The added diagnostic value of automated QT-dispersion measurements and automated ST-segment deviations in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute cardiac ischemia.

The purpose of this study was to determine the added value of automated QT dispersion and ST-segment measurements to physician interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) in patients with chest pain. To date, poor reproducibility of manual measurements and lack of shown added value have limited the clinical use of QT dispersion. Twelve-lead ECGs (n = 1,161) from the Milwaukee Prehospital Chest Pain Database were independently classified by 2 physicians into 3 groups (acute myocardial infarction (AMI), acute cardiac ischemia (ACI), or nonischemic), and their consensus was obtained. QT-end and QT-peak dispersions were measured by a computerized system. The computer also identified ST-segment deviations. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPV) for AMI and ACI were evaluated independently and in combinations. For AMI, physicians' consensus classification was remarkably good (sensitivity, 48%, specificity, 99%). Independent classification by QT-end and QT-peak dispersions or ST deviations was not superior to the physicians' consensus. Optimal classification occurred by combining automated QT-end dispersion and ST deviations with physicians' consensus. This combination increased sensitivity for the diagnoses of AMI by 35% (65% vs 48%, P < .001) and ACI by 55% (62% vs 40%, P < .001) compared with physicians' consensus, while maintaining comparable specificity. This study supports a potential clinical role for automated QT dispersion when combined with other diagnostic methods for detecting AMI and ACI.

Sensing failure in a tiered therapy implantable cardioverter defibrillator: role of auto adjustable gain.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators have an established role in the management of life-threatening tachyarrhythmias. These devices use sophisticated sensing circuitry to detect and promptly treat a vast majority of these arrhythmias. However, they are not foolproof. We report one case where the device failed to sense every other QRS complex during induced ventricular fibrillation due to marked electrical alterans. Thus, undersensing can be a potentially fatal problem despite the use of auto adjustable gain.

Characterization of atrioventricular nodal behavior and ventricular response during atrial fibrillation before and after a selective slow-pathway ablation.

BACKGROUND: The presence of atrioventricular nodal dual-pathway physiology in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) provides an opportunity to characterize the effect of a selective slow-pathway ablation on the ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation (AF). This may have important clinical implications for the nonpharmacological management of AF with a rapid ventricular rate. METHODS AND RESULTS: Selective radiofrequency catheter ablation of the atrioventricular nodal slow pathway was performed with a stepwise approach in patients with documented sustained AVNRT. The AV nodal conduction properties and refractoriness and the ventricular rate during induced AF were assessed at baseline and under autonomic blockade before and after a selective slow-pathway ablation in 18 patients (mean age, 34 +/- 8 years). Sustained AVNRT was induced with a mean cycle length of 339 +/- 58 ms. A slow-pathway ablation was successfully achieved with 5 +/- 4 applications of radiofrequency energy. The shortest cycle length of 1:1 AV conduction and the AV nodal effective refractory period significantly prolonged after ablation (367 +/- 53 versus 403 +/- 55 ms, P < .0001, and 258 +/- 55 versus 292 +/- 74 ms, P < .05, respectively). Selective slow-pathway ablation significantly prolonged the mean (526 +/- 93 versus 612 +/- 107 ms, P < .0001), the shortest (378 +/- 59 versus 423 +/- 73 ms, P < .0001), and the longest (826 +/- 150 versus 969 +/- 226 ms, P < .01) cycle lengths of the ventricular response to AF. Significant slowing of the ventricular rate during AF occurred in 13 patients (72%), including all eight patients in whom AV nodal dual-pathway physiology was abolished. Five patients did not have a significant change in the ventricular rate during AF; a persistent dual AV nodal pathway physiology was demonstrable in four of these patients. Loss of dual-pathway physiology after ablation had a sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 80%, and positive predictive value of 91% for slowing the ventricular rate during AF. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing a slow-pathway ablation for control of AVNRT, selective slow-pathway ablation may cause a significant decrease in the ventricular rate during AF. These effects are primarily due to the prolongation of AV nodal conduction properties and refractory period of the residual AV nodal transmission system. These findings may have important therapeutic implications for the nonpharmacological treatment of AF, particularly in patients with underlying dual AV nodal physiology.

Transcatheter ablation of posteroseptal accessory pathways using a venous approach and radiofrequency energy.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of transcatheter ablation of atrioventricular (AV) accessory pathways (APs) located in the posteroseptal region using a right atrial approach and radiofrequency energy was evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty consecutive patients with APs in the posteroseptal region underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation. Manifest preexcitation was present in 36 patients and a concealed AP in 14. In 18 patients (group 1), the ventriculoatrial (VA) interval during orthodromic tachycardia was prolonged by 21 +/- 7 milliseconds (range, 10 to 30 milliseconds) with functional left bundle-branch block. In 16 patients (group 2), functional left bundle-branch block caused no VA interval prolongation. The remaining 16 patients (group 3) had no inducible left bundle-branch block during orthodromic tachycardia. Functional right bundle-branch block was induced in 30 patients with no effect on the VA interval. In group 1, of 14 patients with manifest preexcitation during sinus rhythm, 10 patients had a positive delta wave in lead V1. Of 10 group 2 patients with manifest preexcitation, only 5 had a positive delta wave in lead V1. In group 3, of 12 patients with manifest preexcitation, 7 exhibited a positive delta wave in lead V1. All posteroseptal APs were successfully ablated, and this was achieved via a right atrial approach in 48 patients and left ventricular approach in only 2. Successful sites were at the posteroseptal region of the tricuspid annulus (30 patients), within the terminal 1 cm of the coronary sinus including its ostium (16 patients), and at the inferomedial aspect of the right atrium posterior to the coronary sinus ostium (2 patients). The posteroseptal region of the left ventricle was the site of successful ablation in 2 patients. Six patients with a recurrence of AP conduction required a repeat ablation, with successful results in 5. Thirty-five patients had a complete electrophysiological evaluation 2 to 3 months after their successful ablation and were found to have no functioning AP. In 49 patients with a final successful ablation, no recurrence of symptoms was noted during a mean follow-up period of 12 +/- 9 months. Complications occurring in 3 patients were cardiac tamponade requiring surgical drainage and repair of a right ventricular tear, pericardial effusion with no hemodynamic consequence that spontaneously resolved, and a transient 2:1 atrioventricular block. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that posteroseptal APs are amenable to successful ablation using a right atrial approach. Success was achieved in 47 cases (94%) in this series even though the ECG and/or electrophysiological characteristics of the posteroseptal APs of some patients were suggestive of "left-sided" pathways.

Slow pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia and a prolonged PR interval.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of selective slow pathway ablation using radiogfrequency energy and a transcatheter technique in patients with a prolonged PR interval and atrioventricular (AV) node reentrant tachycardia. BACKGROUND: Although both fast and slow AV node pathways can be ablated in patients with AV node reentrant tachycardia, slow pathway ablation, by obviating the risk of AV block, appears to be safer. However, the safety and efficacy of selective slow pathway ablation using transcatheter radiofrequency energy in patients with a prolonged PR interval during sinus rhythm are unclear. METHODS: The seven study patients with a prolonged PR interval (mean +/- SD 237 +/- 26 ms) comprised three women and four men with a mean age of 31 +/- 15 years. The slow pathway was targeted in all seven patients at the posterior/inferior interatrial septal aspect of the tricuspid annulus. Two patients presented with the uncommon variety of AV node reentrant tachycardia after initial fast pathway ablation; in the remaining five patients, the AV node reentrant tachycardia was of the common variety. RESULTS: A single radiofrequency pulse at 30 W successfully abolished the slow pathway in both the anterograde and the retrograde direction in the two patients with uncommon AV node reentrant tachycardia. A mean of 5 +/- 3 radiofrequency pulses were required in the remaining five patients with reentrant tachycardia of the common variety. The postablation PR interval and AH interval remained unchanged. The shortest cycle length of 1:1 AV conduction was prolonged significantly (from 327 +/- 31 to 440 +/- 59 ms, p < 0.01, as was the AV node effective refractory period (from 244 +/- 35 to 344 +/- 43 ms, p < 0.01). During a mean follow-up interval of 20 +/- 6 months, no patient developed symptoms suggestive of AV node reentrant tachycardia or had evidence of second- or third-degree AV block. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the AV node slow pathway can be ablated in patients with AV node reentrant tachycardia who demonstrate a prolonged PR interval during sinus rhythm.

Ablation of left free-wall accessory pathways using radiofrequency energy at the atrial insertion site: transseptal versus transaortic approach.

INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter ablation of the left free-wall atrioventricular accessory pathways (AP) by delivery of radiofrequency current at the ventricular insertion site has been shown to be effective. The efficacy of such a technique targeting the atrial insertion site of the AP was evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred consecutive patients with left free-wall APs and symptomatic supraventricular tachyarrhythmias were included. APs were manifest in 55 patients and concealed in 45. There were 55 men and 45 women with a mean age of 35 years. A total of 107 left free-wall APs were identified in these patients. In these 100 patients, successful ablation was accomplished in all by using a transseptal (45 patients) or transaortic (54 patients) technique. In one patient, ablation was accomplished from within the coronary sinus. Seven patients required a repeat ablative procedure, which was performed successfully. During 107 ablative procedures, six were associated with nonfatal complications including pericardial effusion (hemopericardium) in two patients, mild mitral regurgitation in two patients, swelling of the left arm in one patient, and staphylococcal bacteremia in one patient. Eighty-two (82%) patients underwent a repeat electrophysiologic study 6 to 8 weeks after successful ablation and were found to have no functioning AP or inducible supraventricular tachycardia. During a mean follow-up of 20 +/- 8 months, none of the 100 patients had a recurrence of tachyarrhythmias. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that the atrial insertion site of the AP can be successfully ablated in the majority of patients with left free-wall APs by using either a transseptal or transaortic approach. Furthermore, both techniques are associated with minimal morbidity and no mortality.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of an accessory atrioventricular connection in a Fontan patient.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation is fast becoming the procedure of choice for the nonpharmacological treatment of atrioventricular connections that are responsible for debilitating tachycardias. We, herein, present a case of reentrant supraventricular tachycardia secondary to an atrioventricular connection in a Fontan patient that was successfully treated with radiofrequency catheter ablation.

Electrophysiologic spectrum of atrioventricular nodal behavior in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia undergoing selective fast or slow pathway ablation.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this report is to delineate the atrioventricular (AV) nodal electrophysiologic behavior in patients undergoing fast or slow pathway ablation for control of their AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred sixteen consecutive patients with symptomatic AVNRT were included. Twenty-two patients underwent fast pathway ablation with complete abolition of AVNRT in all and development of complete AV block in five patients. Of 17 patients with intact AV conduction postablation, 12 had demonstrated antegrade dual pathway physiology during baseline study, which was maintained in three and lost in nine patients postablation. Two patients with successful fast pathway ablation developed uncommon AVNRT necessitating a slow pathway ablation. Twenty-one patients demonstrated both common and uncommon forms of AV nodal reentry during baseline study. The earliest site of atrial activation was close to the His-bundle recording site (anterior interatrial septum) during common variety and the coronary sinus ostium (posterior interatrial septum) during the uncommon AV nodal reentry in all 21 patients. Ninety-six patients underwent successful slow pathway ablation. Among these, the antegrade dual pathway physiology demonstrable during baseline study (60 patients) was maintained in 25 and lost in 35 patients postablation. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that: (1) dual pathway physiology may persist after successful ablation, which might be a reflection of multiple reentrant pathways in patients with AVNRT; and (2) the retrograde pathways during common and uncommon AVNRT have anatomically separate atrial breakthroughs. These findings have important electrophysiologic implications regarding the prevailing concept of the AV nodal physiology in patients with AVNRT.

Selective transcatheter ablation of the fast and slow pathways using radiofrequency energy in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of selective fast versus slow pathway ablation using radiofrequency energy and a transcatheter technique in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) were evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-nine consecutive patients with symptomatic AVNRT were included. There were 37 women and 12 men (mean age, 43 +/- 20 years). The first 16 patients underwent a fast pathway ablation with radiofrequency current applied in the anterior/superior aspect of the tricuspid annulus. The remaining 33 patients initially had their slow pathway targeted at the posterior/inferior aspect of the right interatrial septum. The fast pathway was successfully ablated in the initial 16 patients and in three additional patients after an unsuccessful slow pathway ablation. A mean of 10 +/- 8 radiofrequency pulses were delivered; the last (successful) pulse was at a power of 24 +/- 7 W for a duration of 22 +/- 15 seconds. Four of these 19 patients developed complete atrioventricular (AV) block. In the remaining 15 patients, the post-ablation atrio-His intervals prolonged from 89 +/- 30 to 138 +/- 43 msec (p less than 0.001), whereas the shortest 1:1 AV conduction and effective refractory period of the AV node remained unchanged. Ten patients lost their ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction, and the other five had a significant prolongation of the shortest cycle length of 1:1 VA conduction (280 +/- 35 versus 468 +/- 30 msec, p less than 0.0001). Slow pathway ablation was attempted initially in 33 patients and in another two who developed uncommon AVNRT after successful fast pathway ablation. Of these 35 patients, 32 had no AVNRT inducible after 6 +/- 4 radiofrequency pulses with the last (successful) pulse given at a power of 36 +/- 12 W for a duration of 35 +/- 15 seconds. After successful slow pathway ablation, the shortest cycle length of 1:1 AV conduction prolonged from 295 +/- 44 to 332 +/- 66 msec (p less than 0.0005), the AV nodal effective refractory period increased from 232 +/- 36 to 281 +/- 61 msec (p less than 0.0001), and the atrio-His interval as well as the shortest cycle length of 1:1 VA conduction remained unchanged. No patients developed AV block. Among the last 33 patients who underwent a slow pathway ablation as the initial attempt and a fast pathway ablation only when the former failed, 32 (97%) had successful AVNRT abolition with intact AV conduction. During a mean follow-up of 6.5 +/- 3.0 months, none of the 49 patients had recurrent tachycardia. Forty patients had repeat electrophysiological studies 4-8 weeks after their successful ablation, and AVNRT could not be induced in 39 patients. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that both fast and slow pathways can be selectively ablated for control of AVNRT: Slow pathway ablation, however, by obviating the risk of AV block, appears to be safer and should be considered as the first approach.

Late infection of joint prostheses.

Late infection of an orthopaedic prosthesis can cause serious illness in elderly patients. Four cases are described to show the importance of recognizing this condition.