scientific Societies in producing statements on this topic, in Italy there is still a significant difference between emergency physicians and cardiologists in managing patients with chest pain. For this reason, the aim of the present consensus document is double: first, to review the evidence-based efficacy and utility of various diagnostic tools, and, second, to delineate the critical pathways (describing key steps) that need to be implemented in order to standardize the management of chest pain patients, making a correct diagnosis and treatment as uniform as possible across the entire country.

Early invasive versus early conservative strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: An outcome research study.

BACKGROUND: An early invasive strategy (EIS) has been shown to yield a better clinical outcome than an early conservative strategy (ECS) in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACSs), particularly in those at higher risk according to the GRACE risk score. However, findings of the clinical trials have not been confirmed in registries. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcome of patients with NSTEACS treated according to an EIS or a ECS in a real-world all-comers outcome research study. METHODS: The primary hypothesis of the study was the non-inferiority of an ECS in comparison with an EIS as to a combined primary end-point of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndromes at one year. Participating centres were divided into two groups: those with a pre-specified routine EIS and those with a pre-specified routine ECS. Two statistical analyses were performed: a) an 'intention to treat' analysis: all patients were considered to be treated according to the pre-specified routine strategy of that centre; b) a 'per protocol' analysis: patients were analysed according to the actual treatment applied. Cox model including propensity score correction was applied for all analyses. RESULTS: The intention to treat analysis showed an equivalence between EIS and ECS (11.4% vs. 11.1%) with regard to the primary end-point incidence at one year. In the three subgroups of patients according to the GRACE risk score (⩽ 108, 109-140, > 140), EIS and ECS confirmed their equivalence (5.3% vs. 3.9%, 8.4% vs. 7.6%, and 20.3% vs. 20.9%, respectively). When the per protocol analysis was applied, a reduction of the primary end-point at one year with EIS vs. ECS was demonstrated (6.2% vs. 15.3%, p=0.021); analysis of the subgroups according to the GRACE risk score numerically confirmed these data (3.1% vs. 6.5%, 5.1% vs. 10.0%, and 10.8% vs. 24.5%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In a real-life registry of all-comers NSTEACS patients, ECS was non-inferior to EIS; however, when EIS was applied according to clinical judgement, a reduction of clinical events at one year was demonstrated.

[ANMCO/SIMEU Consensus document: In-hospital management of patients presenting with chest pain]. / Documento di consenso ANMCO/SIMEU: Gestione intraospedaliera dei pazienti che si presentano con dolore toracico.

Chest pain is a common general practice presentation that requires careful diagnostic assessment because of its diverse and potentially serious causes. However, the evaluation of acute chest pain remains challenging, despite many new insights over the past two decades. The percentage of patients presenting to the emergency departments because of acute chest pain appears to be increasing. Nowadays, there are two essential chest pain-related issues: 1) the missed diagnoses of acute coronary syndromes with a poor short-term prognosis; 2) the increasing percentage of hospitalizations of low-risk cases.It is well known that hospitalization of a low-risk chest pain patient can lead to unnecessary tests and procedures, with an increasing trend of complications and burden of costs. Therefore, the significantly reduced financial resources of healthcare systems induce physicians and administrators to improve the efficiency of care protocols for patients with acute chest pain. Despite the efforts of the Scientific Societies in producing statements on this topic, in Italy there is still a significant difference between emergency physicians and cardiologists in managing patients with chest pain. For this reason, the aim of the present consensus document is double: first, to review the evidence-based efficacy and utility of various diagnostic tools, and, second, to delineate the critical pathways (describing key steps) that need to be implemented in order to standardize the management of chest pain patients, making a correct diagnosis and treatment as uniform as possible across the entire country.

A risk score for predicting 1-year mortality in patients ≥75 years of age presenting with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Approximately 1/3 of patients with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are ≥75 years of age. Risk stratification in these patients is generally difficult because supporting evidence is scarce. The investigators developed and validated a simple risk prediction score for 1-year mortality in patients ≥75 years of age presenting with NSTE ACS. The derivation cohort was the Italian Elderly ACS trial, which included 313 patients with NSTE ACS aged ≥75 years. A logistic regression model was developed to predict 1-year mortality. The validation cohort was a registry cohort of 332 patients with NSTE ACS meeting the same inclusion criteria as for the Italian Elderly ACS trial but excluded from the trial for any reason. The risk score included 5 statistically significant covariates: previous vascular event, hemoglobin level, estimated glomerular filtration rate, ischemic electrocardiographic changes, and elevated troponin level. The model allowed a maximum score of 6. The score demonstrated a good discriminating power (C statistic = 0.739) and calibration, even among subgroups defined by gender and age. When validated in the registry cohort, the scoring system confirmed a strong association with the risk for all-cause death. Moreover, a score ≥3 (the highest baseline risk group) identified a subset of patients with NSTE ACS most likely to benefit from an invasive approach. In conclusion, the risk for 1-year mortality in patients ≥75 years of age with NSTE ACS is substantial and can be predicted through a score that can be easily derived at the bedside at hospital presentation. The score may help in guiding treatment strategy.

Secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction: drug adherence, treatment goals, and predictors of health lifestyle habits. The BLITZ-4 Registry.

BACKGROUND: To describe drug adherence and treatment goals, and to identify the independent predictors of smoking persistence and unsatisfactory lifestyle habits six months after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: 11,706 patients with AMI (30% female, mean age 68 years) were enrolled in 163 large-volume coronary care units (CCUs). At six months, drug adherence was ≥90%, while blood pressure (BP) <140/90 mmHg, low density lipoprotein (LDL) <100 mg/dl (in patients on statins), HbA1c <7% (in treated diabetics), and smoking persistence were observed in 74%, 76%, 45%, and 27% of patients, respectively. Inadequate fish intake decreased from 73% to 55%, inadequate intake of fruit and vegetables from 32% to 23%, and insufficient exercise in eligible patients from 74% to 59% (p < 0.0001). At multivariable analysis, a post-discharge cardiac visit and referral to cardiac rehabilitation at follow-up were independently associated with a lower risk of insufficient physical exercise (odds ratio (OR) 0.71 and 0.70, respectively) and persistent smoking (OR 0.68 and 0.60), whereas only referral to cardiac rehabilitation was associated with a lower risk of inadequate fish and fruit/vegetable intake (OR 0.70 and 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: Six months after an AMI, despite a high adherence to drug treatments, BP, LDL, and diabetic goals are inadequately achieved. Subjects with healthy lifestyles improved after discharge, but the rate of those with regular exercise habits and adequate fish intake could be further improved. Access to post-discharge cardiac visit and referral to cardiac rehabilitation were associated with better adherence to healthy lifestyles. Knowledge of the variables associated with specific lifestyle changes may help in tailoring secondary prevention programmes.

[Management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the Umbria region: results from the observational prospective Umbria-STEMI registry]. / La gestione dell'infarto miocardico acuto con sopraslivellamento del tratto ST nella regione Umbria: risultati del registro prospettico osservazionale Umbria-STEMI.

BACKGROUND: In the last few years, advances have been made in the diagnosis and management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Recent guidelines have been developed to improve outcome of STEMI patients by implementation of the recommendations into clinical practice. In order to assess the disease burden, the treatment modalities and the mid-term outcome of STEMI in the Umbria region, Italy, we performed a prospective observational study of all patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of STEMI from October 14, 2006 to April 14, 2008 (Umbria-STEMI registry). METHODS: All the medical emergency services (118) and all the emergency, internal medicine and cardiology departments were involved in the project. Three typologies of cardiology departments are operating in our region: a) intensive care units (ICUs) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) facilities fully operating 24 h/day and 7 days/week (1 center), b) ICUs with PCI facilities operating 6 h/day and 5 days/week (2 centers); c) ICUs without PCI facilities (4 centers). The Umbria-STEMI health area includes about 850 000 inhabitants. RESULTS: Overall, 868 patients (70% male, mean age 66.5 +/- 13.3 years) were enrolled. Patients with late presentation (> 12 h) or non-persistent ST-segment elevation (9.9%) were excluded. 86.7% of patients underwent reperfusion treatment: 45.9% with primary angioplasty and 40.8% with thrombolysis (64 of them had rescue angioplasty). Primary angioplasty was mainly performed in the hospital with PCI facilities operating 24 h/day. 104 patients with STEMI (13.3%) did not receive any type of coronary reperfusion therapy. In a logistic regression analysis, the direct admission to the hospital with fully operating PCI facilities was the strongest positive predictor of reperfusion therapy utilization, whereas the time delay, older age and TIMI risk index were negative predictors. The mean door-to-needle time for lytic therapy was 60 min, and the door-to-balloon time for primary angioplasty was 156 min. In-hospital mortality was 5.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The Umbria-STEMI registry disclosed several discrepancies between guidelines-recommended treatments and their utilization in daily practice. Efforts should be made to reduce the delay from symptom onset to intervention.

Beta-blockers and risk of all-cause mortality in non-cardiac surgery.

Myocardial ischemia is a frequent complication in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery and beta-blockers may exert a protective effect. The main benefit of beta-blockers in perioperative cardiovascular morbidity and mortality is believed to be linked to specific effects on myocardial oxygen supply and demand. beta-blockers may exert anti-inflammatory and anti-arrhythmic effects. Randomized clinical trials which evaluated the effects of beta-blockers on all-cause mortality in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery have yielded conflicting results. In 9 trials, 10,544 patients with non-cardiac surgery were randomized to beta-blockers (n = 5274) or placebo (n = 5270) and there were a total of 304 deaths. Patients randomized to beta-blockers group showed a 19% increased risk of all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95-1.50; p = 0.135). However, trials included in the meta-analysis differed in several aspects, and a significant degree of heterogeneity (I( 2) = 46.5%) was noted. A recent analysis showed that the surgical risk category had a substantial influence on the overall estimate of the effect of beta-blockers. Compared with patients in the intermediate-high-surgical-risk category, those in the high-risk category showed a 73% reduction in the risk of total mortality with beta-blockers compared with placebo (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.10-0.71, p = 0.016). These data suggest that perioperative beta-blockers confer a benefit which is mostly limited to patients undergoing high-risk surgery.

Chronic nitrate therapy is associated with different presentation and evolution of acute coronary syndromes: insights from 52,693 patients in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events.

AIMS: Brief episode(s) of ischaemia may increase cardiac tolerance to a subsequent major ischaemic insult ('preconditioning'). Nitrates can pharmacologically mimic ischaemic preconditioning in animals. In this study, we investigated whether antecedent nitrate therapy affords protection toward acute ischaemic events using data from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. METHODS AND RESULTS: The dataset comprised 52,693 patients from 123 centres in 14 countries: 42,138 (80%) were nitrate-naïve and 10,555 (20%) were on chronic nitrates at admission. In nitrate-naïve patients, admission diagnosis was ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in 41%, whereas 59% presented with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). In contrast, only 18% nitrate users showed STEMI, whereas 82% presented with NSTE-ACS. Thus, among nitrate users clinical presentation was tilted toward NSTE-ACS by more than four-fold, STEMI occurring in less than one of five patients (P < 0.0001). After adjustment (age, sex, medical history, prior therapy, revascularization, previous angina), chronic nitrate use remained independent predictor of NSTE-ACS (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.26-1.46; P < 0.0001). Furthermore, regardless of presentation, within both STEMI and NSTEMI populations, antecedent nitrate use was associated with significantly lower levels of CK-MB and troponin (P < 0.0001 for all). CONCLUSION: In this large multinational registry, chronic nitrate use was associated with a shift away from STEMI in favour of NSTE-ACS and with less release of markers of cardiac necrosis. These findings suggest that in nitrate users acute coronary events may develop to a smaller extent. Randomized, placebo-controlled trials are warranted to establish whether nitrate therapy may pharmacologically precondition the heart toward ischaemic episodes.

New-onset hyperglycemia and acute coronary syndrome: a systematic overview and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients without a history of diabetes often develop hyperglycemia during an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). New onset of hyperglycemia (NH) is associated with higher mortality both in the short and long-term. AIM: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to investigate the association between NH and mortality in patients with ACS. In-hospital, 30-day and long-term mortality were analyzed separately. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE for prospective studies of patients with ACS reporting the association between NH and mortality, using Research Methodology Filters. This was supplemented by hand searching reference lists of retrieved articles. We determined study eligibility and conducted data abstraction independently and disagreements were resolved by consensus. We pooled odds ratios (OR) from individual studies using a random effects model. RESULTS: Our search strategy identified 24 studies. The prevalence of NH varied widely 3% to 71% depending on the definition of NH used. NH significantly increased the risk of in-hospital (OR 3.62, 95% CI: 3.09 - 4.24; p < 0.0001, I2=0.0%; 15 studies, 10673 patients), 30-day (OR 4.81, 95% CI: 2.18 - 10.61, p < 0.0001, I2=92.2%; 4 studies, 101447 patients), and long-term (up to 108 months) mortality (OR 2.02, 95% CI: 1.62-2.51; p < 0.0001, I2=79.4%; 12 studies, 102099 patients). CONCLUSIONS: In patients without a prior diagnosis of diabetes who are admitted to hospital for ACS, NH increases the risk of both short and long-term mortality. These data highlight the need for further studies addressing the control of blood glucose levels in patients with ACS. SUMMARY: Patients without history of diabetes may develop new hyperglycemia (NH) on admission to hospital for AMI. We systematically reviewed the prognostic impact of NH on short- and long-term mortality in patients without prior diagnosis of diabetes who attended the hospital for ACS. We identified 24 outcome studies which met a set of pre-specified criteria. Prevalence of NH ranged from 3% to 71% according to different thresholds of blood glucose concentrations. NH significantly increased the risk of in-hospital (OR 3.62, 95% CI: 3.09 - 4.24; p < 0.0001, I2=0.0%; 15 studies, 10673 patients), 30-day (OR 4.81, 95% CI: 2.18 - 10.61, p < 0.0001, I2=92.2%; 4 studies, 101447 patients)), and long-term (up to 108 months) mortality (OR 2.02, 95% CI: 1.62-2.51; p < 0.0001, I2=79.4%; 12 studies, 102,099 patients).