Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am Surg ; 63(2): 199-204, 1997 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9012437

RESUMO

Since November 1992, 160 patients were referred to the Vascular Surgery Laboratory for duplex scanning to assess whether a femoral artery pseudoaneurysm was present. Of these patients, 33 per cent (n = 53) had femoral artery pseudoaneurysms with maximal diameters ranging from 1.5 to 8.1 cm. Most pseudoaneurysms (79%; 42 of 53) followed diagnostic or therapeutic cardiac catheterization procedures. Pseudoaneurysms were treated by external compression using an ultrasound probe in 33 of these 53 patients, and thrombosis of the aneurysm was successfully induced in 76 per cent (n = 25) of those in whom nonoperative external compression therapy was attempted. Of the eight patients in whom compression was unsuccessful, three had severe pain that required cessation of compression, and femoral nerve involvement by the pseudoaneurysm was noted at surgery in two of the three. One additional patient refused a second attempt at compression due to discomfort. Of the other four failures of compression, four (50% overall) received anticoagulants during or prior to compression. In 25 patients with successful pseudoaneurysm thrombosis after external compression, none had severe pain from compression, and 40 per cent (n = 10) were on anticoagulants until or during compression. Four of the 53 (7.5%) pseudoaneurysms diagnosed in the vascular laboratory subsequently thrombosed spontaneously, and two patients (3.8%) experienced pseudoaneurysm rupture. Thrombosis of postcatheterization pseudoaneurysms can be achieved by nonoperative compression therapy in most patients. Severe pain during external compression suggests possible femoral nerve involvement by the pseudoaneurysm and is an indication for surgical therapy.


Assuntos
Falso Aneurisma/etiologia , Falso Aneurisma/terapia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Artéria Femoral/lesões , Idoso , Falso Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagem , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Constrição , Humanos , Ultrassonografia Doppler Dupla
2.
J Vasc Surg ; 24(4): 608-12; discussion 612-3, 1996 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8911409

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Venacavograms are routinely obtained before vena cava filter placement to evaluate cava size, patency, and the presence of thrombus or venous anomalies. The objective of this study was to determine the ability of duplex ultrasonography to adequately evaluate the inferior vena cava (IVC) for size, patency, and the presence of thrombus before Greenfield filter (GF) insertion. METHODS: Duplex ultrasonographic scans were performed in 40 patients who had documented lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis diagnosed by duplex scan before GF placement. The infrarenal transverse and anteroposterior diameters of the IVC were measured, and the entire IVC was imaged for patency and the presence of thrombus or anomalies. Preoperative venacavograms were not obtained in any patients who had GFs placed in the operating room, but was performed during surgery during filter insertion. An additional 26 patients who had deep venous thrombosis and did not have caval interruption underwent IVC duplex to determine the patency and proximal extent of venous thrombosis. RESULTS: The indications for GF placement were contraindication to anticoagulation in 72.5% (29 patients); five filters were placed prophylactically; three for failure of anticoagulation; two after a complication of anticoagulation; and one before pulmonary embolectomy. The filters were placed in the operating room by surgeons in 82.5% of patients, with the remainder inserted in an angiography suite by an interventional radiologist. The ability of duplex to measure a transverse diameter of 26 mm or less had a sensitivity of 97.5%, positive predictive value of 100%, and overall accuracy of 97.5% using venacavography as the standard. Measurements of IVC diameter by duplex correlated with those based on venacavograms (r = 0.766; p < 0.001). Of the entire group of 66 IVC duplex examinations, one (1.5%) was incomplete because of technical limitations. IVC thrombus was noted by duplex in two patients who underwent GF insertion, which was confirmed with venacavography. No IVC anomalies were noted by duplex scans or venacavograms. CONCLUSION: Duplex ultrasonography is a useful and accurate method for assessment of the IVC before vena cava filter placement.


Assuntos
Ultrassonografia Doppler Dupla , Filtros de Veia Cava , Veia Cava Inferior/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiografia , Trombose/diagnóstico por imagem , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA