The radix entomolaris in mandibular first molars: an endodontic challenge.

AIM: To present cases of mandibular first molars with an additional distolingual root (radix entomolaris, RE) and to survey the literature on the incidence of this anatomical feature. SUMMARY: A major anatomical variant of the two-rooted mandibular first molar is a tooth with an additional distolingual and third root: the RE. The prevalence of these three-rooted mandibular first molars appears to be less than 3% in African populations, not to exceed 4.2% in Caucasians, to be less than 5% in Eurasian and Asian populations, and to be higher than 5% (even up to 40%) in populations with Mongolian traits. A total of 18 cases (12 root filled and six extracted mandibular first molars) with an RE were collected during the years 2000-2003 in patients of Caucasian origin. As far as the access was concerned, entering the root canal in the RE required a modification of the opening in a distolingual direction resulting in a trapezoidal opening cavity. None of the orifices was located midway between the mesial and distal root component. Based on the anatomy of the extracted samples and the bending of ISO 10 files after scouting of the root canal in the RE, three types of curvature were detected: (I) straight or no curvature (two cases); (II) coronal third curved and straight continuation to the apex (five cases); and (III) curvature in the coronal third and buccal curvature from the middle third or apical third of the root (11 cases). KEY LEARNING POINTS: Clinicians should be aware of this unusual root morphology in mandibular first molars in Caucasian people. Radiographs exposed at two different horizontal angles are needed to identify this additional root. The access cavity must be modified in a distolingual direction in order to visualize and treat the RE, this results in a trapezoidal access cavity.

Shaping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals.

AIM: To determine the shaping ability of ProTaper instruments in simulated root canals. METHODOLOGY: Forty canals with four different shapes in terms of angle (20 degrees and 40 degrees) and position of curvature (straight section before curve: 8 and 12 mm) were enlarged according to the recommendations of the manufacturer with the finishing files F1, F2 and F3 to full working length. Preoperative and postoperative pictures, recorded using a digital camera, were superimposed and aberrations recorded. Measurements were carried out at five different points: at the canal orifice (O); half-way to the orifice in the straight section (HO); beginning of the curve (BC); apex of the curve (AC); end-point (EP). RESULTS: Ten instruments deformed (nine F3 and one S1, all in canals with straight section of 8 mm), one instrument fractured. There were significant differences between the various canal shapes for the amount of resin removed from the inner curve at all points (O: P < 0.05; HO: P = 0.001; BC, AC and EP: P < 0.001); and for the resin removed on the outer curve at points HO, AC and EP (P < 0.001). Mean transportation was towards the inner aspect of the curve in all canal types at points BC, towards the outer aspect at the end-point of preparation (EP) in all canals with 12 mm straight section. In 8 mm straight section canals, four danger zones were found; in 12 mm straight section canals three zips were present. The canal aberrations were produced following the use of the F2 and F3 instruments. There were no aberrations following the use of the F1 instrument. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, ProTaper instruments performed acceptable tapered preparations in all canal types. When using F2 and F3 in curved canals, care should be taken to avoid excessive removal at the inner curve, leading to danger zones. In addition, care should also be taken to avoid deformation of the F3 instrument.

Shaping ability of GTTM Rotary Files in simulated resin root canals.

AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the shaping ability of GT Rotary Files in simulated root canals. METHODOLOGY: Forty canals with four different shapes in terms of angle (40 degrees and 60 degrees) and position of curvature (straight section before curve: 8 and 12 mm) were prepared using a crown-down/stepback technique. Pre-operative and post-operative pictures, recorded using an image analysis system, were super-imposed and aberrations recorded. Measurements were carried out at 5 different points: at the canal orifice (0): half-way to the orifice in the straight section (HO); the beginning of the curve (BC); the apex of the curve (AC): the endpoint (EP). RESULTS: Two instrument fractures occurred and 9 instruments were deformed. Overall, eight zips and one ledge were created. There were significant differences (P < 0.001) for the total width of the canals between the various canal shapes at AC, BC and HO. There were significant differences (P < 0.001) for the amount of resin removed from the outer aspect of the curve at AC, BC and HO; and for the amount of resin removed from the inner aspect of the curve at all five measuring points (0, AC and EP (P < 0.05) and HO and BC (P < 0.001)). Mean transportation was towards the inner aspect of the canal in canals with straight sections of 12 mm regardless the curve angle; towards the outer aspect in canals with straight sections of 8 mm and 40 degrees curves at all the five measuring points, and at AC, BC and HO when the curve was 60 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, GT Rotary Files produced acceptable canal shapes. In narrow and curved canals, the length of the straight section of the canal determines the direction of transportation more than the angle of the curve. In the 60 degrees curves, a high incidence of instrument deformation was found when using the 0.04 tapered instruments.