The Power of Preference Signaling: A Monumental Shift in the Orthopaedic Surgery Application Process.

INTRODUCTION: Orthopaedic surgery has consistently been one of the most competitive specialties in the US residency selection process. This is due in part to the steady upward trend in average applications received per program and average applications submitted per applicant, which is of growing concern. With the implementation of the Preference Signaling Program, the total number of applications has now dropped for the first time in many years, indicating signaling may improve the application process. The hypothesis is that signaling has led to a decrease in applications sent by applicants and a decrease in applications received by programs. METHODS: A 7-question survey regarding their interview and match statistics was sent to orthopaedic surgery residency programs that participated in the Electronic Residency Application Service during the 2023-2024 application cycle. A response from the program director/administrator was then recorded. RESULTS: Our program search yielded 159 programs with 106 respondents (66.7%). 82 programs (78.8%) solely interviewed applicants who signaled their program. 92.7% of current interns signaled the program where they matched, and 88 programs (84.6%) matched only applicants who signaled. 95 programs (89.6%) revealed that implementing signaling has improved the application process. CONCLUSION: Most of the programs only interviewed applicants who also signaled, and nearly all matched orthopaedic surgery applicants from the 2022-2023 cycle signaled their matching program. Orthopaedic surgery applicants should consider only applying to 30 programs and using all 30 available signals. Applicants should also be more confident knowing that beyond the 30 signals they use, there is limited support to say that they will receive an interview outside of these 30 applications. Orthopaedic surgery programs will also now have the ability to allocate more time to applicants most interested in their program, given the reduction of applications.

Surgical Approach and Dislocation Risk After Hemiarthroplasty in Geriatric Patients With Femoral Neck Fracture With and Without Cognitive Impairments-Does Cognitive Impairment Influence Dislocation Risk?

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there is an association between surgical approach and dislocation risk in patients with cognitive impairment compared with those without cognitive impairment treated with hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Large, multicenter health system. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One thousand four hundred eighty-one patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. 828 hips met inclusion criteria, 290 (35.0%) were cognitively impaired, and 538 (65.0%) were cognitively intact. INTERVENTION: Hemiarthroplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Prosthetic hip dislocation. RESULTS: The overall dislocation rate was 2.1% (17 of 828), 3.4% (10 of 290) in the cognitively impaired group, and 1.3% (7 of 538) in the cognitively intact group with a median time to dislocation of 20.5 days (range 2-326 days), 24.5 days (range 3-326 days), and 19.0 days (range 2-36 days), respectively. In the entire cohort, there were no dislocations (0 of 58) with the direct anterior approach (DA); 1.1% (6 of 553) and 5.1% (11 of 217) dislocated with the modified Hardinge (MH) and posterior approaches (PA), respectively. In the cognitively impaired group, there were no dislocations with the DA (0 of 19); 1.5% (3 of 202) and 10.1% (7 of 69) dislocated with the MH and PA, respectively. In the cognitively intact group, there were no dislocations (0 of 39) with the DA; 0.85% (3 of 351) and 2.7% (4 of 148) dislocated with the MH and PA, respectively. There were statistically significant associations between surgical approach and dislocation in the entire cohort and the cognitively impaired group when comparing the MH and PA groups. This was not observed in the cognitively intact group. Patients who dislocated had 3.2 times (95% CI 1.2, 8.7) ( P = 0.0226) the hazard of death compared with patients who did not dislocate. Dislocation effectively increased the risk of death by 221% (HR 3.2 95% CI 1.2, 8.7) ( P = 0.0226). CONCLUSIONS: In this patient population, the PA has a higher dislocation rate than other approaches and has an especially high rate of dislocation when the patients were cognitively impaired. The authors of this study suggest careful consideration of surgical approach when treating these injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Periprosthetic Fracture through a Unicortical Tracking Pin Site after Computer Navigated Total Knee Replacement.

A rare complication from computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty is a fracture through the insertion site of a tracking pin. These pins are inserted across the femoral and tibial shafts either bicortically, transcortically, or unicortically and have a reported fracture incidence of 1.38%, with all published cases occurring after bicortical pin placement. In this case, a 60-year-old female suffered a femoral shaft fracture through a unicortically inserted computer navigation tracking pin 6 weeks after total knee arthroplasty. Her fracture was successfully fixated with an intramedullary nail with retention of the knee prosthesis. This case is important as it records the risk for a postoperative fracture through a unicortically inserted computer navigation pin.

Do local antibiotics reduce periprosthetic joint infections? A retrospective review of 744 cases.

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are uncommon but not rare and have significant morbidity and financial implications. Local antibiotics have been used successfully in other areas of orthopedics to reduce postoperative infections, but this method has not been proven in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Beginning January 1, 2014, our primary investigators began using surgical site lavage with providone-iodine solution and administering 2 g of vancomcyin powder in the surgical wound prior to capsule closure for all primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasties. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients two years prior to this date and two years after to compare occurrence of PJI. The groups were broken down into patients who received local antibiotics versus those who did not. The groups were further broken down by type of surgery performed; primary or revision total hip or knee arthroplasty. Administration of local antibiotics was preventative for PJI only in the primary total knee arthroplasty group (aOR = 0.28, 0.09-0.89). Administration of local antibiotics trended towards a preventative effect for PJI in the other groups but was not statistically significant. Patients receiving local antibiotics had similar blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels postoperatively compared to the no antibiotics group indicating minimal systemic effects of local vancomycin powder. While the use of local antibiotics may prevent PJI, more data is required especially in the revision arthroplasty groups.