Characteristics of Spinal Morphology According to the "Current" and "Theoretical" Roussouly Classification Systems in a Diverse, Asymptomatic Cohort: Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS).

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To classify spinal morphology using the "current" and "theoretical" Roussouly systems and assess sagittal alignment in an asymptomatic cohort. METHODS: 467 asymptomatic volunteers were recruited from 5 countries. Radiographic parameters were measured via the EOS imaging system. "Current" and "theoretical" Roussouly classification was assigned with sagittal whole spine imaging using sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), and the lumbar apex. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare subject characteristics across Roussouly types, followed by post hoc Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Volunteers were categorized into 4 groups (Types 1-4) and 1 subgroup (Type 3 AP) using the "current" and "theoretical" Roussouly systems. The mean PI in "current" Roussouly groups was 40.8° (Type 1), 43.6° (Type 2), 52.4° (Type 3), 62.4° (Type 4), and 43.7° (Type 3AP). The mean PI in "theoretical" Roussouly groups was 36.5° (Type 1), 39.1°(Type 2), 52.5° (Type 3), 67.3° (Type 4), and 51.0° (Type 3AP). The difference in PI between "current" and "theoretical" Roussouly types was significant for Type 1 (P = .02), Type 2 (P < .001), Type 4 (P < .001), and Type 3AP (P < .001). 34.7% of subjects had a "current" Roussouly type different from the "theoretical" type. Type 3 theoretical shape had the most frequent mismatch, constituting 61.1% of the mismatched subjects. 51.5% of mismatched Type 3 become "current" Type 4. CONCLUSION: The distribution of Roussouly types differs depending on whether the "current" or "theoretical" classification are employed. A sizeable proportion of volunteers exhibited current and theoretical type mismatch, highlighting the need to interpret sagittal alignment cautiously when utilizing the Roussouly system.

Characteristics of Spinal Morphology According to the Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score in a Diverse, Asymptomatic Cohort: Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) cohort: prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the distribution of GAP scores in the MEANS cohort and compare the spinal shape via stratification by GAP alignment category, age, and country. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The GAP score has been used to categorize spinal morphology and prognosticate adult spinal deformity surgical outcomes and mechanical complications. We analyzed a large, multiethnic, asymptomatic cohort to assess the distribution of GAP scores. METHODS: Four hundred sixty-seven healthy volunteers without spinal disorders were recruited in five countries. Sagittal radiographic parameters were measured via the EOS imaging system. The GAP total and constituent factor scores were calculated for each patient. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was performed to compare variables across groups, followed by the post hoc Games-Howell test. Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical variables. The significance level was set to P <0.05. RESULTS: In the MEANS cohort, 13.7% (64/467) of volunteers were ≥60 years old, and 86.3% (403/467) were <60 years old. 76.9% (359/467) was proportioned, 19.5% (91/467) was moderately disproportioned, and 3.6% (17/467) was severely disproportioned. There was no significant difference in the frequency of proportioned, moderately, or severely disproportioned GAP between subjects from different countries ( P =0.060). Those with severely disproportioned GAP alignment were on average 14.5 years older ( P =0.016), had 23.1° lower magnitude lumbar lordosis (LL) ( P <0.001), 14.2° higher pelvic tilt ( P <0.001), 13.3° lower sacral slope ( P <0.001), and 24.1° higher pelvic-incidence (PI)-LL mismatch ( P <0.001), 18.2° higher global tilt ( P <0.001) than those with proportioned GAP; thoracic kyphosis and PI were not significantly different ( P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The GAP system applies to a large, multiethnic, asymptomatic cohort. Spinal alignment should be considered on a spectrum, as 19.5% of the asymptomatic volunteers were classified as moderately disproportioned and 3.6% severely disproportioned. Radiographic malalignment does not always indicate symptoms or pathology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

The Importance of Pelvic Obliquity in Assessing Spinal Coronal Alignment: Normative Values, Demographic, and Radiographic Correlations.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: In a geographically diverse population of asymptomatic volunteers, we sought to report the incidence of pelvic obliquity (PO), establish normative values of PO across patient factors, and assess the correlation of PO with radiographic parameters. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PO is defined as the misalignment of the pelvis and can be assessed through several anatomic landmarks. Significant PO, whether caused by leg-length discrepancy or not, can lead to coronal malalignment which causes severe pain and disability. Significant emphasis has been placed on achieving appropriate sagittal alignment in recent decades; however, a greater understanding of coronal alignment is needed, and PO is a crucial aspect of evaluating the coronal plane in adult spinal deformity patients. METHODS: Asymptomatic adult volunteers, ages 18-80 years, enrolled patients from 5 countries (France, Japan, Singapore, Tunisia, and the United States) in the "multiethnic alignment normative study" cohort (IRB 201812144). The included volunteers had no known spinal disorder(s), no significant neck or back pain (Visual Analog Scale: ≤2; Oswestry Disability Index: ≤20), and no abnormal alignment (Cobb ≤20°). PO was measured in the frontal plane as the distance between the highest points of each acetabulum, calculated along the vertical axis in millimeters (mm). The incidence of PO was defined as PO ≥10 mm. Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon rank-sum, Pearson correlation, and linear regression were used. RESULTS: A total of 467 patients were included, and PO values by age, sex, body mass index, and country were provided. The overall incidence of PO ≥10 mm was 4.3%, and a nonsignificant trend toward increased PO with age was seen ( P = 0.077). No significant differences were seen in PO between sex, ethnicity, or body mass index groups. No significant correlation existed between PO and other commonly used coronal radiographic measurements. CONCLUSION: PO ≥10 mm occurred in 4.3% of asymptomatic volunteers. Despite the importance of recognizing PO in preventing coronal malalignment, PO did not seem to be associated with other radiographic and demographic information, which underscores the importance of intentionally assessing for any PO before surgery. These results in an asymptomatic population provide a foundation for studying PO in patients with spinal pathology.

Age and Gender Based Spinopelvic and Regional Spinal Alignment in Asymptomatic Adult Volunteers: Results of the Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS).

BACKGROUND: Spinal alignment can have a significant impact on a patient's overall quality of life. Predicting the ideal sagittal spinal alignment of a specific individual is still a difficult task. The Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) investigated skeletal alignment, including the spine and lower extremities, of the largest multi-ethnic cohort of asymptomatic adult volunteers. In this analysis, the authors aim to assess normative values of spinopelvic parameters and the regional cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spinal alignment in asymptomatic volunteers stratified by age and sex. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Asymptomatic volunteers between ages 18 and 80 years were enrolled prospectively from centers in France, Japan, Singapore, Tunisia, and the United States. Volunteers included reported no significant neck or back pain (Visual Analog Scale ≤2), nor any known spinal disorder(s). All volunteers underwent a standing full-body or full-spine low-dose stereoradiograph. RESULTS: MEANS consisted of 468 volunteers with a mean age of 40.4±14.8 years. Mean cervical lordosis from C2 to C7 was -0.4±12.7°. The T1-slope averaged 23.0±7.9° and showed strong correlation ( r =0.87) with the C7-slope mean of 19.8±8.6°. Thoracic kyphosis (TK) from T4 to T12 showed a mean of 37.4±10.9°. Average L1-S1 lumbar lordosis (LL) was -57.4±11.3°. The mean pelvic incidence (PI) measured 52.0±10.7° and pelvic tilt was 12.5±7.3°. Sacral slope averaged 39.5±8.2°. The average PI-LL was -5.4±10.7°. Approximately 60% of volunteers met the PI-LL criteria within ±10°, 8.3% were ≥10°, while 32.1% were ≤-10°. LL showed moderate correlation with PI ( r =0.53) and TK ( r =0.50), while there was no correlation between TK and PI. Multiple linear regression including PI, TK, and age resulted in the following equation LL=14.6+0.57 (PI)+0.57 (TK)-0.2 (age) ( r =0.75). CONCLUSIONS: LL did not change with increasing age in asymptomatic volunteers. However, TK did increase with age leading to an increase in T1-slope and a compensatory increase in cervical lordosis. TK did not correlate with PI and was an independent variable in the prediction of LL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-prospective cohort study.

Age- and Gender-based Global Sagittal Spinal Alignment in Asymptomatic Adult Volunteers: Results of the Multiethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS).

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter Cohort. OBJECTIVE: Assess normative values of sagittal spinal and lower extremity alignment in asymptomatic volunteers stratified by age and gender. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Our understanding of ideal sagittal alignment is still evolving. The Multiethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) investigated skeletal alignment of the largest multiethnic cohort of asymptomatic adult volunteers. We aim to assess normative values of sagittal spinal and lower extremity alignment in asymptomatic volunteers stratified by age and gender. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Asymptomatic volunteers between the ages of 18-80 years were enrolled prospectively and then analyzed retrospectively from six different centers. Volunteers included reported no significant neck or back pain, nor any known spinal disorder(s). All volunteers underwent a standing full-body or full-spine low-dose stereoradiograph. RESULTS: MEANS consisted of 468 volunteers with a mean age of 40.4±14.8 years. Thoracic kyphosis (TK) from T4 to T12 showed a mean of 37.4±10.9°. The average L1-S1 lumbar lordosis (LL) was -57.4±11.3°. LL did not show significant differences across the five age groups. TK showed a significant difference based on age ( P <0.0001). Sagittal vertical axis increased across age groups from -14.2 mm in young adults to 17.0 mm in patients >64. Similar trend was seen for T1 pelvic angle with a mean of 5.0° in young adults and 13.7° in those older than age 64. Knee flexion increased across age groups without a significant change in odontoid-knee distance which is a surrogate for the center of the head aligned over the knees. CONCLUSIONS: In asymptomatic volunteers, sagittal alignment parameters showed a slow and steady change across age groups exemplified by an increase in TK. However, LL did not show a significant decrease across age groups. Volunteers used compensatory mechanisms such as slight pelvis retroversion, knee flexion, and neck extension to maintain an aligned sagittal posture with their head centered over their knees (odontoid-knee). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Cervical Inclination Angle: Normative Values in an Adult Multiethnic Asymptomatic Population.

OBJECTIVE: The role of the craniocervical complex in spinal sagittal alignment has rarely been analyzed but it may play a fundamental role in postoperative mechanical complications. The aim of the study is to analyze the normative value of the cervical inclination angle (CIA) in an adult asymptomatic multiethnic population. METHODS: Standing full-spine EOS of adult asymptomatic volunteers from 5 different countries were analyzed. The CIA was analyzed globally and then in each decade of life. Different ethnicities were compared. Comparisons between different groups was performed using a t-test and statistical significance was considered with a p-value < 0.05. RESULTS: EOS of 468 volunteers were analyzed. The global mean CIA was 80.2° with a maximum difference of 9° between T1 and T12 (p < 0.001). The CIA remains constant until 60 years old then decreases significantly passing from a mean value before 20 years old of 82.25° to 73.65° after 70 years old. A statistically significant difference was found between the Arabics and other ethnicities with the formers having an inferior CIA: this was related to a mean older age (p < 0.05) and higher body mass index (p < 0.05) in the Arabics. CONCLUSION: The CIA remains constant until 60 years old and then reduces slightly but never under 70°. This angle is helpful to evaluate the lever arm at the upper instrumented vertebra after an adult spinal deformity surgery and could predict the occurrence of a proximal junctional kyphosis when its value is lower than normal. Further clinical studies must confirm this theory.

Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score Is Predictive of Perioperative Adverse Events in Operatively Treated Thoracic and Lumbar Fractures.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of patients with surgically treated thoracolumbar fractures. PURPOSE: This study aimed to describe the incidence of adverse events (AEs) after surgical stabilization of thoracolumbar spine injuries and to identify predictive factors for the occurrence of AEs. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Thoracolumbar spine fractures are frequently present in patients with blunt trauma and are associated with significant morbidity. AEs can occur due to the initial spinal injury or secondary to surgical treatment. There is a lack of emphasis in the literature on the AEs that can occur after operative management of thoracolumbar fractures. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 199 patients with surgically treated thoracolumbar fractures operated between January 2007 and January 2018. The potential risk factors for the development of AEs as well as the development of common complications were evaluated by univariate analysis, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors predictive of the above. RESULTS: The overall rate of AEs was 46.7%; 83 patients (41.7%) had nonsurgical AEs, whereas 24 (12.1%) had surgical adverse events. The most common AEs were urinary tract infections in 43 patients (21.6%), and hospital-acquired pneumonia in 21 patients (10.6%). On multivariate logistic regression, a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS) score of 8-10 (odds ratio [OR], 6.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.33-17.51), the presence of polytrauma (OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.17-5.99), and undergoing open surgery (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.09-4.88) were significant risk factors for AEs. The absence of neurological deficit was associated with a lower rate of AEs (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.31-0.70). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests the presence of polytrauma, preoperative American Spinal Injury Association score, and TLICS score are predictive of AEs in patients with surgically treated thoracolumbar fractures. The results might also suggest a role for minimally invasive surgical methods in reducing AEs in these patients.

The 2019 Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) Asia Pacific Traveling Fellowship.

The Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) is dedicated to advancing the care of patients with cervical spine pathology. The authors present here highlights of the 2019 CSRS-Asia Pacific Traveling Fellowship.

Patient and radiographer assessment of slump sitting flexion compared to conventional standing forward bending flexion.

BACKGROUND: A comparative survey from patients and radiographers of the new slump sitting flexion posture and the conventional standing forward bending posture. This study was performed to compare the technical and logistical aspects of the slump sitting versus the forward bending posture. Slump sitting flexes the lumbar spine more than the forward bending and increases the diagnosis rate of sagittal spinal instability up to 40% depending on the diagnostic criteria used. This should not come at the expense of patient safety and comfort nor burden the radiographers. METHODS: Sixty patients were recruited from a single tertiary spine centre. Patients were block randomised into two groups with either the forward bending or the slump sitting being performed first. Feedback was obtained through self-administered questionnaires from patients regarding perceived safety, convenience and comfort, plus from radiographers regarding the imaging process, proxy measures of radiographer ability and scan difficulty. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the baseline characteristics in both groups. Majority (63%) of patients preferred slump sitting and felt that forward bending caused pain (P=0.025). Overall, slump sitting was equivalent in comfort, perceived safety and ease to forward bending. Despite requiring more logistics (P=0.031), more effort to set up (P=0.002) and explain (P=0.012), the majority of radiographers (83%) preferred slump sitting. This method was felt to be less dangerous (P=0.015) and easier to maintain (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the superiority of slump sitting in allowing more lumbar flexion compared to the forward bending comes with patient safety or comfort. The technical demands of the learning curve can be offset with training. As such, slump sitting flexion views should be adopted as the standardized method for assessing spinal instability.

Spinal Implants Can Be Inserted in Patients With Deep Spine Infection: Results From a Large Cohort Study.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, cohort study of 84 patients with deep spine infection managed at a major tertiary hospital over 14 years with a minimum follow up of 2 years. OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of instrumentation in spines with deep infection. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It is often believed that implants should not be inserted in patients with deep spine infection because of the risk of persistent or recurrent infection. However, there are often concerns about spinal stability and a paucity of evidence to guide clinical practice in this field. METHODS: We compared the mortality, reoperation, and reinfection rates in patients with spine infection treated with antibiotics alone, antibiotics with debridement, and antibiotics with debridement and instrumentation. Significant outcome predictors were determined using multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: Forty-nine males and 35 females with a mean age was 62.0 years had spine infection affecting the lumbar spine predominantly. The most common form of infection was osteomyelitis and spondylodiscitis (69.4%). Staphylococcus aureus was the most common causative organism (61.2%).There was no difference in terms of reoperation or relapse for patients treated with antibiotics alone, antibiotics with debridement, or antibiotics with debridement and instrumentation. However, compared with antibiotics alone, the crude inhospital mortality was lower for patients treated with instrumentation (odds ratio, OR, 0.82; P = 0.01), and antibiotics with debridement (OR 0.80; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Spinal instrumentation in an infected spine is safe and not associated with higher reoperation or relapse rates. Mortality is lower for patients treated with instrumentation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Prevalence of carpal fracture in Singapore.

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of carpal fracture in Singapore, to compare demographic differences between isolated scaphoid and other carpal fractures, and to identify parameters associated with multiple carpal fractures. METHODS: A total of 149 patients with 162 carpal fractures seen at the National University Hospital in 2009 were enrolled into the study. We retrospectively reviewed their case records and radiographic studies. Pertinent demographic data including patient age, gender, occupation, injured wrist, dominant hand, mechanism of injury, and type of carpal fracture were then recorded and statistically analyzed. We also performed a separate analysis of isolated scaphoid versus other carpal fractures and single versus multiple carpal fractures. RESULTS: Patients with carpal fracture were predominantly male (132), below 40 years of age (116), and usually right hand dominant (136). The more common occupations were students (30), full-time military national servicemen (24), and construction workers (14). Most presented after a fall on an outstretched hand from standing height (81). The scaphoid was the most common single carpal fracture (99). This was followed by triquetrum (27), hamate (5), pisiform (4), lunate (2), capitate (1), and trapezium (1). No fracture of the trapezoid was encountered. Ten patients had multiple carpal fractures, of which 4 were perilunate fracture dislocations. The mean age and male/female ratio for isolated scaphoid and other carpal fractures was 26 years versus 41 years (p<.001) and 13:1 versus 4:1 (p=.036), respectively. A high-energy mechanism of injury was the only parameter associated with multiple carpal fractures (p=.009). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of carpal fracture in our population was consistent with studies performed in other countries. Military conscription was identified as an at-risk activity predisposing to carpal fracture. Isolated scaphoid and other carpal fractures exhibit different demographics in terms of age and gender, which may be related to differences in the mechanism of injury. A high-energy mechanism of injury was associated with multiple carpal fractures.