An Exploratory and Qualitative Analysis of Self-Reported Evaluations for Fever.

Background: Despite the high prevalence of post-operative fever, a variety of approaches are taken as to the components of a fever evaluation, when it should be undertaken, and when empiric antibiotic agents should be started. Hypothesis: There is a lack of consensus surrounding many common components of a post-operative fever evaluation. Patients and Methods: The Surgical Infection Society membership was surveyed to determine practices surrounding evaluation of post-operative fever. Eight scenarios were posed in febrile (38.5°C), post-operative general surgery or trauma patients, with 19 possible components of work-up (physical examination, complete blood count [CBC], fungal biomarkers, lactate and procalcitonin [PCT] concentrations, cultures, imaging) and management (antibiotic agents). Each scenario was then re-considered for intensive care unit (ICU) patients (intubated/unstable hemodynamics). Agreement on a parameter (<1/4 or >3/4 of respondents) achieved consensus, positive or negative. Parameters between had equipoise; α was set at 0.05. Results: Among the examined scenarios, only CBC and physical examination received positive consensus across most scenarios. Blood/urine cultures, imaging, lactate, inflammatory biomarkers, and the empiric administration of antibiotic agents did not reach consensus; support was variable depending on the clinical scenario, illness severity, and the individual preferences of the answering clinician. The qualitative portion of the survey identified "fever threshold and duration," "clinical suspicion," and "physiologic manifestation" as the most important factors for deciding about the initiation of a fever evaluation and the potential empiric administration of antibiotic agents. Conclusions: There is consensus only for physical and examination routine laboratory work when initiating the evaluation of febrile post-operative patients. However, there are multiple components of a fever evaluation that individual respondents would select depending on the clinical scenario and severity of illness. Parameters demonstrating equipoise are potential candidates for formal guidance or pragmatic prospective trials.

Development and Validation of a Novel Hollow Viscus Injury Prediction Score for Abdominal Seatbelt Sign: A Pacific Coast Surgical Association Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: High-quality CT can exclude hollow viscus injury (HVI) in patients with abdominal seatbelt sign (SBS) but performs poorly at identifying HVI. Delay in diagnosis of HVI has significant consequences necessitating timely identification. STUDY DESIGN: This multicenter, prospective observational study conducted at 9 trauma centers between August 2020 and October 2021 included adult trauma patients with abdominal SBS who underwent abdominal CT before surgery. HVI was determined intraoperatively and physiologic, examination, laboratory, and imaging findings were collected. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator- and probit regression-selected predictor variables and coefficients were used to assign integer points for the HVI score. Validation was performed by comparing the area under receiver operating curves (AUROC). RESULTS: Analysis included 473 in the development set and 203 in the validation set. The HVI score includes initial systolic blood pressure <110 mmHg, abdominal tenderness, guarding, and select abdominal CT findings. The derivation set has an AUROC of 0.96, and the validation set has an AUROC of 0.91. The HVI score ranges from 0 to 17 with score 0 to 5 having an HVI risk of 0.03% to 5.36%, 6 to 9 having a risk of 10.65% to 44.1%, and 10 to 17 having a risk of 58.59% to 99.72%. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study developed and validated a novel HVI score incorporating readily available physiologic, examination, and CT findings to risk stratify patients with an abdominal SBS. The HVI score can be used to guide decisions regarding management of a patient with an abdominal SBS and suspected HVI.

Self-Reported Diagnosis and Management of Surgical Site Infection Highlights Lack of Objective Measures and Treatment Guidance.

Background: There is little guidance regarding empiric therapy for superficial surgical site infections (SSIs). Management of incisions with signs of SSI lacks consensus and management is variable among individual surgeons. Methods: The Surgical Infection Society was surveyed regarding management of SSIs. Cases were provided with varying wound descriptions, initial wound class (WC), post-operative day, and presence of a prosthesis. Responses were in multiple-choice format; statistics: χ2; α = 0.05. Results: Seventy-eight members responded. For appearance scenarios, respondents believed that both mild erythema (55%) and clear drainage (64%) could be observed, whereas substantial (>3 cm) erythema or purulence should be treated with complete (22% and 50%) or partial (55% and 40%) opening of the incision. Degree of erythema did not influence administration of antibiotic agents, but purulence was more likely than clear drainage to be treated with antibiotics (38% vs. 6%; p < 0.001). There were no differences based on WC, except that clean cases were more likely than higher WC scenarios to be treated with gram-positive coverage alone (WC 1 [26%] vs. 2 [10%] vs. 3 [13%] vs. 4 [4%]; p < 0.001). Post-operative day (POD) three appeared to be an inflection point for more aggressive treatment of suspected incisional SSI, with fewer (POD 0 [86%] vs. POD day 3 [54%]; p < 0.001) reporting observation. Respondents were more likely to obtain imaging, start broad-spectrum antibiotic agents, and return to the operating room for purulence in the presence of a mesh. Conclusions: Presented with escalating possibility of SSI, respondents reported lower rates of observation, increased use of antibiotic agents, and increased surgical drainage. Many scenarios lack consensus regarding appropriate therapy. The complete elimination of SSIs is unlikely to be accomplished soon, and this study provides a framework for understanding how surgeons approach SSIs, and potential areas for further research or pragmatic guidance.

Different Surgeon, Different Closure: Lack of Consensus on Appropriate Closure Technique for Various Case Scenarios.

Background: Many techniques for closure of surgical incisions are available to the surgeon, but there is minimal guidance regarding which technique(s) should be utilized at the conclusion of surgery and under what circumstances. Hypothesis: Management of incisions at the conclusion of surgery lacks consensus and varies among individual surgeons. Methods: The Surgical Infection Society membership was surveyed on the management of incisions at the conclusion of surgery. Several case scenarios were provided to test the influences of operation type, intra-operative contamination, and hemodynamic stability on incision management (e.g., close fascia or skin, use of incision/wound vacuum-assisted closure [VAC] device). Responses by two-thirds of participants were required to achieve consensus. Data analysis by χ2 test and logistic regression, a = 0.05. Response heterogeneity was quantified by the Shannon index (SI). Results: Among 78 respondents, consensus was achieved for elective splenectomy (91% close skin/dry dressing). Open appendectomy and left colectomy/end-colostomy had the greatest heterogeneity (SI, 1.68 and 1.63, respectively). During trauma laparotomy, the majority used damage control for hemodynamic instability (53%-67%) but not for hemodynamically stable patients (0%-1.3%; p < 0.001). Additional consensus was achieved for close skin/dry dressing for hemodynamically stable trauma splenectomy patients (87%) and fascia open/wound VAC for hemodynamically unstable colon resection/anastomosis (67%). Fecal diversion for rectal injury and colon resection/anastomosis (both when hemodynamically stable) had high heterogeneity (SI, 1.56 and 1.48, respectively). In penetrating trauma, sentiment was for more use of wet-to-dry dressings and incision/wound VAC with increased contamination in hemodynamically stable patients. Conclusions: Damage control was favored in hemodynamically unstable trauma patients, with use of wet-to-dry dressings and incision/wound VAC with spillage after penetrating trauma. However, most scenarios did not achieve consensus. High variability of practices regarding incision management at the conclusion of surgery was confirmed. Prospective studies and evidence-based guidance are needed to guide decision making at end-operation.

Center Volume and Survival Relationship for Neonates With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Treated With Extracorporeal Life Support.

OBJECTIVES: Literature is emerging regarding the role of center volume as an independent variable contributing to improved outcomes. A higher volume of index procedures may be associated with decreased morbidity and mortality. This association has not been examined for the subgroup of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) receiving extracorporeal life support (ECLS). Our study aims to examine the risk-adjusted association between center volume and outcomes in CDH-ECLS neonates, hypothesizing that higher center volume confers a survival advantage. DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective comparative study using the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization database. SETTING: One hundred twenty international pediatric centers. PATIENTS: Neonates with CDH managed with ECLS from 2000 to 2019. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The cohort included 4,985 neonates with a mortality rate of 50.6%. For the 120 centers studied, mean center volume was 42.4 ± 34.6 CDH ECLS cases over the 20-year study period. In an adjusted model, higher ECLS volume was associated with lower odds of mortality: odds ratio (OR) 0.995 (95% CI, 0.992-0.999; p = 0.014). For an increase in one sd in volume, that is, 1.75 cases annually, the OR for mortality was lower by 16.7%. Volume was examined as a categorical exposure variable where low-volume centers (fewer than 2 cases/yr) were associated with 54% higher odds of mortality (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.03-2.29) compared with high-volume centers. On-ECLS complications (mechanical, neurologic, cardiac, hematologic metabolic, and renal) were not associated with volume. The likelihood of infectious complications was higher for low- (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.06-3.40) and medium-volume (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.03-3.39) compared with high-volume centers. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a survival advantage directly proportional to center volume was observed for CDH patients managed with ECLS. There was no significant difference in most complication rates. Future studies should aim to identify factors contributing to the higher mortality and morbidity observed at low-volume centers.

Excluding Hollow Viscus Injury for Abdominal Seat Belt Sign Using Computed Tomography.

Importance: Abdominal seat belt sign (SBS) has historically entailed admission and observation because of the diagnostic limitations of computed tomography (CT) imaging and high rates of hollow viscus injury (HVI). Recent single-institution, observational studies have questioned the utility of this practice. Objective: To evaluate whether a negative CT scan can safely predict the absence of HVI in the setting of an abdominal SBS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, observational cohort study was conducted in 9 level I trauma centers between August 2020 and October 2021 and included adult trauma patients with abdominal SBS. Exposures: Inclusion in the study required abdominal CT as part of the initial trauma evaluation and before any surgical intervention, if performed. Results of CT scans were considered positive if they revealed any of the following: abdominal wall soft tissue contusion, free fluid, bowel wall thickening, mesenteric stranding, mesenteric hematoma, bowel dilation, pneumatosis, or pneumoperitoneum. Main Outcomes and Measures: Presence of HVI diagnosed at the time of operative intervention. Results: A total of 754 patients with abdominal SBS had an HVI prevalence of 9.2% (n = 69), with only 1 patient with HVI (0.1%) having a negative CT (ie, none of the 8 a priori CT findings). On bivariate analysis comparing patients with and without HVI, there were significant associations between each of the individual CT scan findings and the presence of HVI. The strongest association was found with the presence of free fluid, with a more than 40-fold increase in the likelihood of HVI (odds ratio [OR], 42.68; 95% CI, 20.48-88.94; P < .001). The presence of free fluid also served as the most effective binary classifier for presence of HVI (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve [AUC], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83-0.91). There was also an association between a negative CT scan and the absence of HVI (OR, 41.09; 95% CI, 9.01-727.69; P < .001; AUC, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.66-0.70). Conclusions and Relevance: The prevalence of HVI among patients with an abdominal SBS and negative findings on CT is extremely low, if not zero. The practice of admitting and observing all patients with abdominal SBS should be reconsidered when a high-quality CT scan is negative, which may lead to significant resource and cost savings.

Different Surgeon, Different Duration: Lack of Consensus on the Appropriate Duration of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Therapy in Surgical Practice.

Background: The principles of antimicrobial stewardship promote the appropriate prescribing of agents with respect to efficacy, safety, duration, and cost. Antibiotic resistance often results from inappropriate use (e.g., indication, selection, duration). We evaluated practice variability in duration of antimicrobials in surgical infection treatment (Rx) or prophylaxis (Px). Hypothesis: There is lack of consensus regarding the duration of antibiotic Px and Rx for many common indications. Methods: A survey was distributed to the Surgical Infection Society (SIS) regarding the use of antimicrobial agents for a variety of scenarios. Standard descriptive statistics were used to compare survey responses. Heterogeneity among question responses were compared using the Shannon Index, expressed as natural units (nats). Results: Sixty-three SIS members responded, most of whom (67%) have held a leadership position within the SIS or contributed as an annual meeting moderator or discussant; 76% have been in practice for more than five years. Regarding peri-operative Px, more than 80% agreed that a single dose is adequate for most indications, with the exceptions of gangrenous cholecystitis (40% single dose, 38% pre-operative +24 hours) and inguinal hernia repair requiring a bowel resection (70% single dose). There was more variability regarding the use of antibiotic Px for various bedside procedures with respondents split between none needed (range, 27%-66%) versus a single dose (range, 31%-67%). Opinions regarding the duration of antimicrobial Rx for hospitalized patients who have undergone a source control operation or procedure varied widely based on indication. Only two of 20 indications achieved more than 60% consensus despite available class 1 evidence: seven days for ventilator-associated pneumonia (77%), and four plus one days for perforated appendicitis (62%). Conclusions: Except for peri-operative antibiotic Px, there is little consensus regarding antibiotic duration among surgical infection experts, despite class 1 evidence and several available guidelines. This highlights the need for further high-level research and better dissemination of guidelines.

CIGARETTE SMOKING IS ASSOCIATED WITH DECREASED MORTALITY IN CRITICALLY ILL TRAUMA PATIENTS.

ABSTRACT: Background: Smoking may offer pathophysiologic adaptations that increase survivability in certain patients with cardiovascular disease. We sought to identify if smoking increases survivability in trauma patients, hypothesizing that critically ill trauma patients who smoke have a decreased risk of mortality compared with non-smokers. Methods: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2010-2016) database was queried for trauma patients with intensive care unit admissions. A multivariable logistic regression model was performed. Results: From the 630,278 critically ill trauma patients identified, 116,068 (18.4%) were current cigarette smokers. Critically ill trauma smokers, compared with non-smokers, had a higher rate of pneumonia (7.8% vs. 6.9%, P< 0.001) and lower mortality rate (4.0% vs. 8.0%, P< 0.001). After controlling for covariates, smokers had a decreased associated risk of mortality compared with non-smokers (OR = 0.55, CI = 0.51-0.60, P< 0.001), and no difference in the risk of major complications (OR = 0.98, CI = 0.931.03, P = 0.44). The same analysis was performed using age as a continuous variable with associated decreased risk of mortality (OR 0.57 (CI 0.53-0.62), P< 0.001). Conclusion: Critically ill trauma smokers had a decreased associated mortality risk compared with non-smokers possibly due to biologic adaptations such as increased oxygen delivery developed from smoking. Future basic science and translational studies are needed to pursue potential novel therapeutic benefits without the deleterious long-term side effects of smoking.

Surgical Infections and the Future of Research: Re-Defining the Research Agenda for the Surgical Infection Society.

Background: Infections represent a major component of surgical practice. Risk mitigation, seeking eradication and optimal patient outcomes, require a concerted, multifocal effort to understand disease and microbiology, prevent infections, and treat them. The present study was undertaken to re-define the Surgical Infection Society (SIS) research agenda for the next decade. Hypothesis: We utilized the expertise of the SIS membership to identify research questions regarding surgical infections, hypothesizing that consensus among participants could be used to re-define the future research agenda. Methods: Members of the SIS were surveyed using a modified Delphi. The three rounds of the survey were targeted at: question generation; question ranking; and reaching consensus. Each of the 15 questions to emerge was evaluated according to level of consensus, feasibility, and data availability. Results: One hundred twenty-four participants contributed. Initially, 226 questions were generated that were condensed to 35 unique questions for consideration in the subsequent two rounds. The 35 questions encompassed several research themes, with antibiotic prophylaxis (n = 8), prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs; n = 6), and improved diagnostics (n = 5) being most common. Standard deviation of importance scores was inversely proportional to the question rank, indicating greater consensus among higher ranking questions. All 15 questions had a feasibility score of greater than three (five-point Likert scale), and the majority (12/15) had a mean data availability score of less than three. In the final round of the survey, the top three topics for further research surrounded non-antimicrobial treatments, optimal treatment duration for bacteremia, and treatment duration for necrotizing soft tissue infections. Conclusions: Using a modified Delphi process, 15 research questions addressing surgical infections were identified. Such questions can assist the SIS and the SIS Foundation for Research and Education in prioritizing and enabling research efforts, and development of a strategic research plan for the next decade.

Risk Factors for Hemolysis During Extracorporeal Life Support for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.

BACKGROUND: Neonates receiving extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) require prolonged support compared with neonates with other forms of respiratory failure. Hemolysis is a complication that can be seen during ECLS and can lead to renal failure and potentially to worse outcomes. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for the development of hemolysis in CDH patients treated with ECLS. METHODS: The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization database was used to identify infants with CDH (2000-2015). The primary outcome was hemolysis (plasma-free hemoglobin >50 mg/dL). Potentially associated variables were identified in the data set. Descriptive statistics and a series of nested multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify associations between hemolysis and demographic, pre-ECLS, and on-ECLS factors. RESULTS: There were 4576 infants with a mortality of 52.5%. The overall mean rate of hemolysis was 10.5% during the study period. In earlier years (2000-2005), the hemolysis rates were 6.3% and 52.7% for roller versus centrifugal pumps, whereas in later years (2010-2015), they were 2.9% and 26.5%, respectively. The fully adjusted model demonstrated that the use of centrifugal pumps was a strong predictor of hemolysis (odds ratio: 6.67, 95% confidence interval: 5.14-8.67). In addition, other risk factors for hemolysis included low 5-min Apgar score, on-ECLS complications (renal, metabolic, and cardiovascular), and duration of ECLS. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of CDH patients receiving ECLS over 15 y, the use of centrifugal pumps increased over time, along with the rate of hemolysis. Patient- and treatment-level risk factors were identified contributing to the development of hemolysis.

Nonaccidental Trauma Is an Independent Risk Factor for Mortality Among Injured Infants.

OBJECTIVES: The Centers for Disease Control disclosed over 600,000 cases of child abuse or neglect in 2016. Single-institution studies have shown that nonaccidental trauma (NAT) has higher complication rates than accidental trauma (AT). Nonaccidental trauma is disproportionately represented in infants. We hypothesized that NAT would increase the risk of mortality in infants. This study aims to provide a contemporary descriptive analysis for infant trauma patients and determine the association between NAT and mortality. METHODS: Infants (<1 year of age) within the Pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2014-2016) were identified. Descriptive statistics (χ2 and t test) were used to compare NAT infants to AT infants. A multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the risk of mortality associated with select variables including NAT. RESULTS: From 14,965 infant traumas, most presented to a level I pediatric trauma center (53.5%) with a median injury severity score of 9. The most common mechanism was falls (48.6%), followed by NAT (14.5%). Overall mortality was 2.1%. Although most NAT infants were white (60.2%), black infants were overrepresented (23.6% vs 18.3%; P < 0.0001) compared with AT infants. The incidence of mortality was higher in NAT infants (41.6% vs 13.9%; P < 0.0001), and they were more likely to have traumatic brain injury (TBI) (63.1% vs 50.6%; P < 0.001). Nonaccidental trauma [odds ratio (OR), 2.48; P < 0.001], hypotension within 24 hours (OR, 8.93; P < 0.001), injury severity score (OR, 1.12; P < 0.001), and severe abbreviated injury scale-head (OR 1.62, P = 0.014) had the highest association with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the incidence of TBI and NAT in infants. Although providers should be vigilant for NAT, suspicion of NAT should prompt close surveillance, as there is a 2-fold increased risk of mortality independent of injury or TBI.

Revisiting the Surgical Infection Society Delphi Analysis of the Research Agenda in Surgical Infections: Advancements and Unanswered Questions.

Background: In 2006, the Surgical Infection Society (SIS) used a modified Delphi process to enlist SIS member-experts to identify 15 research priorities in the field of surgical infectious diseases; it was intended to serve as a research road map for the next one to two decades. We sought to evaluate the progress made in each of these priority areas. Hypothesis: We examined the progress achieved with respect to the 15 research areas identified by the Delphi process at that time, hypothesizing that advances in knowledge would be achieved in most domains, if not all. Methods: Surgical Infection Society members were surveyed to determine whether each priority area question had been satisfactorily answered in the last 14 years; to assess the quality of evidence answering each question (1-3 scale); and to delineate whether there is a current unmet need for continued research in each area. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding these initiatives were also identified via literature search and their citations in the literature were tabulated. Results: Sixty-six members of the SIS responded to the survey. Thirteen of 15 research priority areas saw an increase in data perceived to be available as adjudged by experts, as well an increase in the number of RCTs addressing that topic. However, there were only six questions that were deemed by experts to be answered sufficiently, primarily regarding antibiotic duration for certain conditions and the impact of glycemic control on infection. The questions that remained unanswered related to nosocomial infections, sepsis/septic shock, prevention of SSI, and antimicrobial pharmacokinetics. For a majority of the questions that experts believed were not answered sufficiently (8/9), respondents opined that continued research into these areas was warranted. Conclusion: Whereas 40% (6/15) of the research questions prioritized by the SIS in 2006 were answered to the satisfaction of member-experts, there are many questions that remain unanswered despite an increase of available data. Revisiting these research priorities highlights advancements made in the field of surgical infections, but also helps identify the areas that would benefit from continued study. That a majority of questions remain unanswered underscores an opportunity for member-experts to collaborate on SIS-managed or -endorsed RCTs.

University Teaching Trauma Centers: Decreased Mortality but Increased Complications.

BACKGROUND: Teaching hospitals are often regarded as excellent institutions with significant resources and prominent academic faculty. However, the involvement of trainees may contribute to higher rates of complications. Conflicting reports exist regarding outcomes between teaching and nonteaching hospitals, and the difference among trauma centers is unknown. We hypothesized that university teaching trauma centers (UTTCs) and nonteaching trauma centers (NTTCs) would have a similar risk of complications and mortality. METHODS: We queried the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2010-2016) for adults treated at UTTCs or NTTCs. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the risk of mortality and in-hospital complications, such as respiratory complications (RCs), venous thromboembolisms (VTEs), and infectious complications (ICs). RESULTS: From 895,896 patients, 765,802 (85%) were treated at UTTCs and 130,094 (15%) at NTTCs. After adjusting for covariates, UTTCs were associated with an increased risk of RCs (odds ratio (OR) 1.33, confidence interval (CI) 1.28-1.37, P < 0.001), VTEs (OR 1.17, CI 1.12-1.23, P < 0.001), and ICs (OR 1.56, CI 1.49-1.64, P < 0.001). However, UTTCs were associated with decreased mortality (OR 0.96, CI 0.93-0.99, P = 0.008) compared with NTTCs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates increased associated risks of RCs, VTEs, and ICs, yet a decreased associated risk of in-hospital mortality for UTTCs when compared with NTTCs. Future studies are needed to identify the underlying causative factors behind these differences.

Racial Disparities in Adult Blunt Trauma Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Study incidence and mortality for blunt trauma patients developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) across race and insurance. DESIGN: The National Trauma Data Bank (2007-2015) was queried for blunt trauma patients age >16. Covariates (age >65, injury severity score [ISS] >25, traumatic brain injury, lung injury, pneumonia, severe sepsis, hypotension on admission, and blood transfusion) were included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. SETTING: Despite progress in the treatment for ARDS, it remains a significant concern. Racial differences in response to trauma and ARDS have been inconsistently demonstrated. Since these prior studies, ARDS has been redefined by the Berlin Criteria, advances in care have been made, and health-care accessibility has changed. PATIENTS: Adult blunt trauma patients with ISS > 15 and length of stay ≥ 3 days to examine patients at high risk of ARDS. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 28 727 patients with ARDS. Most were white (76.2%), followed by blacks (11.5%), Hispanics (11.3%), and Asians (1.8%). Overall mortality was 20.5%. Compared to whites, blacks (odds ratio [OR]: 1.15, confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-1.20, P < .001) had higher risk of ARDS, being Hispanic was protective (OR: 0.80, CI: 0.76-0.83, P < .001). Asians with ARDS were at greater risk of death (OR: 1.31, CI: 1.07-1.61, P < .05) while being black was not associated with risk of death. Patients with private insurance had less diagnosed ARDS and those with ARDS had lower mortality than other insurances (OR: 0.86, CI: 0.79-0.92, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Data from the National Trauma Data Bank (2007-2015) demonstrates racial and insurance disparities in the development of ARDS in blunt trauma patients. When compared to whites, blacks are at higher risk of developing ARDS while being Hispanic is protective. Likewise, Asians are at greatest risk of death and blacks have no difference in mortality when compared to whites. Patients with private insurance have lower risk of incidence and mortality.

Prediction of 7-Day Readmission Risk for Pediatric Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients admitted for trauma may have unique risk factors of unplanned readmission and require condition-specific models to maximize accuracy of prediction. We used a multicenter data set on trauma admissions to study risk factors and predict unplanned 7-day readmissions with comparison to the 30-day metric. METHODS: Data from 28 hospitals in the United States consisting of 82,532 patients (95,158 encounters) were retrieved, and 75% of the data were used for building a random intercept, mixed-effects regression model, whereas the remaining were used for evaluating model performance. The variables included were demographics, payer, current and past health care utilization, trauma-related and other diagnoses, medications, and surgical procedures. RESULTS: Certain conditions such as poisoning and medical/surgical complications during treatment of traumatic injuries are associated with increased odds of unplanned readmission. Conversely, trauma-related conditions, such as trauma to the thorax, knee, lower leg, hip/thigh, elbow/forearm, and shoulder/upper arm, are associated with reduced odds of readmission. Additional predictors include the current and past health care utilization and the number of medications. The corresponding 7-day model achieved an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.737 (0.716, 0.757) on an independent test set and shared similar risk factors with the 30-day version. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with trauma-related conditions have risk of readmission modified by the type of trauma. As a result, additional quality of care measures may be required for patients with trauma-related conditions that elevate their risk of readmission.

The value of prophylactic chest tubes in tracheoesophageal fistula repair.

PURPOSE: Intraoperative chest tubes (IOCTs) can be placed during esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) repair to control pneumothoraces and detect esophageal leaks, potentially preventing the need for postoperative chest tubes (POCTs). However, data are lacking regarding IOCTs' effect. We hypothesized that IOCT placement would not reduce the risk of POCT placement and would increase hospital length of stay (LOS). METHODS: This was a single-center case-control study of type C EA/TEF patients repaired at a tertiary referral center between 2006 and 2017. Postoperative complications of patients who received IOCTs (n = 83) were compared to that of patients who did not receive IOCTs (n = 26). Patients were compared via propensity score matching. Additionally, sensitivity analyses excluding low birth weight (LBW) patients and patients undergoing delayed esophageal anastomosis were also performed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in rates of pneumothoraces or esophageal leaks between the IOCT and no-IOCT groups, nor were either of these complications detected earlier in the IOCT group. Rates of POCT placement and mortality also did not differ between groups. IOCT patients were associated with increased hospital LOS (28 vs 15.5 days, p < 0.001) and esophageal strictures (30% vs 8%, p = 0.04) requiring a return to the operating room (RTOR). CONCLUSION: IOCTs did not improve outcomes in EA/TEF repair. IOCTs seem associated with increased LOS and ROTR for esophageal stricture, suggesting that IOCTs may not be beneficial after EA/TEF repair.

Predictors of long ECMO runs for congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

BACKGROUND: Although longer ECMO run times for patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) have been associated with worse outcomes, a large study has not been conducted to examine the risk factors for long ECMO runs. METHODS: The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry from 2000 to 2015 was used to identify predictors of long ECMO runs in CDH patients. A long run was any duration of ≥14 days. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between demographics, pre-ECMO blood gas/ventilator settings, comorbid conditions, and therapies on long ECMO runs. RESULTS: There were 4730 CDH-infants examined. The largest association with long ECMO runs was on-ECMO repair (OR: 3.72, 95% CI: 3.013-4.602, p < 0.001) and the use of THAM (OR: 1.463, 95% CI: 1.062-2.016, p = 0.02). Each drop in pH quartile was associated with an increased risk of long ECMO run: pH ≥ 7.3 (reference), pH 7.2-7.9 (OR 1.24, 95% CI: 0.98-1.57, p = 0.07), pH 7.08-7.19 (OR 1.46, 95% CI: 1.17-1.84, p = 0.001), pH ≤ 7.07 (OR 1.64, 95% CI: 1.29-2.07, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found a correlation between both pre-ECMO demographics/timing of repair and the subsequent risk of long ECMO runs, providing insight for both providers and parents about the risk factors for longer runs. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The development of multiorgan dysfunction in CDH-ECMO neonates is associated with the level of pre-ECMO support.

PURPOSE: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is the most common indication for neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), but mortality remains at 50%. Multiorgan failure can occur in 25% and has been linked to worse outcomes. We sought to examine the factors that would increase the risk of multiorgan dysfunction (MOD). METHODS: The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) database was used to identify infants with CDH (2000-2015). The primary outcome was MOD, which was defined as the presence of organ failure in ≥2 organ systems. We used a multivariable logistic regression to examine the effect of demographics, pre-ECMO respiratory status, comorbidities, and therapies on MOD. RESULTS: There were a total of 4374 CDH infants who were treated with ECMO. Overall mortality was 52.4%. The risk models demonstrated that pre-ECMO cardiac arrest (OR 1.458, CI: 1.146-1.861, p = 0.002) and hand-bagging (OR 1.461, CI: 1.094-1.963, p = 0.032) had the strongest association with MOD. In addition, other pre-ECMO indicators of disease severity (pH, HFOV, MAP, 5-min APGAR) and pre-ECMO therapies (bicarb, neuromuscular [NM] blockers) were also associated with MOD. CONCLUSIONS: The level of pre-ECMO support has a significant association with the development of MOD, and initiation of ECMO prior to arrest seems to be critical to avoid complications. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Early cognitive impairment is common after intracranial hemorrhage with mild traumatic brain injury.

BACKDROP: The incidence of early cognitive impairment (ECI) after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is unknown. We hypothesized ECI is common and can be predicted based on Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Brain Injury Guideline (BIG) category. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review of adult trauma patients (2014-2016) with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and mild TBI (GCS score, 13-15) was performed. The primary outcome was ECI, defined as a Rancho Los Amigos score less than 8. Routine cognitive evaluation is performed on all ICH patients at our institution. Comparisons between ECI and no-ECI groups regarding demographic, cognitive, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using bivariate statistics. The odds of ECI were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 465 patients with mild TBI, 70.3% were male, and the average age was 53 ± 23 years. The most common mechanism of injury was fall (41.1%) followed by motor vehicle collision (15.9%). The incidence of ECI was 51.4% (n = 239). The incidence in patients with a GCS score of 15 was 42.9%, and BIG 1 category was 42.7%. There were no differences in demographics (age, sex, comorbidities), mechanism of injury, or imaging when comparing ECI patients with no-ECI patients. The GCS score was lower in the ECI group (14.4 vs. 14.7, p < 0.001). Patients with ECI were also less likely to be discharged home (58.2% vs. 78.3%, p < 0.001). Lower GCS-verbal, BIG category 3, and presence of pelvic/extremity fractures were strong risk factors for ECI in a logistic regression model adjusted for age, loss of consciousness, anticoagulants, narcotic administration, and Rotterdam score. CONCLUSION: Half of all patients with ICH and mild TBI had ECI. Both lower initial GCS score and BIG category 3 were associated with increased likelihood of ECI. Therefore, we recommend all patients with ICH and mild TBI undergo cognitive evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Study, Level III.