RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that immune checkpoint inhibitors may represent a promising strategy for boosting immune responses and improving the antitumor activity of standard therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies. AIMS: Phase 1/2 FUSION NHL 001 was designed to determine the safety and efficacy of durvalumab, an anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, combined with standard-of-care therapies for lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). METHODS AND RESULTS: The primary endpoints were to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of the drugs used in combination with durvalumab (durvalumab was administered at the previously recommended dose of 1500 mg every 4 weeks) and to assess safety and tolerability. Patients were enrolled into one of four arms: durvalumab monotherapy (Arm D) or durvalumab in combination with lenalidomide ± rituximab (Arm A), ibrutinib (Arm B), or rituximab ± bendamustine (Arm C). A total of 106 patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma were enrolled. All but two patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); those not experiencing a TEAE were in Arm C (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL]) and Arm D (DLBCL during the durvalumab monotherapy treatment period). No new safety signals were identified, and TEAEs were consistent with the respective safety profiles for each study treatment. Across the study, patients with follicular lymphoma (FL; n = 23) had an overall response rate (ORR) of 59%; ORR among DLBCL patients (n = 37) was 18%. Exploratory biomarker analysis showed that response to durvalumab monotherapy or combination therapy was associated with higher interferon-γ signature scores in patients with FL (p = .02). CONCLUSION: Durvalumab as monotherapy or in combination is tolerable but requires close monitoring. The high rate of TEAEs during this study may reflect on the difficulty in combining durvalumab with full doses of other agents. Durvalumab alone or in combination appeared to add limited benefit to therapy.
Assuntos
Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/etiologia , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) is an autologous, CD19-directed, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell product for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) after 2 or more lines of systemic therapy. In vivo cellular expansion after single-dose administration of liso-cel has been characterized. In this article, in vivo liso-cel expansion in the pivotal study TRANSCEND NHL 001 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02631044) was further characterized to assess the relationship between in vivo cellular expansion after single-dose administration of liso-cel and efficacy or safety after adjusting for key baseline characteristics. Two bioanalytical methods, quantitative polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometry, were used for the assessment of cellular kinetics of liso-cel, which showed high concordance for in vivo cellular expansion. Multivariable logistic regression analyses demonstrated that higher in vivo cellular expansion of liso-cel was associated with a higher overall response and complete response rate, and a higher incidence of cytokine release syndrome and neurological events in patients with relapsed or refractory LBCL. Age and tumor burden (by sum of the product of perpendicular diameters) were likely to confound the relationship between in vivo cellular expansion and efficacy, where the association became stronger after controlling for these factors. Repeat dosing of liso-cel was tested in the study; however, in vivo cellular expansion of liso-cel was lower after repeat dosing than after the initial dose. These findings should enable a comprehensive understanding of the in vivo cellular kinetics of liso-cel and the association with outcomes in relapsed/refractory LBCL.
Assuntos
Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Adulto , Antígenos CD19 , Humanos , Imunoterapia Adotiva/efeitos adversos , Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Linfócitos TRESUMO
Patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have poor outcomes following first-line cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and rituximab (R-CHOP). Evidence shows chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade can increase antitumor efficacy. This study investigated durvalumab, a programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor, combined with R-CHOP or lenalidomide + R-CHOP (R2-CHOP) in newly diagnosed high-risk DLBCL. Patients received durvalumab 1125 mg every 21 days for 2-8 cycles + R-CHOP (non-activated B-cell [ABC] subtype) or R2-CHOP (ABC), then durvalumab consolidation (1500 mg every 28 days). Of 46 patients, 43 received R-CHOP and three R2-CHOP. All patients had the high-risk disease; 14 (30.4%) and eight (17.4%) had double- or triple-hit DLBCL, respectively. Following induction, 20/37 (54.1%) patients receiving durvalumab + R-CHOP achieved complete response (CR), and seven (18.9%) partial response (PR); 25 (67.6% [95% CI 50.2-82.0]) continued to consolidation and were progression-free at 12 months. Among efficacy-evaluable patients with double- or triple-hit DLBCL (n = 12), five achieved CR and five PR. Adverse events were generally consistent with R-CHOP. Correlative analyses did not identify conclusive biomarkers of response. Durvalumab + R-CHOP is feasible in DLBCL with no new safety signals, but the combination provided no greater benefit than R-CHOP.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/efeitos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Doxorrubicina/efeitos adversos , Doxorrubicina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prednisona/efeitos adversos , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Rituximab/efeitos adversos , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Vincristina/efeitos adversos , Vincristina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) is a CD19-directed, defined composition, 4-1BB chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product administered at equal target doses of CD8+ and CD4+ CAR+ T cells. Large between-subject variability has been noted with CAR T-cell therapies; patient characteristics might contribute to CAR T-cell expansion variability. We developed a population cellular kinetic model to characterize the kinetics of the liso-cel transgene, via quantitative polymerase chain reaction assessment after intravenous infusion of liso-cel, and to understand covariates that might influence liso-cel kinetics in individual patients. METHODS: We employed nonlinear mixed-effects modeling to develop a population cellular kinetic model for liso-cel. The population cellular kinetic analysis was performed using 2524 post-infusion transgene observations from 261 patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma who were treated with a single dose of liso-cel in TRANSCEND NHL 001. Covariates for the analysis included baseline intrinsic factors such as age, baseline disease characteristics, and liso-cel and coadministration factors. RESULTS: Liso-cel cellular kinetics were well described by a piecewise model of cellular growth kinetics that featured lag, exponential growth, and biexponential decay phases. Population means (95% confidence interval) of lag phase duration, doubling time, time to maximum levels, initial decline half-life, and terminal half-life were 3.27 (2.71-3.97), 0.755 (0.667-0.821), 9.29 (8.81-9.70), 5.00 (4.15-5.90), and 352 (241-647) days, respectively. The magnitude of effect on liso-cel expansion metrics demonstrated that the covariate associations were smaller than the residual between-subject variability in the population. CONCLUSIONS: The covariates tested were not considered to have a meaningful impact on liso-cel kinetics. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02631044.
Assuntos
Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Antígenos CD19 , Humanos , Cinética , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfócitos T/genética , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos/genética , Linfócitos TRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Durvalumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death ligand 1, has been approved for urothelial carcinoma and stage III non-small cell lung cancer by the US Food and Drug Administration and is being evaluated in various malignancies. The objective of this study was to develop a population-pharmacokinetic model of durvalumab in patients with various hematologic malignancies and to investigate the effects of demographic and disease factors on the pharmacokinetics in this population. METHODS: A total of 1812 concentrations from 267 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, acute myeloid leukemia, multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or Hodgkin lymphoma were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of durvalumab was adequately described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination. A decrease in durvalumab clearance over time was mainly explained by incorporation of time-dependent changes in albumin (in all patients) and immunoglobulin G (in patients with multiple myeloma) into the model. For multiple myeloma, patients with immunoglobulin G ≥ 20 g/L showed a 30% lower area under the concentration-time curve at cycle 1 compared with patients with immunoglobulin G < 20 g/L. The impact of any baseline covariates on durvalumab pharmacokinetics did not appear to be clinically relevant. The pharmacokinetics of durvalumab in hematologic malignancies was generally consistent with previously reported pharmacokinetics in solid tumors. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the same dosing regimen (1500 mg every 4 weeks) for both solid tumors and hematologic malignancies from the perspective of adequate exposure. Additionally, total immunoglobulin G level could be a critical covariate for the pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies in patients with multiple myeloma.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/farmacocinética , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/farmacocinética , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/imunologia , Imunoglobulina G/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Albuminas/efeitos dos fármacos , Albuminas/metabolismo , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais/sangue , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/sangue , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Área Sob a Curva , Feminino , Neoplasias Hematológicas/etnologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/metabolismo , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/metabolismo , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/metabolismo , Linfoma não Hodgkin/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma não Hodgkin/metabolismo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiplo/imunologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/metabolismo , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/tratamento farmacológico , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/metabolismoRESUMO
CD33 is a valid target for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but has proven challenging for antibody-drug conjugates. Herein, we investigated the cellular determinants for the activity of the novel CD33/CD3-directed bispecific T-cell engager antibody, AMG 330. In the presence of T cells, AMG 330 was highly active against human AML cell lines and primary AML cells in a dose- and effector to target cell ratio-dependent manner. Using cell lines engineered to express wild-type CD33 at increased levels, we found a quantitative relationship between AMG 330 cytotoxicity and CD33 expression; in contrast, AMG 330 cytotoxicity was neither affected by common CD33 single nucleotide polymorphisms nor expression of the adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette (ABC) transporter proteins, P-glycoprotein or breast cancer resistance protein. Unlike bivalent CD33 antibodies, AMG 330 did not reduce surface CD33 expression. The epigenetic modifier drugs, panobinostat and azacitidine, increased CD33 expression in some cell lines and augmented AMG 330-induced cytotoxicity. These findings demonstrate that AMG 330 has potent CD33-dependent cytolytic activity in vitro, which can be further enhanced with other clinically available therapeutics. As it neither modulates CD33 expression nor is affected by ABC transporter activity, AMG 330 is highly promising for clinical exploration as it may overcome some limitations of previous CD33-targeted agents.