The role of stents in hemodialysis vascular access.

Vascular access is the Achilles' heel of dialysis therapy among patient with end stage kidney disease. The development of neointimal hyperplasia and subsequent stenosis is common in vascular access and is associated with significant morbidity. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty using balloon inflation was the standard therapy of these lesions. However, the balloon-based approaches were associated with poor vascular access patency rate necessitating new inventions. It is within this context that different types of stents were developed in order to improve the overall dialysis vascular access functionality. In this article, we review the available literature regarding the use of stents in treating dialysis vascular access stenotic lesions. Further, we review the major clinical trials of stent use in different anatomic locations and in different clinical scenarios.

Renal replacement therapy in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: Who and how.

Patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support frequently develop renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). RRT may be performed via a dialysis catheter based approach or via the ECMO circuit. We describe our experience with both techniques. A total of 68 patients undergoing ECMO support at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Predictors of renal failure requiring RRT were determined. Patients undergoing RRT via a dialysis catheter were compared with those undergoing RRT via the ECMO circuit. 10 of the 68 patients required RRT support prior to ECMO. Of the remaining 58 patients, 25 (43%) required new RRT support on ECMO. Lower albumin levels and postcardiotomy shock were predictive of new renal failure requiring RRT on ECMO. RRT performed via the ECMO circuit demonstrated similar efficacy as via a dialysis catheter. Outcomes were much worse for patients requiring new RRT on ECMO support, with a doubling of the length of ECMO support and less that one-third the survival rate of patients not requiring RRT on ECMO support. New renal failure requiring RRT occurs in nearly one-half of patients on ECMO support, with poor outcomes. RRT may be performed via the ECMO circuit with similar efficacy as via a dialysis catheter.

Treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in ESRD: a 2-year, single-center crossover study.

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a common complication of chronic kidney disease. The management of SHPT commonly involves vitamin D, either calcitriol or newer analogs (paricalcitol or doxercalciferol), along with dietary phosphorus restriction and phosphate binding agents. Published reports have suggested that treatment with paricalcitol in hemodialyzed (HD) patients offers a morbidity or mortality advantage in comparison with treatment with calcitriol. We have recently reported that switching from calcitriol to paricalcitol resulted in a lower serum calcium and calcium-phosphorus product (Ca x P product), as well as lower parathyroid hormone (PTH) and alkaline phosphatase during 6 months of serial treatment. We converted all HD patients in our large urban dialysis center from calcitriol to paricalcitol using a 1:3 conversion ratio, on the basis of published data. Comparisons of individual patient mean biochemical values, as well as episodes of hypercalcemia and elevated Ca x P product, were made after adjusting for equivalent doses. In addition, we recorded the number of missed doses during two years of therapy. No patient in this study had received a calcimimetic before or during the study period. Fifty-nine patients were treated with calcitriol for at least 12 months and then completed 12 months of paricalcitol. Conversion from calcitriol to paricalcitol resulted in lower serum calcium (P=0.0003), lower serum phosphorus (P=0.027), lower Ca x P product (P=0.003), reduced PTH (P=0.001) and reduced serum alkaline phosphatase (P=0.0005). Most dramatically, there was a highly significant difference in the number of missed doses (P<0.0001) during the treatments. This 2-year single-center study, comparing long-term calcitriol with paricalcitol treatment in the same HD patients, extends our previous findings, offers new information regarding single episodes of potentially adverse biochemical effects related to vitamin D therapy, and provides several clues that may explain the outcome advantages suggested by previously published retrospective analyses of large dialysis provider-pooled databases.

Serum fructosamine versus glycosylated hemoglobin as an index of glycemic control, hospitalization, and infection in diabetic hemodialysis patients.

Diabetes is the most common cause of end-stage renal disease and an important risk factor for morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. Glycemic control, utilizing serial measurement of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), is generally recommended to limit end-organ damage, including cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We, along with others, have previously suggested that HbA1c may not be a reliable measure of glycemic control in dialysis patients, and have therefore explored the use of serum fructosamine (SF) as an alternative marker. The objective of this study was to compare HbA1c levels with SF in monitoring glycemic control and associated morbidity (infection and hospitalization) in diabetic patients in a large urban hemodialysis (HD) center. We enrolled 100 diabetic HD patients and followed them up prospectively for 3 years. Data on demographics, as well as biochemical and clinical data, including hospitalizations and infections, were recorded. The mean age was 63 years. In all 54% were women and the majority were African Americans (72%). As expected, HbA1c and albumin-corrected fructosamine (AlbF) levels were highly correlated and both were significantly associated with serum glucose. AlbF, however, was more highly correlated with mean glucose values when less than 150 mg/dl and was a more useful predictor of morbidity. By univariate logistic regression and by Poisson regression analysis, AlbF, but not HbA1c, was a significant predictor of hospitalization. Additionally, in patients dialyzed by arteriovenous (AV) access (that is, excluding those dialyzed via vascular catheters), AlbF, but not HbA1c, was a significant predictor of infection. In conclusion, AlbF is as reliable a marker as HbA1c for glycemic control in diabetic patients on HD, and may be advantageous for patients with serum glucose in a desirable therapeutic range (<150 mg/dl). In addition, AlbF, but not HbA1c, is associated with morbidity (hospitalizations and infections) in diabetic patients on HD.