Complete soft tissue sarcoma resection is a viable treatment option for select elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Decreased performance status, comorbidities, and disease natural history may erode enthusiasm for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resection in elderly patients. Consequently, we evaluated the outcome of elderly patients amenable to complete surgical resection treated at a single institution. METHODS: Prospectively accrued data were used to identify patients with primary STS age >or=65 years (n = 325) who underwent complete macroscopic resection at our institution (1996-2007). Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors. RESULTS: Median age at presentation was 72 years; 179 patients (55.1%) had associated comorbidities with an ASA score of >or=3. Extremity was the most common site (57.1%; n = 186), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma the most common histology (60.4%; n = 197); 232 (71.2%) were high grade, 222 (68.3%) were >5 cm. Thirty-day postoperative mortality was 0.9% (n = 3); overall complication rate was 30.7% (n = 100), and mean postoperative hospital stay was 9 days (range, 1-84). Estimated median survival was 96 months, 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 63%. Multivariable analysis identified age >or=75 year (HR = 2.03), tumor size: 5-15 vs <5 cm (HR = 3.54), or >15 vs <5 cm (HR = 10.33), and high-grade (HR = 5.53) as significant independent adverse prognostic factors. Compared with patients aged 65-74 years, older patients had more high grade tumors (P = .04), received chemotherapy less often (P < .0001), developed different patterns of recurrence (P < .05), and exhibited a shorter median survival (70 months; P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Properly selected elderly patients can safely undergo extensive STS resections. Until more effective therapies become available, surgery in the elderly is indicated and remains the best means for STS control.

Outcome of locally recurrent and metastatic angiosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Angiosarcoma (AS) is a rare soft tissue sarcoma with an enhanced propensity for local and systemic failure. The outcome of locally recurrent and metastatic AS treated at a single institution was evaluated. METHODS: Medical records of AS patients treated for local recurrence and distant metastasis (1993-2008) were retrospectively reviewed. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify prognosticators. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were treated for locally recurrent AS; the majority (59%) were 5 cm as the only independent adverse prognosticator of recurrent AS-specific survival [hazard ratio (HR): 3.26, P = 0.04]. Ninety-nine patients were treated for metastatic AS; 73% had multiple metastatic sites; the lung was the most common site (36%). Chemotherapy, mainly doxorubicin- and/or paclitaxel-based regimens, were administered to 95 patients (96%). Radiotherapy was utilized in 25% cases; 16% of patients underwent curative-intent surgery. Median DSS was 10 months (95% CI: 7.9-12 months). Isolated lymph node metastasis versus hematogenic spread was the only statistically significant favorable prognostic factor identified (HR: 0.29, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Locally recurrent AS is often treatable; complete resection can potentially prolong survival. In contrast, metastatic patients have a grave prognosis; however, patients with isolated lymphatic spread and possibly those treated with taxol-based chemotherapeutic regimens have a favorable outcome.