Inclusion of Psychiatric-Mental Health Advanced Practice Nurses in Federal Behavioral Workforce Planning.

Psychiatric-mental health (PMH) advanced practice nurses have the education, certification, and licensure to address the need for providers who can deliver the full scope of mental health services and thereby increase access to mental health care. Although the PMH nurse practitioner (PMHNP) segment of this workforce is rapidly growing, it has scant visibility in workforce planning and the evolving national behavioral health workforce database. An understanding of PMHNP characteristics and practice roles seems to be lacking. Addressing this limitation demands clear messaging around this workforce's scope of practice and data indicating how PMHNP capabilities meet mental health treatment needs.

The Future of the Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing Workforce: Using Our Skill Set to Address Incongruities in Mental Health Care Delivery.

The USA is dealing with well-documented issues around mental health and its treatment. The Psychiatric Mental Health (PMH) workforce is growing and practicing in a variety of roles within the mental health system. How will PMH nurses address instances when the structure of services does not meet the mental health needs of the population? In this piece, I argue that to some degree the future of the PMH workforce will be determined by how well we use our capacity and capabilities to address incongruities in service structure and population needs. Five areas of concern with mental health services are outlined; they all involve factors that can be addressed with innovative approaches and optimum utilization of the PMH workforce. Included are suggestions on how PMH nurses might direct efforts toward these service issues, particularly by using their skill set and presence in the mental health system. Strategies include forging a tighter connection between the work of advanced practice and registered nurses in delivering care. Broadly, these efforts should be directed at building models of patient-centered care that address the needs of populations, reducing disparities, and demonstrating how engagement is a critical lever of effective inpatient and community-based care.

American Psychiatric Nurses Association Position: Staffing Inpatient Psychiatric Units.

OBJECTIVE: An American Psychiatric Nurses Association (APNA) task force reviewed current staffing research to revise and update the 2011 APNA "Staffing inpatient psychiatric units" position paper and provide recommendations to the APNA Board of Directors on how psychiatric mental health (PMH) nurses might champion the staffing needs of inpatient psychiatric units. METHODS: Current research on staffing and nursing practice in inpatient psychiatric units was reviewed as well as variables believed to influence staffing and nursing practice, such as consumer needs and workplace culture. Since current nurse staffing principles emphasize nursing value and how that value is connected to outcomes, the literature search included a focus on staffing and related patient outcomes. RESULTS: PMH nurses are critical to the safety and quality of care in inpatient psychiatric units. However, there are little existing data on the relationship between staffing levels and even common adverse events such as staff injury and restraint of patients. Furthermore, there is scant research conducted on inpatient psychiatric units that informs optimal staffing models or establishes links between staffing and patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with current evidence, the universal use of a single method or model of determining staffing needs (e.g., nursing hours per, case mix index, or mandatory ratios) is not recommended. PMH nurses should champion systematic evaluation of staffing on their inpatient units against select patient, nurse, and system outcomes. A data repository of PMH nurse-sensitive outcomes is necessary to benchmark unit performance and staffing.

Presentation of Depressive Symptoms in Autism Spectrum Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Depressive disorders are frequently mis- and underdiagnosed in individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to identify and synthesize current knowledge regarding (1) the presentation of depressive symptoms and (2) the use of self-reports in assessing depressive symptoms in individuals with ASD and comparisons between self-reported and observer-reported symptoms. A scoping review was conducted to capture the full range of literature on the topic and to identify research gaps. METHODS: Articles were identified through a search of academic literature and screened for relevance to the aims of the review. RESULTS: In addition to typical depression symptoms, individuals with ASD may demonstrate atypical symptoms such as changes in autistic symptoms, self-injurious behavior, and psychomotor changes. Moreover, the review revealed a bias toward observer-reports of symptoms. Self-reports frequently were not included or were ascribed less weight than observer-reports. Self-reports typically differed from reports given by parents or other caregivers, but a consistent pattern in these differences has not been established. CONCLUSIONS: Further research on the use of self-reports in assessing depressive symptoms in individuals with ASD is needed. Self-reports may provide information not obtainable through observer-reports, and integrating both self- and observer-reports in psychiatric evaluations may produce more comprehensive and accurate assessments.

Development and Validation of an Operational Model for Nursing Academic-Practice Partnerships.

BACKGROUND: Several definitions and guiding principles for nursing academic-practice partnerships exist. PROBLEM: There remains a gap between academic-practice partnership definitions and practical operational models, thereby limiting schools of nursing ability to engage in productive partnerships. This article describes the development and validation of a novel Operational Model for Nursing Academic-Practice Partnerships. APPROACH: An email survey of all nursing faculty (n = 228) identified quantity and types of faculty-led academic-practice partnerships. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were analyzed via thematic analysis conducted by 2 members of the project team and validated by the full project team. OUTCOMES: The Operational Model for Academic-Practice Partnerships was created and is comprised of 8 partnership strategies: innovation, embedded faculty, joint appointment, consultant, independent practice, volunteer, scholarship, and clinical site development. CONCLUSION: We offer this model as a framework to structure the development, implementation, and evaluation of academic-practice partnerships at nursing schools.

Psychiatric Nursing Workforce Survey: Results and Implications.

OBJECTIVE: The last national survey of psychiatric-mental health (PMH) nurses was conducted in 2016 and was limited to advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs). Data on the demographic and employment characteristics of the PMH workforce could inform how to optimize the PMH nursing workforce to address increasing demands for mental health services. The objective was to conduct a national survey of PMH registered nurses (RNs) and PMH-APRNs to gather data on their demographic, educational, and practice characteristics. METHODS: An email survey was administered between October 2020 and February 2021 to all members of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association and to all PMH-APRNs certified by the American Nurses Credentialing Center. Separate surveys included 51 questions (RN) and 52 questions (APRN). Survey questions were informed by several sources including the Minimum Data Set for the Behavioral Health Workforce. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 4,088 PMH-RNs and 5,158 PMH-APRNs, with a combined response rate of 12.1%. Findings suggest that the workforce is aging but has increased slightly in diversity. In all, 62.4% of RNs reported a hospital as their primary employment setting, while the majority of APRNs (70.4%) practice in outpatient settings. Forty-four percent of the PMH-APRN respondents indicated that most of their patients receive federal insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing must plan for significant retirements in the PMH workforce in next 5 years. Hospital-based practice continues to dominate PMH-RN roles but might be expanded to community-based settings teaming with PMH-APRNs in outpatient sites. Increasing the diversity of the workforce should be prioritized.

Evaluation of Psychiatric Rehospitalization of Individuals Treated at a Federally Qualified Health Center.

At a federally qualified health center which often receives discharge referrals from the local hospital, rehospitalization rates and reasons were unknown yet pertinent information for assuring timely follow-up appointments. This study examined psychiatric discharge and rehospitalization between August 2020 and January 2021. Between August and October 2020, all adult patients of the FQHC were investigated who presented to or were discharged from the hospital. Those who received a primary psychiatric diagnosis were then examined retrospectively (between November 2020 and January 2021) to determine readmission status. During the study period, 36 patients were hospitalized with primary psychiatric diagnoses, 81% of whom did not establish behavioral health care subsequent to their initial hospitalization. The overall 90-day readmission rate of the sample was 41.7% with 80% of these individuals returning within 30 days.

Delineating Quality Indicators of Inpatient Psychiatric Hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Assuring quality care is critical to the well-being and recovery of individuals receiving inpatient psychiatric treatment, yet a comprehensive map of quality inpatient care does not exist. AIMS: To isolate and describe quality elements of inpatient psychiatric treatment. METHODS: A survey queried psychiatric inpatient nursing leaders on what they considered to be critical elements of quality. The survey was emailed to 40 American Psychiatric Nurses Association members, and 39 individuals responded. In the survey, participants were asked to comment on the importance of six dimensions of quality as well as quality indicators used on their units. RESULTS: Data from this survey indicate how thought leaders conceptualized quality of inpatient care. A unifying philosophy of care was endorsed as a quality element as was structure that affords staff available time on the unit-engaging with patients. While staffing levels were viewed as important, the respondents commented on the nuances between staffing and quality. Participants endorsed the importance of involving individuals in their treatment planning as well as tapping into patients' perspectives on the treatment experience. CONCLUSIONS: The participants' responses compliment the quality literature and reinforce the need to develop a comprehensive map of quality elements. These elements interact in complex way, for instance, staffing, engagement, and teamwork is tied to the organizational structure and philosophy of care, which in turn facilitates consumer involvement in care. Thus, gauging the impact of quality on outcomes will demand consideration of the interaction of factors not just the linear relationship of one element to an outcome.

Implementation of an Isolation Shelter for Individuals with COVID 19 Experiencing Homelessness.

The COVID-19 pandemic had a devastating impact on non-sheltered homeless and housing-insecure individuals. This report details the development of a Chicago-based isolation shelter designed for people experiencing homelessness and recovering from COVID-19. The model is informative concerning the rapid development of services for people marginalized by the health care system.

Exploring the thinking, reasoning and clinical approach of expert child psychiatric nurses.

BACKGROUND: Expert nurses are characterized by their deep knowledge of patient situations and understanding of patients in the context of their total situation. We know of no studies that have focused on the expert practice of child/adolescent (C/A) psychiatric mental health (PMH) advanced practice nurse. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to gather information on how expert C/A advanced practice psychiatric nurses (APPNs) view their role and assess/treat children and adolescents with complex mental health issues. METHOD: Expert C/A APPNs were interviewed by one of the two investigators using a semi-structured interview guide. All interviews were audiotaped and transcribed. This was a qualitative descriptive study and in line with that method, interview content was open-coded and examined for themes that were collapsed into categories. RESULTS: Fifteen C/A PMH APPNs were interviewed. Initial categories that were distilled included descriptions of their commitment to the population, development of families as partners, an expanded approach to medication management, and how they demonstrate expertise. CONCLUSION: Expert nurses adopt an invaluable approach to children and families-inherently patient and family-centered. They view the child/teen in terms of the multiple contexts of their lives.