[Evaluation of the operating results and costs associated with the implementation of a flexible ureteroscopy activity within a university hospital center]. / Évaluation des résultats opératoires et des coûts liés à la mise en place d'une activité d'urétéroscopie souple au sein d'un centre hospitalo-universitaire.

INTRODUCTION: The increasing use of flexible ureteroscopy (USSR) sets the cost problems inevitably associated with the fragility of these endoscopes. The aim of this work is to clear from a recent example (universitary hospital) results, costs during the implementation of this technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study conducted from December 2012 (date of introduction of the activity) in March 2015 concerning the USSR made in a French universitary hospital for stone disease. In this analysis, the cost of consumables was not evaluated, nor the costs of the operating theater or hospitalization. RESULTS: One hundred forty-one hundred and thirteen patients USSR were conducted by seven surgeons. Seventeen breakages and failures have been identified and have led to the sending of the endoscope for repair. Breakage rate and failure was 12%. All failures were treated with a standard exchange of the device (including 4 standard exchanges made under warranty). The estimated average cost of outages was 3600 euros. This represents an average cost per procedure of about 625 euros (acquisition plus cost of failures) without counting the costs of sterilization or high-level disinfection. The impossibility of relocating the lower calyx stones is associated with an excess risk of breakage (odd ratio: 2.92 CI95: [1.02; 8.37]). CONCLUSION: This study is novel because it focuses on the cost of implementing a technique in a French university hospital. The use of flexible ureteroscope to unique uses might be an interesting source of savings in the implementation of this technique. This remains to be evaluated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

[Prostate cancer of elderly patients: Place and role of geriatric assessment]. / Cancer de prostate des sujets âgés : place et rôle de l'évaluation gériatrique.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to appreciate the place and role of geriatric assessment in elderly patients with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prostate cancer patients who underwent geriatric assessment during the therapeutic management from 2008 to 2014. Patient, tumor, treatment characteristics and their associated toxicity as well as the parameters of geriatric assessment were studied. The occurrence of geriatric assessment within the 3 months preceding a therapeutic decision was reviewed. RESULTS: Data of seventy-four patients were analyzed with a median follow-up of 15.6 years. The average age at diagnosis was 74.3 and 80.6 at the geriatric assessment. At the time of the geriatric assessment 64 patients had metastatic disease, 39 were in poor condition more than 50% of patients had walking ability disorders. Thirteen patients underwent radical surgery, 28 received radiotherapy, 30 patients had chemotherapy and hormonotherapy was prescribed for 72 patients. The geriatric assessment, requested on average 15 years after diagnosis, was not carried out within the 3 months preceding treatment decision for 55 patients. CONCLUSION: The recourse to geriatric assessment is predominantly used to endorse a decision of supportive care for elderly patients with prostate cancer. An early intervention by a geriatrician consultant for the initial management and then at each therapeutic event is a sine qua non condition for efficient personalized therapeutic management suitable to every patient according to physiological age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

The effects on lipid serum levels of a 2-year adjuvant treatment with exemestane after tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The third-generation aromatase inhibitor exemestane represents a new development in the treatment of estrogen-positive breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects on lipid profile and body composition of the shift from tamoxifen to exemestane. METHODS: After 2-3 years of tamoxifen adjuvant treatment, 68 postmenopausal women were randomly assigned to either continue tamoxifen 20 mg/day (n = 35) or to switch to exemestane 25 mg/day (n = 33). RESULTS: No significant changes in lipid profile were found in patients continuing on tamoxifen. In the exemestane group, serum HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TG) decreased significantly (p < 0.01) and serum LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) increased significantly (p < 0.05) with respect to baseline. The difference between the two groups was significant. Moreover, in the exemestane group, fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) showed an opposite trend, which determined a progressive and significant increase in the FFM/FM ratio. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the choice of first-line treatment or adjuvant therapy for breast cancer should also take the individual lipid and body composition profile into account.

The relationship of ghrelin and adiponectin with bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in elderly men.

Body weight is commonly considered a significant predictor of bone mineral density (BMD). Adiponectin, an adipocyte-derived hormone, could modulate BMD. Moreover, recent studies have reported that ghrelin is able to stimulate bone formation. In this study, we investigated any associations of adiponectin and ghrelin serum levels with bone turnover markers and BMD in elderly men. In 137 men aged 55 years and older (mean age 67.4 +/- 5.4 years, mean body mass index [BMI] 26.6 +/- 3.4 kg/m2), we evaluated serum adiponectin, serum ghrelin, body composition (fat mass and lean mass), BMD, bone alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and the carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (betaCTX). Ghrelin showed significant correlations with BMD at the femoral neck (r = 0.25, P < 0.01), total femur (r = 0.22, P < 0.05), and whole body (r = 0.18, P < 0.05). However, after adjusting for age, BMI, and calcium intake, the correlation remained significant only for femoral neck BMD. Ghrelin showed a significant correlation with lean mass but not with fat mass and bone turnover markers. Adiponectin showed a positive association with both bone ALP and betaCTX; the correlation between adiponectin and bone ALP (r = 0.25, P < 0.01) remained significant after adjusting for confounding variables. No significant correlations between adiponectin and BMD at all skeletal sites were observed. In conclusion, our study suggests that in elderly Italian men serum ghrelin was significantly associated with femoral neck BMD and that adiponectin was positively associated with bone ALP. Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of adipocytokines in bone metabolism.