A Mixed-Rate Strategy on a Bilaterally-Synchronized Cochlear Implant Processor Offering the Opportunity to Provide Both Speech Understanding and Interaural Time Difference Cues.

Background/Objective: Bilaterally implanted cochlear implant (CI) users do not consistently have access to interaural time differences (ITDs). ITDs are crucial for restoring the ability to localize sounds and understand speech in noisy environments. Lack of access to ITDs is partly due to lack of communication between clinical processors across the ears and partly because processors must use relatively high rates of stimulation to encode envelope information. Speech understanding is best at higher stimulation rates, but sensitivity to ITDs in the timing of pulses is best at low stimulation rates. Methods: We implemented a practical "mixed rate" strategy that encodes ITD information using a low stimulation rate on some channels and speech information using high rates on the remaining channels. The strategy was tested using a bilaterally synchronized research processor, the CCi-MOBILE. Nine bilaterally implanted CI users were tested on speech understanding and were asked to judge the location of a sound based on ITDs encoded using this strategy. Results: Performance was similar in both tasks between the control strategy and the new strategy. Conclusions: We discuss the benefits and drawbacks of the sound coding strategy and provide guidelines for utilizing synchronized processors for developing strategies.

Lateralization of binaural envelope cues measured with a mobile cochlear-implant research processora).

Bilateral cochlear implant (BICI) listeners do not have full access to the binaural cues that normal hearing (NH) listeners use for spatial hearing tasks such as localization. When using their unsynchronized everyday processors, BICI listeners demonstrate sensitivity to interaural level differences (ILDs) in the envelopes of sounds, but interaural time differences (ITDs) are less reliably available. It is unclear how BICI listeners use combinations of ILDs and envelope ITDs, and how much each cue contributes to perceived sound location. The CCi-MOBILE is a bilaterally synchronized research processor with the untested potential to provide spatial cues to BICI listeners. In the present study, the CCi-MOBILE was used to measure the ability of BICI listeners to perceive lateralized sound sources when single pairs of electrodes were presented amplitude-modulated stimuli with combinations of ILDs and envelope ITDs. Young NH listeners were also tested using amplitude-modulated high-frequency tones. A cue weighting analysis with six BICI and ten NH listeners revealed that ILDs contributed more than envelope ITDs to lateralization for both groups. Moreover, envelope ITDs contributed to lateralization for NH listeners but had negligible contribution for BICI listeners. These results suggest that the CCi-MOBILE is suitable for binaural testing and developing bilateral processing strategies.

The Impact of Synchronized Cochlear Implant Sampling and Stimulation on Free-Field Spatial Hearing Outcomes: Comparing the ciPDA Research Processor to Clinical Processors.

OBJECTIVES: Bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) listeners use independent processors in each ear. This independence and lack of shared hardware prevents control of the timing of sampling and stimulation across ears, which precludes the development of bilaterally-coordinated signal processing strategies. As a result, these devices potentially reduce access to binaural cues and introduce disruptive artifacts. For example, measurements from two clinical processors demonstrate that independently-running processors introduce interaural incoherence. These issues are typically avoided in the laboratory by using research processors with bilaterally-synchronized hardware. However, these research processors do not typically run in real-time and are difficult to take out into the real-world due to their benchtop nature. Hence, the question of whether just applying hardware synchronization to reduce bilateral stimulation artifacts (and thereby potentially improve functional spatial hearing performance) has been difficult to answer. The CI personal digital assistant (ciPDA) research processor, which uses one clock to drive two processors, presented an opportunity to examine whether synchronization of hardware can have an impact on spatial hearing performance. DESIGN: Free-field sound localization and spatial release from masking (SRM) were assessed in 10 BiCI listeners using both their clinical processors and the synchronized ciPDA processor. For sound localization, localization accuracy was compared within-subject for the two processor types. For SRM, speech reception thresholds were compared for spatially separated and co-located configurations, and the amount of unmasking was compared for synchronized and unsynchronized hardware. There were no deliberate changes of the sound processing strategy on the ciPDA to restore or improve binaural cues. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in localization accuracy between unsynchronized and synchronized hardware (p = 0.62). Speech reception thresholds were higher with the ciPDA. In addition, although five of eight participants demonstrated improved SRM with synchronized hardware, there was no significant difference in the amount of unmasking due to spatial separation between synchronized and unsynchronized hardware (p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Using processors with synchronized hardware did not yield an improvement in sound localization or SRM for all individuals, suggesting that mere synchronization of hardware is not sufficient for improving spatial hearing outcomes. Further work is needed to improve sound coding strategies to facilitate access to spatial hearing cues. This study provides a benchmark for spatial hearing performance with real-time, bilaterally-synchronized research processors.