RESUMO
BACKGROUND: To determine if construction and trades workers formerly employed at US Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear weapons sites are at significant risk for occupational diseases, we studied the mortality experience of participants in the Building Trades National Medical Screening Program (BTMed). METHODS: The cohort included 26,922 participants enrolled between 1998 and 2021 and 8367 deaths. Standardized mortality ratios were calculated based on US death rates. Cox models compared construction workers (n = 22,747; 7487 deaths) to two nonconstruction subpopulations: administrative, scientific and security workers (n = 1894; 330 deaths), and all other nonconstruction workers (n = 2218; 550 deaths). RESULTS: Mortality was elevated for all causes, all cancers, cancers of the trachea, bronchus, lung, kidneys, and lymphatic and hematopoietic system, mesothelioma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asbestosis, transportation injuries, and other injuries, particularly accidental poisonings. There were 167 deaths from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which was lower than expected using US death rates. Overall cause-specific mortality was significantly higher among construction workers than for internal comparison groups. CONCLUSIONS: Construction workers employed at DOE sites have a significantly increased risk for occupational illnesses. Apart from COVID-19 deaths, this update: (1) found that mortality among construction workers is significantly elevated compared to the US population and significantly higher than in the internal comparison populations, and (2) confirmed excess risk for these workers for first employment after 1990. Cancer mortality risks are similar to the cancers identified for DOE compensation from radiation exposures. The high lung cancer risk supports the value of early lung cancer detection. Continued medical surveillance is important.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Indústria da Construção , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Seguimentos , Pulmão , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversosRESUMO
While all forms of asbestos have been determined to be carcinogenic to humans by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as well as other authoritative bodies, the relative carcinogenic potency of chrysotile continues to be argued, largely in the context of toxic tort litigation. Relatively few epidemiologic studies have investigated only a single form of asbestos; however, one study that included an asbestos textile plant located in Marshville, North Carolina that processed chrysotile asbestos was used by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2020 to help inform the agency's chrysotile asbestos risk assessment. During the EPA proceedings toxic tort defense consultants submitted comments to the EPA docket and made public presentations asserting that the Marshville plant had processed amphibole asbestos types and should not be used for the chrysotile risk assessment. A detailed evaluation of defense consultant assertions and supporting information and a full assessment of the available information concerning asbestos types used at the Marshville plant was undertaken. The preponderance of evidence continues to support the conclusion that neither amosite nor crocidolite were likely to have been processed in the Marshville textile plant. Defense consultants' assertions about chrysotile use are not supported by the preponderance of evidence and constitute an example of manipulation of information to cast uncertainty and doubt rather than to seek truth and contribute to the body of scientific evidence.
Assuntos
Amianto , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Mesotelioma , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Asbestos Serpentinas/toxicidade , Asbestos Serpentinas/análise , United States Environmental Protection Agency , Amianto/toxicidade , Amianto/análise , Amiantos Anfibólicos/toxicidade , Amiantos Anfibólicos/análise , Asbesto Crocidolita/análise , Asbesto Crocidolita/toxicidade , Medição de Risco , Mesotelioma/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Spirometry-based studies of occupational lung disease have mostly focused on obstructive or mixed obstructive/restrictive outcomes. We wanted to determine if restrictive spirometry pattern (RSP) is associated with occupation and increased mortality. METHODS: Study participants included 18,145 workers with demographic and smoking data and repeatable spirometry. The mortality analysis cohort included 15,445 workers with known vital status and cause of death through December 31, 2016. Stratified analyses explored RSP prevalence by demographic and clinical variables and trade. Log-binomial regression models explored RSP risk factors while controlling for important confounders such as smoking, obesity, and comorbidities. Cox regression models explored mortality risk by spirometry category. RESULTS: Prevalence of RSP was very high (28.6%). Mortality hazard ratios for RSP were 1.50 for all causes, 1.86 for cardiovascular diseases, 2.31 for respiratory diseases, and 1.66 for lung cancer. All construction trades except painters, machinists, and roofers had significantly elevated risk for RSP compared to our internal reference group. RSP was significantly associated with both parenchymal and pleural changes seen by chest X-ray. CONCLUSIONS: Construction trade workers are at significantly increased risk for RSP independent of obesity. Individuals with RSP are at increased risk for all-cause mortality as well as mortality attributable to respiratory diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and lung cancer. RSP deserves greater attention in occupational medicine and epidemiology.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Indústria da Construção , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Transtornos Respiratórios , Humanos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Espirometria , Obesidade/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Construction workers have always had a high risk of occupational illnesses. We used 25 years of data from a medical screening program serving older construction workers to determine how much health outcomes have improved over the past 60 years. METHODS: We investigated changes in relative risk for chest radiographs consistent with pneumoconiosis, COPD by spirometry, lung cancer mortality, and audiometry-assessed hearing impairment among workers participating in a medical screening program. Results were stratified by decade of first construction employment: before 1960, 1960-1969, 1970-1979, 1980-1989, and after 1990. Poisson and Cox regression analyses assessed relative risk by decade adjusted for age, sex, smoking, and years of construction trade work. RESULTS: Subjects were 94% male and, on average, 60 years old with 25 years of construction work. When compared to workers employed before 1960, those first employed after 1990 experienced the following reductions in model-adjusted relative risks: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 32%; all pneumoconiosis, 68%; parenchymal abnormalities, 35%; pleural abnormalities, 71%; hearing impairment, 20%; and lung cancer mortality, 48%. Risks started to decline in the 1960s with greatest reductions among workers first employed after 1970. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the positive impact that adoption of occupational health protections have had over the past 60 years. The greatest risk reductions were observed for outcomes with strong regulatory and legal incentives to reduce exposures and associated risks, such as those associated with inhalation hazards (asbestos and silica), while lowest improvement was for hearing impairment, for which little regulatory enforcement and few prevention incentives have been adopted.
Assuntos
Indústria da Construção , Perda Auditiva , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Saúde Ocupacional , Pneumoconiose , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Pneumoconiose/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Construction workers at U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear weapons facilities are screened to identify DOE-related occupational illnesses, including beryllium sensitization (BeS) and chronic beryllium disease (CBD). The study objectives were to estimate beryllium disease risks and the CBD claims acceptance rate in the energy workers' benefits program. METHODS: Workers diagnosed with BeS via beryllium lymphocyte proliferation test (BeLPT) included in screening examinations were interviewed about subsequent diagnosis of CBD. We estimated the proportion who developed CBD based on the ratio of CBD cases, based on self-reported compensation claim status, to all workers with BeS interviewed. We used stratified analyses to explore trends in disease frequency by age, race, sex, DOE employment duration, site, trade group, and cigarette smoking history. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2020, 21,854 workers received a BeLPT; 262 (1.20%) had BeS (two abnormals or one abnormal plus one borderline test); 212 (0.97%) had a single abnormal BeLPT. Of 177 BeS workers interviewed, 35 (19.8%) reported an accepted CBD compensation claim. The claims acceptance rate among BeS workers increased with years of DOE employment, from 8.4% with <5 years to 33.3% for >25 or more years. Five of 68 interviewed workers with a single positive BeLPT reported CBD claim acceptance; an additional CBD case was confirmed by chart review (8.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Years of DOE work predict the risk of developing CBD among those sensitized and getting a claim for CBD accepted. Ongoing surveillance and increased awareness of the risk of beryllium exposure and CBD as an occupational disease among construction workers are needed.
Assuntos
Beriliose , Indústria da Construção , Exposição Ocupacional , Beriliose/diagnóstico , Beriliose/epidemiologia , Beriliose/etiologia , Berílio , Doença Crônica , Seguimentos , Humanos , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/análiseRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Few studies have defined the risk of hearing impairment and tinnitus after retirement. This report measures hearing impairment and tinnitus prevalence among older construction trades workers. METHODS: The study cohort included 21,340 participants in a national medical screening program (www.btmed.org). Audiometric hearing impairment was classified according to the Global Burden of Disease Study. Tinnitus was determined by self-report. An internal subcohort of nonconstruction trades workers served as a reference group. Stratified analyses and multivariate analyses were used to measure the prevalence of hearing impairment and tinnitus by age, sex, and job category. RESULTS: Prevalence of any hearing impairment was 55.2% (males, 57.7%; females, 26.8%) and increased rapidly with age. Construction trades workers were 40% more likely to have hearing impairment than the reference group. The overall prevalence of tinnitus was 46.52% and followed patterns similar to hearing impairment. Workers with hearing impairment were more likely to also have tinnitus, but tinnitus was frequently reported in the absence of measured hearing impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Hearing impairment and tinnitus prevalence were much higher in this study than in previous research. A significant reason for the difference is that BTMed follows participants after they have retired. To draw conclusions about the risk for work-related chronic diseases and disorders it is important to monitor workers through their lifetimes. Also, tinnitus by itself should be given greater significance. These findings reinforce the need to promote noise reduction and hearing conservation in construction.
Assuntos
Indústria da Construção , Perda Auditiva , Zumbido , Audiometria , Feminino , Perda Auditiva/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Autorrelato , Zumbido/diagnóstico , Zumbido/epidemiologia , Zumbido/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A 2010 study of construction workers participating in medical screening programs at the Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear facilities demonstrated increased chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) risk. The current study of a larger worker cohort allowed for a more nuanced analysis of COPD risk, including for employment beginning after the mid-1990s. METHODS: Study participants included 17,941 workers with demographic and smoking data and spirometry with a minimum of three recorded expiratory efforts and reproducibility of forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ) of 0.2 L or less. COPD was defined as a FEV1 /FVC ratio below the lower limit of normal using established prediction equations without use of bronchodilation. Stratified analyses explored COPD prevalence by demographic variables and trade. Logistic regression analyses assessed risks by trade and time periods of trade and DOE site work, controlling for age, gender, race/ethnicity, body mass index, and smoking. RESULTS: Overall COPD prevalence was 13.4% and 67.4% of cases were classified as moderate to severe. Compared to nonconstruction workers, construction trade workers were at significantly increased risk of all COPD (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.29-1.79) and even more so for severe COPD (OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.32-1.96). The highest risk trades were cement masons/bricklayers (OR = 2.36; 95% CI = 1.71-3.26) and roofers (OR = 2.22; 95% CI = 1.48-3.32). Risk among workers employed after 1995 was elevated but not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Construction workers are at increased COPD risk. Results support the prevention of both smoking and occupational exposures to reduce these risks. While the number of participants employed after 1995 was small, patterns of risk were consistent with findings in the overall cohort.
Assuntos
Indústria da Construção/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Prevalência , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/etiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Testes de Função Respiratória , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Espirometria , Capacidade VitalRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study examined predictors of lung cancer mortality, beyond age and smoking, among construction workers employed at US Department of Energy (DOE) sites to better define eligibility for low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening. METHODS: Predictive models were based on 17 069 workers and 352 lung cancer deaths. Risk factors included age, gender, race/ethnicity, cigarette smoking, years of trade or DOE work, body mass index (BMI), chest X-ray results, spirometry results, respiratory symptoms, beryllium sensitisation and personal history of cancer. Competing risk Cox models were used to obtain HRs and to predict 5-year risks. RESULTS: Factors beyond age and smoking included in the final predictive model were chest X-ray changes, abnormal lung function, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), respiratory symptoms, BMI, personal history of cancer and having worked 5 or more years at a DOE site or in construction. Risk-based LDCT eligibility demonstrated improved sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value compared with current US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines. The risk of lung cancer death from 5 years of work in the construction industry or at a DOE site was comparable with the risk from a personal cancer history, a family history of cancer or a diagnosis of COPD. LDCT eligibility criteria used for DOE construction workers, which includes factors beyond age and smoking, identified 86% of participants who eventually would die from lung cancer compared with 51% based on age and smoking alone. CONCLUSIONS: Results support inclusion of risk from occupational exposures and non-malignant respiratory clinical findings in LDCT clinical guidelines.
Assuntos
Indústria da Construção , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Doenças Profissionais/mortalidade , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Governo Federal , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To determine if construction and trades workers employed at U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear sites facilities are at significant risk for diseases associated with occupational exposures, we compared the mortality experience of participants in the Building Trades National Medical Screening Program (BTMed) to that of the US population. METHODS: The cohort includes 24,086 BTMed participants enrolled between 1998 and 2016 and 5203 deaths. Cause-specific standardized mortality ratios were calculated based on US death rates. RESULTS: Mortality was elevated for all causes, all cancers, cancers of the trachea, bronchus, and lung and lymphatic and hematopoietic system, mesothelioma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asbestosis, transportation injuries, and other injuries, particularly those caused by accidental poisoning, suggesting a possible effect of the opioid epidemic. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from other injuries, mortality patterns were very similar to those reported in the past in this population. Construction workers employed at DOE sites have a significantly increased risk for occupational illnesses. Risks are associated with employment during all time periods covered including possibly after 1990. The cancer risks closely match the cancers identified for DOE compensation from radiation exposures. The high risk of lung cancer supports the value of early lung cancer detection. Continued medical surveillance is important.
Assuntos
Indústria da Construção/estatística & dados numéricos , Centrais Nucleares/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Profissionais/mortalidade , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Lesões por Radiação/mortalidade , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Centrais Nucleares/organização & administração , Vigilância da População , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/etiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/mortalidade , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Government Agencies/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The US National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends two pathways for eligibility for Early Lung Cancer Detection (ELCD) programmes. Option 2 includes individuals with occupational exposures to lung carcinogens, in combination with a lesser requirement on smoking. Our objective was to determine if this algorithm resulted in a similar prevalence of lung cancer as has been found using smoking risk alone, and if so to present an approach for lung cancer screening in high-risk worker populations. METHODS: We enrolled 1260 former workers meeting NCCN criteria, with modifications to account for occupational exposures in an ELCD programme. RESULTS: At baseline, 1.6% had a lung cancer diagnosed, a rate similar to the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial (NLST). Among NLST participants, 59% were current smokers at the time of baseline scan or had quit smoking fewer than 15 years prior to baseline; all had a minimum of 30 pack-years of smoking. Among our population, only 24.5% were current smokers and 40.1% of our participants had smoked fewer than 30 pack-years; only 43.5% would meet entry criteria for the NLST. The most likely explanation for the high prevalence of screen-detected lung cancers in the face of a reduced risk from smoking is the addition of occupational risk factors for lung cancer. CONCLUSION: Occupational exposures to lung carcinogens should be incorporated into criteria used for ELCD programmes, using the algorithm developed by NCCN or with an individualised risk assessment; current risk assessment tools can be modified to incorporate occupational risk.
Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Carcinógenos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
CONTEXT: Health care workers have high rates of musculoskeletal injuries, but many of these injuries go unreported to workers' compensation and national surveillance systems. Little is known regarding the work-related injuries of certified athletic trainers (ATs). OBJECTIVE: To determine the 12-month incidence and prevalence of work-related injuries and describe injury-reporting and -management strategies. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Population-based online survey. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Of the 29â051 ATs currently certified by the Board of Certification, Inc, who "opted in" to research studies, we randomly selected 10â000. Of these, 1826 (18.3%) ATs currently working in the clinical setting were eligible and participated in the baseline survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): An online survey was e-mailed in May of 2012. We assessed self-reported work-related injuries in the previous 12 months and management strategies including medical care, work limitations or modifications, and time off work. Statistics (frequencies and percentages) were calculated to describe injury rates per 200â000 work hours, injury prevalence, injury characteristics, and injury-reporting and -management strategies. RESULTS: A total of 247 ATs reported 419 work-related injuries during the previous 12 months, for an incidence rate of 21.6 per 200â000 hours (95% confidence interval = 19.6, 23.7) and injury prevalence of 13.5% (95% confidence interval = 12.0%, 15.1%). The low back (26%), hand/fingers (9%), and knee (9%) were frequently affected body sites. Injuries were most often caused by bodily motion/overexertion/repetition (52%), contact with objects/equipment/persons (24%), or slips/trips/falls (15%). More than half of injured ATs (55.5%) sought medical care, 25% missed work, and most (77%) did not file a workers' compensation claim for their injury. Half of injured ATs were limited at work (n = 125), and 89% modified or changed their athletic training work as a result of the injury. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of AT work-related injuries required medical care or work limitations and were not reported for workers' compensation. Understanding how ATs care for and manage their work-related injuries is important given that few take time off work.
Assuntos
Traumatismos em Atletas , Sistema Musculoesquelético/lesões , Traumatismos Ocupacionais , Educação Física e Treinamento , Esportes , Adulto , Traumatismos em Atletas/epidemiologia , Traumatismos em Atletas/terapia , Estudos Transversais , Gerenciamento Clínico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/terapia , Licença Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A prior study of this construction worker population found significant noise-associated hearing loss. This follow-up study included a much larger study population and consideration of additional risk factors. METHODS: Data included audiometry, clinical chemistry, personal history, and work history. Qualitative exposure metrics for noise and solvents were developed. Analyses compared construction workers to an internal reference group with lower exposures and an external worker population with low noise exposure. RESULTS: Among participants (n = 19 127) an overall prevalence of hearing loss of 58% was observed, with significantly increased prevalence across all construction trades. Construction workers had significantly increased risk of hearing loss compared to reference populations, with increasing risk by work duration. Noise exposure, solvent exposure, hypertension, and smoking were significant risk factors in multivariate models. CONCLUSIONS: Results support a causal relationship between construction trades work and hearing loss. Prevention should focus on reducing exposure to noise, solvents, and cigarette smoke.
Assuntos
Indústria da Construção , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Solventes , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Audiometria , Feminino , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Doenças Profissionais/fisiopatologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Current regulations require that asbestos fibers are collected and examined using a light microscope. This method fails to enumerate fibers that are too short or thin to reliably count using a light microscope under normal conditions. METHODS: A cohort of 3054 workers employed at an asbestos textile plant was followed to ascertain causes of death. Exposure was almost entirely chrysotile. Fiber counts were quantified using light microscopy and electron microscopy. The g-formula was used to estimate impacts on lung cancer of policies defined in terms of fiber counts quantified using light and electron microscopy. RESULTS: Given exposure at the current standard, the estimated lung cancer risk was 7.33%, comparable to the risk expected under a standard of 1 fiber/mL counted using electron microscopy (7.30%). The lifetime risk of lung cancer under a standard of 0.1 fiber/mL counted by electron microscopy was estimated to be 7.10%. CONCLUSIONS: We identify policies defined in terms of electron microscopy-based asbestos exposure metrics that yield comparable, or lower, lung cancer mortality than that expected under the current standard.
Assuntos
Asbestos Serpentinas/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Doenças Profissionais/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Profissionais/mortalidade , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Asbestos Serpentinas/análise , Causas de Morte , Estudos de Coortes , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Monitoramento Ambiental/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Microscopia Eletrônica , Fibras Minerais , Método de Monte Carlo , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , South Carolina/epidemiologia , Indústria TêxtilRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To characterize barriers to healthy eating (BHE) and physical activity (BPA) among participants in a workplace weight management intervention. METHODS: Steps to health participants completed a questionnaire to ascertain barriers to physical activity and healthy eating faced. Exploratory factor analysis was used to determine the factor structure for BPA and BHE. The relationships of these factors with accelerometer data and dietary behaviors were assessed using linear regression. RESULTS: Barriers to physical activity included time constraints and lack of interest and motivation, and to healthy eating, lack of self-control and convenience, and lack of access to healthy foods. Higher BHE correlated with higher sugary beverage intake but not fruit and vegetable and fat intake. CONCLUSIONS: To improve their effectiveness, workplace weight management programs should consider addressing and reducing barriers to healthy eating and physical activity.
Assuntos
Dieta Saudável , Exercício Físico , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Obesidade/prevenção & controle , Programas de Redução de Peso , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Alimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Motivação , Saúde Ocupacional , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Autocontrole , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Local de TrabalhoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Occupational exposures to vapours, gasses, dusts and fumes (VGDF) and chest X-ray abnormalities by the International Labour Office (ILO) classification system are associated with reduced lung function, with the majority of published studies being cross-sectional. We examined the effects of VGDF exposures, as well as ILO parenchymal changes, pleural plaque and diffuse pleural thickening (DPT) on reduction in lung function in a longitudinal study. METHODS: Chest radiographs and spirometry for 3150 ageing construction workers enrolled in a medical screening programme with a baseline and at least one follow-up examination were studied. Indices for VGDF exposure, parenchymal changes, pleural plaque and DPT severity were developed and used in longitudinal mixed models of lung function. RESULTS: Smoking and VGDF exposure were associated with decreased FEV1 and FVC at baseline as well as accelerated rates of annual decline. High VGDF exposure was associated with a yearly decline of -19.5 mL for FEV1 and -15.7 mL for FVC. Parenchymal abnormalities, pleural plaque and DPT were more strongly associated with reduced FVC. An increase of one unit in the pleural plaque severity index resulted in approximately -5.3 mL loss of FVC and -3.3 mL loss of FEV1, with a possible non-linear effect of plaque on FEV1. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing pleural plaque severity was associated with progressively greater loss of FVC and FEV1, supporting a causal association. VGDF exposures were associated with reduced FVC and FEV1 at baseline as well as accelerated annual loss of lung function.
Assuntos
Indústria da Construção , Poeira , Gases , Pulmão/efeitos dos fármacos , Doenças Profissionais/fisiopatologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Pleura/patologia , Idoso , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Doenças Pleurais/patologia , Espirometria , Capacidade Vital , TrabalhoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and occupational musculoskeletal (MSK) injury rates, and the statistical interaction between BMI and occupational exposure to MSK hazards (measured by level of MSK injury risk based on job category). METHODS: Using 17 years of data from 38,214 university and health system employees, multivariate Poisson regression modeled the interaction between BMI and MSK injury risk on injury rates. RESULTS: A significant interaction between BMI and MSK injury risk was observed. Although the effect of BMI was strongest for 'low' MSK injury risk occupations, absolute MSK injury rates for 'mid'/'high' MSK injury risk occupations remained larger. CONCLUSIONS: To address the occupational MSK injury burden, initiatives focused on optimal measures of workers' BMI are important but should not be prioritized over (or used in lieu of) interventions targeting job-specific MSK injury hazards.
Assuntos
Índice de Massa Corporal , Setor de Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema Musculoesquelético/lesões , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/epidemiologia , Ocupações/estatística & dados numéricos , Universidades/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Lesões nas Costas/epidemiologia , Fumar Cigarros/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Exercício Físico , Feminino , Humanos , Extremidade Inferior/lesões , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Lesões do Pescoço/epidemiologia , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/etnologia , Distribuição de Poisson , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Lesões do Ombro/epidemiologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A study of medical outcomes among 6857 elderly construction workers who received an initial and at least one periodic follow-up examination as a result of participating in a medical screening program was undertaken. METHODS: We compared results from the initial examination to follow-up examinations delivered at least 3 years after the initial examination for the following outcomes: body mass index (BMI); total serum cholesterol; nonhigh-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol; hemoglobin A1c, hypertension; current cigarette smoking; and 10-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk scores. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements (Pâ<â0.05) were observed for all measures except BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in a periodic medical screening program for elderly construction workers is associated with a favorable impact on common health outcomes. When presented with a program designed for them, blue-collar workers are motivated to seek improvements in their health status.
Assuntos
Indústria da Construção , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Hipercolesterolemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Obesidade/prevenção & controle , Saúde Ocupacional , Prevenção Secundária , Idoso , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Fumar Cigarros , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Humanos , Hipercolesterolemia/diagnóstico , Hipercolesterolemia/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/diagnóstico , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco , Abandono do Hábito de FumarRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Examine trends and patterns of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) among construction workers in the USA, with an emphasis on older workers. METHODS: WMSDs were identified from the 1992-2014 Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses (SOII), and employment was estimated from the Current Population Survey (CPS). Risk of WMSDs was measured by number of WMSDs per 10â 000 full-time equivalent workers and stratified by major demographic and employment subgroups. Time series analysis was performed to examine the trend of WMSDs in construction. RESULTS: The number of WMSDs significantly dropped in the US construction industry, following the overall injury trends. However, the rate of WMSDs in construction remained higher than in all industries combined; the median days away from work increased from 8â days in 1992 to 13â days in 2014, and the proportion of WMSDs for construction workers aged 55 to 64â years almost doubled. By occupation, construction labourers had the largest number of WMSD cases, while helpers, heating and air-conditioning mechanics, cement masons and sheet metal workers had the highest rates of WMSDs. The major cause of WMSDs in construction was overexertion, and back injuries accounted for more than 40% of WMSDs among construction workers. The estimated wage loss for private wage-and-salary construction workers was $46 million in 2014. CONCLUSIONS: Construction workers continue to face a higher risk of WMSDs. Ergonomic solutions that reduce overexertion-the primary exposure for WMSDs-should be adopted extensively at construction sites, particularly for workers with a higher risk of WMSDs.
Assuntos
Indústria da Construção , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiologia , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/etiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/epidemiologia , Absenteísmo , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Lesões nas Costas , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema Musculoesquelético/lesões , Fatores de Risco , Licença Médica , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Regulation of asbestos fibers in the workplace is partly determined by which fibers can be visually counted. However, a majority of fibers are too short and thin to count this way and are, consequently, not subject to regulation. METHODS: We estimate lung cancer risk associated with asbestos fibers of varying length and width. We apply an order-constrained prior both to leverage external information from toxicological studies of asbestos health effects. This prior assumes that risk from asbestos fibers increases with increasing length and decreases with increasing width. RESULTS: When we apply a shared mean for the effect of all asbestos fiber exposure groups, the rate ratios for each fiber group per unit exposure appear mostly equal. Rate ratio estimates for fibers of diameter <0.25 µm and length <1.5 and 1.5-5.0 µm are the most precise. When applying an order-constrained prior, we find that estimates of lung cancer rate ratio per unit of exposure to unregulated fibers 20-40 and >40 µm in the thinnest fiber group are similar in magnitude to estimates of risk associated with long fibers in the regulated fraction of airborne asbestos fibers. Rate ratio estimates for longer fibers are larger than those for shorter fibers, but thicker and thinner fibers do not differ as the toxicologically derived prior had expected. CONCLUSION: Credible intervals for fiber size-specific risk estimates overlap; thus, we cannot conclude that there are substantial differences in effect by fiber size. Nonetheless, our results suggest that some unregulated asbestos fibers may be associated with increased incidence of lung cancer.