Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Front Oncol ; 11: 694620, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34868910

RESUMO

New drugs come not only with benefits but also with unexpected toxicities which need to be promptly recognized and managed. Starting from a scholar case of acute heart failure with preserved ejection fraction following the administration of trabectedin (ET-743, Yondelis®) in a patient with a metastatic solitary fibrous tumor, we performed a systematic review of the literature encompassing the results of previous cardiac safety analysis published ten years ago, a review of clinical trials published during the last 10 years as well as single-case descriptions related to trabectedin cardiotoxicity. The estimated incidence of cardiac toxicity was 3,4% among patients receiving trabectedin, with recent data suggesting a higher rate of heart failure than previously recognized. Previous or concomitant anthracyclines exposure may represent a risk factor. Assaying for NT-pro-BNP may be useful for the early detection of individuals with trabectedin-induced heart failure.

2.
J Geriatr Oncol ; 11(3): 380-388, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31171494

RESUMO

Older patients are one of the most relevant sub-groups of patients with breast cancer and will only gain in importance as demographic transition unfolds. Their management, in both the early and advanced settings, should take into consideration specific clinical needs and is made more difficult by the limited availability of evidence on the efficacy and safety of standard treatment regimens in older patients. At the root of this situation is the low rate of participation of older patients in clinical trials, often due to age limits for inclusion, and limitations on the participation of persons with significant comorbidities or organ dysfunction. Although this has begun to change in recent years, most agents currently in use have not been tested in a substantial number of older patients. This includes the targeted agents that have, in the last fifteen years, changed the prognosis of patients with early and advanced breast cancer. Most data guiding the use of targeted agents in older patients come from sub-analysis of larger trials or small retrospective cohort studies. The goal of this review is to go over the available evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of targeted agents approved for use in breast cancer (trastuzumab, lapatinib, T-DM1, pertuzumab, neratinib, palbociclib, bevacizumab, ribociclib, abemaciclib, everolimus, olaparib, talazoparib), and place their side effects into an older-specific context in order to help medical oncologists when making treatment decisions and managing older patients with breast cancer.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias da Mama , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Receptor ErbB-2 , Estudos Retrospectivos , Trastuzumab/efeitos adversos
3.
J Geriatr Oncol ; 7(6): 463-470, 2016 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27238734

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use upon admission and at discharge in a geriatric oncology unit after involving a clinical pharmacist. Although the few studies conducted in geriatric oncology units used the 2003 Beers criteria, this study used START and STOPP criteria, a more appropriate tool for European formularies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective study in older (≥70years) patients consecutively admitted to a geriatric oncology unit in a cancer center from July 2011 to April 2012. Clinical pharmacist conducted a complete comprehensive medication review including non-prescription and complementary (herbals) medications. This information coupled with the patient's medical history allows identifying PIMs using the STOPP and START criteria. The number of PIMs at admission and at discharge from the hospital was compared after clinical pharmacist intervention. RESULTS: Ninety-one older patients with cancer (mean age±SD=79±6years) were included in the study. START criteria identified 41 PIMs for 31 persons (34%) at admission compared to 7 PIMs for 6 persons (7%) at discharge. STOPP criteria identified 50 PIMs at admission for 29 persons (32%) compared to 16 PIMs at discharge for 14 persons (16%). Results showed significantly lower START scores at discharge than at admission (p<0.001); similarly, STOPP criteria demonstrated fewer PIMs at discharge than at admission (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of START and STOPP criteria by a clinical pharmacist allows identifying PIMs and changing prescriptions for older patients with cancer in agreement with the oncologist and geriatrician of the team.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Prescrição Inadequada , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Institutos de Câncer , Cateteres de Demora , Feminino , Idoso Fragilizado , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Farmacêuticos/normas , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/normas , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropriados/estatística & dados numéricos , Prática Profissional , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...