RESUMO
Rituximab (RTX) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that targets the CD20 antigen on B cells and is used in various autoimmune disorders. In this study, we aimed to measure the awareness of pediatric rheumatologists about the use of RTX through a survey. Between February and March 2023, a 42-question survey was sent via email to pediatric rheumatology specialists in Turkey. The participants were questioned for which diagnoses and system involvement they preferred to use RTX, which routine tests they performed, vaccination policy, and adverse events that occurred during or after infusion. Forty-one pediatric rheumatologists answered the survey. They prescribed RTX most frequently for systemic lupus erythematosus (87.8%) and ANCA-associated vasculitis (9.8%). Prior to the administration of RTX, 95% of clinicians checked renal and liver function tests, as well as immunoglobulin levels. The most frequently tested hepatitis markers before treatment were HBsAg and anti-HBs antibody (97.6%), while 85.4% of rheumatologists checked for anti-HCV. Clinicians (31.4%) reported that they postpone RTX infusion 2 weeks following an inactivated vaccine. Sixty-one percent of rheumatologists reported starting RTX treatment 1 month after live vaccines, while 26.8% waited 6 months. The most frequent adverse events were an allergic reaction during RTX infusion (65.9%), hypogammaglobulinemia (46.3%), and rash (36.6%). In the event of hypogammaglobulinemia after RTX treatment, physicians reported that they frequently (58.5%) continued RTX after intravenous immunoglobulin administration. CONCLUSIONS: RTX has become a common treatment option in pediatric rheumatology in recent years. Treatment management may vary between clinician such as vaccination and routine tests. WHAT IS KNOWN: ⢠During the course of rituximab therapy, clinicians should be attentive to specific considerations in pre-treatment, during administration, and in post-treatment patient monitoring. WHAT IS NEW: ⢠There are differences in practice among clinicians in the management of RTX therapy. These practice disparities have the potential to impact the optimal course of treatment. ⢠This study highlights that standardized guidelines are needed for RTX treatment in pediatric rheumatology, particularly for vaccination policies and routine tests.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Reumatologistas , Rituximab , Humanos , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Rituximab/efeitos adversos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Criança , Inquéritos e Questionários , Masculino , Turquia , Feminino , Reumatologia , Doenças Autoimunes/tratamento farmacológico , Pediatras/estatística & dados numéricos , PediatriaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Proper nutrition is a significant contributor to growth achievement in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). In this study, the aim was to analyze the growth parameters and nutritional status of children with JIA and then compare them with their healthy peers. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 54 patients with JIA and the same number of healthy peers. Growth parameter z-scores and nutrient distributions were analyzed and compared with a control group and among disease subgroups. RESULTS: While the average height in the control group was significantly greater than in the patient group, there was similarity in terms of body weight and body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.001, P = 0.33, P = 0.14, respectively). Body weight and BMI z-scores of patients with high disease activity at the most recent visit were significantly lower (P = 0.03, P = 0.01, respectively). Both groups had similar energy and protein requirement-meeting percentages (P = 0.62, P = 0.51). JIA atients had higher carbohydrate intake (P = 0.04), and fat intake was higher in controls (P = 0.02). Energy obtained from junk food was higher in patients with entesitis-related arthritis (ERA) compared to oligoarticular JIA and polyarticular JIA (P = 0.03). Micronutrient intake in the ERA group was significantly lower for vitamin E, C, and folate (P = 0.02, P = 0.03, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In our cohort, patients had a lower height score. As they have a diet characterized by adequate energy/protein, carbohydrate, and high fat intake, this may be a reflection of disease activity. Although some of the micronutrient intakes were less than normal in both groups, significant deficiencies were identified in the ERA group.
Assuntos
Artrite Juvenil , Índice de Massa Corporal , Estado Nutricional , Humanos , Artrite Juvenil/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Criança , Peso Corporal , Pré-Escolar , Estatura , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Adolescente , Ingestão de Energia , Dieta/estatística & dados numéricos , Dieta/métodosRESUMO
To evaluate the sleep quality and fatigue levels in children with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) in comparison to healthy children. The Pediatric Quality of Life Multidimensional Fatigue Scale (PedsQL-MFS) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were the instruments utilized to assess fatigue and sleep quality in children with FMF and controls, respectively. Spearman's rank coefficient was decisive in determining the association between patient-reported outcome measures and disease-related features. Two hundred twenty-five (59.3% female) patients and 182 (51.6% female) healthy counterparts were enrolled in the study. In PSQI, where high scores indicate sleep disturbance, the median score was significantly higher in the patient group (5; 3-6) than the control group (3; 2-4) (p < 0.001). PEDsQL-MFS demonstrated significantly lower fatigue levels in the control group than patients (p = 0.01). The level of fatigue in the patient group was found to increase in correlation with sleep problems (r: - 0.750, p < 0.001). Additionally, a high correlation was present between the PSQI/PedsQL-MFS scores and the number of attacks in the last year (r: - 0.645, p < 0.001/r: 0.721, p < 0.001, respectively). There was no difference in terms of fatigue and sleep disorders between mutations (homozygous, heterozygous, or compound heterozygous) in the MEFV gene (p > 0.05). Conclusion: High disease activity has a significant negative impact on the sleep quality and fatigue levels of patients with FMF. This study emphasizes the importance of assessing fatigue and sleep quality with objective outcome tools periodically in FMF patients throughout the disease course. What is Known: ⢠Fatigue is a common matter that often accompanies rheumatic diseases and causes disability. ⢠Chronic rheumatic diseases often experience poor sleep quality. What is New: ⢠In high correlation with the disease severity of familial Mediterranean fever, sleep quality decreases and fatigue level increases significantly. ⢠In familial Mediterranean fever patients, a negative correlation is present between age and the general fatigue and sleep/rest related fatigue scores (low scores indicating greater fatigue) and sleep quality is poorer in the adolescent age group.
Assuntos
Febre Familiar do Mediterrâneo , Fadiga , Qualidade de Vida , Qualidade do Sono , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília , Humanos , Febre Familiar do Mediterrâneo/complicações , Feminino , Masculino , Fadiga/etiologia , Criança , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Adolescente , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/etiologia , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/diagnóstico , Inquéritos e Questionários , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo PacienteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a prevalent childhood chronic arthritis, often persisting into adulthood. Effective transitional care becomes crucial as these patients transition from pediatric to adult healthcare systems. Despite the concept of transitional care being recognized, its real-world implementation remains inadequately explored. This study aims to evaluate the thoughts and practices of healthcare providers regarding transitional care for JIA patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among pediatric and adult rheumatologists in Turkey. Based on the American Academy of Pediatrics' six core elements of transitional care, the survey included 86 questions. The respondents' demographic data, attitudes towards transitional care, and practical implementation were assessed. RESULTS: The survey included 48 rheumatologists, with 43.7% having a transition clinic. The main barriers to establishing transition programs were the absence of adult rheumatologists, lack of time, and financial constraints. Only 23.8% had a multidisciplinary team for transition care. Participants agreed on the importance of coordination and cooperation between pediatric and adult healthcare services. The timing of the transition process varied, with no consensus on when to initiate or complete it. Participants advocated for validated questionnaires adapted to local conditions to assess transition readiness. CONCLUSIONS: The study sheds light on the challenges and perspectives surrounding transitional care for JIA patients in Turkey. Despite recognized needs and intentions, practical implementation remains limited due to various barriers. Cultural factors and resource constraints affect the transition process. While acknowledging the existing shortcomings, the research serves as a ground for further efforts to improve transitional care and ensure better outcomes for JIA patients transitioning into adulthood.
Assuntos
Artrite Juvenil , Transição para Assistência do Adulto , Cuidado Transicional , Adolescente , Humanos , Artrite Juvenil/terapia , Estudos Transversais , Reumatologistas , TurquiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to outline the demographic data, clinical spectrum, and treatment approach of sarcoidosis in a large group of patients and sought to figure out the variations of early-onset (EOS) and late-onset paediatric sarcoidosis (LOS). METHODS: The study followed a retrospective-descriptive design, with the analysis of medical records of cases diagnosed as paediatric sarcoidosis. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were included in the study. The median age at disease onset and follow-up duration were 83 (28.2-119) and 24 (6-48) months, respectively. Ten (19.2%) cases had EOS (before 5th birthday) and 42 (80.7%) cases had LOS. The most common clinical findings at the time of the disease onset were ocular symptoms (40.4%) followed by joint manifestation (25%), dermatological symptoms (13.5%), and features related to multi-organ involvement (11.5%). Anterior uveitis was the most common (55%) one among ocular manifestations. Patients with EOS displayed joint, eye, and dermatological findings more commonly than patients with LOS. The recurrence rate of disease in patients with EOS (5.7%) and LOS (21.1%) were not statistically different (P = .7). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with EOS and LOS may present with variable clinical features and studies addressing paediatric sarcoidosis cases in collaboration between disciplines will enhance the awareness of this rare disease among physicians and assist early diagnosis with lesser complications.
Assuntos
Sarcoidose , Uveíte , Humanos , Criança , Uveíte/diagnóstico , Uveíte/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Turquia , Sarcoidose/diagnóstico , Sarcoidose/terapia , Sarcoidose/complicaçõesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected patient care in general. We aimed to analyze the impact of the pandemic on pediatric rheumatology practice. METHODS: An online survey including 22 questions was created by the representatives of the Emerging RheumatoloGists and rEsearchers (EMERGE) group of the Pediatric Rheumatology European Society (PReS) on SurveyMonkey. The descriptive analysis of the responses was performed on SurveyMonkey. RESULTS: Overall, 469 pediatric rheumatologists (F/M: 2.9) from 70 countries completed the survey. The practice of drug prescription is not affected by the pandemic, according to 65.3 % of the respondents, while 24.3 % and 16.5 % are prescribing biologic drugs and corticosteroids less often, respectively. Over 40 % of the respondents have seen an increased number of patients with vasculitis or chilblains during the pandemic. One-third of the respondents stated no adjustments in their clinical practice after 2.5 years of COVID-19 pandemic. The rest indicated implementing various changes, with an emphasis on incorporating telemedicine. Telemedicine constitutes ≥10 % of the clinical practice for one-third of the participants. Nonetheless, 35.5 % agree that there are still delays in patient care due to the pandemic. However, most (â¼90 %) think our practice is returning to the pre-pandemic routine. CONCLUSION: The findings of our study indicate a significant alteration in pediatric rheumatology practice due to the pandemic. This includes increased caution when prescribing anti-rheumatic drugs, a transition towards telemedicine utilization, delays in routine care, and a rise in COVID-19-related inflammatory conditions. It is imperative to address these aspects in order to improve patient care in pediatric rheumatology.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Reumatologia , Telemedicina , Criança , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Pandemias , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is no clear data on the optimal duration of treatment with anti-interleukin-1 drugs in colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever patients, as well as on the dose interval. This study aimed to assess patients whose canakinumab dose interval was adjusted according to a specific protocol, with the objective of evaluating the effectiveness of implementing this protocol for the patient care. METHODS: The files of 45 patients whose canakinumab treatment interval was opened with a standard protocol previously determined by the Delphi method were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Canakinumab treatment was initiated once a month for all patients. In the sixth month of canakinumab treatment, a dose interval extension was introduced; however, 7 patients (15.5%) experienced an attack, and consequently, no further interval extension was administered to them. For 29 patients, the dose interval was successfully extended to once every three months, as they remained attack-free for a year after the first interval extension. Nine patients continued receiving the drug every 2 months, as they had not yet completed one year since the first extension. The study found no significant correlation between experiencing an attack during the dose interval extension protocol and the number, duration of attacks, or autoinflammatory diseases activity index score. CONCLUSION: Extending treatment intervals with canakinumab in colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever shows promise for favorable outcomes.
Assuntos
Febre Familiar do Mediterrâneo , Humanos , Criança , Febre Familiar do Mediterrâneo/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Colchicina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To reveal the vaccination status of patients with pediatric rheumatic disease (PedRD) and to compare this with healthy controls. METHODS: The electronic health records of the Ministry of Health regarding the vaccination status of children with PedRD followed in a tertiary hospital were analyzed cross-sectionally and compared with their healthy controls. The missing vaccines were reported according to individual, age-appropriate schedule and causes of skipped vaccines in both groups were investigated with an online survey. RESULTS: The vaccination rate of patients in the last examination was 71.4% (90/126) and 95.7% (110/115) in healthy controls (p < 0.001). Measles-mumps-rubella vaccine, diphtheria, the administration rates of the second dose of tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated polio and Haemophilus influenzae type B, chickenpox, and hepatitis A vaccines were significantly lower in patients than in controls (p values 0.004, 0.02, 0.01, 0.013, respectively). The pre-diagnosis incomplete vaccination proportion was significantly higher in the patient group (16.6%) than in healthy controls (4.3%) (p = 0.002). In the patient group, the proportion of incomplete live-attenuated vaccines after diagnosis (25%) was more than pre-diagnosis (61.1%) (p = 0.04), while the proportion of incomplete non-live vaccines before and after diagnosis was similar (47.2% and 50%, respectively) (p = 0.73). The major reasons for missed vaccines were physicians' recommendations (15.6%), the presence of PedRD diagnosis (12.5%), and the drugs used (12.5%). CONCLUSION: Vaccination coverage of PedRD patients has been shown to lag behind the routine vaccination schedule (71.4%). In addition to new recommendations, electronic health system records for vaccination may be appropriate for the follow-up of these patients, and the addition of reminder alerts may be useful to reduce the rate of missed vaccinations.
Assuntos
Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche , Cobertura Vacinal , Humanos , Criança , Lactente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , VacinaçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical features and treatment outcomes of children with juvenile psoriatic arthritis (JPsA) and to compare the distinct patterns of the disease between early-onset and late-onset age groups. METHODS: Patients with JPsA followed regularly for at least 6 months between 2010-2020 in 7 pediatric rheumatology centers in Turkey were included in the study. The demographic features, clinical manifestations, treatment strategies, and outcomes of the patients were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Eighty-seven (46 male/41 female) patients were included in the study. The mean age at diagnosis was 11.9 ± 4.5. Fifty-seven (65.5%) patients had psoriasis at the time of diagnosis, arthritis preceded psoriasis in 10 (11.5%) patients. Thirty (34.5%) patients had dactylitis, 28 (32.2%) had nail pitting, 36 (41.4%) had involvement of the small joints, 20 (23%) had enthesitis. Sacroiliitis was detected in 11 (12.6%) patients by magnetic resonance imaging. Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) were positive in 35 (40.2%) patients. Twelve children (%13.8) were in the early-onset (<5 years) group. Uveitis and ANA positivity were more common in the early-onset group. Active joint counts and activity scores of our patients showed significant improvement at 6th month and at the last control compared with baseline. CONCLUSION: About one-third of patients with JPsA do not have psoriasis at the time of diagnosis. In some patients, no skin lesion is seen during the course of the disease. Children with psoriatic arthritis seem to display two different phenotypes. Younger children have female predominance, ANA positivity, and uveitis, while older children have more axial involvement.
RESUMO
Classical attacks of familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) are often accompanied by fever, but some of the patients have attacks without fever. This study aimed to compare the characteristics of FMF patients with and without fever during their attacks and draw attention to the different clinical presentations of FMF in children. Medical files of patients aged 0-18 years who were followed up with the diagnosis of FMF in two reference pediatric rheumatology centers were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: children who had had no fever in any of their attacks were assigned as group 1, and those who had fever during their attacks were classified as group 2. Out of 2003 patients evaluated, 191 (9.53%) patients had attacks not accompanied by fever and their median age at onset of symptoms (7.0 vs. 4.0 years, p < 0.001) and the median age at diagnosis (8.6 vs. 6.0 years, p < 0.001) were significantly higher; however, group 2 had a delay in diagnosis. The annual number of attacks and abdominal attacks were more common in group 2; arthritis, arthralgia, erysipelas-like rash, exercise-induced leg pain, and myalgia were more common in group 1. Conclusion: The data from the assessment of children with FMF attacks not accompanied with fever were presented for the first time. Children with late age onset of FMF and dominance of musculoskeletal features may display attacks not accompanied with fever. What is Known: ⢠Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is the most common inherited auto-inflammatory disease, characterized by recurrent attacks of fever, serositis, and musculoskeletal symptoms. ⢠Although fever is the most common symptom, few studies have reported attacks without fever. What is New: ⢠The aim of this study was to identify patients with FMF but without fever during attacks and to demonstrate their distinctive presentations. ⢠We found that 7% of our patients had afebrile attacks with predominant musculoskeletal symptoms and were diagnosed earlier than patients with febrile attacks, probably due to early referral to pediatric rheumatology clinics.
Assuntos
Artrite , Febre Familiar do Mediterrâneo , Criança , Humanos , Febre Familiar do Mediterrâneo/diagnóstico , Febre Familiar do Mediterrâneo/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Febre/etiologia , Febre/complicações , ColchicinaRESUMO
Objectives: The rapid expansion in the use of telemedicine after the COVID-19 pandemic has led many patients with chronic diseases to seek alternative ways for follow-ups. This study aimed to investigate the demands and opinions of parents of children with rheumatic diseases toward telemedicine and to examine the factors affecting telemedicine preference. Methods: A single-center, cross-sectional, Web-based survey study was conducted. Sociodemographic data, characteristics of the disease, access to the clinic, internet use, and views on telemedicine were assessed. Factors effecting telemedicine preference were evaluated by multivariate analysis. Results: A total of 245 parents have completed the survey. The diagnoses of patients were recurrent fever syndromes (55.1%), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (31.0%), systemic connective tissue diseases (8.2%), and vasculitis (5.7%). The majority of patients came to the clinic by public transport (n = 190, 77.6%). Sixty-eight (27.8%) patients missed at least one outpatient appointment in the last year. Majority (n = 172, 70.2%) of parents stated that they would prefer telemedicine visits if it becomes available. Multivariate analysis revealed that the most related factors to telemedicine preference were higher education level (odds ratio [OR]: 6.69, confidence interval [95% CI]: 2.21-20.25, p = 0.001), missing an appointment (OR: 3.04, 95% CI: 1.41-6.56, p = 0.004), and travel time longer than 1 h (OR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.13-3.86, p = 0.012). Conclusion: Telemedicine visits are in demand in pediatric rheumatology and should be considered an alternative method to ensure continuity of patient follow-up. A personal approach should be followed when selecting patients for telemedicine.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Reumatologia , Telemedicina , Criança , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Pandemias , PaisRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To develop a novel scoring system to predict colchicine resistance in Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) based on the initial features of the patients. METHODS: The medical records of patients were analyzed prior to the initiation of colchicine. After generating a predictive score in the initial cohort, it was applied to an independent cohort for external validation of effectiveness and reliability. RESULTS: Among 1418 patients with FMF, 56 (3.9%) were colchicine resistant (cr) and 1312 (96.1%) were colchicine responsive. Recurrent arthritis (4 points), protracted febrile myalgia (8 points), erysipelas-like erythema (2 points), exertional leg pain (2 points), and carrying M694V homozygous mutation (4 points) were determined as the parameters for predicting cr-FMF in the logistic regression model. The cut-off value of 9 was 87% sensitive and 82% specific to foresee the risk of cr-FMF in the receiver operating characteristic. Validation of the scoring system with an independent group (cr-FMF = 107, colchicine responsive = 1935) revealed that the cut-off value was 82% sensitive and 79% specific to identify the risk of cr-FMF. CONCLUSIONS: By constructing this reliable and predictor tool, we enunciate that predicting cr-FMF at the initiation of the disease and interfering timely before the emergence of complications will be possible.
Assuntos
Artrite , Febre Familiar do Mediterrâneo , Criança , Humanos , Febre Familiar do Mediterrâneo/diagnóstico , Febre Familiar do Mediterrâneo/tratamento farmacológico , Febre Familiar do Mediterrâneo/genética , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Colchicina/farmacologia , Colchicina/uso terapêutico , Artrite/complicações , FebreRESUMO
To evaluate the safety profile of measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) booster in children diagnosed with rheumatic diseases receiving biological agents. The study included retrospective safety data of children administered MMR booster dose receiving biologics or biologics with methotrexate. The files of 182 patients were accessed from the pediatric rheumatology biological therapy archive, and the vaccination status of these children was obtained by accessing electronic records. Of 182 patients, 14 patients were vaccinated with MMR booster dose. Thirteen of the patients were followed up with a diagnosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis and one with colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever. None of the patients had disease exacerbation after vaccination, and three patients had mild side effects consisting of rash, angioedema, joint pain, and fatigue. Conclusion: This study supports the data regarding evidence of the safety of MMR booster dose administration in children with rheumatic diseases receiving bDMARDs. What is Known: ⢠MMR booster is avoided in immunocompromised pediatric patients receiving bDMARDs except in specific conditions. What is New: ⢠The MMR booster dose may be safe in children with PedRD receiving bDMARDs or bDMARDs with MTX. These bullets can be added to the manuscript.
Assuntos
Artrite Juvenil , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola , Sarampo , Caxumba , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão) , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Anticorpos Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Artrite Juvenil/tratamento farmacológico , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/efeitos adversos , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Caxumba/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Imunização SecundáriaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performances of recently proposed Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization criteria versus current International League of Associations for Rheumatology criteria for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA). METHODS: The study was performed at the Department of Pediatric Rheumatology in Istanbul Faculty of Medicine with a retrospective design, covering the date range 2010-2021. Patients diagnosed with sJIA, Kawasaki disease and common autoinflammatory diseases were included. Both the International League of Associations for Rheumatology and Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization classification criteria were applied to each patient and cross-checked with expert rheumatologist diagnosis. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients with sJIA were compared against 189 (74 Kawasaki disease, 83 familial Mediterranean fever, 16 mevalonate kinase deficiency, 10 cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes, and 6 tumour necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome) patients. The Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization criteria demonstrated higher sensitivity (62.2% vs 80.5%, P =.003) but comparable specificity (90.5% vs 91%) as regards the International League of Associations for Rheumatology criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The revised criteria appear to enhance the ability to provide early recognition and pertinent classification of sJIA. No superiority was observed in segregating sJIA from common autoinflammatory diseases and Kawasaki disease, namely in terms of specificity.
Assuntos
Artrite Juvenil , Doenças Hereditárias Autoinflamatórias , Síndrome de Linfonodos Mucocutâneos , Reumatologia , Criança , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Artrite Juvenil/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Biosimilars have been adopted by clinicians more slowly than anticipated in the post-marketing phase. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to reveal the perceptions and attitudes of pediatric rheumatologists towards biosimilars and the obstacles to biosimilar therapy. METHODS: A web-based survey designed to determine the knowledge, experience, and perceptions of pediatric rheumatologists about biosimilars was electronically mailed to the participants between April and August 2021. Responses were collected anonymously and subsequently analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 114 pediatric rheumatologists including fellows (32.4%), specialists (29.8%), and seniors (37.7%) responded to the questionnaire. According to the data, 75 (65.8%) physicians had already prescribed at least one biosimilar. The vast majority of participants were aware of the potential cost savings of biosimilars (84, 73.3%). Participants who felt insufficiently informed were 41.8%, 67.6%, and 83.7% among seniors, specialists, and fellows, respectively. In pediatric rheumatology, the scarcity of clinical trials and real-life data (64%) and inadequate information about tolerance to the biosimilars and related side effects in children (49.1%) were the most common barriers expressed by prescribers. Nearly half (45%) of the pediatric rheumatologists preferred to prescribe biosimilars in the treatment of biologic-naive cases. However, most (93%) were reluctant to switch a reference molecule to a biosimilar while the patient was doing well under the originator medicine. CONCLUSIONS: This survey provided insights into the concerns about prescribing biosimilars among pediatric rheumatologists. In the field of pediatric rheumatology, further education about biosimilars and real-life experiences is required to better inform about treatment options in children.
Assuntos
Medicamentos Biossimilares , Médicos , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Medicamentos Biossimilares/uso terapêutico , Criança , Humanos , Reumatologistas , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine represents a cornerstone in tackling the pandemic and with the approval of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in December 2020, it has become a beacon of hope for people around the world, including children. This study aimed to present the data on the humoral response and safety of vaccine in a cohort of patients with paediatric rheumatic diseases receiving immunomodulatory treatments. METHODS: Forty-one children with paediatric rheumatic diseases were included and were vaccinated with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (two doses of 30 µg administered 3-4 weeks apart). To assess the humoral response, IgG antibodies developed against the S1/Receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein at baseline and 3-4 weeks after the second dose were measured. The possible local and systemic side effects and disease activity scores were evaluated during the study period. RESULTS: After the second dose of vaccine, markedly elevated anti-RBD IgG titres were observed in all patients with a median titre of 20â474 AU/ml [interquartile range (IQR) 6534-36â151] with a good safety profile. The median disease duration was 4.3 (IQR 3.5-5.6) years. In the cohort, 14 (34.1%) received conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs), 16 (39%) received biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and 11 (26.8%) received a combined therapy (cDMARDs and bDMARDs). Patients treated with combined therapy [median 4695 (IQR 2764-26â491)] had significantly lower median titres of anti-RBD IgG than those receiving only cDMARDs. CONCLUSION: Paediatric rheumatic diseases patients receiving immunomodulatory treatments were able to mount an effective humoral response after two dose regimens of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine safely without interrupting their current treatments.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , COVID-19 , Doenças Reumáticas , Vacinas Virais , Humanos , Criança , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacina BNT162 , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados , Vacinas Virais/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Imunoglobulina G , Doenças Reumáticas/induzido quimicamente , Vacinas de mRNARESUMO
BACKGROUND: Vaccination programs are effective strategies in preventing infectious diseases and controlling epidemics. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in children has not yet been approved globally, and it is unclear what attitude families will take when it is approved in children. We aimed to investigate the underlying causes of vaccine acceptance, hesitation, and refusal, as well as concerns about the acceptability of the COVID-19 vaccine by parents of children with rheumatic diseases. METHODS: Parents of children followed up with a diagnosis of rheumatic disease in the pediatric rheumatology outpatient clinic of a university hospital were included in the study. We applied a closed web-based online survey conducted cross-sectionally and sent to the participants via mobile smartphones. RESULTS: For fathers, mothers, and their children, acceptance rates for a COVID-19 vaccine were 64.2%, 57.7%, and 41.8%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, factors affecting parents' acceptance of vaccines for their children were as follows: "Receiving antirheumatic medications regularly (AOR 5.40, 95% CI 1.10-26.33, p = 0.03), the previous history of getting special recommended vaccines (AOR 4.12, 95% CI 1.12-27.85, p = 0.03), relying on vaccines for ending pandemic (AOR 8.84, 95% CI 2.80-27.85, p = 0.001), complying with the pandemic measures entirely (AOR 5.24, 95% CI 1.46-18.74, p = 0.01)". The two most common reasons for vaccine rejection were fear of the side effects of the vaccine and its possible interaction with rheumatic drugs used by children. CONCLUSION: According to our survey, parents were more likely to accept a COVID-19 vaccine for themselves than their children. The success of COVID-19 vaccination programs sources highly on people's willingness to accept the vaccine. It is crucial to vaccinate children for achieving herd immunity and in terms of avoiding vaccine hesitancy. Larger data examining the causes of concerns in parents of both healthy children and children with chronic diseases should be delineated.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Reumáticas , Atitude , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pais , SARS-CoV-2 , VacinaçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To review the real-life data, to provide an input to the literature concerning treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with adalimumab (ADL) biosimilar. METHOD: This multi-centric retrospective study was conducted among children with JIA, followed up for at least 24-weeks from the initiation of ADL biosimilar (ABP 501) treatment. Adverse events and alterations in disease activity scores were figured out. RESULTS: The median age of the group was 15.5 (5-18) years. JIA categories were oligoarticular (n =12), enthesitis-related (ERA) (n=24), psoriatic (PsA) (n=6), and polyarticular (n=4). Uveitis was detected at the initiation of the disease (n=3), during the disease course (n=5), or before the diagnosis (n=1). The first-line treatment preferences were ADL biosimilar (n=37) and etanercept (n=9). On the 6th month of ABP 501, 40 (86.9%) patients had achieved complete remission. Six patients (1 PsA, 1 polyarticular JIA, and 4 ERA) had ongoing active arthritis. Furthermore, all except one of the patients had remission of ophthalmologic findings. No life-threatening adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: ABP 501 has a gradual increase in prescription in pediatric rheumatology. Real-life data of the cohort announce that ADL biosimilar is a suitable and effective treatment option for patients with JIA in case of indication.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Artrite Juvenil , Medicamentos Biossimilares , Reumatologia , Adalimumab/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Artrite Juvenil/diagnóstico , Artrite Juvenil/tratamento farmacológico , Medicamentos Biossimilares/efeitos adversos , Criança , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The primary aim of the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is complete remission and minimizing the development of complications. Though biologic agents (BAs) provide better disease control, data related to BA switching patterns in JIA patients are scarce. This study aimed to determine the BA switching patterns in JIA patients. The study included children with JIA that received ≥ 1 BAs. Disease activity was evaluated based on the juvenile arthritis disease activity score 71 (JADAS71). Demographic data, clinical and laboratory findings, BA switching patterns, and the rationales for BA switching were recorded. The study included 177 (82 female and 95 male) JIA patients that received ≥ 1 BAs. Mean age at diagnosis of JIA was 9.1 ± 4.9 years. BAs were prescribed a median of 14 months (range: 3-66 months) after diagnosis. Among the 177 patients, 31 (17.5%) required BA switching a median 10.5 months (range: 3-38 months) after initiation of the first BA. Among all the BAs that were switched to after administration of the first BA, tocilizumab was the most commonly switched (n = 15). The most common reason for BA switching was inadequate response (n = 29). BAs were switched 2 times in 5 patients and 3 times in 1 patient. When patients that switched BAs 1 time were compared to those that switched 2 and 3 times there were not any differences in terms of JIA types, whereas those that switched 2 and 3 times had a higher active joint count and JADAS71 score after 6 months of initiation of the first BA. As some of the JIA patients could not achieve remission despite using the prescribed BA, BA switching was required. Herein, we provide data on both BA switching patterns and requirements, which may improve the management of JIA patients.
Assuntos
Artrite Juvenil/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Indução de Remissão/métodos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
To evaluate the vaccine response of treatment-naive juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients who were fully vaccinated against Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) and then compare their antibody status with healthy controls. In this multicenter study, initial visit hepatitis B surface antigen (HbsAg) and anti-hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-Hbs) titers of 262 treatment-naive JIA patients who were followed up regularly between May 2015 and October 2019 were evaluated retrospectively from patients' medical records and compared with 276 healthy peers. Both HbsAg and anti-Hbs antibody titers were tested by the ELISA technique. Anti-HBs titers ≥ 10 IU/L were considered as reactive indicating seroprotection against HBV. In the JIA group, seropositivity rate was 59.1% while 72.9% of the control group were immune against HBV (p = 0.002). The median titer for anti-Hbs was 14 (range: 0-1000) IU/L in the patient group and 43.3 (range: 0-1000) IU/L in the control group (p = 0.01). Neither JIA patients nor healthy controls were positive for HbsAg. Patients with JIA vaccinated according to the national vaccination schedule were evaluated at their first visit in pediatric rheumatology outpatient clinics for anti-Hbs presence and it was found that they have lesser seroprotectivity than their age and sex-matched routinely vaccinated, healthy peers. So, to complete missing vaccines and booster vaccine doses, assessing the immune status of the patients at the time of diagnosis against HBV should be in the check-list of physicians dealing with pediatric rheumatic diseases.