A multicenter phase II trial of anti-EGFR-immunoliposomes loaded with doxorubicin in patients with advanced triple negative breast cancer.

Advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive, but initially chemo-sensitive disease. The prognosis is poor and more than three quarters of patients experience progression 12 months after the initiation of conventional first-line chemotherapy. Approximately two thirds of TNBC express epidermal growth factor receptor 1 (EGFR). We have developed an anti-EGFR targeted nanocontainer drug by inserting anti-EGFR antibody fragments into the membrane of pegylated liposomes (anti-EGFR-ILs-dox). The payload consists of doxorubicin, a standard drug for TNBC. In a first-in-human phase I trial in 26 patients with various advanced solid malignancies, anti-EGFR-ILs-dox has shown little toxicity and encouraging efficacy. In this single-arm phase II trial, we assessed the efficacy of anti-EGFR-ILs-dox as first-line therapy in patients with advanced, EGFR + TNBC. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 12 months (PFS12m). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). 48 patients received anti-EGFR-ILs-dox 50 mg/m2 iv, on day one of a 28 days-cycle until progression. The Kaplan-Meier estimate for PFS12m was 13% (one-sided 90% CI 7%, 95% CI [5%, 25%]), median PFS was 3.5 months (95% CI 1.9, 5.4). The trial has not reached its primary endpoint. There were no new toxicity signals. Based on these results, anti-EGFR-ILs-dox should not be further developed for TNBC. It remains an open question whether anti-EGFR-ILs-dox would offer more opportunities in other EGFR-expressing malignancies, where targeting this receptor has already shown anticancer effects.Trial registration: This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02833766. Registered 14/07/2016.

Investigational medicinal products, related costs and hospital pharmacy services for investigator-initiated trials: A mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Conducting high quality investigator-initiated trials (IITs) is challenging and costly. The costs of investigational medicinal products (IMPs) in IITs and the role of hospital pharmacies in the planning of IITs are unclear. We conducted a mixed-methods study to compare planned and actual costs of IMPs in Swiss IITs, to examine potential reasons for differences, and to gather stakeholder views about hospital services for IITs. METHODS: We included all IITs with IMP services from the Basel hospital pharmacy invoiced between January 2014 and June 2020 (n = 24). We documented trial and IMP characteristics including planned and actual IMP costs. Our working definition for a substantial cost difference was that the actual IMP costs were more than 10% higher than the planned IMP costs in a trial. We conducted semi-structured interviews with investigators, clinical trials unit and hospital pharmacy staff, and qualitatively analyzed transcribed interviews. RESULTS: For 13 IITs we observed no differences between planned and actual costs of IMPs (median, 11'000 US$; interquartile range [IQR], 8'882-16'302 US$), but for 11 IITs we found cost increases from a median of 11'000 US$ (IQR, 8'922-36'166 US$) to a median over 28'000 US$ (IQR, 13'004-49'777 US$). All multicenter trials and 10 of 11 IITs with patients experienced substantial cost differences. From the interviews we identified four main themes: 1) Patient recruitment and organizational problems were identified as main reasons for cost differences, 2) higher actual IMP costs were bearable for most investigators, 3) IMP services for IITs were not a priority for the hospital pharmacy, and 4) closer collaboration between clinical trial unit and hospital pharmacy staff, and sufficient staff for IITs at the hospital pharmacy could improve IMP services. CONCLUSIONS: Multicenter IITs enrolling patients are particularly at risk for higher IMP costs than planned. These trials are more difficult to plan and logistically challenging, which leads to delays and expiring IMP shelf-lives. IMP services of hospital pharmacies are important for IITs in Switzerland, but need to be further developed.

A meta-research study revealed several challenges in obtaining placebos for investigator-initiated drug trials.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically assess the kind of placebos used in investigator-initiated randomized controlled trials (RCTs), from where they are obtained, and the hurdles that exist in obtaining them. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: PubMed was searched for recently published noncommercial, placebo-controlled randomized drug trials. Corresponding authors were invited to participate in an online survey. RESULTS: From 423 eligible articles, 109 (26%) corresponding authors (partially) participated. Twenty-one of 102 (21%) authors reported that the placebos used were not matching (correctly labeled in only one publication). The main sources in obtaining placebos were hospital pharmacies (32 of 107; 30%) and the manufacturer of the study drug (28 of 107; 26%). RCTs with a hypothesis in the interest of the manufacturer of the study drug were more likely to have obtained placebos from the drug manufacturer (18 of 49; 37% vs. 5 of 29; 17%). Median costs for placebos and packaging were US$ 58,286 (IQR US$ 2,428- US$ 160,770; n = 24), accounting for a median of 10.3% of the overall trial budget. CONCLUSION: Although using matching placebos is widely accepted as a basic practice in RCTs, there seems to be no standard source to acquire them. Obtaining placebos requires substantial resources, and using nonmatching placebos is common.

Single-dose versus 3-day cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in transurethral resection or greenlight laser vaporisation of the prostate: study protocol for a multicentre randomised placebo controlled non-inferiority trial (CITrUS trial).

BACKGROUND: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and Greenlight laser vaporisation (GL) of the prostate are frequently performed urological procedures. For TURP, a single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis (AP) is recommended to reduce postoperative urinary tract infections. So far, no international recommendations for AP have been established for GL. In a survey-based study in Switzerland, Germany and Austria, urologists reported routinely extending AP primarily for 3 days after both interventions. We therefore aim to determine whether single-dose AP with cotrimoxazole is non-inferior to 3-day AP with cotrimoxazole in patients undergoing TURP or GL of the prostate. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. We plan to assess the non-inferiority of single-dose AP compared to 3-day AP. The primary outcome is the occurrence of clinically diagnosed symptomatic urinary tract infections which are treated with antimicrobial agents within 30 days after randomisation. The vast majority of collected outcomes will be assessed from routinely collected data. The sample size was estimated to be able to show the non-inferiority of single-dose AP compared to 3-day AP with at least 80% power (1 - ß = 0.8) at a significance level of α = 5%, applying a 1:1 randomisation scheme. The non-inferiority margin was determined in order to preserve 70% of the effect of usual care on the primary outcome. For an assumed event rate of 9% in both treatment arms, this resulted in a non-inferiority margin of 4.4% (i.e. 13.4% to 9%). To prove non-inferiority, a total of 1574 patients should be recruited, in order to have 1416 evaluable patients. The study is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation. DISCUSSION: For AP in TURP and GL, there is a large gap between usual clinical practice and evidence-based guidelines. If single-dose AP proves non-inferior to prolonged AP, our study findings may help to reduce the duration of AP in daily routine-potentially reducing the risk of emerging resistance and complications related to AP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03633643 . Registered 16 August 2018.

Improved Muscle Function in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy through L-Arginine and Metformin: An Investigator-Initiated, Open-Label, Single-Center, Proof-Of-Concept-Study.

UNLABELLED: Altered neuronal nitric oxide synthase function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy leads to impaired mitochondrial function which is thought to be one cause of muscle damage in this disease. The study tested if increased intramuscular nitric oxide concentration can improve mitochondrial energy metabolism in Duchenne muscular dystrophy using a novel therapeutic approach through the combination of L-arginine with metformin. Five ambulatory, genetically confirmed Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients aged between 7­10 years were treated with L-arginine (3 x 2.5 g/d) and metformin (2 x 250 mg/d) for 16 weeks. Treatment effects were assessed using mitochondrial protein expression analysis in muscular biopsies, indirect calorimetry, Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, quantitative thigh muscle MRI, and clinical scores of muscle performance. There were no serious side effects and no patient dropped out. Muscle biopsy results showed pre-treatment a significantly reduced mitochondrial protein expression and increased oxidative stress in Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients compared to controls. Post-treatment a significant elevation of proteins of the mitochondrial electron transport chain was observed as well as a reduction in oxidative stress. Treatment also decreased resting energy expenditure rates and energy substrate use shifted from carbohydrates to fatty acids. These changes were associated with improved clinical scores. In conclusion pharmacological stimulation of the nitric oxide pathway leads to improved mitochondria function and clinically a slowing of disease progression in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. This study shall lead to further development of this novel therapeutic approach into a real alternative for Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02516085.

Large-scale manufacturing of GMP-compliant anti-EGFR targeted nanocarriers: production of doxorubicin-loaded anti-EGFR-immunoliposomes for a first-in-man clinical trial.

We describe the large-scale, GMP-compliant production process of doxorubicin-loaded and anti-EGFR-coated immunoliposomes (anti-EGFR-ILs-dox) used in a first-in-man, dose escalation clinical trial. 10 batches of this nanoparticle have been produced in clean room facilities. Stability data from the pre-GMP and the GMP batch indicate that the anti-EGFR-ILs-dox nanoparticle was stable for at least 18 months after release. Release criteria included visual inspection, sterility testing, as well as measurements of pH (pH 5.0-7.0), doxorubicin HCl concentration (0.45-0.55 mg/ml), endotoxin concentration (<1.21 IU/ml), leakage (<10%), particle size (Z-average of Caelyx ± 20 nm), and particle uptake (uptake absolute: >0.50 ng doxorubicin/µg protein; uptake relatively to PLD: >5 fold). All batches fulfilled the defined release criteria, indicating a high reproducibility as well as batch-to-batch uniformity of the main physico-chemical features of the nanoparticles in the setting of the large-scale GMP process. In the clinical trial, 29 patients were treated with this nanoparticle between 2007 and 2010. Pharmacokinetic data of anti-EGFR-ILs-dox collected during the clinical study revealed stability of the nanocarrier in vivo. Thus, reliable and GMP-compliant production of anti-EGFR-targeted nanoparticles for clinical application is feasible.

Tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of doxorubicin-loaded anti-EGFR immunoliposomes in advanced solid tumours: a phase 1 dose-escalation study.

BACKGROUND: Results of preclinical studies have shown that EGFR immunoliposomes have substantial antitumour effects. We aimed to assess the tolerability, safety, pharmokinetics, and efficacy of anti-EGFR immunoliposomes loaded with doxorubicin (anti-EGFR ILs-dox) in patients with solid tumours. METHODS: In this first-in-man, open-label, phase 1 clinical study, we enrolled patients at University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland, who had EGFR-overexpressing advanced solid tumours no longer amenable to standard treatment. Anti-EGFR ILs-dox nanoparticles were constructed by covalently linking pegylated liposomes containing doxorubicin to antigen-binding fragments (Fab') of cetuximab. We intravenously infused the nanoparticle at escalating doses (doxorubicin 5 mg/m(2), 10 mg/m(2), 20 mg/m(2), 30 mg/m(2), 40 mg/m(2), 50 mg/m(2), and 60 mg/m(2)) once every 4 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The primary endpoint was to establish the maximum tolerated dose. We analysed patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01702129. FINDINGS: Between Jan 30, 2007, and March 4, 2010, we gave the drug to 29 patients, three of whom were withdrawn from the study because we could not complete a safety assessment. Of the 26 patients assessed for the primary endpoint, two who received a dose of 60 mg/m(2) had dose-limiting toxicities (one had neutropenia and the other had anaemia); therefore, the maximum tolerated dose was defined as 50 mg/m(2). At all lower doses, anti-EGFR ILs-dox was well tolerated; grade 1 skin toxicity occurred in two patients only. We recorded 22 serious adverse events (SAEs) in 17 patients, mostly due to tumour progression. Three SAEs were fatal. Only three SAEs (febrile neutropenia, septicaemia, and a fatal massive oral bleed) were probably or possibly related to study drug. No patients had palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia, alopecia, cardiotoxicity, or cumulative toxicity. Best response to treatment included one complete response, one partial response, and ten stable disease lasting 2-12 months (median 5·75 months). INTERPRETATION: Because anti-EGFR ILs-dox was well tolerated up to 50 mg doxorubicin per m(2), and we recorded clinical activity, further assessment of this nanoparticle at this dose in phase 2 trials is warranted. FUNDING: Cancer League Basel, Swiss Cancer League, Schoenmakers-Müller Foundation, and Werner Geissberger Foundation.

Dose calculation in opioid rotation: electronic calculator vs. manual calculation.

OBJECTIVE: To generate, validate and establish a web-based individualised opioid conversion calculator at the University Hospital Basel and to analyse its value and significance. SETTING: A 700-bed university hospital. METHOD: Published data were screened by a Medline search using the keywords: opioid, rotation, switching, potency and dose ratio. Based on this data, the criteria for the conversion calculator were defined. A prospective process validation was performed prior to the approval. Five months after the introduction of the tool, an online survey was performed in order to evaluate its acceptance by users. In the last step, a manual calculation using a written table was compared with the calculator in a cross-over trial with 72 participants in order to assess the findings of the survey. RESULTS: The opioid conversion calculator could be generated for 24 combinations of 6 opioids for 5 different routes of administration. The validation of the calculator was performed successfully without discovering any major or critical defects. The proportion of correct answers increased from 68% using the table to 81% using the calculator (P < 0.001), the median time necessary to answer the ten questions was 8.9 min using the table and 4.8 min using the calculator. CONCLUSION: A web-based opioid conversion calculator was planned, generated, validated and established at the hospital. Based on the results of the online survey and the results of our cross-over trial we conclude that the tool saves time compared to manual calculation and may contribute to patient safety by avoiding calculation errors. With this tool we contribute to the optimisation of processes in hospital and patient safety.