Arteriovenous Graft Infection Due to Granulicatella adiacens.

Granulicatella adiacens is a gram-positive coccus that is normally found in the human oral cavity and gastrointestinal and urogenital tracts but can rarely cause infection. When it does cause infection, Granulicatella adiacens has been most associated with bacteremia and endovascular infection, but to our knowledge, there are no previously documented cases of arteriovenous graft (AVG) infection. We present a case of Granulicatella adiacens bacteremia with associated AVG infection.

A Case of Colchicine Toxicity Presenting With Euglycemic Diabetic Ketoacidosis.

Colchicine has a narrow therapeutic window and a high risk of toxicity when co-administered with CYP3A4 inhibitors and P-glycoprotein inhibitors. Colchicine toxicity is associated with various metabolic disturbances and can cause multiorgan failure and death. However, to our knowledge, there are no documented reports of colchicine toxicity initially presenting as euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). We present a case of colchicine toxicity with concomitant euglycemic DKA in a man with long-term colchicine use who was also prescribed clarithromycin and dapagliflozin.

Prevalence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Proton Pump Inhibitor-Refractory Symptoms.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There are few data on the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the United States. We performed a population-based study to determine the prevalence of GERD symptoms and persistent GERD symptoms despite use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). METHODS: We conducted the National Gastrointestinal Survey in 2015 using MyGiHealth, an app that guides participants through National Institutes of Health gastrointestinal Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System surveys. Primary outcomes were prevalence of GERD symptoms in the past and persistence of GERD symptoms (heartburn or regurgitation 2 or more days in past week) among participants taking PPIs. Population weights were applied to the data and multivariable regression was used to adjust for confounding. RESULTS: Among 71,812 participants, 32,878 (44.1%) reported having had GERD symptoms in the past and 23,039 (30.9%) reported having GERD symptoms in the past week. We also found that 35.1% of those who had experienced GERD symptoms were currently on therapy (55.2% on PPIs, 24.3% on histamine-2 receptor blockers, and 24.4% on antacids). Among 3229 participants taking daily PPIs, 54.1% had persistent GERD symptoms. Younger individuals, women, Latino individuals, and participants with irritable bowel syndrome or Crohn's disease were more likely to have continued symptoms, even when taking PPIs. CONCLUSIONS: Using a population-based survey, we found GERD symptoms to be common: 2 of 5 participants have had GERD symptoms in the past and 1 of 3 had symptoms in the past week. We also found that half of PPI users have persistent symptoms. Given the significant effect of GERD on quality of life, further research and development of new therapies are needed for patients with PPI-refractory GERD symptoms.

Economic analysis of implementing virtual reality therapy for pain among hospitalized patients.

Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a novel and effective non-pharmacologic therapy for pain, and there is growing interest to use VR in the acute hospital setting. We sought to explore the cost and effectiveness thresholds VR therapy must meet to be cost-saving as an inpatient pain management program. The result is a framework for hospital administrators to evaluate the return on investment of implementing inpatient VR programs of varying effectiveness and cost. Utilizing decision analysis software, we compared adjuvant VR therapy for pain management vs. usual care among hospitalized patients. In the VR strategy, we analyzed potential cost-savings from reductions in opioid utilization and hospital length of stay (LOS), as well as increased reimbursements from higher patient satisfaction as measured by the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey. The average overall hospitalization cost-savings per patient for the VR program vs. usual care was $5.39 (95% confidence interval -$11.00 to $156.17). In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis across 1000 hypothetical hospitals of varying size and staffing, VR remained cost-saving in 89.2% of trials. The VR program was cost-saving so long as it reduced LOS by ≥14.6%; the model was not sensitive to differences in opioid use or HCAHPS. We conclude that inpatient VR therapy may be cost-saving for a hospital system primarily if it reduces LOS. In isolation, cost-savings from reductions in opioid utilization and increased HCAHPS-related reimbursements are not sufficient to overcome the costs of VR.

Erratum: Author Correction: Economic analysis of implementing virtual reality therapy for pain among hospitalized patients.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/s41746-018-0026-4.].