Long-term quality of life and psycho-social outcomes after oropharyngeal cancer surgery and radial forearm free-flap reconstruction: A GETTEC prospective multicentric study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term quality of life (QoL) and psycho-social outcomes, and to determine their predictive factors after oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) surgery and radial forearm free-flap (RFFF) reconstruction. METHODS: Patients who had undergone OPC surgery and RFFF reconstruction who were still alive and disease-free at least 1 year after surgery were enrolled in this prospective multicentric study. Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core (QLQ-C30) and Head and Neck Cancer (QLQ-H&N35) QoL questionnaires, the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10) questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The level of dysphagia was evaluated using the Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI) and the Dysphagia Outcomes and Severity Scale (DOSS). Predictive factors of these clinical outcomes were determined in univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were included in this study. Long-term QoL and functioning scales scores were well-preserved (all superior to 70%). Main persistent symptoms were fatigue, reduced sexuality and oral function-related disorders (swallowing, teeth, salivary and mouth-opening problems). HADS anxiety and depression scores were 7.2 and 5.4, respectively. Twenty-one (36%) patients presented an anxiodepressive disorder (HADS global score ≥ 15). Among the 21 patients who were still working before surgery, 11 (52%) had returned to work at the time of our study. The HADS global score (p < 0.001) was the main predictor of QoL, VHI-10 and DOSS scores. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological distress is the main determinant of long-term QoL and is therefore of critical importance in the multidisciplinary management of OPC patients.

Weekly cisplatin with radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Although commonly used for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) concomitant radio-chemotherapy (RT-CT) with weekly cisplatin has not been definitely studied. We conducted a single centre retrospective study with the aim to evaluate efficacy and acute toxicity of definitive concomitant RT-CT with 40 mg/m2 weekly cisplatin in patients with locally advanced HNSCC with a particular emphasis on RT modality (conventional or accelerated) and dose of cisplatin delivered. METHODS: One hundred and twelve consecutive patients were included. They were given cisplatin 40 mg/m2)week concomitantly with conventionally fractionated (CFRT) (N=33) or accelerated (ART) (N=79) RT. RESULTS: RT was delivered according to the treatment plan in 104 patients and full dose was given to 107 patients. A median cumulative cisplatin dose of 240 mg/m2 was administered to patients treated with CFRT and of 200 mg/m2 to those treated with ART. Overall complete response rate was 81.3%. With a median follow up of 38.4 months, median overall survival (OS) was 75 months, not influenced by RT type or cisplatin dose received. The most clinically significant grade 3 or 4 acute toxicities were stomatitis (35.7%), neutropenia (25%), anemia (12.5%) and acute kidney injury (5.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that a median cumulative dose of 200 mg/m2 cisplatin can be safely administered using a weekly regimen to patients treated with concomitant RT (CFRT or ART). Efficacy results and toxicity compare favorably with those described with triweekly cisplatin RT-CT, suggesting that a randomized comparison should be undertaken.

[Aero-digestive tract squamous intra-epithelial neoplasia]. / Néoplasie intra-épithéliale épidermoïde des voies aéro-digestives supérieures.

Aero-digestive tract squamous intra-epithelial neoplasia is a disease whose genetic and epigenetic features lead to clinical signs and well codified histologic features. This publication aims to review the molecular alterations which have been identified in these lesions, to clarify the clinical manifestations and to discuss the proposed histological classification.

Perception of head and neck cancer quality of life within the medical world: a multicultural study.

BACKGROUND: Physician's perception of quality of life of patients with cancer is unclear. No reports have evaluated its influence on patient management. METHODS: Five hundred otolaryngologists completed a questionnaire regarding the quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer. RESULTS: Seventy-eight percent of responders thought that quality of life must be considered when choosing treatment, even if this meant decreased survival. Seventy-five percent thought it justified to withhold curative treatment if this would lead to impaired quality of life. Pain and breathing were the most important symptoms to consider. The perception was worse for physicians practicing in Latin culture, working in private practice, or with no personal acquaintance with a head and neck cancer victim and was better after radiotherapy than after surgery and chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Quality of life is important for physicians and is considered as essential as survival by many physicians. The perception of patient's quality of life influences the treatment choice.