Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMJ Open ; 14(4): e074188, 2024 Apr 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38684278

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of seven Chinese patent medicines (CPMs) combined with conventional triple/quadruple therapy (T/Q) for Helicobacter pylori-positive peptic ulcers. DESIGN: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP database, Wanfang database, ScienceDirect, EBSCO, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and PubMed were searched through 1 June 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) testing CPMs combined with T/Q for H. pylori-positive peptic ulcers were included. The CPMs included Anweiyang capsule, Jianweiyuyang tablets/capsule/granule, Jinghuaweikang capsule, Kangfuxin liquid, Puyuanhewei capsule, Weifuchun tablets/capsule and Weisu granule. At least one of the following outcome indicators was recorded: complete ulcer healing rate (CUHR), effective rate (ER), H. pylori eradication rate (HPER), rate of peptic ulcer recurrence (RPUR) and incidence of adverse reactions (IAR). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two researchers independently conducted the study selection and extracted data for included studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A pairwise meta-analysis was performed using RevMan V.5.3. Network meta-analysis was performed using STATA/MP V.15.0. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 36 RCTs involving 3620 patients were included. Compared with T/Q alone, Weisu+T/Q, Weifuchun+T/Q and Puyuanhewei+T/Q had the highest CUHR, ER and HPER, respectively. Weisu+T/Q and Jianweiyuyang+T/Q had the lowest RPUR and IAR, respectively. The cluster analysis results showed Jianweiyuyang+T/Q might be the best choice concerning efficacy and safety simultaneously, followed by Kangfuxin+T/Q. CONCLUSION: Among the combination therapies with the CPMs, Jianweiyuyang+T/Q might be the most favourable option for H. pylori-positive peptic ulcers, followed by Kangfuxin+T/Q. Considering the limited quantity and quality of the included RCTs, the results should be interpreted with caution. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022327687.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Medicamentos de Ervas Chinesas , Infecções por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Metanálise em Rede , Úlcera Péptica , Humanos , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Medicamentos de Ervas Chinesas/uso terapêutico , Medicamentos de Ervas Chinesas/efeitos adversos , Úlcera Péptica/tratamento farmacológico , Úlcera Péptica/microbiologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Antiulcerosos/uso terapêutico , Antiulcerosos/administração & dosagem , Antiulcerosos/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Medicamentos sem Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Medicamentos sem Prescrição/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA