Ultrasound versus Nerve Stimulator Guided Obturator Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor.

BACKGROUND: Urinary bladder cancer is more common in geriatric population. Transurethral resection of bladder tumor remains the mainstay of treatment. It is usually performed under subarachnoid block. However, obturator nerve is spared in subarachnoid block that can produce adductor jerk, which is associated with bladder injury, rupture, incomplete resection of tumor and hematoma. To overcome this jerk, selective obturator nerve block is commonly performed. Thus, we conducted this study to compare the efficacy of ultrasound and nerve stimulator-guided techniques for obturator nerve block. METHODS: This is a prospective, comparative study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Nepal. Sixty patients, scheduled to undergo Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor for lateral and posterolateral wall bladder cancer under subarachnoid block were enrolled and divided into two group having thirty patients in each groups. Group I received 15 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine to block obturator nerve by using peripheral nerve stimulator. Group II received the same amount of Bupivacaine to block obturator nerve under ultrasound guidance. We evaluated the success of the block, ease of the procedure and complications. RESULTS: The adductor reflex was present in 23.33% of cases with nerve stimulator guided obturator nerve block, whereas, it was16.66% in ultrasound guided technique (p=0.75). The success rate of obturator nerve block was 76.66% in nerve stimulator guided technique, whereas 83.33% in ultrasound guided technique (p= 0.21). 83.33% of obturator nerve block was found to be easy in nerve stimulator guided technique, whereas 66.66 % in ultrasound guided technique (p = 0.14). There were no major complications noted. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study conclude that both ultrasound and nerve stimulator guided techniques equally abolished the adductor reflexes. Both techniques are easy to perform and safe.

Impact Of COVID-19 On Patients Requiring Spine Surgery: A Tertiary Level Government Trauma Hospital Experience.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 outbreak caused by the SARS Corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), that appeared in Wuhan, China in December 2019 evolved into a pandemic and caused a devastating effect in all aspect of life. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of Covid-19 on the management of spine patients requiring surgery and to observe the functioning of a trauma center in a pandemic situation. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed at National Trauma Center, Kathmandu, Nepal from January 1 2019 to February 28 2020(Pre-Covid period) and March 1 2020 to April 30 2021(Covid Period) . All patients undergoing spine surgery were included and details regarding demographics, diagnosis, surgical procedures were obtained and compared between pre- covid and covid period and also between complete lockdown period and partial lockdown period of the covid duration. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients undergoing surgery in the Pre covid period was (40.4 ± 14.51) years and covid period was (38.9 ± 14.00) years. The number of spine surgeries performed during the pre covid period was 295 whereas the number decreased to 197 in the covid period. The total number of non traumatic spine surgery in the pre covid period was 22.03% of the total spine surgery cases where as it decreased to 11.68% in the covid period. Similarly out of the total cases instrumented surgery was 91.86% in the pre covid period whereas it was 97.97% in the covid period. While analyzing the spine surgery done in the COVID period we found that most of the cases of surgery done in the complete restriction period was of traumatic spine only (97.77%) where as in the limited restriction period non traumatic spine surgery was also increased with traumatic spine surgery accounting for 85.52% of the total spine surgery cases. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID pandemic has had a direct impact on traumatic and non-traumatic spine surgeries performed in this center.

Clinical Characteristics and outcome analysis of SARS-CoV-2 patients admitted to different Critical Care Units in Nepal.

BACKGROUND: The clinical presentation, biochemical characteristics, and outcomes of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 can vary in different populations. The purpose of the study is to assess the clinical presentation and identify predictors of mortality among patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome admitted to different critical care units in Nepal. METHODS: An observational study was conducted among the confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patients admitted to different critical care units in seven provinces of Nepal. Retrospective data was collected for the period of three months (April 14, 2021 to July 15, 2021) in relation to the peak of the second wave of COVID-19 pandemic in Nepal. Clinical, biochemical and mortality data were collected from the admitted patients of different critical care units. Univariate logistic regression analysis was done among the selected variables at 5% significance. Final predictor variables were identified after multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: Out of total of 646 patients admitted to critical care units of different provinces of Nepal, there was a male predominance 420 (65%). A total of 232(35.91 %) patients were non-survivors with the majority of mortality occurring in patients > 50 years of age. Cough (72.3 %), shortness of breath (70.9%) and fever (56 %) were the most common presenting clinical features. Increasing age, presence of comorbidity, critical COVID-19 cases, respiratory rate, temperature, serum urea and alanine aminotransferase were identified as predictors of mortality after multiple regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 36 % of the confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patient admitted to critical care units did not survive. There was a male preponderance with most casualties occurring in patients more than 50 years of age. Cough, shortness of breath and fever were the most common presenting features. After multiple regression analysis of the identified clinical and biochemical factors, age, presence of comorbidity, respiratory rate, temperature, severity grade as per the World Health Organization classification, serum urea and alanine aminotransferase were identified as the predictors of mortality.

Correlation between neurologic status and spinal injury at the Cervicothoracic Junction.

BACKGROUND: With limited studies on spinal injuries occurring at the cervicothoracic junction, there is currently a knowledge gap regarding the correlation between morphology of injury and neurology and whether surgery provides a favorable neurological outcome. The primary objective was to determine whether the neurological deficit correlated with the severity of injury at this region of the spine. METHODS: All patients with injuries at the cervicothoracic junction from December 2015 to December 2020 in a government trauma hospital were included. Patient demographics, characteristics of the injury, neurological score, imaging findings, surgery details and neurological outcomes were analyzed. All patients had a minimum follow up of 2 years. RESULTS: Of the total 30 patients, 23 were male and 7 female with mean age 42.4 years. 90% had fall injuries with 76.7% sustaining AO type C injury and 10% with AO B2 injury.73.4% had injury at C6-C7 level followed by 13.3% , C7-T1. Only 16.7% patients presented with intact neurology. Plain x-rays failed to detect cervicothoracic junction, injuries in 63.3% patients. Posterior stabilization was performed in 56.7%. Neurological improvement was observed in 9 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Though cervicothoracic junction injuries are uncommon, they are highly unstable injuries and difficult to diagnose by plain x-rays. These injuries also result in profound neurological deficit. Surgical stabilization of these injuries should be considered for a favorable neurological and functional outcome.

Establishment of National Medical Registries: The Time has Arrived.

NA.

Reliability and Validity of the Adapted Nepali Version of the AO Spine Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma.

BACKGROUND: The AO Spine Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma has been validated in English and Dutch language, however, there is an absence of a translated and validated version in Nepali language. The purpose of this study was to translate the AO Spine Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma into Nepali and adapt cross-culturally as outlined by established guidelines, as well as test its psychometric properties among Nepali speaking spine trauma patients. METHODS: Patients were recruited from two Nepali centers as a cross-sectional multicenter validation study. The English version of AO Spine Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Nepali language following international guidelines. Next to AO Spine Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma also the EQ-5D-3L was filled out by the patients for concurrent validity. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the patient characteristics. Assessment of measurement properties included content validity (floor and ceiling effects), internal consistency (Cronbach's ? and item total-correlation coefficients) and test-retest reliability by the Bland-Altman plot and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients. Spearman correlation tests were performed within the items and in correlation to EQ-5D-3L. RESULTS: Sixty two spine trauma patients completed the instrument with a mean time of 6.8 minutes. The translated version showed good content validity with no floor and ceiling effects. The internal consistency was excellent with a Cronbach's ? of 0.95. The Spearman correlations within the AO Spine Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma items were 0.07 - 0.65 and the test-retest analysis showed excellent results with an Intraclass Correlation Coefficients value of 0.95 (CI 0.93 - 0.97). Inverse correlation was observed between Nepali AO Spine PROST with EQ-5D-3L components. CONCLUSIONS: The Nepali version of AO Spine Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma demonstrated excellent validity and reliability results for measuring patient-reported outcomes of spine trauma patients.

Outcome of Cervical Spine Trauma Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit at a Tertiary Government Referral Trauma Center in Nepal.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating event for patient and family. It has a huge impact on society because of intensive resources required to manage the patient in both acute and rehabilitation phases. With the limited resource setting in underdeveloped countries like Nepal, questions are often raised regarding whether the outcome justifies the expenses of their care. The objective was to assess the outcomes of cervical SCI patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: All cervical SCI admitted in ICU during May 2017 to August 2018 were included in this study. Demographic details, mode, morphology, and neurological level of injury, intervention performed and outcomes of ICU stay were analyzed. RESULTS: Out of 48 patients, 36 (75%) were male and 12 female with mean age 43.9 ± 15.9 years. Fall injury was the commonest mode of injury (83.3%). Most patients presented within 1 to 3 days of injury and C5-C6 (33.3%) was the most common involved level and 75% presented with ASIA A neurology. Mechanical ventilation was required in 95.8% of the patients and 22 patients were operated upon. The average stay in ICU was 15 days and 13 patients died in the ICU. CONCLUSIONS: Majority of cervical SCI with complete motor paraplegia required ICU care. Inspite of the intensive care, a subset of these patients succumbed to the complications of the injury. Therefore, it is essential to establish trauma ICU care with specific protocols on managing cervical spine injuries.

Epidemiology of Trauma Patients Presented at Emergency Department of Trauma Center.

BACKGROUND: Emergency Department of National Trauma Center Nepal Center is the only specialized trauma care hospital in Nepal, in operation since 2012. Traumatic injury is one of the major causes for mortality worldwide. This study aims to see the epidemiology, pattern of injuries and outcome of the patients presenting to the emergency room. METHODS: After getting ethical approval, we included all patients presenting to the Emergency Department with at least one injury, between Jan 2018 to Dec 2020. Informations on age, gender, mechanism of injury and outcome was abstracted for all patients presenting to the emergency department. Data were extracted from hospital database with the permission of hospital authority. RESULTS: Total of 49991 patients presented to emergency department with different types of injuries.  Among them 7792 (14.0%) needed hospital admission. Fall and road crashes comprised almost 80% of admitted cases. Mortality was 2.1% of admitted patients, mostly with head injuries followed by multiple injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Among the patient visiting the trauma center during the study period most common mechanism of the injury were fall and road crash with head and neck injury. Majority of the patients were only managed in the ward without surgery.

Review of Subaxial Cervical Spine Injuries Presenting to a Tertiary-Level Hospital in Nepal: Challenges in Surgical Management in a Third World Scenario.

STUDY DESIGN: Epidemiological retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To describe the demographics, timing to surgery, delay, short-term neurological recovery, and complications in surgically treated subaxial cervical trauma in a resource-constrained country. METHODS: Thirty consecutive subaxial cervical trauma patients presenting to a trauma hospital in Nepal between December 2015 and August 2017 were analyzed as a retrospective cohort. Patients were segregated into 4 groups based on the timing to surgery: within 2 days, 3 to 7 days, 8 to 30 days, and >31 days. RESULTS: There were 27 male and 3 female patients with mean age 40 years. Twenty-four sustained fall injury, and 27 patients were from outside Kathmandu. No patients were treated within the first 48 hours; only 9 were treated between 3 and 7 days, 16 between 8 and 30 days, and 5 a month later. Major delay was finance and operating room availability. Thirteen patients had a C6C7 involvement followed by C5C6 in 6 patients. Seven patients had complete neurological deficit while 18 patients had incomplete deficit. A total of 46.7% improved their neurology in 6 months. No neurological recovery was observed in complete deficit patients. CONCLUSION: Seventy percent of our patients were treated longer than 1 week after injury, which would likely be considered unacceptable in most first world countries. As expected, the outcomes for many of these patients were far worse than reported in North American centers with early access to medical care and insurance. Despite this, nearly half of our patients improved neurologically following treatment; hence, surgery holds hope of some restoration of neurologic deficits.

Clinical Efficacy of Selective Nerve Root Block in Lumbar Radiculopathy due to Disc Prolapse.

BACKGROUND: Selective Nerve Root Block using steroid is a proven technique for management of lumbar radiculopathy. The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of selective nerve root block in lumbar radiculopathy. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted for duration of one year in patients diagnosed with lumbar radiculopathy. Patients with leg pain, positive straight leg raising test and single level disc prolapse were included in the study. The procedure was performed under fluoroscopic guidance and Visual Analogue Pain rating scale and Oswestry Disability Index score was used for assessment pre-injection, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months and 1-year post injection. RESULTS: Total 35 patient with mean age of 37.7± 9.31 years were included in the study. The pre-injection Visual Analogue Pain Score(Mean ± S.D:7.8±0.7) was significantly reduced at one week (4.2±1.47, p <0.00001), one month (2.74±1.06, p <0.00001), six months (2.31±0.75, p <0.00001) and one year (2.62±0.84, p <0.00001). Similarly, pre-injection Oswestry Disability Index score (Mean ± S.D: 32.09±5.95) was significantly reduced at one week (19.51±7.26, p <0.00001), one month (12.71±4.56, p <0.00001), six months (9.8±2.87, p <0.00001) and one year (10.09±2.97, p <0.00001) but not significantly improved when compared at 6 months and 1 year (p < 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: Selective Nerve Root Block in lumbar radiculopathy significantly reduces Visual Analogue Pain Score up to a year, however, the reduction in pain plateaus around six months.Disability index score only reduces for first 6 months but doesn't significantly reduce from six months to one year.

Epidemiological Characteristics of Dorsal and Lumbar Spine Trauma Presenting to a Trauma Hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal: Formulation of a National Spine Policy.

INTRODUCTION: Outcome of spine injury treated in resource constrained regions may not be the same as in developed nations. The aim of the present study was to study the epidemiological characteristics, delay, complications, and outcome of surgically treated dorsal and lumbar trauma. METHODS: Retrospective study of dorsal and lumbar spine injury patients treated between December 2015 and August 2017. Patients were segregated into four groups based on the timing of surgery: 0-2 days, 3-7 days, 8-30 days, and more than 31 days. Only one operating room twice a week was allotted to spine surgery, and spine had to compete with orthopedic and surgical trauma for admission and surgery. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients (male 61) with mean age 33 years were operated for dorsal and lumbar spine injuries. 84% of the total patients sustained a fall, and 86.8% were from the periphery. Though 69.2% presented within 2 days, only 4.4% were operated within 2 days. Majority of the delay was due to unavailability of the operating room followed by financial constraints. Twenty-seven patients had complete deficit, 32 incomplete deficit, and 32 normal neurology. Four patients operated within 2 days improved their neurology, 7 incomplete deficit patients in 3-7 days group improved, 6 in 8-30 days group improved, whereas no patient in more than 31 days group improved. Overall 53.1% of neurologically incomplete deficit patients improved if operated within 30 days. No neurological improvement was seen in the 27 complete deficit patients. Wound infection, pulmonary contusion, and deep vein thrombosis were seen in 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS: As expected 95.6% of our patients were treated more than 3 days after injury and 60% more than a week later, which may not be acceptable in advanced countries. Despite the delay, 53.1% had an improvement in neurology when operated within 30 days. Hence, surgery still holds the hope of neurological recovery and quicker rehabilitation.