Evaluation of imaging indicators in differentiating idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus from Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: There are currently many imaging indicators for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). However, their diagnostic performance has not been well compared, especially in differentiating iNPH from Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of these imaging indicators in differentiating iNPH from AD. METHODS: We retrospectively collected patients with iNPH from the West China Hospital between June 2016 and December 2023. Age-sex-matched patients with AD and healthy controls (HCs) are included as controls (ChiCTR2300070078, March 2023). Twelve imaging indicators were evaluated on MRI, including disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus (DESH), Evans' index (EI), callosal angle, z-EI, temporal horn, dilated Sylvian fissure, focal sulcal dilation, tight high convexity, deep white matter hyperintensities, periventricular hyperintensities, DESH scale, and Simplified Radscale. We analyzed the receiver operating characteristic curves and calculated the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients with iNPH (mean age: 73.1 ± 6.5; 35 males), 46 patients with AD (mean age: 73.0 ± 6.6; 35 males), and 46 HCs (mean age: 73.0 ± 5.9; 35 males) were included. The largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was found in EI (0.93; 95 % CI: 0.89-0.98) and z-EI (0.93; 95 % CI: 0.87-0.98). DESH scale ≥ 6 had the highest specificity (93 %, 43/46). CONCLUSION: EI and z-EI had the best diagnostic performance in differentiating iNPH from AD. The DESH scale could assist in diagnosing iNPH due to its high specificity.

TUG-891 inhibits neuronal endoplasmic reticulum stress and pyroptosis activation and protects neurons in a mouse model of intraventricular hemorrhage.

Pyroptosis plays an important role in hemorrhagic stroke. Excessive endoplasmic reticulum stress can cause endoplasmic reticulum dysfunction and cellular pyroptosis by regulating the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain and leucine-rich repeat pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) pathway. However, the relationship between pyroptosis and endoplasmic reticulum stress after intraventricular hemorrhage is unclear. In this study, we established a mouse model of intraventricular hemorrhage and found pyroptosis and endoplasmic reticulum stress in brain tissue. Intraperitoneal injection of the selective GPR120 agonist TUG-891 inhibited endoplasmic reticulum stress, pyroptosis, and inflammation and protected neurons. The neuroprotective effect of TUG-891 appears related to inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum stress and pyroptosis activation.

Association between vascular risk factors and idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a Mendelian randomization study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) have a higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes. However, the causal effects of these vascular risk factors on iNPH remain unclear. This study aimed to explore the causal relationship between vascular risk factors (VRFs) and iNPH. METHODS: We conducted the Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis of iNPH. We included nineteen vascular risk factors related to hypertension, diabetes, lipids, obesity, smoking, alcohol consumption, exercise, sleep, and cardiovascular events as exposure factors. We used the inverse-variance weighted method for causal effect estimation and weighted median, maximum likelihood, and MR Egger regression methods for sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: We found that genetically predicting essential hypertension (OR = 1.608 (1.330-1.944), p = 0.013) and increased sleep duration (OR = 16.395 (5.624-47.799), p = 0.009) were associated with higher odds of iNPH. Type 1 diabetes (OR = 0.869 (0.828-0.913), p = 0.004) was associated with lower odds of iNPH. For the other 16 VRFs, there was no evidence that they were significantly associated with iNPH. Sensitivity analyses showed that essential hypertension and type 1 diabetes were significantly associated with iNPH. CONCLUSION: In our MR study on VRFs and iNPH, we found essential hypertension to be a causal risk factor for iNPH. This suggests that hypertension may be involved in the pathophysiological mechanism of iNPH.