Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
J Med Case Rep ; 15(1): 428, 2021 Aug 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34404447

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors represent the most frequently encountered primary mesenchymal tumors. Whereas the liver and the peritoneum are known to be the preferential metastasis sites, no therapeutic standard has yet been established for the management of bone metastases because of their very low incidence. We report a unique example of a single humerus metastasis of a jejunal gastrointestinal stromal tumor. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 72-year-old European woman whose jejunal gastrointestinal stromal tumor was resected in 2013 and treated during the following 3 years with imatinib (400 mg daily). In 2018, she developed a single humeral bone lesion that was identified as a gastrointestinal stromal tumor metastasis. After 7 months of imatinib intake, reconstructive surgery was performed. Pathologists confirmed the satisfactory histological regression and assessed the complete tumor resection. The patient is still on imatinib maintenance therapy, with no recurrence reported so far. She fully recovered the upper limb function after following an appropriate rehabilitation program. DISCUSSION: Current literature and published case reports indicate that bones are one of the rarest locations of gastrointestinal stromal tumor metastasis (about 1%), with occurrence mainly in the spine. Patients initially diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the small intestine and stomach are more likely to suffer from bone metastasis, compared with other gastrointestinal stromal tumor locations. The median overall survival rate is higher for patients with isolated bone metastasis compared with those having liver metastasis. Metastasis occurs on average 4 years after the primary, but it may take up to 20 years, emphasizing the need for long-term clinical and radiological monitoring. Although specific guidelines for such cases have not yet been established, we suggest that a multimodal concerted approach involving surgery or radiotherapy associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor intake should be considered. CONCLUSION: Bones are one of the rarest locations of gastrointestinal stromal tumor metastasis. A multidisciplinary collaboration was set up to allow conservative surgery of our patient after several months of imatinib treatment. A year and a half later, the patient is still in complete remission. This specific case supports the concept of an intermediate stage between local and oligometastatic disease that should be managed with a curative aim, as much as possible.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Humanos , Úmero , Mesilato de Imatinib/uso terapêutico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia
2.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 44(9): 1378-1383, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30131104

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal metastasis from biliary carcinoma (PMC) is associated with poor prognosis when treated with chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on survival of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and compare with conventional palliative chemotherapy for patients with PMC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective multicenter international database was retrospectively searched to identify all patients with PMC treated with a potentially curative CRS/HIPEC (CRS/HIPEC group). The overall survival (OS) was compared to patients with PMC treated with palliative chemotherapy (systemic chemotherapy group). Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and compared with Log-Rank test. RESULTS: Between 1995 and 2015, 34 patients were included in the surgical group, and compared to 21 in the systemic chemotherapy group. In the surgical group, median peritoneal cancer index was 9 (range 3-26), macroscopically complete resection was obtained for 25 patients (73%). There was more gallbladder localization in the surgical group compared to the chemotherapy group (35% vs. 18%, p = 0.001). Median OS was 21.4 and 9.3 months for surgical and chemotherapy group, respectively (p=0.007). Three-year overall survival was 30% and 10% for surgical and chemotherapy group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatment with CRS and HIPEC for biliary carcinoma with peritoneal metastasis is feasible and may provide survival benefit when compared to palliative chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/métodos , Hipertermia Induzida/métodos , Neoplasias Peritoneais/terapia , Sistema de Registros , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/mortalidade , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/secundário , Feminino , Seguimentos , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Peritoneais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Peritoneais/secundário , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências
3.
Eur J Cancer ; 65: 69-79, 2016 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27472649

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a severe disease with mainly locoregional evolution. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is the reported treatment with the longest survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of perioperative systemic chemotherapy strategies on survival and postoperative outcomes in patients with DMPM treated with curative intent with CRS-HIPEC, using a multi-institutional database: the French RENAPE network. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1991 to 2014, 126 DMPM patients underwent CRS-HIPEC at 20 tertiary centres. The population was divided into four groups according to perioperative treatment: only neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NA), only adjuvant chemotherapy (ADJ), perioperative chemotherapy (PO) and no chemotherapy before or after CRS-HIPEC (NoC). RESULTS: All groups (NA: n = 42; ADJ: n = 16; PO: n = 16; NoC: n = 48) were comparable regarding clinicopathological data and main DMPM prognostic factors. After a median follow-up of 61 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 40%, 67%, 62% and 56% in NA, ADJ, PO and NoC groups, respectively (P = 0.049). Major complications occurred for 41%, 45%, 35% and 41% of patients from NA, ADJ, PO and NoC groups, respectively (P = 0.299). In multivariate analysis, NA was independently associated with worse OS (hazard ratio, 2.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-4.94; P = 0.033). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study suggests that adjuvant chemotherapy may delay recurrence and improve survival and that NA may impact negatively the survival for patients with DMPM who underwent CRS-HIPEC with curative intent. Upfront CRS and HIPEC should be considered when achievable, waiting for stronger level of scientific evidence.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução , Hipertermia Induzida , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Mesotelioma/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intraperitoneais , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Masculino , Mesotelioma/mortalidade , Mesotelioma Maligno , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Peritoneais/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Adulto Jovem
4.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 41(10): 1361-7, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26263848

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Over the last two decades, many surgical teams have developed programs to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis with extensive cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Currently, there are no specific recommendations for HIPEC procedures concerning environmental contamination risk management, personal protective equipment (PPE), or occupational health supervision. METHODS: A survey of the institutional practices among all French teams currently performing HIPEC procedures was carried out via the French network for the treatment of rare peritoneal malignancies (RENAPE). RESULTS: Thirty three surgical teams responded, 14 (42.4%) which reported more than 10 years of HIPEC experience. Some practices were widespread, such as using HIPEC machine approved by the European Community (100%), individualized or centralized smoke evacuation (81.8%), "open" abdominal coverage during perfusion (75.8%), and maintaining the same surgeon throughout the procedure (69.7%). Others were more heterogeneous, including laminar flow air circulation (54.5%) and the provision of safety protocols in the event of perfusate spills (51.5%). The use of specialized personal protective equipment is ubiquitous (93.9%) but widely variable between programs. CONCLUSION: Protocols regarding cytoreductive surgery/HIPEC and the associated professional risks in France lack standardization and should be established.


Assuntos
Ar Condicionado/métodos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/métodos , Hipertermia Induzida/métodos , Infusões Parenterais/métodos , Neoplasias Peritoneais/terapia , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica , França , Humanos , Saúde Ocupacional , Gestão de Riscos , Fumaça , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
Br J Cancer ; 106(3): 460-7, 2012 Jan 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22173671

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intraperitoneal (IP) perioperative chemotherapy with cisplatin is an interesting option in ovarian cancer treatment. A combination of cisplatin with IP epinephrine (already shown to improve IP and decrease systemic platinum (Pt) exposure) was evaluated using a population pharmacokinetic analysis. METHODS: Data from 55 patients treated with cisplatin-based IP perioperative chemotherapy with (n=26) or without (n=29) epinephrine were analysed using NONMEM. RESULTS: Epinephrine halves clearance between peritoneum and serum (IPCL) and increases the Pt central volume of distribution, IP exposure and penetration in tissue. IPCL has a better predictive value than any other parameter with respect to renal toxicity. CONCLUSION: This confirms that IPCL could be useful in assessing renal toxicity. As IPCL is also linked to tissue penetration and IP exposure, it may be proposed as biomarker. In addition to a Bayesian estimation, we propose a single-sample calculation-way to assess it. Prospective studies are needed to validate IPCL as a biomarker in this context.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Peritônio/metabolismo , Adulto , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/sangue , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Biomarcadores/sangue , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Cisplatino/sangue , Cisplatino/farmacocinética , Esquema de Medicação , Epinefrina/sangue , Epinefrina/farmacocinética , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intraperitoneais , Período Intraoperatório , Taxa de Depuração Metabólica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Biológicos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia
6.
Rev Med Interne ; 27(5): 409-13, 2006 May.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16545502

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Ganglioneuroma is a rare benign nervous tumour frequently located in the retroperitoneal area. We report the case of a 22-year-old female patient where this tumour was revealed by nephritic colic complicated by pyelitis and kidney abscess. EXEGESIS: The patient presented with brutal feverish lumbar pains and urinary signs. Abundant iconography, in particular contrasted enhanced sonography, allowed to show a massive retroperitoneal lump and a puncture-biopsy indicated a ganglioneuroma which was surgically removed by laparotomy. Signs may be varied and misleading. Biological and radiological exams are useful for the diagnosis which can only be confirmed by the thorough histological examination of the removed sample. CONCLUSION: A large retroperitoneal lump without alteration of the patient's health should point to this diagnosis, since the complete surgical removal leads to recovery without recurrence, but all the other differential diagnoses must first be dismissed.


Assuntos
Cólica/fisiopatologia , Ganglioneuroma/diagnóstico , Nefrite/complicações , Abscesso/complicações , Adulto , Feminino , Ganglioneuroma/complicações , Humanos , Nefropatias/complicações , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Pielite/complicações
7.
Ann Endocrinol (Paris) ; 65(3): 221-4, 2004 May.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15277980

RESUMO

Intrathyroidal parathyroid adenoma is an infrequent lesion which can be explained by abnormalities during embryonic migration of the parathyroid glands. That abnormality can be a cause of failed cervical exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism. From a case report and literature data, we propose an exploration processes to search those ectopic parathyroid adenoma.


Assuntos
Adenoma/diagnóstico , Coristoma/patologia , Neoplasias das Paratireoides/diagnóstico , Glândula Tireoide , Adenoma/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperparatireoidismo/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias das Paratireoides/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...