Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for postgraduate competency based intensive care medicine training in the Netherlands: The next step towards excellence in intensive care medicine training.

INTRODUCTION: The Competency Based Training in Intensive Care Education (CoBaTrICE) programme developed common standards of ICM training by describing competencies of an intensivist. Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) of Intensive Care Medicine (ICM) (EPAsICM) are presented as a new workplace-based assessment tool in competency-based training of intensivists. EPAs are activities to be entrusted to a trainee once he (or she) has attained competence. EPAs emphasise the role of trust between trainees and supervisors. EPAs bridge the gap between competencies and competence. METHODS: An expert panel of ICM (vice)programme directors and intensivists in The Netherlands integrated the CoBaTrICE and CanMEDS competencies into EPAsICM. Comment and feedback was sought from other ICM programme directors and educational experts and processed in the final version of EPAsICM before implementation in the Dutch ICM training programme. RESULTS: A list of 15 EPAsICM are considered to reflect the spectrum of clinical practice while incorporating the competencies of CoBaTrICE and CanMEDS. The grading system is designed as a 5-point entrustment scale based on the amount of supervision a trainee needs, aligning with daily judgement of trainees by intensivists. CONCLUSION: EPAsICM is an assessment tool that formalises entrustment decisions and can be a valuable addition in international ICM training.

Are graduated intensivists prepared for practice? A case study from The Netherlands.

PURPOSE: An evaluation of the alignment between intensive care medicine (ICM) training and practice provides valuable information for the development of ICM training. Therefore this study examines how well recently licensed intensivists feel prepared for practice and whether intensivists from different background specialties attain comparable preparedness rates. METHODS: An inventory was developed to cover the tasks that constitute ICM practice. Two hundred five recently licensed Dutch intensivists received a questionnaire in which they could indicate how well their ICM training programme prepared them for these tasks on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Ninety-one respondents returned the questionnaire (response 45%). Respondents felt excellently prepared for 67 tasks, well prepared for 16 tasks, marginally sufficiently prepared for 6 tasks and insufficiently prepared for 15 tasks. Intensivists from anaesthesiology felt better prepared for IC specific activities (mean 4.25, SD 0.38) than those from internal medicine (mean 4.01, SD 0.40, P=.02).Average scores on tasks related to medical expertise were relatively high while tasks relating to management and leadership, science and professional development scored lower. CONCLUSIONS: Although recently licensed intensivists are well prepared for most tasks in ICM, lower preparedness scores on tasks related to leadership and management, science, and professional development call for re-evaluation of the current curriculum.

Progress testing in intensive care medicine training: useful and feasible?!

So far the in-training assessment of knowledge is perhaps underrepresented in postgraduate assessment frameworks in intensive care medicine (ICM). In most contemporary training programs a predominant emphasis is placed on workplace based learning and workplace based assessment. This article provides a concise general background on the nature and use of progress testing, and touches upon potential strengths, and constraints regarding its potential implementation and use in the postgraduate ICM training programs.

Boussignac continuous positive airway pressure for weaning with tracheostomy tubes.

BACKGROUND: In patients who are weaned with a tracheostomy tube (TT), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is frequently used. Dedicated CPAP systems or ventilators with bulky tubing are usually applied. However, CPAP can also be effective without a ventilator by the disposable Boussignac CPAP (BCPAP) system that is normally used with face masks. OBJECTIVE: It was the aim of this audit to evaluate the feasibility of low-level BCPAP in patients who were weaned with a TT. METHODS: All patients at our surgical intensive care unit who received a TT for weaning were considered for application of BCPAP. Once patients had received minimal pressure support from the mechanical ventilator, the BCPAP device was connected to the TT three times a day for 30 min with pressure set to 3-5 cm H(2)O, FiO(2) at 0.4 and with humidification. BCPAP was then gradually extended to 24 h/day. Patient acceptance, complications and outcome were recorded. RESULTS: 58 patients received a TT to facilitate weaning. They had a median stay of 52 days in the intensive care unit during which they had an endotracheal tube for 22 days and a TT for 28 days. 50 of these patients (86%) received BCPAP for a median of 16 days. The lightweight BCPAP system was well tolerated without tube obstructions or accidental decannulations and may have contributed to patient mobility. No patient remained on ventilatory support after hospital discharge. In-hospital and 1-year survival were 86 and 71%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BCPAP is a feasible and safe method for weaning tracheostomy patients.