Cancer Core Europe: Leveraging Institutional Synergies to Advance Oncology Research and Care Globally.

Cancer Core Europe brings together the expertise, resources, and interests of seven leading cancer institutes committed to leveraging collective innovation and collaboration in precision oncology. Through targeted efforts addressing key medical challenges in cancer and partnerships with multiple stakeholders, the consortium seeks to advance cancer research and enhance equitable patient care.

Profile of the multicenter cohort of the German Cancer Consortium's Clinical Communication Platform.

Treatment concepts in oncology are becoming increasingly personalized and diverse. Successively, changes in standards of care mandate continuous monitoring of patient pathways and clinical outcomes based on large, representative real-world data. The German Cancer Consortium's (DKTK) Clinical Communication Platform (CCP) provides such opportunity. Connecting fourteen university hospital-based cancer centers, the CCP relies on a federated IT-infrastructure sourcing data from facility-based cancer registry units and biobanks. Federated analyses resulted in a cohort of 600,915 patients, out of which 232,991 were incident since 2013 and for which a comprehensive documentation is available. Next to demographic data (i.e., age at diagnosis: 2.0% 0-20 years, 8.3% 21-40 years, 30.9% 41-60 years, 50.1% 61-80 years, 8.8% 81+ years; and gender: 45.2% female, 54.7% male, 0.1% other) and diagnoses (five most frequent tumor origins: 22,523 prostate, 18,409 breast, 15,575 lung, 13,964 skin/malignant melanoma, 9005 brain), the cohort dataset contains information about therapeutic interventions and response assessments and is connected to 287,883 liquid and tissue biosamples. Focusing on diagnoses and therapy-sequences, showcase analyses of diagnosis-specific sub-cohorts (pancreas, larynx, kidney, thyroid gland) demonstrate the analytical opportunities offered by the cohort's data. Due to its data granularity and size, the cohort is a potential catalyst for translational cancer research. It provides rapid access to comprehensive patient groups and may improve the understanding of the clinical course of various (even rare) malignancies. Therefore, the cohort may serve as a decisions-making tool for clinical trial design and contributes to the evaluation of scientific findings under real-world conditions.

Pressure injury prevention in the operating unit of a Swiss university hospital: a best practice implementation project.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this project was to promote best practice in pressure injury prevention for patients during the intraoperative period in the main operating unit of a Swiss tertiary hospital, through improving risk assessment, safe positioning and documentation. INTRODUCTION: Pressure injury is a common and serious complication of surgery patients. Despite pressure injuries being mostly preventable, they are not a top priority of operating room professionals. METHODS: A baseline audit was conducted using the JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System, applying nine evidence-based criteria. The audit was followed by the implementation of multiple strategies to promote best practice in pressure injury prevention. A follow-up audit was conducted to determine the compliance with best practice recommendations. RESULTS: The baseline audit indicated poor compliance with evidence-based practice in most audited criteria. The project team identified barriers to best practice and strategies implemented to improve practice, including tailored education, direct support in each surgery specialty, assignment of responsibilities regarding pressure injury prevention measures among the multidisciplinary team members and multiple channels of communication. Improvements in practice were observed in eight of nine criteria in the follow-up audit. CONCLUSION: The project demonstrated important positive changes in pressure injury prevention during the intraoperative period, despite a sharp slowdown in its implementation process. Continuing education for nursing and nonnursing practitioners has been systematized. Follow-up audits will need to be conducted in the future to maintain pressure injury prevention processes, and contribute to safety of care in adult patients during the perioperative period.

ADT2FHIR - A Tool for Converting ADT/GEKID Oncology Data to HL7 FHIR Resources.

Harmonized and interoperable data management is a core requirement for federated infrastructures in clinical research. Institutions participating in such infrastructures often have to invest large degrees of time and resources in implementing necessary data integration processes to convert their local data to the required target structure. If the data is already available in an alternative shared data structure, the transformation from source to the desired target structure can be implemented once and then be distributed to all participants to reduce effort and harmonize results. The HL7® FHIR® standard is used as a basis for the shared data model of several medical consortia like DKTK and GBA. It is based on so-called resources which can be represented in XML. Oncological data in German university hospitals is commonly available in the ADT/GEKID format. From this common basis we conceptualized and implemented a transformation which accepts ADT/GEKID XML files and returns FHIR resources. We identified several problems with using the general ADT/GEKID structure in federated research infrastructures, as well as some possible pitfalls relating to the FHIR need for resource ids and focus on semantic coding which differs from the approach in the ADT/GEKID standard. To facilitate participation in federated infrastructures, we propose the ADT2FHIR transformation tool for partners with oncological data in the ADT/GEKID format.