Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Hazard Mater ; 149(3): 543-7, 2007 Nov 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17693019

RESUMO

Elevated concentrations of nutrients and mercury (Hg) make Steamboat Creek (SBC) the most polluted tributary of the Truckee River. Since wetlands are considered cost-effective, reliable, and potential sites for methylmercury (MeHg) production, a small-scale wetland system was constructed and monitored for several years in order to quantify both nutrient removal and transformation of mercury. Results indicated seasonal variations in nutrient removal with 40-75% of total nitrogen and 30-60% of total phosphorus being removed with highest removals during summer and lowest removals during winter. The wetland system behaved as a sink for MeHg during the winter months and as a source for MeHg during summer months.


Assuntos
Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Mercúrio/isolamento & purificação , Purificação da Água/métodos , Áreas Alagadas , Desenho de Equipamento , Compostos de Metilmercúrio/isolamento & purificação , Nitrogênio/isolamento & purificação , Fósforo/isolamento & purificação , Estações do Ano , Movimentos da Água , Poluentes Químicos da Água
2.
Water Res ; 41(17): 4005-14, 2007 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17604810

RESUMO

The nutrient-rich liquid stream produced during the dewatering of digested biomass (i.e., the centrate) is commonly mixed with the influent raw wastewater at wastewater treatment facilities. This increases the nitrogen and phosphorus loading on biological processes, increases operating costs, and in some cases, results in increased nutrient concentrations in the final effluent. Forward osmosis (FO) is a membrane treatment process that was investigated at bench scale to determine its feasibility to concentrate centrate under both batch and continuous operating conditions. The continuous bench-scale system used FO as pretreatment for reverse osmosis (RO). Results demonstrated that high water flux and high nutrient rejection could be achieved. The combined FO/RO process exhibited sustainable flux over an extended time period. A mathematical model was developed in order to determine the specific energy, power, and membrane area requirements for a larger-scale centrate treatment process. Modeling results indicated that to optimize power and membrane area requirements, the system should be operated at approximately 70% water recovery.


Assuntos
Biomassa , Purificação da Água/métodos , Amônia/química , Anaerobiose , Membranas Artificiais , Osmose , Fosfatos/química , Soluções , Fatores de Tempo
3.
J Environ Qual ; 35(6): 2352-9, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17071906

RESUMO

Mercury associated with natural enrichment, historic mining, and ore processing is a contaminant of concern in watersheds of the western USA. In this region, water is a highly managed resource and wetlands, known to be important sites of methyl mercury production, are often an integral component of watersheds. This study applied controlled manipulations of four replicated experimental wetland designs with different water and soil mercury concentrations to determine the potential impacts on methyl mercury export. Wetlands were manipulated by drying and wetting, changing hydraulic retention time, and adding sulfate and nitrate to influent waters. In a summer drying and wetting manipulation, an immediate increase in total methyl mercury release was observed with rewetting, however, concentrations decreased quickly. Drying all wetlands over the winter and rewetting in the spring resulted in high net methyl mercury output relative to that observed before drying. Net methyl mercury output was not influenced by changes in hydraulic retention time from 4 to 8 h or to 30 min, or by increasing the nitrate concentration from 0.1 to 10 mg L(-1). The addition of sulfate to the inlet waters of two mesocosms to increase concentrations from approximately 100 to 250 mg L(-1) did not result in a clear effect on methyl mercury output, most likely due to sulfate concentrations being higher than optimal for methyl mercury production. Despite the lack of response to sulfate amendments, the change in sulfate concentration between the inlet and outlet of the mesocosms and temperature were the parameters best correlated with methyl mercury outputs.


Assuntos
Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Resíduos Industriais/análise , Compostos de Metilmercúrio/análise , Poluentes do Solo/análise , Poluentes Químicos da Água/análise , Compostos de Metilmercúrio/toxicidade , Meio-Oeste dos Estados Unidos , Mineração , Nitratos/química , Rios , Estações do Ano , Poluentes do Solo/toxicidade , Sulfatos/química , Fatores de Tempo , Poluentes Químicos da Água/toxicidade , Purificação da Água/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA