[Comparison of available clinical and imaging tools to assess good positioning of a fluocinolone acetonide implant (Iluvien®) in the vitreous cavity after injection]. / Comparaison des moyens clinique et d'imagerie disponibles en pratique clinique pour objectiver la présence de l'implant d'acétonide de fluocinolone (Iluvien®) dans la cavité vitréenne après injection.

INTRODUCTION: Sustained-release corticosteroid implants are injected into the vitreous cavity using preloaded pens. The fluocinolone (FAc) implant is approximately half the size of the dexamethasone implant (Dex-I). It is simply introduced in the vitreous base rather than propelled into the vitreous cavity as is Dex-I. Verification of its positioning after injection is thus difficult by indirect ophthalmoscopy. The goal of our study is to compare the performance of available clinical and imaging tools to confirm the presence of the FAc in the vitreous cavity following injection. METHODS: Twelve eyes of 12 consecutive patients were included in a retrospective, single-center, observational study carried out at the Bordeaux University Hospital, France. All patients were injected with the FAc after pupil dilation, and presence of the implant was immediately checked by indirect biomicroscopy, wide-field retinography (Clarus®, Carl-Zeiss-Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA) and ultra-wide-field retinography (California®, Optos, Edinburgh, United-Kingdom). Seven days later, a B-mode ultrasonography (10MHz, AVISO, Quantel-medical, France) and an UBM ultrasonography (50MHz, AVISO, Quantel-medical, France) were performed. RESULTS: Indirect biomicroscopy and wide-field retinography detected 4/12 implants (33.3%). Ultra-wide-field retinophotography detected 6/12 implants (50%). All the implants seen using indirect biomicroscopy and wide-field retinography were also visualized with ultra-wide-field. B-mode ultrasonography showed 5/12 implants (41.6%) and UBM 9/12 implants (75%). Finally, one implant dislocated into the anterior chamber and was seen in the iridocorneal angle on gonioscopy. CONCLUSION: Objective confirmation of the proper positioning of the FAc implant in the vitreous cavity is mandatory. If both indirect ophthalmoscopy and anterior examination fail to detect it, ultra-wide field retinography along with UBM ultrasonography, if necessary, appear to be the two best imaging modalities to use.

[Intravitreal clindamycin injection in toxoplasma retinochoroiditis: About 9 cases in the ophthalmology department of the CHU de Bordeaux]. / Injection intravitréenne de clindamycine dans le traitement des rétinochoroïdites toxoplasmiques : à propos de 9 cas dans le service d'ophtalmologie du CHU de Bordeaux.

INTRODUCTION: Toxoplasma retinochoroiditis (TRC) is the main cause of posterior uveitis in immunocompetent patients. Several studies have shown safety and efficacy of treatment with intravitreal clindamycin injection in patients with contraindications, inadequate response or side effects with classic oral therapy. The goal of this study is to describe anatomic and functional results of local treatment with intravitreal clindamycin injection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an observational, retrospective, single-center study in the ophthalmology service of Bordeaux university medical center between December 2017 and January 2020 on management of toxoplasma retinochoroiditis by intravitreal clindamycin injection. We analyzed the efficacy of this treatment on improvement in visual acuity, decrease in size of the retinal lesion and decrease in macular thickness. RESULTS: A total of 10 eyes of 9 patients were injected. Only a single injection was required in 9 of the 10 cases. Injections demonstrated improvement in the 3 study criteria; visual acuity went from a mean of 1 LogMAR (1.07±0.77) pre-injection to 0.4 LogMAR (0.43±0.53) at 6 months, lesion size decreased by 51%, and macular thickness decreased by 78µm over the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal clindamycin injections are safe and effective for the treatment of TRC. They offer an alternative in patients with allergies, side effects or inadequate response to classic oral therapy.

[Treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration: Consensus of French experts for first-line treatment selection and the importance of long-term risk/benefit ratio]. / Consensus d'experts français sur les critères de choix d'un traitement de 1re intention dans la DMLA néovasculaire et importance du ratio bénéfice/risque à long terme.

Choosing a first-line treatment to optimize long-term outcomes is a major challenge for treating patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The development of several new molecules makes it critical to identify the relevant factors to consider so as to provide an optimal risk-benefit ratio when initiating a treatment in naïve patients with neovascular AMD. This paper proposes a consensus established with the Delphi method (which includes a gradation in a consensus based on an analysis of the convergence rate of answers) to provide criteria that guide the ophthalmologist's decision for treatment initiation and follow-up in neovascular AMD patients. Fourteen questions were submitted to 93 French retina experts. Thirteen (93%) of the questions reached a consensus (≥50% of answers consensual). The criteria recommended to take into account were both efficacy and onset of action of the molecules, their safety, and the ability to decrease injection frequency. The primary criterion of expected efficacy of a molecule is a combination of the gain in visual acuity and resorption of retinal fluid. With regard to safety, experts recommend tighter follow-up for molecules currently in development, and at every scheduled visit, patients should be screened to identify early any potential adverse effects such as intraocular inflammation, retinal vasculitis or vascular occlusion. Experts also emphasize the importance of the packaging of the biological, with a preference toward prefilled syringes. Injection frequency is a key factor, and the authors recommended aiming for a maximal injection interval of 12 to 16 weeks. The stability of that maximum interval is also an important factor to consider in treatment selection.

Diabetic retinopathy in well-controlled type 2 diabetes: Role of glycaemic memory.

AIMS: As diabetic retinopathy (DR) can occur even in well-controlled patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), our study sought to determine whether it might be related to 'glucose memory' by evaluating patients' HbA1c over previous years and their skin autofluorescence (SAF). METHODS: In 334 patients with T2D and HbA1c levels≤8%, their available values of HbA1c from previous years were collected, and their SAF measured by an advanced glycation end-product (AGE) reader. Binary logistic regression analysis was then used to correlate DR with previously recorded HbA1c levels and to SAF, with adjustment for DR risk factors [age, gender, BMI, duration of diabetes, arterial hypertension, diabetic kidney disease (DKD), blood lipid levels and statin treatment]. RESULTS: Our patients were mostly men (58.4%) aged 63±10years, with a duration of diabetes of 13±10years and HbA1c=7.1±0.7%. Of these patients, 84 (25.1%) had DR, which was associated with longer duration of diabetes and greater prevalence of DKD. A total of 605 HbA1c values from previous years were collected for time periods -4±3 months (n=255), -16±4months (n=152), -30±4months (n=93) and -62±26 months (n=105). After adjustment, the association between DR and having an HbA1c higher than the median was significant only for the oldest previous HbA1c values: OR=6.75, 95% CI: 1.90-23.90. Moreover, SAF values were higher in those with DR [2.95±0.67 arbitrary units (AU)] vs 2.65±0.65 AU with no DR (P<0.01) and were also associated with the oldest previous HbA1c values (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Our study found that 25.1% of our well-controlled T2D patients had DR, which was related to both their HbA1c levels from 5years prior to study admission and their SAF values, a marker of glucose memory.