Associations of Breathing Pattern Disorder and Nijmegen Score With Clinical Outcomes in Difficult-to-Treat Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Breathing pattern disorder (BPD) reflects altered biomechanical patterns of breathing that drive breathing difficulty and commonly accompanies difficult-to-treat asthma. Diagnosis of BPD has no gold standard, but Nijmegen Questionnaire (NQ) >23 is commonly used. OBJECTIVES: We sought to advance clinical characterization of BPD and better understand the clinical utility of NQ in difficult asthma in patients from the Wessex AsThma CoHort of difficult asthma (WATCH) study. METHODS: Associations between demographic and clinical factors in difficult asthma and BPD, ascertained by clinical diagnosis (yes/no, n = 476), by NQ scores (≤23: normal [no suggestion of BPD] and >23: abnormal [suggested BPD], n = 372), as well as the continuous raw NQ scores were assessed in univariate models to identify significant risk factors associated with the 3 BPD outcomes. For the clinician-diagnosed and NQ-based BPD, associations of continuous factors were assessed using the independent samples t test or the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate for the data distribution or by the Spearman correlation test. Dichotomous associations were evaluated using χ2 tests. Multivariable logistic (dichotomous outcomes) and linear regression models (continuous outcomes) were developed to identify predictive factors associated with clinician-diagnosed and NQ-based BPD, dichotomous and continuous. Patients with data on NQ scores were grouped into NQ quartiles (low, moderate, high, and very high). The patterns of association of the quartiles with 4 health-related questionnaire outcomes were assessed using linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Multivariable regression identified that clinically diagnosed BPD was associated with female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07, 3.20), comorbidities (rhinitis [OR: 2.46; 95% CI: 1.45, 4.17], gastroesophageal reflux disease [GORD] [OR: 2.77; 95% CI: 1.58, 4.84], inducible laryngeal obstruction [OR: 4.37; 95% CI: 2.01, 9.50], and any psychological comorbidity [OR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.13, 3.07]), and health care usage (exacerbations [OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.003, 1.14] and previous intensive care unit (ICU) admissions [OR: 2.03; 95% CI: 1.18, 3.47]). Abnormal NQ-based BPD diagnosis was associated with history of eczema (OR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.07, 3.14), GORD (OR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.15, 3.27), or any psychological comorbidity (OR: 4.29; 95% CI: 2.64, 6.95) at multivariable regression. Differences between clinical and NQ-based BPD traits were also found with 42% discordance in BPD state between these definitions. Multivariable linear regression analysis with NQ as a continuous outcome showed positive association with worse asthma outcomes (admission to ICU, P = .037), different phenotypic traits (female sex, P = .001; ever smoker, P = .025), and greater multimorbidity (GORD, P = .002; sleep apnea, P = .04; and any psychological comorbidity, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: BPD is associated with worse health outcomes and negative health impacts in difficult asthma within a multimorbidity disease model. It therefore merits better recognition and prompt treatment. Clinical diagnosis and NQ offer different perspectives on BPD, so this goal may be best addressed by considering clinical features alongside the magnitude of NQ.

Impact of sex on severe asthma: a cross-sectional retrospective analysis of UK primary and specialist care.

INTRODUCTION: After puberty, females are more likely to develop asthma and in a more severe form than males. The associations between asthma and sex are complex with multiple intrinsic and external factors. AIM: To evaluate the sex differences in the characteristics and treatment of patients with severe asthma (SA) in a real-world setting. METHODS: Demographic, clinical and treatment characteristics for patients with SA in the UK Severe Asthma Registry (UKSAR) and Optimum Patient Care Research Database (OPCRD) were retrospectively analysed by sex using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusted for year, age and hospital/practice. RESULTS: 3679 (60.9% female) patients from UKSAR and 18 369 patients (67.9% female) from OPCRD with SA were included. Females were more likely to be symptomatic with increased Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (UKSAR adjusted OR (aOR) 1.14, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.18) and Royal College of Physicians-3 Question scores (OPCRD aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.47). However, they had a higher forced expiratory volume in 1 second per cent (FEV1%) predicted (UKSAR 68.7% vs 64.8%, p<0.001) with no significant difference in peak expiratory flow. Type 2 biomarkers IgE (UKSAR 129 IU/mL vs 208 IU/mL, p<0.001) and FeNO (UKSAR 36ppb vs 46ppb, p<0.001) were lower in females with no significant difference in blood eosinophils or biological therapy. Females were less likely to be on maintenance oral corticosteroids (UKSAR aOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.99) but more likely to be obese (UKSAR aOR 1.67, 95% CI 145 to 1.93; OPCRD SA aOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.58). CONCLUSIONS: Females had increased symptoms and were more likely to be obese despite higher FEV1% predicted and lower type 2 biomarkers with consistent and clinically important differences across both datasets.

An examination of factorial invariance of the Asthma Control Questionnaire among adults with severe asthma.

BACKGROUND: The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) is used to assess asthma symptom control. The relationship between the questionnaire items and symptom control has not been fully studied in severe asthmatic patients, and its validity for making comparisons between subgroups of patients is unknown. METHODS: Data was obtained from patients in the United Kingdom Severe Asthma Registry whose symptom control was assessed using the five-item ACQ (ACQ5) (n = 2,951). Confirmatory factor analysis determined whether a latent factor for asthma symptom control, as measured by the ACQ5, was consistent with the data. Measurement invariance was examined in relation to ethnicity, sex and age; this included testing for approximate measurement invariance using Bayesian Structural Equation Modelling (BSEM). The fitted models were used to estimate the internal consistency reliability of the ACQ5. Invariance of factor means across subgroups was assessed. RESULTS: A one-factor construct with residual correlations for the ACQ5 was an excellent fit to the data in all subgroups (Root Mean Square Error Approximation 0.03 [90%CI 0.02,0.05], p-close fit 0.93, Comparative Fit Index 1.00, Tucker Lewis Index 1.00}. Expected item responses were consistent for Caucasian and non-Caucasian patients with the same absolute level of symptom control. There was some evidence that females and younger adults reported wakening more frequently during the night than males and older adults respectively with the same absolute level of symptom control (p<0.001). However approximate measurement invariance was tenable and any failure to observe strong measurement invariance had minimal impact when comparing mean levels of asthma symptom control between patients of different sexes or ages. Average levels of asthma symptom control were lower for non-Caucasians (p = 0.001), females (p<0.01)and increased with age (p<0.01). Reliability of the instrument was high (over 88%) in all subgroups studied. CONCLUSION: The ACQ5 is informative in comparing levels of symptom control between severe asthmatic patients of different ethnicities, sexes and ages. It is important that analyses are replicated in other severe asthma registries to determine whether measurement invariance is observed.

How Does Mild Asthma Differ Phenotypically from Difficult-to-Treat Asthma?

Background: Despite most of the asthma population having mild disease, the mild asthma phenotype is poorly understood. Here, we aim to address this gap in knowledge by extensively characterising the mild asthma phenotype and comparing this with difficult-to-treat asthma. Methods: We assessed two real-world adult cohorts from the South of England using an identical methodology: the Wessex AsThma CoHort of difficult asthma (WATCH) (n=498) and a mild asthma cohort from the comparator arm of the Epigenetics Of Severe Asthma (EOSA) study (n=67). Data acquisition included detailed clinical, health and disease-related questionnaires, anthropometry, allergy and lung function testing, plus biological samples (blood and sputum) in a subset. Results: Mild asthma is predominantly early-onset and is associated with type-2 (T2) inflammation (atopy, raised fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), blood/sputum eosinophilia) plus preserved lung function. A high prevalence of comorbidities and multimorbidity was observed in mild asthma, particularly depression (58.2%) and anxiety (56.7%). In comparison to difficult asthma, mild disease showed similar female predominance (>60%), T2-high inflammation and atopy prevalence, but lower peripheral blood/airway neutrophil counts and preserved lung function. Mild asthma was also associated with a greater prevalence of current smokers (20.9%). A multi-component T2-high inflammatory measure was comparable between the cohorts; T2-high status 88.1% in mild asthma and 93.5% in difficult asthma. Conclusion: Phenotypic characterisation of mild asthma identified early-onset disease with high prevalence of current smokers, T2-high inflammation and significant multimorbidity burden. Early comprehensive assessment of mild asthma patients could help prevent potential later progression to more complex severe disease.

Comprehensive Characterization of Difficult-to-Treat Asthma Reveals Near Absence of T2-Low Status.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is conventionally stratified as type 2 inflammation (T2)-high or T2-low disease. Identifying T2 status has therapeutic implications for patient management, but a real-world understanding of this T2 paradigm in difficult-to-treat and severe asthma remains limited. OBJECTIVES: To identify the prevalence of T2-high status in difficult-to-treat asthma patients using a multicomponent definition and compare clinical and pathophysiologic characteristics between patients classified as T2-high and T2-low. METHODS: We evaluated 388 biologic-naive patients from the Wessex Asthma Cohort of difficult asthma (WATCH) study in the United Kingdom. Type 2-high asthma was defined as 20 parts per billion or greater FeNO , 150 cells/µL or greater peripheral blood eosinophils, the need for maintenance oral corticosteroids, and/or clinically allergy-driven asthma. RESULTS: This multicomponent assessment identified T2-high asthma in 93% of patients (360 of 388). Body mass index, inhaled corticosteroid dose, asthma exacerbations, and common comorbidities did not differ by T2 status. Significantly worse airflow limitation was found in T2-high compared with T2-low patients (FEV1/FVC 65.9% vs 74.6%). Moreover, 75% of patients defined as having T2-low asthma had raised peripheral blood eosinophils within the preceding 10 years, which left only seven patients (1.8%) who had never had T2 signals. Incorporation of sputum eosinophilia 2% or greater into the multicomponent definition in a subset of 117 patients with induced sputum data similarly found that 96% (112 of 117) met criteria for T2-high asthma, 50% of whom (56 of 112) had sputum eosinophils 2% or greater. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all patients with difficult-to-treat asthma have T2-high disease; less than 2% of patients never display T2-defining criteria. This highlights a need to assess T2 status comprehensively in clinical practice before labeling a patient with difficult-to-treat asthma as T2-low.

The Detrimental Clinical Associations of Anxiety and Depression with Difficult Asthma Outcomes.

Difficult asthma describes asthma in which comorbidities, inadequate treatment, suboptimal inhaler technique and/or poor adherence impede good asthma control. The association of anxiety and depression with difficult asthma outcomes (exacerbations, hospital admissions, asthma control, etc.) is unclear. This study assessed the clinical associations of anxiety and depression with difficult asthma outcomes in patients with a specialist diagnosis of difficult asthma. Using real-world data, we retrospectively phenotyped patients from the Wessex Asthma Cohort of Difficult Asthma (N = 441) using clinical diagnoses of anxiety and depression against those without anxiety or depression (controls). Additionally, we stratified patients by severity of psychological distress using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). We found that depression and/or anxiety were reported in 43.1% of subjects and were associated with worse disease-related questionnaire scores. Each psychological comorbidity group showed differential associations with difficult asthma outcomes. Anxiety alone (7.9%) was associated with dysfunctional breathing and more hospitalisations [anxiety, median (IQR): 0 (2) vs. controls: 0 (0)], while depression alone (11.6%) was associated with obesity and obstructive sleep apnoea. The dual anxiety and depression group (23.6%) displayed multimorbidity, worse asthma outcomes, female predominance and earlier asthma onset. Worse HADS-A scores in patients with anxiety were associated with worse subjective outcomes (questionnaire scores), while worse HADS-D scores in patients with depression were associated with worse objective (ICU admissions and maintenance oral corticosteroid requirements) and subjective outcomes. In conclusion, anxiety and depression are common in difficult asthma but exert differential detrimental effects. Difficult asthma patients with dual anxiety and depression experience worse asthma outcomes alongside worse measures of psychological distress. There is a severity-gradient association of HADS scores with worse difficult asthma outcomes. Collectively, our findings highlight the need for holistic, multidisciplinary approaches that promote early identification and management of anxiety and depression in difficult asthma patients.

Ethnic Differences in Severe Asthma Clinical Care and Outcomes: An Analysis of United Kingdom Primary and Specialist Care.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the effects of ethnicity in severe asthma is important for optimal personalized patient care. OBJECTIVE: To assess ethnic differences in disease control, exacerbations, biological phenotype, and treatment in severe asthma in the United Kingdom. METHODS: We compared demographics, type 2 biomarkers, lung function, asthma control, medications, and health care use between White and underrepresented ethnic group patients in the UK Severe Asthma Registry (UKSAR) and Optimum Patient Care Research Database (OPCRD). RESULTS: A total of 3637 patients (665 from the underrepresented ethnic group) were included from UKSAR and 10,549 (577 from the underrepresented ethnic group) from OPCRD. Patients in the underrepresented ethnic group had higher levels of uncontrolled disease when measurements were made using the asthma control questionnaire in UKSAR (odds ratio [OR] = 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.93) and the Royal College of Physicians 3 Questions in OPCRD (OR = 1.82; 95% CI, 1.27-2.60). Although exacerbation rates were similar, patients in the underrepresented ethnic group were more likely to have recently attended the emergency department (OR = 1.55; 95% CI, 1.26-1.92) or to have been hospitalized (OR = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.07-1.59) owing to asthma. Inflammatory biomarkers were consistently higher in the underrepresented ethnic group, including blood eosinophils in OPCRD (ratio = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05-1.20) and in UKSAR blood eosinophils (ratio = 1.16; 95% CI, 1.06-1.27), FeNO (ratio = 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04-1.26), and IgE (ratio = 1.70; 95% CI, 1.47-1.97). Patients in the underrepresented ethnic group were more likely to be atopic in the UKSAR (OR = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.07-1.63) and OPCRD (OR = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.26-2.21), and less likely to be using maintenance oral corticosteroids at referral (OR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Severe asthma patients from underrepresented ethnic groups presented with a higher disease burden and were more likely to attend the emergency department. They had a distinct phenotypic presentation and differences in medicine use, with higher levels of type 2 biomarkers.

Risks of infection, hospital and ICU admission, and death from COVID-19 in people with asthma: systematic review and meta-analyses.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if and to what degree asthma may predispose to worse COVID-19 outcomes in order to inform treatment and prevention decisions, including shielding and vaccine prioritisation. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Electronic databases were searched (October 2020) for clinical studies reporting at least one of the following stratified by asthma status: risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2; hospitalisation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission or mortality with COVID-19. PARTICIPANTS: Adults and children who tested positive for or were suspected to have COVID-19. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures were the following stratified by asthma status: risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2; hospitalisation, ICU admission or mortality with COVID-19. We pooled odds ratios (ORs) and presented these with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Certainty was assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations). RESULTS: 30 (n=112 420) studies were included (12 judged high quality, 15 medium, 3 low). Few provided indication of asthma severity. Point estimates indicated reduced risks in people with asthma for all outcomes, but in all cases the evidence was judged to be of very low certainty and 95% CIs all included no difference and the possibility of increased risk (death: OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.13, I2=58%; hospitalisation: OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.26; ICU admission: OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.24). Findings on hospitalisation are also limited by substantial unexplained statistical heterogeneity. Within people with asthma, allergic asthma was associated with less COVID-19 risk and concurrent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was associated with increased risk. In some studies, corticosteroids were associated with increased risk, but this may reflect increased risk in people with more severe asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Though absence of evidence of a clear association between asthma and worse outcomes from COVID-19 should not be interpreted as evidence of absence, the data reviewed indicate that risks from COVID-19 in people with asthma, as a whole, may be less than originally anticipated.

The impact of the first COVID-19 surge on severe asthma patients in the UK. Which is worse: the virus or the lockdown?

Asthma therapy, including monoclonal antibodies, was not associated with #COVID19 infection or hospitalisation in a UK severe asthma population. Shielding led to a reported worsening of mental health in nearly half of patients contacted (47%). https://bit.ly/3jImUsG.

Clinical evaluation of type 2 disease status in a real-world population of difficult to manage asthma using historic electronic healthcare records of blood eosinophil counts.

BACKGROUND: Blood eosinophil measurement is essential for the phenotypic characterization of patients with difficult asthma and in determining eligibility for anti-IL-5/IL-5Rα biological therapies. However, assessing such measures over limited time spans may not reveal the true underlying eosinophilic phenotype, as treatment, including daily oral corticosteroid therapy, suppresses eosinophilic inflammation and asthma is intrinsically variable. METHODS: We interrogated the electronic healthcare records of patients in the Wessex AsThma CoHort of difficult asthma (WATCH) study (UK). In 501 patients being evaluated in this tertiary care centre for difficult to control asthma, all requested full blood count test results in a 10-year retrospective period from the index WATCH assessment were investigated (n = 11,176). RESULTS: In 235 biological therapy-naïve participants who had 10 or more measures in this time period, 40.3% were eosinophilic (blood eosinophils ≥300 cells/µl) at WATCH enrolment whilst an additional 43.1%, though not eosinophilic at enrolment, demonstrated eosinophilia at least once in the preceding decade. Persistent eosinophilia was associated with worse post-bronchodilator airway obstruction and higher Fractional exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO). In contrast, the 16.6% of patients who never demonstrated eosinophilia at this blood eosinophil threshold showed preserved lung function and lower markers of Type 2 inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: This highlights the central role that type 2 inflammation, as indicated by blood eosinophilia, has in difficult asthma and suggests that longitudinal electronic healthcare record analysis can be an important tool in clinical asthma phenotyping, providing insight that may help understand disease progression and better guide more specific treatment approaches.

Asthma and COVID-19: review of evidence on risks and management considerations.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory illnesses typically present increased risks to people with asthma (PWA). However, data on the risks of COVID-19 to PWA have presented contradictory findings, with implications for asthma management. OBJECTIVE: To assess the risks and management considerations of COVID-19 in people with asthma (PWA). METHOD: We conducted a rapid literature review. We searched PubMed, medRxiv, LitCovid, TRIP, Google and Google Scholar for terms relating to asthma and COVID-19, and for systematic reviews related to specific management questions within our review, in April 2020. References were screened and data were extracted by one reviewer. RESULTS: We extracted data from 139 references. The evidence available is limited, with some sources suggesting an under-representation of PWA in hospitalised cases and others showing an increased risk of worse outcomes in PWA, which may be associated with disease severity. Consensus broadly holds that asthma medications should be continued as usual. Almost all aspects of asthma care will be disrupted during the pandemic due not only to limits in face-to-face care but also to the fact that many of the diagnostic tools used in asthma are considered aerosol-generating procedures. Self-management and remote interventions may be of benefit for asthma care during this time but have not been tested in this context. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on COVID-19 and asthma is limited and continuing to emerge. More research is needed on the possible associations between asthma and COVID-19 infection and severity, as well as on interventions to support asthma care in light of constraints and disruptions to healthcare systems. We found no evidence regarding health inequalities, and this urgently needs to be addressed in the literature as the burdens of asthma and of COVID-19 are not equally distributed across the population.

New Perspectives on Difficult Asthma; Sex and Age of Asthma-Onset Based Phenotypes.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a diverse condition that differs with age and sex. However, it remains unclear how sex, age of asthma onset, and/or their interaction influence clinical expression of more problematic adult "difficult" asthma. OBJECTIVES: To better understand the clinical features of difficult asthma within a real-world clinical setting using novel phenotypic classification, stratifying subjects by sex and age of asthma onset. METHODS: Participants in a longitudinal difficult asthma clinical cohort study (Wessex AsThma CoHort of difficult asthma; WATCH), United Kingdom (n = 501), were stratified into 4 difficult asthma phenotypes based on sex and age of asthma onset (early <18 years or adult ≥18 years) and characterized in relation to clinical and pathophysiological features. RESULTS: The cohort had more female participants (65%) but had similar proportions of participants with early- or adult-onset disease. Early-onset female disease was commonest (35%), highly atopic, with good spirometry and strong associations with some physical comorbidities but highest psychophysiologic comorbidities. Adult-onset females also had considerable psychophysiologic comorbidities and highest obesity, and were least atopic. Amongst male subjects, proportionately more had adult-onset disease. Early-onset male disease was rarest (14%) but associated with worst lung function, high smoking, atopy, and fungal sensitization. Despite shortest disease duration, adult-onset males had highest use of maintenance oral corticosteroid, poor lung function, and highest fractional exhaled nitrogen oxide in spite of highest smoking prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that sex, age of asthma onset, and their interactions influence different clinical manifestations of difficult asthma and identifies a greater risk for lung function loss and oral corticosteroid dependence associated with smoking in adult-onset male subjects.

Exhaled volatile organic compounds in adult asthma: a systematic review.

The search for biomarkers that can guide precision medicine in asthma, particularly those that can be translated to the clinic, has seen recent interest in exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Given the number of studies reporting "breathomics" findings and its growing integration in clinical trials, we performed a systematic review of the literature to summarise current evidence and understanding of breathomics technology in asthma.A PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)-oriented systematic search was performed (CRD42017084145) of MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane databases to search for any reports that assessed exhaled VOCs in adult asthma patients, using the following terms (asthma AND (volatile organic compounds AND exhaled) OR breathomics).Two authors independently determined the eligibility of 2957 unique records, of which 66 underwent full-text review. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment was performed on the 22 studies deemed to fulfil the search criteria. The studies are described in terms of methodology and the evidence narratively summarised under the following clinical headings: diagnostics, phenotyping, treatment stratification, treatment monitoring and exacerbation prediction/assessment.Our review found that most studies were designed to assess diagnostic potential rather than focus on underlying biology or treatable traits. Results are generally limited by a lack of methodological standardisation and external validation and by insufficiently powered studies, but there is consistency across the literature that exhaled VOCs are sensitive to underlying inflammation. Modern studies are applying robust breath analysis workflows to large multi-centre study designs, which should unlock the full potential of measurement of exhaled volatile organic compounds in airways diseases such as asthma.

Protocol for the Wessex AsThma CoHort of difficult asthma (WATCH): a pragmatic real-life longitudinal study of difficult asthma in the clinic.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is now widely recognised to be a heterogeneous disease. The last two decades have seen the identification of a number of biological targets and development of various novel therapies. Despite this, asthma still represents a significant health and economic burden worldwide. Why some individuals should continue to suffer remains unclear. METHODS: The Wessex Asthma Cohort of Difficult Asthma (WATCH) is an ongoing 'real-life', prospective study of patients in the University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust (UHSFT) Difficult Asthma service. Research data capture is aligned with the extensive clinical characterisation required of a commissioned National Health Service (NHS) Specialist Centre for Severe Asthma. Data acquisition includes detailed clinical, health and disease-related questionnaires, anthropometry, allergy and lung function testing, radiological imaging (in a small subset) and collection of biological samples (blood, urine and sputum). Prospective data are captured in parallel to clinical follow up appointments, with data entered into a bespoke database. DISCUSSION: The pragmatic ongoing nature of the WATCH study allows comprehensive assessment of the real world clinical spectrum seen in a Specialist Asthma Centre and allows a longitudinal perspective of deeply phenotyped patients. It is anticipated that the WATCH cohort would act as a vehicle for potential collaborative asthma studies and will build upon our understanding of mechanisms underlying difficult asthma.

Temperature-controlled laminar airflow in severe asthma for exacerbation reduction (The LASER Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Asthma affects more than 5 million patients in the United Kingdom. Nearly 500,000 of these patients have severe asthma with severe symptoms and frequent exacerbations that are inadequately controlled with available treatments. The burden of severe asthma on the NHS is enormous, accounting for 80 % of the total asthma cost (£1 billion), with frequent exacerbations and expensive medications generating much of this cost. Of those patients with severe asthma, 70 % are sensitised to indoor aeroallergens, and the level of exposure to allergens determines the symptoms; patients exposed to high levels are therefore most at risk of exacerbations and hospital admissions. The LASER trial aims to assess whether a new treatment, temperature controlled laminar airflow (TLA) delivered by the Airsonett™ device, can reduce the frequency of exacerbations in patients with severe allergic asthma by reducing exposure to aeroallergens overnight. METHODS: This multicentre study is a placebo-controlled, blinded, randomised controlled, parallel group trial. A total of 222 patients with a new or current diagnosis of severe allergic asthma will be assigned with a random element in a 1:1 ratio to receive either an active device for one year or a placebo device. The primary outcome is the frequency of severe asthma exacerbations occurring over a 12-month period, defined in accordance with the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) guidelines. Secondary outcomes include changes in asthma control, lung function, asthma-specific and global quality of life for participants and their carers, adherence to intervention, healthcare resource use and costs, and cost-effectiveness. Qualitative interviews will be conducted to elicit participant's and their partner's perceptions of the treatment. DISCUSSION: Effective measures of allergen avoidance have, to date, proved elusive. The LASER trial aims to address this. The study will ascertain whether home-based nocturnal TLA usage over a 12-month period can reduce the frequency of exacerbations and improve asthma control and quality of life as compared to placebo, whilst being cost-effective and acceptable to adults with poorly controlled, severe allergic asthma. The results of this study will be widely applicable to the many patients with allergic asthma both in the UK and internationally. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trials ISRCTN46346208 (Date assigned 22 January 2014).