Efficacy and Safety of Firibastat, A First-in-Class Brain Aminopeptidase A Inhibitor, in Hypertensive Overweight Patients of Multiple Ethnic Origins.

BACKGROUND: Despite existing therapy, successful control of hypertension in the United States is estimated at less than 50%. In blacks, hypertension occurs earlier, is more severe, controlled less often and has a higher morbidity and mortality than in whites. Blacks are also less responsive to monotherapy with angiotensin-I converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-II receptor type 1 blockers. Obesity, higher salt-sensitivity and low plasma renin activity are possible reasons of this poor blood pressure (BP) control, especially in blacks. The aim of the study was to assess efficacy and safety of firibastat, a first-in-class aminopeptidase A inhibitor preventing conversion of brain angiotensin-II into angiotensin-III, in BP lowering in a high-risk diverse hypertensive population. METHODS: Two hundred fifty-six overweight or obese hypertensive patients, including 54% black and Hispanic individuals, were enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, phase II study. After a 2-week wash-out period, subjects received firibastat for 8 weeks (250 mg BID orally for 2 weeks, then 500 mg BID if automated office blood pressure (AOBP) >140/90 mm Hg; hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg QD was added after 1 month if AOBP ≥160/110 mm Hg). The primary end point was change from baseline in systolic AOBP after 8 weeks of treatment, and secondary end points include diastolic AOBP, 24-hour mean ambulatory BP and safety. RESULTS: Firibastat lowered systolic AOBP by 9.5 mm Hg ( P<0.0001) and diastolic AOBP by 4.2 mm Hg ( P<0.0001). 85% of the subjects did not receive hydrochlorothiazide and were treated with firibastat alone. Significant BP reduction was found across all subgroups regardless age, sex, body mass index, or race. Systolic AOBP decreased by 10.2 mm Hg ( P<0.0001) in obese patients, by 10.5 mm Hg ( P<0.0001) in blacks, and 8.9 mm Hg ( P<0.0001) in nonblacks. Most frequent adverse events were headaches (4%) and skin reactions (3%). No angioedema was reported. No change in potassium, sodium, and creatinine blood level were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the efficacy of firibastat in lowering BP in a high-risk diverse population where monotherapy with angiotensin-I converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-II receptor type 1 blockers may be less effective and support the strategy to further investigate firibastat in subjects with difficult-to-treat or potentially resistant hypertension. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique Identifier: NCT03198793.

Paracetamol and opioid pathways: a pilot randomized clinical trial.

Previous studies suggest that the antinociceptive action of paracetamol (acetaminophen, APAP) might involve descending inhibitory pain pathways and the opioidergic system: this study explores this issue in humans with naloxone, the opioid antagonist. After ethical approval, 12 healthy male volunteers were included in this randomized, controlled, double-blind, crossover, four-arm study. They were administered intravenous paracetamol (APAP 1 g) or saline (placebo, pl) followed at 100 min with IV naloxone (Nal 8 mg) or saline, every week for 4 weeks. The amplitude of cerebral potentials evoked by thermal/painful stimuli applied on the arm was recorded nine times over 150 min, witnessing of pain integration at central level. Amplitude changes as well as areas under the curve (AUCs) over 150 min were compared for the four treatments by repeated measures ANOVA (significance 0.05). Amplitude changes were significant for APAP/pl vs. pl/pl at t150: -44% (95%CI -58 to -30) vs. -27% (95%CI -37 to -17; P < 0.05) but not vs. APAP/Nal. AUC (0-150) of APAP/pl is significantly different from pl/pl (-3452%.min (95%CI -4705 to -2199) vs. -933% min (95%CI -2273 to 407; P = 0.015) but not from APAP/Nal (-1731% min (95%CI -3676 to 214; P = 0.08) and other treatments. AUC (90-150) is not significantly different. This pilot study shows for the first time in human volunteers that naloxone does not inhibit paracetamol antinociception, suggesting no significant implication of the opioid system in paracetamol mechanism of action: this needs be confirmed on a larger number of subjects.