Have the prevalence of eczema symptoms increased in the Mexican pediatric population? Prevalence and associated factors according to Global Asthma Network Phase I.

Background: In children, atopic dermatitis or eczema is the most common inflammatory disease of the skin. According to the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Phase IIIB in Mexico, 5.8% of children and 4.9% of adolescents had eczema symptoms. In 2012, Global Asthma Network (GAN) was established to update the prevalence of eczema and estimate potential factors contributing to its development. Objective: To estimate the prevalence and associated factors for atopic eczema symptoms and diagnosis in children and adolescents according to GAN Phase I and compare the results with ISAAC Phase IIIB in Mexico. Methods: A cross-sectional, multicenter survey was conducted in 15 Mexican centers during the period of 2015-2017 using the GAN Phase I questionnaires in children (6-7-year-olds) and adolescents (13-14-year-olds). The prevalences obtained from the GAN Phase I study, were compared with ISAAC Phase IIIB results; a Spearman's correlation analysis was conducted between temperature, relative humidity, and altitude and eczema symptoms, and a logistic regression was performed to predict current eczema symptoms by age group. Results: A total of 35 777 children and 41 399 adolescents were included. Since ISAAC Phase IIIB, the prevalence of itchy rash in the past 12 months significantly increased in the children's group [6.6% (95% CI 5.7-7.4) vs 7.8 (95% CI 7.5-8.1), p = 0.000] and adolescents' group [5.8% (95% CI 5.0-6.7) vs 6.7% (95% CI 6.5-7.0), p = 0.000].In the adolescents' group, the prevalence of nocturnal awakenings caused by rash symptoms on more than one night per week had a negative correlation between altitude (Spearman's Rho = -0.558, p value = 0.031), and a positive correlation with the average annual temperature (Spearman's Rho = 0.604, p value = 0.017) and annual relative humidity (Spearman's Rho = 0.742, p value = 0.002). The most significant associations in children were the presence of sneezing or runny or blocked nose in the past 12 months [(OR 3.13, 95% CI 2.60-3.77), p = 0.000], the use of paracetamol in the first year of life ([OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.15-2.01), p = 0.003] and the use of antibiotics in the first year of life [(OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.08-1.55) p = 0.004]. Moreover, altitude at 100-1000 m above sea level was associated with current eczema symptoms in adolescents (p = 0.001). Conclusions: There has been a significant increase in eczema symptoms in both age groups since ISAAC Phase IIIB study. Additionally, eczema symptoms were associated with temperature, relative humidity, asthma, hay fever symptoms, the use of paracetamol and antibiotics.

Immunostimulants for preventing respiratory tract infection in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Childhood acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, so, immunostimulants have been used as a preventative measure. Despite this, there is no updated evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of immunostimulant drugs for this purpose. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of immunostimulants in preventing ARTIs in children based on the most recent scientific evidence. Data sources such as PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Google Scholar, and Scopus were searched from 1965 to 10 January 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immunostimulants administered by any method, with placebo to prevent ARTIs on children under 18 years of age without immunodeficiencies, anatomical, genetic, or allergic conditions. In order to analyze data from the studies, we used Review Manager 5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020), assessed the certainty of the evidence with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE), and assessed the quality and risk of bias of the studies using the RoB tool 1.0. Further, outcomes were combined and analyzed using meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, and sensitivity analysis. Throughout the review, we included 72 placebo-controlled clinical trials involving 12,229 children. The meta-analyses, however, included only 38 studies (52.8%) with 4643 children (38% of the total) with data on mean number of ARTIs. These studies demonstrated a reduction in the ARTIs (MD -1.12 [95%CI -1.39 to -0.85]) and ratio of means of ARTIs (0.61 [95%CI 0.54-0.69]), corresponding to a percentage reduction of 39% (95%CI, 46%-31%) with moderate-quality data. Nevertheless, since there was considerable to substantial heterogeneity and bias was unclear in all domains in 32 out of 72 trials, the quality of the evidence for efficacy was deemed low. Only 14 trials reported adverse events. The review indicates that immunostimulants reduce the incidence of ARTIs by 40% on average in susceptible children, despite low-quality evidence, heterogeneity, and the possibility of publication bias. However, further studies are needed to establish immunostimulants' safety and efficacy profiles. This review was conducted without the support of any funding and has no registered number.

Anaphylaxis to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in the Setting of a Nationwide Passive Epidemiological Surveillance Program.

BACKGROUND: Information on anaphylaxis among recipients of vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remains scarce. OBJECTIVE: To identify the observed incidence of anaphylaxis in recipients of different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. METHODS: A nationwide observational study among recipients of 61,414,803 doses of seven different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, describing the incidence and characteristics of adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who developed anaphylaxis as an adverse event following immunization (AEFI) against SARS-CoV-2 vaccines between December 24, 2020, and October 15, 2021, in Mexico. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients developed anaphylaxis as an AEFI, for an overall observed incidence of 1.07 cases per 1,000,000 (95% CI 0.84-1.37) administered doses. Eighty-six percent of the patients were female, consistent with previous reports of AEFI to COVID-19 vaccines. mRNA-based vaccine recipients had the highest frequency of anaphylaxis, followed by adenovirus-vectored vaccines and inactivated virus recipients, with an observed incidence of 2.5, 0.7, and 0.2 cases per 1,000,000 doses administered, respectively. Only 46% of the patients received correct treatment with epinephrine as the first-line treatment through the appropriate route and dose. We detected one case of anaphylactic reaction-related death occurring 5 min following immunization with ChAdOx1 nCov-19 for a mortality rate of 1.5% among those who developed this AEFI. CONCLUSIONS: In our population, anaphylactic reactions were infrequent. Our study provides further evidence supporting the security of these newly developed vaccines.

[Anaphylaxis caused by vaccines]. / Anafilaxia causada por vacunas.

Even though the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic represents a historical challenge, science has had an exponential development, and the current vaccination campaigns are proof of this. Unfortunately, along came misinformation and myths regarding their production and their adverse effects. For this reason, we have considered of utter importance to review anaphylaxis, one of the most feared vaccine adverse events.Anaphylaxis can be defined as a life-threatening acute and systemic allergic reaction, with a wide clinical spectrum, which can be explained by many immunological mechanisms, and whose diagnostic complexity demands the fulfillment of strict criteria. Though infrequent, any vaccine has the potential to trigger anaphylaxis. In the United States, for the new SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, rates from 1:200 000 (Pfizer-BioNTech) to 1:360 000 doses (Moderna) have been estimated. Vaccine adverse events can be mediated by hypersensitivity reactions, either allergic or not. Unlike a typical drug allergy, rarely is the active ingredient responsible for the reaction. Therefore, excipients must be considered during the approach to this problem. Vaccine associated anaphylaxis has to be referred to an allergist so as to guarantee the maximum benefit for the patient and improve the vaccines' security profile.

A pesar de la difícil situación que se enfrenta con la actual pandemia de COVID-19, la ciencia ha tenido un desarrollo exponencial. Si bien la inmunización contra esa enfermedad ha sido posible gracias a ello, desafortunadamente se ha acompañado de desinformación y mitos en torno a su fabricación y reacciones adversas. Por tal razón, es importante revisar una de las reacciones adversas a vacunas más temidas para el personal de salud y la población general, la anafilaxia. La anafilaxia se define como una reacción alérgica aguda y sistémica que puede poner en riesgo la vida; se asocia con distintos mecanismos inmunológicos, factores desencadenantes y manifestaciones clínicas. Su diagnóstico puede ser confuso, por lo que se han establecido diferentes criterios. Todas las inmunizaciones tienen el potencial de desencadenar anafilaxia, aunque este evento es poco frecuente. Respecto de las vacunas contra el coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, en Estados Unidos se ha reportado una tasa de anafilaxia de 1:200 000 para la vacuna Pfizer-BioNTech, y de 1:360 000 para la vacuna de Moderna. Al igual que un fármaco, las vacunas pueden presentar efectos adversos mediados por mecanismos de hipersensibilidad, pero a diferencia de lo que sucede con los medicamentos, el principio activo rara vez es el responsable; es más frecuente que las reacciones indeseadas se deban a los excipientes. La sospecha de una anafilaxia secundaria a su aplicación obliga a una oportuna referencia y a un correcto diagnóstico, tanto para el beneficio del paciente como para mejorar el perfil de seguridad de la vacuna.

Prevalence and risk factors associated with allergic rhinitis in Mexican school children: Global Asthma Network Phase I.

BACKGROUND: The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) showed a wide variability in prevalence and severity of allergic rhinitis (AR) and rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC), in addition to other atopic diseases (Asher et al, 2006).1 The Global Asthma Network (GAN) has continued to study these conditions. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of AR and ARC in children and adolescents in Mexico and to assess their association with different risk factors. METHODS: GAN Phase I is a cross-sectional, multicentre survey carried out in 15 centres corresponding to 14 Mexican cities throughout 2016-2019 using the validated Spanish language version of the GAN Phase I questionnaires. The questionnaires were completed by 35 780 parents of 6-7 year old primary school pupils (children) and by 41 399 adolescents, 13-14 years old. RESULTS: The current and cumulative prevalence of AR was higher in the adolescents (26.2-37.5%, respectively) in comparison to the children (17.9-24.9%, respectively), especially in female participants. This tendency was also observed in the current prevalence of ARC, where 15.1% of female adolescents reported nasal symptoms accompanied with itchy-watery eyes in the past year. The most important risk factors for AR and ARC were the presence of wheezing in the past 12 months, wheezing in the first year of life, the previous diagnosis of asthma and eczema symptoms. Furthermore, allergic symptoms had a negative tendency concerning altitude. CONCLUSION: This is the largest AR epidemiological study ever conducted in Mexico. It shows an increase in AR prevalence, as well as significant associations with modifiable risk factors, which could help to establish recommendations to reduce the burden of this condition.

Have asthma symptoms in Mexico changed in the past 15 years? Time trends from the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood to the Global Asthma Network

BACKGROUND: The Global Asthma Network (GAN) builds on the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC). OBJECTIVE: To compare asthma prevalence time trends in primary and secondary school children in four Mexican centers participating in ISAAC and GAN. METHODS: GAN is a cross-sectional, multicenter, epidemiological methodology carried out in groups of primary school children aged 6-7 and adolescents aged 13-14 following the ISAAC Phase Three protocol, with additional questions on risk factors and asthma management. RESULTS: Overall, the prevalence of asthma symptoms and diagnosis in primary school children was higher in males than in females both in ISAAC (p < 0.05) and in GAN (p < 0.01), while adolescent females had a higher prevalence, also both in ISAAC (p < 0.001) and in GAN (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of asthma and its symptoms has increased from ISAAC Phase Three since 2003 to GAN Phase I in Mexico in 2019. These findings are in line with the increases observed in the centers with low asthma baseline prevalence in ISAAC Phase One in comparison with ISAAC Phase Three

No disponible

Global Asthma Network Phase I study in Mexico: prevalence of asthma symptoms, risk factors and altitude associations-a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Global Asthma Network (GAN) was established in 2012 as a development to the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood to improve asthma care globally. OBJECTIVE: To survey asthma, allergic rhinitis and atopic dermatitis in primary and secondary school children and to investigate and evaluate its prevalence, severity, management and risk factors in Mexico. METHODS: GAN Phase I is a cross-sectional, multicentre survey carried out in 15 centres corresponding to 14 Mexican cities throughout 2016-2019 using the validated Spanish language version of the GAN Phase I questionnaires. The questionnaires were completed by parents of 6-7-year-old primary school pupils (school children) and by 13-14-year-old adolescents. RESULTS: A total of 35 780 school children and 41 399 adolescents participated. Wheezing ever prevalence was 26.2% (95% CI 25.8% to 26.7%) in school children and 23.9% (95% CI 23.4% to 24.3%) in adolescents. The corresponding frequencies for current wheeze were 10.2% (95% CI 9.9% to 10.5%) and 11.6% (95% CI 11.2% to 11.9%). In school children, the risk factors for current wheeze were rhinitis (OR 4.484; 95% CI 3.915% to 5.134%) and rash symptoms (OR 1.735; 95% CI 1.461% to 2.059%). For adolescents, rhinitis symptoms (OR 3.492; 95% CI 3.188% to 3.825%) and allergic rhinitis diagnosis (OR 2.144; 95% CI 1.787% to 2.572%) were the most significant. For both groups, there was a negative relation with centres' sea level altitude higher than 1500 m above mean sea level (p<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The most important risk factors for asthma symptoms in both age groups were the presence of rhinitis and rash symptoms or diagnosis. On the other hand, sea level altitude higher than 1500 metres was a protective factor.

The burden of asthma in an inner-city area: A historical review 10 years after Isaac.

BACKGROUND: According to the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) methodology, in 2003, the prevalence of asthma symptoms in children 6-7 years old and adolescents 13-14 years old was 11.6% and 13.7%, respectively. Since then, the number of asthma cases has increased worldwide. The study was conducted in several districts in northern Mexico City to evaluate the prevalence of asthma in these age groups and examine possible risk factors. The data were compared to the 2003 results from the same area. METHODS: This was a comparative cross-sectional study following the official Global Asthma Network (GAN) methodology. The parents or guardians of participants completed a questionnaire that explored demographics, asthma symptoms, diagnoses, and possible risk factors. Central tendency measurements were determined for statistical analysis and chi-squared distribution for possible risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 2515 children aged 6-7 years and 3375 adolescents aged 13-14 years participated in the study. Compared to the ISAAC results, we found a greater prevalence of wheezing in both children (at some time in life, 19.2% vs. 27.1%; over the last year, 6.8% vs. 10.6%) and adolescents (at some time in life, 16.9% vs. 19.7%), and for children with an asthma diagnosis (4.5% vs. 5.1%). For both groups, the most common risk factor associated with wheezing was the presence of rhinitis symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma symptoms are highly prevalent in Mexico City, occurring in almost 20% of adolescents. Compared to a decade ago, there was a 7.9% increase in the prevalence of asthma symptoms in children. Almost half of the children and adolescents presenting with symptoms had experienced more than four episodes per year. However, less than 50% of children and adolescents with asthma symptoms had been diagnosed with this disorder, suggesting under-diagnosis.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of OM-85 vs placebo in the prevention of acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) in children that attend day-care centers.

BACKGROUND: Children that attend day-care centers frequently contract acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs). ARTIs represent a burden for both children and parents. Systematic reviews on the use of immunostimulants for the prevention of juvenile recurrent ARTIs have provided moderate evidence of efficacy and safety. The aim of the study was to establish whether the immunostimulant, OM-85, was cost-effective in preventing ARTIs in children 2-6 years old that attended day-care centers or preschools in Mexico. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of OM-85. For costs, we assumed an institutional perspective, which included the costs of care and supplies over a study period of six months, during the autumn-winter seasons. We created decision trees and constructed a model to identify pharmacoeconomic parameters. We generated 1000 estimations with the bootstrap method to calculate descriptive statistics of pharmacoeconomic parameters. We evaluated cost-effectiveness compared to treatment without immunostimulants. RESULTS: The mean (SD) incidences of ARTIs were 5.59 ± 0.29 without immunostimulants and 2.97 ± 0.32 with OM-85, during the study period. The mean (25th, 75th percentile) direct costs of ARTIs were 57.04 (37.11, 76.39) US$ (US dollars) without immunostimulants and 48.53 (37.35, 58.93) US$ with OM-85, with a mean increment of - 8.51(- 17.08, 0.75) US$, and a mean cost-effectiveness of - 17.94 (- 36.48, 1.66) US$. The direct costs plus the cost of one parent missing work to care for the child with ARTI were 125.76 (102.83, 150.16) US$, without immunostimulant and 85.21 (72.15, 98.81) US$, with OM-85. The increment was - 40.55 (- 68.29, - 13.95) US$, and the cost-effectiveness was - 86.89 (- 142.37, - 29.34) US$.Part of the cost reduction was ascribed to the reduced use of medications, particularly antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Our results were consistent with previous clinical studies conducted in closed institutions in Mexico. OM-85 reduced the number of ARTIs and the frequency of antibiotics use. We concluded that OM-85 was cost-effective for preventing ARTIs in children that attended day-care centers, particularly when parental absenteeism was covered by the institutions.

Effect of omega-3 fatty acids supplementation combined with lifestyle intervention on adipokines and biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in obese adolescents with hypertriglyceridemia.

Obesity in adolescents is considered a major public health problem; combined interventional approaches such as omega-3 supplementation with lifestyle intervention (LI) might exert synergistic effects and exceed the impact of each individual strategy. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate if the supplementation of omega-3 with LI could improve metabolic and endothelial abnormality in obese adolescents with hypertriglyceridemia. The study involved sixty-nine adolescents with normal weight and seventy obese adolescents with hypertriglyceridemia. All obese adolescents were applied to LI and randomly assigned to omega-3 supplementation or placebo group for 12 weeks. The obese adolescents with hypertriglyceridemia presented increased levels of leptin, retinol binding protein 4 (RBP4), selectin E (sE) and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and decreased levels of adiponectin compared with control subjects. After 12-week intervention, omega-3 supplementation with LI decreased significantly in triglycerides, HOMA, leptin, RBP4, ADMA and sE. Moreover, omega-3 with LI displayed a significant reduction in triglycerides, ADMA and sE in comparison with LI alone. In subjects with omega-3 combined with LI assessed by multivariate regression model, the reduction in triglycerides was the only independent determinant of the decrease in ADMA. The reductions in triglycerides and HOMA were significantly contributed to the changes in sE. Our data indicated that omega-3 combined with LI in short duration significantly improved dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, abnormality of adipokines, endothelial dysfunction in comparison of LI alone, indicating the combined approach is an effective clinical and applicable strategy to control metabolic abnormality and decrease the risks of cardiovascular diseases in obese adolescents.

An admixture mapping meta-analysis implicates genetic variation at 18q21 with asthma susceptibility in Latinos.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a common but complex disease with racial/ethnic differences in prevalence, morbidity, and response to therapies. OBJECTIVE: We sought to perform an analysis of genetic ancestry to identify new loci that contribute to asthma susceptibility. METHODS: We leveraged the mixed ancestry of 3902 Latinos and performed an admixture mapping meta-analysis for asthma susceptibility. We replicated associations in an independent study of 3774 Latinos, performed targeted sequencing for fine mapping, and tested for disease correlations with gene expression in the whole blood of more than 500 subjects from 3 racial/ethnic groups. RESULTS: We identified a genome-wide significant admixture mapping peak at 18q21 in Latinos (P = 6.8 × 10-6), where Native American ancestry was associated with increased risk of asthma (odds ratio [OR], 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.34; P = .002) and European ancestry was associated with protection (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77-0.96; P = .008). Our findings were replicated in an independent childhood asthma study in Latinos (P = 5.3 × 10-3, combined P = 2.6 × 10-7). Fine mapping of 18q21 in 1978 Latinos identified a significant association with multiple variants 5' of SMAD family member 2 (SMAD2) in Mexicans, whereas a single rare variant in the same window was the top association in Puerto Ricans. Low versus high SMAD2 blood expression was correlated with case status (13.4% lower expression; OR, 3.93; 95% CI, 2.12-7.28; P < .001). In addition, lower expression of SMAD2 was associated with more frequent exacerbations among Puerto Ricans with asthma. CONCLUSION: Ancestry at 18q21 was significantly associated with asthma in Latinos and implicated multiple ancestry-informative noncoding variants upstream of SMAD2 with asthma susceptibility. Furthermore, decreased SMAD2 expression in blood was strongly associated with increased asthma risk and increased exacerbations.

Pediatric asthma treatment: What to do when international guideline recommendations do not agree.

BACKGROUND: There was a need for a solid asthma guideline in Mexico to update and unify asthma management. Because high-quality asthma guidelines exist worldwide, in which the latest evidence on asthma management is summarized, the ADAPTE approach allows for the development of a national asthma guideline based on evidence from already existing guidelines, adapted to national needs. OBJECTIVE: To fuse evidence from the best asthma guidelines and adapt it to local needs with the ADAPTE approach. METHODS: The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II asthma guidelines were evaluated by a core group to select 3 primary guidelines. For each step of asthma management, clinical questions were formulated and replied according to (1) evidence in the primary guidelines, (2) safety, (3) Cost, and (4) patient preference. The Guidelines Development Group, composed of a broad range of experts from medical specialties, primary care physicians, and methodologists, adjusted the draft questions and replies in several rounds of a Delphi process and 3 face-to-face meetings, taking into account the reality of the situation in Mexico. We present the results of the pediatric asthma treatment part. RESULTS: Selected primary guidelines are from the British Thoracic Society and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (BTS/SIGN), Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), and Spanish Guidelines on the Management of Asthma (GEMA) 2015, with 2016 updates. Recommendations or suggestions were made for asthma treatment in Mexico. In this article, the detailed analysis of the evidence present in the BTS/SIGN, GINA, and GEMA sections on the (non) pharmacologic treatment of pediatric asthma, education, and devices are presented for 2 age groups: children 5 years or younger and children 6 to 11 years old with asthma. CONCLUSION: For the pediatric treatment and patient education sections, applying the AGREE II and Delphi methods is useful to develop a scientifically sustained document, adjusted to the Mexican situation, as is the Mexican Guideline on Asthma.

[Mexican Asthma Guidelines: GUIMA 2017]. / Guía Mexicana del Asma: GUIMA 2017.

BACKGROUND: The need for a national guideline, with a broad basis among specialists and primary care physicians was felt in Mexico, to try unifying asthma management. As several high-quality asthma guidelines exist worldwide, it was decided to select the best three for transculturation. METHODS: Following the internationally recommended methodology for guideline transculturation, ADAPTE, a literature search for asthma guidelines, published 1-1-2007 through 31-12-2015 was conducted. AGREE-II evaluations yielded 3/40 most suitable for transculturation. Their compound evidence was fused with local reality, patient preference, cost and safety considerations to draft the guideline document. Subsequently, this was adjusted by physicians from 12 national medical societies in several rounds of a Delphi process and 3 face-to-face meetings to reach the final version. RESULTS: Evidence was fused from British Thoracic Society Asthma Guideline 2014, Global Initiative on Asthma 2015, and Guía Española del Manejo del Asma 2015 (2016 updates included). After 3 Delphi-rounds we developed an evidence-based document taking into account patient characteristics, including age, treatment costs and safety and best locally available medication. CONCLUSIONS: In cooperation pulmonologists, allergists, ENT physicians, paediatricians and GPs were able to develop an evidence-based document for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of asthma and its exacerbations in Mexico.

Antecedentes: Con el objetivo de unificar el manejo del asma en México se estructuró una guía clínica que conjunta el conocimiento de diversas especialidades y la atención en el primer nivel de contacto. Se seleccionaron 3 guías publicadas en el ámbito internacional para su transculturación. Métodos: Conforme a la metodología ADAPTE se usó AGREE II después de la búsqueda bibliográfica de guías sobre asma publicadas entre 2007 y 2015. Se fusionó la realidad local con la evidencia de 3/40 mejores guías. El documento inicial fue sometido a la revisión de representantes de 12 sociedades médicas en varias rondas Delphi hasta llegar a la versión final. Resultados: Las guías base fueron la British Thoracic Society Asthma Guideline 2014, la Global Initiative on Asthma 2015 y la Guía Española del Manejo del Asma 2015. Después de 3 rondas Delphi se desarrolló un documento en el que se consideraron las características de los pacientes según edad, costos de los tratamientos y perfiles de seguridad de los fármacos disponibles en México. Conclusión: Con la cooperación de neumólogos, alergólogos, otorrinolaringólogos, pediatras y médicos generales se llegó a un consenso basado en evidencia, en el que se incluyeron recomendaciones sobre prevención, diagnóstico y tratamiento del asma y sus crisis.

Abnormality of adipokines and endothelial dysfunction in Mexican obese adolescents with insulin resistance.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the possible relationship among insulin resistance (IR), endothelial dysfunction, and alteration of adipokines in Mexican obese adolescents and their association with metabolic syndrome (MetS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-seven adolescents were classified according to the body mass index (BMI) (control: N=104; obese: N=123) and homeostasis model of the assessment-insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) (obese with IR: N=65). The circulating concentrations of leptin, adiponectin, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), and IR were determined by standard methods. RESULTS: The obese adolescents with IR presented increased presence of MetS and higher circulating concentrations in sICAM-1 in comparison with the obese subjects without IR. The lowest concentrations of adiponectin were observed in the obese with IR. In multivariate linear regression models, sICAM-1 along with triglycerides, total cholesterol, and waist circumference was strongly associated with HOMA-IR (R2=0.457, P=0.008). Similarly, after adjustment for age, BMI-SDS, lipids, and adipokines, HOMA-IR remained associated with sICAM-1 (R2=0.372, P=0.008). BMI-SDS was mildly associated with leptin (R2=0.176, P=0.002) and the waist circumference was mild and independent determinant of adiponectin (R2=0.136, P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrated that the obese adolescents, particularly the obese subjects with IR exhibited increased presence of MetS, abnormality of adipokines, and endothelial dysfunction. The significant interaction between IR and endothelial dysfunction may suggest a novel therapeutic approach to prevent or delay systemic IR and the genesis of cardiovascular diseases in obese patients.

Adipokines, asymmetrical dimethylarginine, and pulmonary function in adolescents with asthma and obesity.

OBJECTIVE: This study was to investigate whether the metabolic abnormalities of adipokines and asymmetrical dimethylarginine (ADMA) associate with pulmonary function deficits in adolescents with obesity and asthma. METHODS: This study enrolled 28 obese adolescents with asthma, 46 obese adolescents without asthma, 58 normal-weight adolescents with asthma, and 63 healthy control subjects. Serum levels of leptin, high-molecule-weight (HMW) adiponectin, retinol binding protein 4 (RBP4), asymmetrical dimethylarginine (ADMA), and pulmonary function were qualified. RESULTS: The obese subjects had higher levels of leptin and ADMA but lower levels of HMW adiponectin than the normal-weight subjects with or without asthma. The subjects with asthma had higher levels of RBP4 than those without asthma. The obese adolescents with asthma had lowest forced expiratory lung volume in the first second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio among the four study groups. In all the study subjects and in the subjects with asthma alone, the FEV1/FVC ratio associated negatively with leptin, however, such association was rendered non-significant when adjusted for BMI. The pulmonary function deficits associated inversely with BMI percentile in the subjects with asthma. However, the decreased FEV1/FVC ratio was not correlated with HMW adiponectin, RBP4 or ADMA. CONCLUSIONS: Our present study confirmed obstructive pattern of pulmonary function characterized by the reduced FEV1/FVC ratio in the obese adolescents with asthma. These pulmonary deficits were associated inversely with the increased BMI percentile.

[Knowledge of asthma: educational intervention with the 2014 GINA guide in primary care physicians]. / Conocimiento de asma: intervención educativa con la guía GINA 2014 en médicos de primer contacto.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a public health problem in the world, so updating the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of asthma is based primarily on the practice of primary care physicians. Educational interventions are useful for increasing knowledge. OBJECTIVE: To compare the level of knowledge of asthma before and after an educational intervention. METHODS: A quasi-experimental prospective study was conducted in general and family practitioners and pediatricians who attended a training workshop on general aspects of asthma and current guidelines for diagnosis and treatment (GINA 2014). A questionnaire consisting of 11 multiple choice questions relating to fundamental aspects of the disease and diagnosis, classification, treatment and management of attacks, was used in two assessments, baseline and post-intervention. RESULTS: A total of 178 patients participated in the study, with knowledge pre-intervention at 25.5 points and post-intervention at 97.5 points on a scale of 100, with p < 0.05. CONCLUSION: Educational interventions are inexpensive and effective tools to increase the knowledge of health professionals, and they have an impact on improving patient care.

Introducción: El asma en un problema de salud pública en el mundo, por ello, la actualización de las guías para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de asma se realiza en función principalmente de la práctica de los médicos de primer contacto. Las intervenciones educativas son útiles para el incremento del conocimiento. Objetivo: Comparar el nivel de conocimiento acerca de asma antes y después de una intervención educativa. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio prospectivo cuasiexperimental, en médicos generales, familiares y pediatras que asistieron a un curso-taller relativo a aspectos generales del asma y las guías actuales para su diagnóstico y tratamiento (GINA 2014). Mediante un cuestionario constituido por 11 preguntas de opción múltiple que abordaban aspectos fundamentales de la enfermedad como diagnóstico, clasificación, tratamiento y manejo de exacerbaciones, se realizaron dos evaluaciones, una basal y otra posintervención. Resultados: Un total de 178 paciente participaron en el estudio, con un conocimiento preintervención de 25.5 puntos y posintervención de 97.5 puntos de una escala de 100, con una p<0.05. Conclusión: Las intervenciones educativas son maniobras de bajo costo y efectivas que incrementan el conocimiento de los profesionales de la salud y tienen impacto en la mejoría de la atención al paciente.

[Antihistamines for the treatment of urticaria in Mexico]. / Antihistamínicos en el tratamiento de la urticaria en México.

There are four types of histamine receptors. Allergic symptoms, especially those in rhinoconjunctivitis and urticaria, are mainly caused by activation of histamine receptor 1 (H1). Consequently, oral H1-antihistamines form and integral part of the treatment of these diseases. Antihistamines are inverse agonists that stabilize the non-active configuration of the histamine receptor. First generation H1-antihistamines cause a variety of adverse effects via several mechanisms: sedation (accumulation in the central nervous system), dry mouth, urinary retention, weight gain (low selectivity: stimulation of serotonin/muscarinic/alpha-adrenergic receptors) and drug interactions (substrate of CYP450-3A4). Generally second generation H1-antihistamines have a better safety profile. New guidelines on allergic rhinitis and urticaria recommend second generation H1-antihistamines as first line drugs, with -if necessary- four-times updosing to obtain control in urticaria. The enhanced efficacy of quadruple doses in urticaria, while maintaining a good safety profile, has been shown for bilastine, desloratadine and levocetirizine (rupatadine). For ebastine and fexofenadine only the safety of quadruple doses has been shown till now. Extreme precaution should be taken with astemizol and terfenadine that never should be up-dosed, as high serum concentrations can cause potentially fatal ventricular tachycardia. First generation antihistamines are not recommended as first line treatment and updosing is not safe.

Existen cuatro tipos de receptores histaminérgicos. Los síntomas de alergia, especialmente rinoconjuntivitis alérgica y urticaria, son principalmente causados por activación del receptor H1; por ende, los antihistamínicos H1 orales (anti-H1) forman parte integral del tratamiento de estas enfermedades. Los antihistamínicos son agonistas inversos, porque estabilizan la forma inactiva del receptor. Los antihistamínicos H1 de primera generación producen efectos adversos por varios mecanismos: sedación (fijación a receptores H1 cerebrales), boca seca, retención urinaria, aumento de peso (baja selectividad: estimulación de los receptores de serotonina, muscarina y alfa-adrenérgicos) e interacciones medicamentosas (con sustrato de citocromo P450-3A4). Los antihistamínicos H1 de segunda generación son generalmente más seguros. Las nuevas guías de tratamiento de la rinitis alérgica y urticaria recomiendan como manejo de primera intención a los antihistamínicos H1 de segunda generación. En urticaria se recomienda hasta cuadruplicar su dosis en caso necesario. El aumento de la eficacia en el control de la urticaria con cuádruple dosis, sin que se afecte la seguridad, se ha documentado para bilastina, desloratadina y levocetirizina (rupatadina). Respecto de ebastina y fexofenadina, hasta ahora, sólo se comprobó la seguridad de cuádruple dosis. Una rigurosa excepción son astemizol y terfenadina, que a concentraciones séricas elevadas pueden causar taquicardia ventricular. No se recomiendan los antihistamínicos H1 de primera generación y aumentar su dosis no es seguro.

[Radiographic changes in children with primary immunodeficiency]. / Alteraciones radiográficas en niños con inmunodeficiencia primaria.

BACKGROUND: Although we have epidemiological information on primary immunodeficiencies (PID), the available information is meager in Mexico. OBJECTIVE: To provide epidemiological information on the delay in the diagnosis of PID and its correlation to chronic lung damage. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective, analytical study was done in patients 0-18 year old age diagnosed with PID for 11 years at the HIMFG (Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez). The variables studied were: age at symptom onset, age at diagnosis, time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis, number of previous pneumonias and studies with radiographic chronic lung damage data. RESULTS: 48 patients were obtained after meeting inclusion criteria; 33 showed lung damage at diagnosis, antibody deficiency being the most affected group. Relating age of onset of symptoms and the time difference of the onset of symptoms to diagnosis showed a strong correlation (p < 0.001, Rho > 0.80). A moderate correlation between the observed time difference vs number of pneumonias (p=0.005, Rho=0.495) and correlation between number of pneumonia and lung damage was highly significant (p <0.001, Rho=0.704). CONCLUSION: A strong relationship between the elapsed time from onset of symptoms and the number of pneumonia with lung injury time was found. So, the recurrent pneumonia (> 2) must make suspect the diagnosis of PID, as recommended in the literature.

Antecedentes: si bien se cuenta con información epidemiológica de las inmunodeficiencias primarias, la información disponible en México es escasa. Objetivos: dar información epidemiológica del retraso del diagnóstico de las inmunodeficiencias primarias y de su correlación con daño pulmonar crónico. Material y método: estudio retrospectivo, analítico, efectuado en pacientes de 0 a 18 años de edad con diagnóstico de inmunodeficiencias primarias durante 11 años en el Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez; las variables estudiadas fueron: edad al inicio de los síntomas, edad al diagnóstico, tiempo desde el inicio de los síntomas al diagnóstico, número de neumonías previas y estudios radiográficos con datos de daño pulmonar crónico. Resultados: se incluyeron 48 pacientes que cumplieron los criterios de inclusión; 33 tenían daño pulmonar al diagnóstico, el déficit de anticuerpos fue el grupo con mayor afectación. Al correlacionar la edad de inicio de los síntomas y la diferencia de tiempo del inicio de los síntomas al diagnóstico se obtuvo una fuerte correlación (p <0.001, Rho > 0.80). Se observó una correlación moderada entre la diferencia en tiempo vs número de neumonías (p=0.005, Rho=0.495) y la correlación entre número de neumonías y daño pulmonar mostró significación alta (p <0.001, Rho=0.704). Conclusión: se encontró una relación estrecha entre el tiempo transcurrido desde el inicio de los síntomas y el número de neumonías con el daño pulmonar, por lo que las neumonías de repetición (más de dos) deben hacer sospechar el diagnóstico de inmunodeficiencia primaria, como se recomienda en la bibliografía mundial.

Implicaciones nutricionales de las dietas de eliminación / Nutritional implications of elimination diets

Resumen:Introducción: La piedra angular del tratamiento de alergia alimentaria es la eliminación de los alimentos causantes. Sin embargo, los niños que restringen el consumo de alimentos básicos tienen un mayor riesgo de desnutrición.El objetivo del estudio fue identificar el estado nutricional de pacientes con dieta de eliminación e identificar la proporción de pacientes del grupo con verdadera alergia alimentaria.Métodos: Se realizó un estudio transversal de enero a octubre de 2014 en el Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez. Se incluyeron pacientes de 1 a 11 años con historia de eliminación de, al menos, uno de cinco alimentos (huevo, leche, trigo, maíz, soya) por un mínimo de 6 meses. Se realizó la valoración nutricional completa y se compararon los índices antropométricos con tablas de Z score para la edad. Se analizaron los datos por medio de estadística descriptiva, y posteriormente con prueba de Kruskal-Wallis y correlación de Spearman.Resultados: Los alimentos más frecuentemente eliminados fueron leche, soya, huevo, maíz y trigo. Al comparar el número de alimentos eliminados de la dieta con los distintos índices antropométricos evaluados, se encontró que entre mayor cantidad de alimentos eliminados, el score Z de peso para la edad (PE) y talla para la edad (TE), así como peso para la talla (PT) fueron menores, y el más afectado fue la reserva grasa. Solamente en el 5% de los niños se corroboró alergia alimentaria.Conclusiones: Nuestro estudio confirma la necesidad de una correcta asesoría nutricional en aquellos pacientes que cuenten con dietas de eliminación, así como el sobrediagnóstico que existe de alergia alimentaria.

Abstract:Background: The backbone of food allergy treatment is the restriction of causative foods. These interventions have shown that children who restrict the consumption of basic foods have a higher risk of malnutrition.The aim of the study was to identify the nutritional status of patients with elimination diet, characterizing their anthropometric indexes and identifying the percentage of patients in the group with true food allergies.Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out from January to October 2014 at the Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez. Patients 1 to 11 years of age with a history of elimination of at least one of five foods (eggs, milk, wheat, corn, soybeans) for a minimum of 6 months were included. Full nutritional assessment was performed by comparing the anthropometric indexes to z score for age. Data analysis used descriptive statistics. Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman correlation were performed.Results: The most frequent eliminated foods were milk, soy, eggs, corn, and wheat. Comparing the number of foods eliminated with different anthropometric indexes, with a greater amount of eliminated food, the z-score of weight/age (W/A), height/age (H/A) and weight/height (W/H) were lower and the most affected index was fat reserve. Only in 5% of children was food allergy confirmed.Conclusions The study confirms the need for nutrition counseling for patients who have elimination diets and overdiagnosis of food allergy.