Amplification techniques and diagnosis of prion diseases.

Protein misfolding cyclic amplification assay (PMCA) and real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) are two amplification techniques based on the ability of PrPsc to induce a conformational change in PrP allowing the detection of minute amounts of PrPsc in body fluids or tissues. PMCA and RT-QuIC have different ability to amplify PrPsc from sporadic, variant and genetic forms of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD). PMCA readily amplifies PrPsc from variant CJD (vCJD) tissue while RT-QuIC easily amplifies PrPsc from sporadic CJD (sCJD) patient tissues. In terms of diagnosis, this implies the possibility of distinguishing vCJD from sCJD and explains the wider use of RT-QuIC given the respective frequencies of vCJD and sCJD. The sensitivity values of RT-QuIC for the diagnosis of sCJD are comparable or higher than those of the other tests (EEG, MRI, detection of 14-3-3 or tau proteins in cerebrospinal fluid) but with a specificity close to 100%. These new diagnostic methods could also be useful for the diagnosis of other neurodegenerative diseases.

Management of endometriosis: CNGOF/HAS clinical practice guidelines - Short version.

First-line diagnostic investigations for endometriosis are physical examination and pelvic ultrasound. The second-line investigations are: targeted pelvic examination performed by an expert clinician, transvaginal ultrasound performed by an expert physician sonographer (radiologist or gynaecologist), and pelvic MRI. Management of endometriosis is recommended when the disease has a functional impact. Recommended first-line hormonal therapies for the management of endometriosis-related pain are combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) or the 52mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (IUS). There is no evidence base on which to recommend systematic preoperative hormonal therapy solely to prevent surgical complications or facilitate surgery. After surgery for endometriosis, a CHC or 52mg levonorgestrel-releasing IUS is recommended as first-line treatment when pregnancy is not desired. In the event of failure of the initial treatment, recurrence, or multiorgan involvement, a multidisciplinary team meeting is recommended, involving physicians, surgeons and other professionals. A laparoscopic approach is recommended for surgical treatment of endometriosis. HRT can be offered to postmenopausal women who have undergone surgical treatment for endometriosis. Antigonadotrophic hormonal therapy is not recommended for patients with endometriosis and infertility to increase the chances of spontaneous pregnancy, including postoperatively. Fertility preservation options must be discussed with patients undergoing surgery for ovarian endometriomas.

[Epidemiology and diagnosis strategy: CNGOF-HAS Endometriosis Guidelines]. / Épidémiologie et stratégie diagnostique, RPC Endométriose CNGOF­HAS.

Based on the best evidence available, we have provided guidelines for clinical practice to target the nature of endometriosis as a disease, the consequences of its natural history on management, and the clinical and imaging evaluation of the disease according to the level of care (primary care, specialized or referral). The frequency of endometriosis is unknown in the general population; endometriosis requires management when it causes symptoms (pain, infertility) or when it affect the function of an organ. In the absence of symptom, there is no need for follow-up or screening of the disease. Endometriosis may be responsible for various pain symptoms such as severe dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, painful bowel movements or low urinary tract signs increasing with menstruation, or infertility. A careful evaluation of the symptoms and their impact on the quality of life should be made. The first-line examinations for the diagnosis of endometriosis are: digital examination and pelvic ultrasound. The second-line examinations are: the pelvic exam by an expert clinician, the pelvic MRI and/or the transvaginal ultrasound by an expert. MRI and ultrasound carrying different and complementary information. Other examinations may be considered as part of the pre-therapeutic assessment of the disease in case of specialized care. Diagnostic laparoscopy may be suggested in case of clinical suspicion of endometriosis whereas preoperative examinations have not proved the disease, it must be part of a management plan of endometriosis-related pain or infertility. During management, it is recommended to give comprehensive information on the different therapeutic alternatives, the benefits and risks expected from each treatment, the risk of recurrence, fertility, especially before surgery. The information must be personalized and take into account the expectations and preferences of the patient, and accompanied by an information notice given to the patient.

[Management of endometriosis: CNGOF-HAS practice guidelines (short version)]. / Prise en charge de l'endométriose : recommandations pour la pratique clinique CNGOF-HAS (texte court).

First-line investigations to diagnose endometriosis are clinical examination and pelvic ultrasound. Second-line investigations include pelvic examination performed by a referent clinician, transvaginal ultrasound performed by a referent echographist, and pelvic MRI. It is recommended to treat endometriosis when it is symptomatic. First-line hormonal treatments recommended for the management of painful endometriosis are combined with hormonal contraceptives or levonorgestrel 52mg IUD. There is no evidence to recommend systematic preoperative hormonal therapy for the unique purpose of preventing the risk of surgical complications or facilitating surgery. After endometriosis surgery, combined hormonal contraceptives or levonorgestrel SIU 52mg are recommended as first-line therapy in the absence of desire of pregnancy. In case of initial treatment failure, recurrence, or multiple organ involvement by endometriosis, medico-surgical and multidisciplinary discussion is recommended. The laparoscopic approach is recommended for the surgical treatment of endometriosis. HRT may be offered in postmenopausal women operated for endometriosis. In case of infertility related to endometriosis, it is not recommended to prescribe anti-gonadotropic hormone therapy to increase the rate of spontaneous pregnancy, including postoperatively. The possibilities of fertility preservation should be discussed with the patient in case of surgery for ovarian endometrioma.

[Expectations of women with endometriosis: What information to deliver? CNGOF-HAS Endometriosis Guidelines]. / Attentes des femmes atteintes d'endométriose : quelle information apporter ? RPC Endométriose CNGOF-HAS.

Women with endometriosis often say that the information doctors give them should be improved. Patient support groups can provide missing information but may lack objectivity, or reliability, and may even generate anxiety or even harm their health. Clear unbiased medical information is the ideal. New patients with endometriosis wish to be taken seriously by primary care physicians, and be referred quickly to a specialist without further unnecessary investigation or delay. The diagnosis of endometriosis should ideally be made quickly, and should clearly specify the nature of the disease, its evolution, and its consequences on quality of life, relationships, and fertility. When choosing a treatment, information should state the risks of each treatment, the risks of recurrence long term, and the therapeutic alternatives. These should include conventional medical treatment, lifestyle adaptation, or alternative therapies. In case of surgery, prior written information should be provided, the likely scar appearance, the short and long term consequences in terms of pain, postoperative recovery time and complication rates. Once the surgery is performed, the degree of endometriotic involvement and the treatment undertaken should be explained. At discharge, patients should be told the expected recovery time, and the consequences of the operation on daily life.

[Technical considerations for KRAS testing in colorectal cancer. The pathologist's point of view]. / Aspect technique de la détermination du statut KRAS dans le cancer colorectal et mise en place en France. Point de vue de l'anatomopathologiste.

The KRAS status is now a mandatory prerequisite in order to treat metastatic colorectal patients with anti-EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) antibodies, such as cetuximab (Erbitux) or panitumumab (Vectibix). KRAS mutations are unambiguously linked to a lack of response to these targeted therapies and to a poor outcome. The optimal determination of the KRAS status should be based on coordination between pathologists and biologists. The pathologist must morphologically check the tumor to be analyzed and be sure that the fixatives used are valuable for molecular biology. The pathologist's involvement may also concern the DNA extraction and the KRAS mutations analyses. This involvement has to be included in a multidisciplinary setting in order to get rapid and robust tests for the clinical use. The imperative knowledge of the KRAS status in the management of metastatic disease represents a good example of this multidisciplinary coordination. In the future, the pathologist's role should be extended, considering the emergence of a more and more personalized medicine, integrating efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Thus, the pathologist may contribute to validate new molecular tests and to offer his specific techniques for translational research.

Identification of signalling proteins interacting with B-Raf in the yeast two-hybrid system.

Recent studies suggested the existence of Ras/B-Raf/ MEK-1 complexes and a critical role for B-Raf in regulating the MAP kinase/ERKs signalling pathway. We report, here, that both Ras and MEK-1 proteins interact physically with B-Raf proteins in the yeast two-hybrid system. In addition, by screening a mouse brain cDNA library, we isolated additional B-Raf interacting proteins. These include three members of the 14-3-3 proteins family (eta, theta and zeta) and the MEK-2 protein. We also show that c-Raf-1, previously reported to interact with beta and zeta 14-3-3 proteins, also interacts with eta and theta 14-3-3 proteins in the two-hybrid system. By using different portions of the B-Raf protein, we mapped the regions of the protein involved in these interactions. Specifically, we have characterized B-Raf specific sequences required for an efficient interaction with MEK proteins. We show that, consequently, B-Raf interacts with MEK-1 and MEK-2 with a better affinity than does c-Raf-1, thus strengthening the notion that B-Raf is a stronger MEK activator than c-Raf-l. Our results also suggest that a MEK specific sequence, not present in MAP kinase kinases which are not activated by members of the Raf family, is required for the interaction with Raf proteins.