Comparison of perennial and preseasonal allergoid immunotherapy in grass pollen allergic patients.

BACKGROUND: The clinical and immunological efficacy of preseasonal allergoid immunotherapy has been previously investigated, however, studies comparing the effectiveness of the two protocols are limited in the literature. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and immunological efficacy of pre-seasonal and perennial allergoid immunotherapy. METHODS: This is a prospective cross sectional two-arm study. During the season; symptom and medication scores were filled. Before and at the end of the season; RQLQ was applied, Phl p sIgE, sIgG4 and IL-10 levels were measured. RESULTS: In preseasonal group patients had better symptom control for most of the weeks, particularly during the peak pollen period (April: w-2 & w-4, p = 0.04; May: w-2, p = 0.02; June: w-1, w-2, p = 0.02; w-3, w-5, p = 0.03; July: w-2, p = 0.01; w-3, p = 0.02; w-4, p = 0.04). In the perennial group, sIgG4 [1st time point: preseasonal 0.02 mgA/L vs perennial 0.13 mgA/L (p < 0.0001); 2nd time point: preseasonal 0.52 mgA/L vs perennial 0.33 mgA/L; 3rd time point: preseasonal 0.04 mgA/L vs perennial 0.12 mgA/L (p < 0.0001)] and IL-10 (1st time point: preseasonal 1.45 pg/ml vs perennial 2.03 pg/ml; 2nd time point: preseasonal 2.29 pg/ml vs perennial 2.19 pg/ml; 3rd time point: preseasonal 2.32 pg/ml vs perennial 2.16 pg/ml) levels were higher and more stable. CONCLUSIONS: Preseasonal immunotherapy provided better control of symptoms throughout the pollen season. However, the blocking antibody response was stronger and more permanent in the perennial immunotherapy group.

Effectiveness of Low-Dose Mepolizumab in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (EGPA): A Real-Life Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Data showing effectiveness of mepolizumab in patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) are limited. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective chart review of patients with EGPA treated with mepolizumab. Clinical, laboratory, functional parameters and asthma, rhinitis control, and quality of life scores (Asthma Control Test [ACT], Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire [AQLQ], Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire [RQLQ], and SinoNasal Outcome Test [SNOT]-22) were evaluated at the baseline, 6th month, and 12th month. Complete response was defined as the absence of asthma and/or ear, nasal symptoms and exacerbations with a prednisone of ≤7.5 mg/day, partial response if it was achieved with a prednisone of >7.5 mg/day. RESULTS: Overall, 25 patients (18 F/7 M) with a median age of 47 years (23-76) were enrolled. Mepolizumab 100 mg/month was administered (dose increased to 300 mg/month in 3 patients). Mepolizumab significantly decreased daily dose of oral corticosteroid (OCS) from 11.04 mg to 3.65 mg together with a significant improvement in ACT, AQLQ, RQLQ, and SNOT-22 scores and a significant reduction in asthma exacerbations and blood eosinophil count at the 6th and 12th month (all p values <0.05). The mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s increased (at baseline: 1.88 L to 2.46 L at the 12th month [p = 0.037]). Seventy-six percent of patients responded completely at the 6th month and 81.25% at the 12th month. The complete responders at the 6th and 12th month were older than partial responders and nonresponders (p = 0.030 and p = 0.057, respectively). Patients with complete response at the 6th month were on lower doses of OCS than partial responders and nonresponders (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose mepolizumab was effective in EGPA patients by improving sinonasal and asthma outcomes, while reducing the need for OCS.

Incidence and clinical course of COVID-19 in patients using omalizumab for chronic spontaneous urticaria and/or severe allergic asthma and using mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma: A single center real life experience.

Introduction: To assess the incidence and course of COVID-19 in patients with severe asthma/chronic spontaneous urticaria using biological agents. Materials and Methods: A total of 202 patients (142 with asthma, and 60 with urticaria) were enrolled. The subjects were asked via face-to-face or telephone interview whether they had been diagnosed with COVID-19 and the course of the disease. Result: Study group consisted of 132 women, and 70 men (median age= 48 years). Median omalizumab dose was 300 mg/month in asthma (min-max= 150-1200 mg). The mepolizumab dose of two patients diagnosed with EGPA was 300 mg/month. Thirty one (15.3%) patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, 22 (71%) of whom were receiving omalizumab and nine (29%) were receiving mepolizumab. Asthma or chronic spontaneous urticaria diagnosis, age, sex, smoking, weight, comorbidities, atopy, and biological agent use were not statistically different between patients with or without COVID-19. Nine COVID-19 patients were hospitalized, and three of them required intensive care. Mepolizumab usage was higher in hospitalized patients (5, 55.6%), whereas omalizumab usage was higher in home-treated patients (18, 81%). The mean duration of biological use in home-treated patients was significantly higher than that of the hospitalized patients (35.64 months vs. 22.56 months, p= 0.024). Biological treatment was interrupted in 47 (23%) patients, selfinterruption due to the infection risk was the foremost reason (34%). Conclusions: The incidence of COVID-19 among patients with asthma and urticaria on mepolizumab and omalizumab was higher compared to studies from other countries. The disease course appeared mild in patients receiving long-term biological therapy.

Characteristics of the patients with asthmarhinitis multimorbidity.

Introduction: Asthma and allergic rhinitis frequently coexist and have been regarded as a single airway disease. Clinical features of patients with asthmarhinitis multimorbidity may change depending on the allergic sensitization pattern. The aim of our study is to determine the frequency, type, and characteristics of the patients with asthma-rhinitis multimorbidity. Materials and Methods: Patients who were followed up with a diagnosis of asthma between 2015 and 2020 in our clinic were included in our crosssectional study. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, rhinitis symptoms, and atopy status according to the results of the skin prick test, and sp IgE were recorded from the patient files. Result: Asthma-rhinitis multimorbidity was seen in 138 (113 F/25 M) out of 405 asthmatics and the mean age was 45.51 ± 13.56 years. They were younger and the age of onset of asthma was earlier than asthma patients without rhinitis. The rate of concomitant allergic rhinitis (AR) was 25.9%, and the rate of non-allergic rhinitis (NAR) was 8.1% in the entire group. There was no difference between patients with AR and NAR in terms of comorbidities such as NSAID sensitivity, nasal polyps, chronic rhinosinusitis, and bronchiectasis but, gastroesophageal reflux disease was more common in those with NAR than in those with AR (39.4%, 18.1%, respectively, p= 0.01). Of 105 asthmatic patients accompanied by allergic rhinitis, 41 (39.09%) were monosensitized, and 64 (60.95%) were polysensitized. House dust mites were found to be the most common responsible allergen in monosensitized patients. Sensitization to two allergens was the most common pattern among polysensitized patients, and mites and mold association was the most frequent. Patients with monosensitized allergic rhinitis had more severe asthma and a higher rate of NSAID sensitivity than polysensitized patients (p= 0.03, p= 0.04, respectively). There was no difference in the control level, frequency of eosinophilia, and other comorbidities. Conclusions: Our patients with asthma-rhinitis multimorbidity were mostly polysensitized. The most responsible allergen for the sensitization was house dust mites, regardless of whether the patient was monosensitized or polysensitized.

Allergen-specific immunotherapy practices and course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients during COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is accepted as the only disease-modifying therapy for IgE-mediated allergic airway diseases and hymenoptera venom allergy. AIT requires repeated contact between patient and physician or nurse in the hospital. Because it is a long-term treatment, compliance is essential issue to obtain maximal efficacy. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic reshaped doctor-patient interaction and pattern of hospital admissions. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the possible changes in the administration of AIT and associated factors, in addition to the characteristics of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infection. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent AIT for hymenoptera venom allergy, allergic rhinitis or allergic asthma between 11 March 2020 and 31 January 2021 were included in our retrospective study. Perennial and preseasonal AIT practices were evaluated. We identified patients with COVID-19 infection among the ones who received AIT. RESULTS: The mean age of 215 patients was 37.8±11.9 years and 52.1% of the patients were female. In our study, 35.4% of perennial AIT patients did not continue treatment after the COVID-19 pandemic, and the cause was patient-related in 66.7% of the cases. Compliance was 70.7% in patients receiving perennial AIT. The highest compliance rate for AIT was for venom allergy (86.5%). Thirty-four patients (15.8%) were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection. No mortality due to COVID-19 infection was observed in those who underwent AIT. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 pandemic has reduced compliance to AIT. Compliance was higher in venom immunotherapy than in aeroallergens. Severe COVID-19 infection and COVID-19 related death were not observed in patients receiving AIT.

Mepolizumab Is an Effective Option in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Regardless of Baseline Features: Single-Center Real-Life Data.

BACKGROUND: Mepolizumab has been approved as a treatment option for severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) patients in our country. We aimed to evaluate the clinical and functional efficacy of mepolizumab in this group of patients in real life as well as the response rates to mepolizumab and the possible factors affecting the response. METHODS: The study was a retrospective chart review of patients with SEA treated with mepolizumab. The data were collected at baseline, and at the 6th and 12th month. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients (41F/21M) with a mean age of 44.41 ± 13.24 years were included in the study. They had poor symptom control with a mean asthma control test (ACT) score of 16.61 ± 5.59, frequent exacerbations with a mean of 3.4 ± 3.7 in the previous 12 months, and 80.6% required daily oral corticosteroid (OCS) with a median dosage of 8 mg/day as methylprednisolone. The ACT score increased to 22.47 ± 3.18 and 22.03 ± 4.31, respectively, and blood eosinophil count decreased from 1,146/µL to 89/µL and 85/µL at the 6th and 12th month, respectively. The mean FEV1 at baseline was 2.102 L there was an increase of 0.373 L at 6th month and 0.596 L at 12th month. The percentage of regular users of OCS decreased to 66.0% at 6th month with a median dosage of 4 mg and 52.6% at 12th month with a median dosage of 2 mg. Mepolizumab reduced the rate of exacerbations compared with the previous year from a mean of 3.40 to 0.15 at 6th month and 0.36 at 12th month. There was a significant improvement in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), and Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores at both of time points. The rate of responders and super-responders at 6th month was 60% and 28%, respectively, and consequently, the overall response rate was 88%. At the 12th month, the super-responder rate increased to 44.7% as well as the overall response to 89.4%. The only difference between the nonresponders, responders, and super-responders at the 6th and 12th month was whether regular daily OCS was used pre-mepolizumab. All nonresponders at both 6th and 12th month were using OCS regularly, whereas most of super-responder used the OCS only during exacerbations. CONCLUSION: Mepolizumab effectively reduced asthma exacerbations, steroid requirement, blood eosinophil counts and improved asthma control, pulmonary function, sinonasal symptoms and quality of life. Our data suggest that mepolizumab would be effective in selected patients in real-life settings.

Coincidence of pollen season and coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: less time outdoors - lesser allergy symptoms in 2020.

BACKGROUND: This year, pollen season coincided with the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Strict preventive measures have been implemented during April and May and then a normalization phase started in our country in June. Our aim is to evaluate the effect of preventive measures during the pandemic process on allergic airway disease symptoms. METHODS: A prospective questionnaire-based study was planned and a questionnaire form was sent to the cell-phones of the subjects with pollen allergy followed in our clinic. Number of airborne grass pollens was determined by Burkard volumetric 7-day spore trap. RESULTS: A total of 222 pollen allergic patients were included in the study. At the beginning of the pandemic, majority of the subjects were spending time mostly indoors. The rate of home-office workers gradually decreased and the rate of office workers and the number of days at work increased from April to June, significantly. Nasal and ocular symptoms of the patients, also increased in June compared to April and May and, approximately one-third of the patients had less symptoms when compared to the same period of the previous year. The rates of using a face mask and taking a shower on return home were high among the subjects during all season. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that spending less time outside during the pollen season and wearing a mask outdoors reduces exposure to pollens and causes a reduction in symptoms. Thus, strict application of measures that cannot be applied in daily practice can make a significant contribution to the management of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Baker's asthma in bread factory workers.

Background: Baker's asthma (BA) is one of the most common causes of occupational asthma. Prevalence of BA varies from 3 to 24% in various studies; however, in our country, there are not enough data on its prevalence. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate wheat flour sensitivity and to determine the rate of BA in workers at a large bread factory in Ankara. Methods: All steps of the study were carried out in the workplace by the research team who made regular visits to the bread factory. A questionnaire was used to determine the presence of respiratory symptoms and its relation with the occupation. Skin-prick tests and specific immunoglobulin E measurements were performed. Pulmonary function tests and specific inhalation challenges (SIC) were performed to confirm the BA diagnosis. Results: A total of 162 workers (women/men, 3/159; mean ±standard error age, 38.25 ± 7.8 years) were included in the study. Of the 99 workers who described symptoms, 88 (88.8%) had nasal and 57 (57.5%) had lower respiratory symptoms. Sensitivity to wheat flour was present in 23 of the workers (14.2%) among all the workers. Among all the workers, seven (4.32%) were diagnosed with BA and SICs were positive in four (2.46%). Conclusion: Wheat sensitivity was high among the bakers who were exposed to wheat flour; however, the prevalence of BA was quite lower than the previous data in the literature.

Omalizumab in non-allergic Asthma: A report of 13 cases.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding the effectiveness of omalizumab in patients with non-allergic asthma. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and functional effectiveness of omalizumab in patients with non-allergic asthma. METHODS: The study was a single-center, retrospective chart review of patients with non-allergic asthma who were treated with add-on omalizumab between February 2014 and March 2016. After omalizumab was started, data of the asthma control test (ACT), pulmonary function test, and daily oral corticosteroid (OCS) dosage were collected at baseline, 16 weeks, 1 year, 2 and 3 years (if available). The number of exacerbations/hospitalizations were collected 1 year prior to and 6 months/1 year after omalizumab. To calculate the total daily dosage of OCS in milligrams, data for 6 months/1 year prior and after omalizumab treatment were recorded. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were included. After omalizumab, the mean ACT was significantly increased at 16 weeks (n = 13, p = 0.002), 1 year (n = 7, p = 0.006), and 2 years (n = 5, p = 0.006). The mean daily OCS dose was significantly decreased at 16 weeks (n = 13, p = 0.001), 1 year (n = 7, p = 0.006), and 2 years (n = 5, p = 0.04). The mean number of exacerbations and hospitalizations were decreased at the 6th month (n = 13; p = 0.001, p = 0.005) and 1st year (n = 7; p = 0.01, p = 0.02). The mean total quantity of OCS decreased 42% from 1.4 to 0.8 g in the six-month period prior to and post-omalizumab treatment (n = 6, p = 0.02) and decreased 76% from 3.8 to 0.9 g at 1 year in the pre vs. post-omalizumab treatment comparison (n = 7, p = 0.01). Six (46.2%) patients responded perfectly and seven (53.8%) partially responded to treatment. CONCLUSION: Omalizumab can be effective in non-atopic severe asthma.

Does the medical diagnosis of occupational asthma coincide with the legal diagnosis?

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of occupational asthma (OA) is increasing worldwide. In this study, we first aimed to document the rate of diagnosis of OA among patients who were referred to our clinic from the Social Security Institution and the factors that affected diagnosis; secondly, we aimed to assess the consistency of the medical and legal diagnoses. METHODS: The study involved 132 consecutive patients who were referred to our clinic for the evaluation of OA between 2010 and 2015. Detailed workplace history, the tools used in the diagnosis such as peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring and bronchial provocation tests, and the final medical diagnosis were recorded from case files. RESULTS: Asthma was diagnosed in 75% (n = 99) of the patients. Among them, 22.2% were diagnosed as having OA. The diagnosis was confirmed by serial PEF measurements, non-specific bronchial hyperreactivity assessment or both of the tests both at work and off-work periods. OA diagnosis was mostly established in active workers (72.7%). The legal diagnosis period was completed in 54.5% of these 22 patients, and 50% (n = 11) were officially diagnosed as having OA with a 91.6% concordance with medical diagnosis. CONCLUSION: This study verifies the importance of diagnosing asthma correctly as a first step in the evaluation of OA. Diagnostic tests other than specific provocation tests could be preferential in patients who still work in the same field. We believe that cooperation with the patient's occupational physician and adequate recognition of the work environment will improve the consistency of legal and medical diagnoses.

Omalizumab in the treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: One center's experience with 14 cases.

BACKGROUND: Omalizumab has been a valuable option for patients with severe allergic asthma, but there are only case reports regarding effectiveness of omalizumab in patients with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and functional effectiveness of omalizumab in patients with asthma and ABPA in long-term follow-up. METHODS: The study was conducted as a retrospective chart review of patients with ABPA who were treated with omalizumab injections between December 2008 and June 2014. Once treatment with omalizumab was started, data were collected at three time points: at baseline, after 1 year, and, in June 2014, at the last follow-up. RESULTS: Fourteen patients with ABPA (seven women and seven men; mean [± standard deviation (SD)] age, 44.21 ± 13.01 years) were included. The treatment period was 31.5 ± 3.99 months (mean ± SD). The difference between the baseline and the last evaluation of the mean percentage of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was significant (p = 0.02). The mean asthma control test score was increased at all-time points compared with the basal score (p = 0.001). After omalizumab treatment was initiated, the patients' mean oral corticosteroid dosage significantly decreased (p = 0.001). The baseline exacerbation rate was 2.7 ± 1.5/y (mean ± SD), and the hospitalization rate was 1.4/y, and both were zero at the last assessment (p = 0.001). Eleven of the patients (78.6%) responded perfectly, and three (21.4%) partially responded to treatment. The patients who had a total immunoglobulin E level of <1000 IU/mL seemed to be more responsive than those whose total immunoglobulin E level was >1000 IU/mL (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Omalizumab provided a clinically important reduction in exacerbations and steroid requirement, and improved asthma symptoms and pulmonary function parameters in patients with asthma and ABPA who had previously shown an unsatisfactory response to Global Initiative for Asthma step 4 treatment.

Churg-Strauss syndrome: a new endotype of severe asthma? Results of 14 Turkish patients.

INTRODUCTION: Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS) is a rare multisystem vasculitis. Considering the variation of autoimmune diseases in different races, it is of interest to determine whether any outstanding features exist for Turkish patients with CSS. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and serological features of the disease, the treatment, and long-term follow-up details, and to investigate possible etiological factors of Turkish CSS patients. METHODS: The study included 14 patients who were diagnosed with CSS, and followed by our department between 2004 and 2012. Possible etiological factors, initial symptoms, clinical presentations, treatment, as well as outcomes were documented. The study was approved by the local ethics. RESULTS: All patients fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology criteria. Initial symptoms were worsening asthma (n = 14; 100%) and skin lesions (n = 6; 43%). All patients had a diagnosis of asthma and nasal polyps, whereas 57.1% had aspirin hypersensitivity at the time of diagnosis. The lungs (100%) and skin (43%) were most commonly involved. Peripheral eosinophilia dominated on initial presentations of all patients. Initial treatments included oral methyl prednisolone in all cases, whereas cyclophosphamide and azathioprine were used in three cases. Relapses were detected in five cases. None of the cases were able to stop the oral corticosteroid treatment. No fatalities were observed. CONCLUSION: We herein describe a new severe asthma endotype in connection with CSS. We suggest that physicians who deal with uncontrolled severe asthma cases should consider CSS in the presence of nasal polyps, aspirin hypersensitivity, and especially peripheral blood eosinophilia over 10%.

Allergic sensitization to ornamental plants in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma.

Ornamental plants (OPs) can lead to immediate-type sensitization and even asthma and rhinitis symptoms in some cases. This study aimed to evaluate sensitization to OPs in patients with asthma and/or allergic rhinitis and to determine the factors affecting the rate of sensitization to OPs. A total of 150 patients with asthma and/or allergic rhinitis and 20 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. Demographics and disease characteristics were recorded. Skin-prick tests were performed with a standardized inhalant allergen panel. Skin tests by "prick-to-prick" method with the leaves of 15 Ops, which are known to lead to allergenic sensitization, were performed. Skin tests with OPs were positive in 80 patients (47.1%). There was no significant difference between OP sensitized and nonsensitized patients in terms of gender, age, number of exposed OPs, and duration of exposure. Skin test positivity rate for OPs was significantly high in atopic subjects, patients with allergic rhinitis, food sensitivity, and indoor OP exposure, but not in patients with pollen and latex allergy. Most sensitizing OPs were Yucca elephantipes (52.5%), Dieffenbachia picta (50.8%), and Euphorbia pulcherrima (47.5%). There was significant correlation between having Saintpaulia ionantha, Croton, Pelargonium, Y. elephantipes, and positive skin test to these plants. Sensitivity to OPs was significantly higher in atopic subjects and patients with allergic rhinitis, food allergy, and indoor OP exposure. Furthermore, atopy and food sensitivity were found as risk factors for developing sensitization to indoor plants. Additional trials on the relationship between sensitization to OPs and allergic symptoms are needed.

Hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media: prevalence, risk factors and the role of skin tests in diagnosis--a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity to contrast media (CMs) may be common and serious. AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of CM hypersensitivity, risk factors associated with it and the role of skin testing in its diagnosis. METHODS: A structured questionnaire was administered to patients who underwent computed tomography during a 1-year period. Skin tests with CMs, including skin prick tests (SPTs), intradermal tests (IDTs) and patch tests (PTs), were conducted on CM reactors (n = 24). Volunteers who tolerated CM exposure or had never been exposed to any CMs served as controls (n = 37). RESULTS: A total of 1,131 patients (630 females and 501 males; mean age 55 ± 14.2 years) were enrolled in the study. The prevalence of historical and current CM reactors was 33/1,131 (2.92%) and 8/1,105 (0.72%), respectively. The skin was the most affected site, with mild to moderate reactions. Female gender, a history of doctor-diagnosed asthma, drug allergy, food allergy and psychiatric diseases were significant risk factors. The sensitivities of SPTs and early readings of IDTs in the diagnosis of immediate reactions were 0 and 20%, respectively, and the specificities were 94.6 and 91.4%, respectively. For early readings of IDTs, the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 40 and 80%, respectively. For nonimmediate reactions, the sensitivities of delayed readings of IDTs and PTs were 14.3 and 25%, respectively; specificity was 100% for both tests. The PPV was 100% for both of these tests, and the NPVs were 85.4 and 82.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are comparable with the incidence, profile and risk factors associated with CM hypersensitivity reported previously. Skin testing with CMs has a high specificity, but its role in diagnosis is limited due to low sensitivity.

General aspects of hypersensitivity pneumonitis in Turkey.

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis prevalence rates are between 5 and 15% of the overall population exposed to known inciting antigens but a small number of cases have been reported from Turkey until now. We aimed to present a broad picture of hypersensitivity pneumonitis in Turkey, thus promoting interest in this relatively common disease in developing countries. Search engines were utilized to retrieve the cases reported from Turkey. Other published journals and meeting abstracts which have not been registered into electronic databases were manually reviewed. Twenty-two cases from 13 reports were characterized by demographics, clinical features, occupational and environmental exposures, diagnostic tools and prognostic data. The majority of the group consisted of women (68.2%) and had a positive history for contact with an avian (59%). Mean exposure period was 69 ± 77.6 months. The most common reported clinical form was chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (58.8%). Reticulonodular pattern was the basic pathological finding (45%). Restrictive impairments of the forced vital capacity (FVC) and carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) of the lungs were the basic pathologies observed in pulmonary function tests. Interstitial fibrosis was the most common pathological finding (61.5%). Few cases reported with preponderance of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis with avian exposure from 70 million populations suggest that many hypersensitivity pneumonitis cases, especially acute forms, have been ignored. Also, hypersensitivity pneumonitis somehow appears to be a neglected occupational disease. The present situation should be considered as a common problem currently faced by developing countries and occupational groups under risk must be investigated promptly.

[Therapy with omalizumab in patients with severe persistent allergic asthma: a real life data in Turkey]. / Agir allerjik astimli hastalarda anti-IgE (omalizumab) tedavisi: Gerçek yasam verileri.

Omalizumab is a biologic agent, which has been shown to be effective in clinical trials in allergic, severe asthmatics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, functional effectiveness, and side effects of omalizumab in real-life conditions respectively. A total of 18 patients (female/male: 11/7) were included to the study. The mean ± SD age, total IgE, disease duration were 41.8 ± 11.2 years, 255.1 ± 197.3 kU/L, 12.8 ± 9.4 years, respectively. Eight patients had isolated mite, seven patients had mite + other inhalant allergen, three patients had only other allergen sensitivity. Mean duration of omalizumab treatment (months ± SD) was 15.1 ± 8.6 (min-max 1-29) months. Omalizumab dose was 150 mg/month in five patients, 300 mg/month in five, 300 mg/15 days in three, 375 mg/15 days in four, 225 mg/15 days in one patient. Data at the date of last visit were compared with one year prior to omalizumab treatment. Mean systemic steroid dose reduced by 83% (14.7 ± 14.6 vs. 3.2 ± 8 mg), number of other asthma medications reduced by 28% (3.6 ± 1.3 vs. 2.5 ± 1.3) (p< 0.05). FEV1% values (53.5 ± 21.2 vs. 64.5 ± 23.5) did not significantly change. Mean numbers of exacerbations (20 ± 57.6 vs. 0.4 ± 0.7), emergency visits (16.5 ± 46.1 vs. 0.4 ± 1.2), hospitalizations (2.1 ± 2.6 vs. 0.1 ± 0.3) decreased by 93%, 95%, 86%, respectively (p< 0.05). ACT scores increased by 94% (10.4 ± 3.4 vs. 20.4 ± 5.7) (p< 0.05). Fifteen patients (88%) were stated as responsive to treatment with omalizumab. Eleven patients (64.8%) stated that their expectations are met, three patients (17.6%) stated that their expectations are close to being met, three patients (17.6%) stated that their expectations are not met. A local side effect was seen in one patient. In conclusion, our data has shown that omalizumab is effective, and safe in severe allergic asthmatics under real-life conditions.

Airway hyperresponsiveness: a comparative study of methacholine and exercise challenges in seasonal allergic rhinitis with or without asthma.

BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic airway hyperreactivity in allergic rhinitis is a risk factor for later development of asthma. Although non-specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) has been measured by several stimuli, the most appropriate measurement technique still remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether an exercise challenge can be used to predict BHR in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients with or without asthma and to compare this bronchial reactivity with a methacholine challenge technique. METHODS: Forty-six consecutive patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis only (n = 31) and with both seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma (n = 15) were included in the study during the pollination period. Subjects underwent first methacholine (mch) and then exercise challenge testing (ECT). There was a 1-week interval between the tests. ECT was performed on a bicycle ergometer. Positive result was defined as a 15% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) post-exercise. A patient's bronchial reactivity to methacholine was considered as hyperresponsive if PC(20) was less than 8 mg/mL. RESULTS: Mch PC(20) values were significantly lower in patients with both rhinitis and asthma (p < 0.062). Among the 46 patients, mch PC(20) values were significantly different between patients who had positive and negative exercise challenge tests (p = 0.007). All patients with rhinitis alone had a negative ECT and 10 had a positive mch challenge. Change in FEV(1) values after ECT was significantly higher in patients with both rhinitis and asthma compared to those with rhinitis alone (p = 0.009). There was a significant relation between positivity of mch and exercise challenges (p = 0.025). ECT positivity was found to be a significant confounding factor in the diagnosis of asthma (p = 0.001). Specificity and sensitivity values were 100% and 24% for ECT and 68% and 100% for mch, respectively. CONCLUSION: Exercise challenge presents poor diagnostic value for detecting bronchial responsiveness in individuals with allergic rhinitis alone during the pollen season.

Risk factors associated with hospitalizations for asthma attacks in Turkey.

The detection of factors associated with hospitalizations for asthma attacks should have a great value in the development of intervention strategies. However, these factors are unknown in Turkey. Our aim was to investigate the factors associated with hospital admissions by comparing hospitalized patients with the community control asthma patients and the relationships between serum eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) levels and the disease severity. Eighty-one subjects hospitalized with asthma (69 women and 12 men) and 300 community control asthma patients (227 women and 73 men) were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. A questionnaire including detailed demographic and clinical data was compiled by all patients. Serum ECP levels were measured in 76, 14, and 9 patients of community control, hospitalized asthma patients, and healthy controls, respectively. Hospitalized patients were older and had longer asthma duration (p < 0.001). The significant risk factors for hospital admission for acute asthma attacks were previous severe asthma (odds ratio [OR], 12.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.17-29.0), aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug intolerance (OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.70-7.74), chronic rhinosinusitis (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.16-4.33), lower educational level (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.33-4.18), and lower atopy ratio (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.13-3.50). These parameters were similar in patients who were hospitalized and in patients who had severe asthma of the community control. ECP levels were significantly higher in hospitalized and severe asthma patients compared with healthy controls. In conclusion, the factors associated with hospitalizations were advanced age, prolonged asthma duration, presence of severe asthma, "nonatopy," acetylsalicylic acid-nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug intolerance, sinusitis, and lower educational level. Further intervention strategies are needed to address these markers to prevent hospitalizations from asthma attacks.