Human mesenchymal stem cell-derived microvesicles modulate T cell response to islet antigen glutamic acid decarboxylase in patients with type 1 diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been shown to abrogate in vitro the proinflammatory response in type 1 diabetes. The mechanism involves paracrine factors, which may include microvesicles (MVs). We evaluated whether MVs derived from heterologous bone-marrow MSCs exert an immunomodulatory effect on T cell responses against GAD (glutamic acid decarboxylase) antigen in type 1 diabetes. METHODS: MVs were purified from heterologous human MSCs by differential centrifugation. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were obtained from patients with type 1 diabetes at disease onset, and responses to GAD65 stimulation were assessed by IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot analysis. Levels of cytokines and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) were measured in the supernatant fraction, and T helper 17 (Th17) and regulatory T cell analysis was performed. RESULTS: MVs were internalised by PBMCs, as assessed by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry analyses. MVs significantly decreased IFN-γ spots and levels in GAD65-stimulated PBMCs, and significantly increased transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß), IL-10, IL-6 and PGE2 levels. Furthermore, MVs decreased the number of Th17 cells and the levels of IL-17, and increased FoxP3(+) regulatory T cells in GAD65-stimulated PBMCs. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: These results provide evidence that MSC-derived MVs can inhibit in vitro a proinflammatory response to an islet antigenic stimulus in type 1 diabetes. The action of MVs involves PGE2 and TGF-ß signalling pathways and IL-10 secretion, suggesting a switch to an anti-inflammatory response of T cells.

Microvesicles derived from endothelial progenitor cells protect the kidney from ischemia-reperfusion injury by microRNA-dependent reprogramming of resident renal cells.

Endothelial progenitor cells are known to reverse acute kidney injury by paracrine mechanisms. We previously found that microvesicles released from these progenitor cells activate an angiogenic program in endothelial cells by horizontal mRNA transfer. Here, we tested whether these microvesicles prevent acute kidney injury in a rat model of ischemia-reperfusion injury. The RNA content of microvesicles was enriched in microRNAs (miRNAs) that modulate proliferation, angiogenesis, and apoptosis. After intravenous injection following ischemia-reperfusion, the microvesicles were localized within peritubular capillaries and tubular cells. This conferred functional and morphologic protection from acute kidney injury by enhanced tubular cell proliferation, reduced apoptosis, and leukocyte infiltration. Microvesicles also protected against progression of chronic kidney damage by inhibiting capillary rarefaction, glomerulosclerosis, and tubulointerstitial fibrosis. The renoprotective effect of microvesicles was lost after treatment with RNase, nonspecific miRNA depletion of microvesicles by Dicer knock-down in the progenitor cells, or depletion of pro-angiogenic miR-126 and miR-296 by transfection with specific miR-antagomirs. Thus, microvesicles derived from endothelial progenitor cells protect the kidney from ischemic acute injury by delivering their RNA content, the miRNA cargo of which contributes to reprogramming hypoxic resident renal cells to a regenerative program.

Exosomes/microvesicles as a mechanism of cell-to-cell communication.

Microvesicles (MVs) are circular fragments of membrane released from the endosomal compartment as exosomes or shed from the surface membranes of most cell types. An increasing body of evidence indicates that they play a pivotal role in cell-to-cell communication. Indeed, they may directly stimulate target cells by receptor-mediated interactions or may transfer from the cell of origin to various bioactive molecules including membrane receptors, proteins, mRNAs, microRNAs, and organelles. In this review we discuss the pleiotropic biologic effects of MVs that are relevant for communication among cells in physiological and pathological conditions. In particular, we discuss their potential involvement in inflammation, renal disease, and tumor progression, and the evidence supporting a bidirectional exchange of genetic information between stem and injured cells. The transfer of gene products from injured cells may explain stem cell functional and phenotypic changes without the need of transdifferentiation into tissue cells. On the other hand, transfer of gene products from stem cells may reprogram injured cells to repair damaged tissues.