Level and correlates of physical activity and sedentary behavior in patients with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional analysis of the Italian Diabetes and Exercise Study_2.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with type 2 diabetes usually show reduced physical activity (PA) and increased sedentary (SED)-time, though to a varying extent, especially for low-intensity PA (LPA), a major determinant of daily energy expenditure that is not accurately captured by questionnaires. This study assessed the level and correlates of PA and SED-time in patients from the Italian Diabetes and Exercise Study_2 (IDES_2). METHODS: Three-hundred physically inactive and sedentary patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled in the IDES_2 to be randomized to an intervention group, receiving theoretical and practical exercise counseling, and a control group, receiving standard care. At baseline, LPA, moderate-to-vigorous-intensity PA (MVPA), and SED-time were measured by accelerometer. Physical fitness and cardiovascular risk factors and scores were also assessed. RESULTS: LPA was 3.93±1.35 hours∙day-1, MVPA was 12.4±4.6 min∙day-1, and SED-time was 11.6±1.2 hours∙day-1, with a large range of values (0.89-7.11 hours∙day-1, 0.6-21.0 min∙day-1, and 9.14-15.28 hours∙day-1, respectively). At bivariate analysis, LPA and MVPA correlated with better cardiovascular risk profile and fitness parameters, whereas the opposite was observed for SED-time. Likewise, values of LPA, MVPA, and SED-time falling in the best tertile were associated with optimal or acceptable levels of cardiovascular risk factors and scores. At multivariate analysis, age, female gender, HbA1c, BMI or waist circumference, and high-sensitivity C reactive protein (for LPA and SED-time only) were negatively associated with LPA and MPA and positively associated with SED-time in an independent manner. CONCLUSIONS: Physically inactive and sedentary patients with type 2 diabetes from the IDES_2 show a low level of PA, though values of LPA, MVPA, and SED-time vary largely. Furthermore, there is a strong correlation of these measures with glycemic control, adiposity and inflammation, thus suggesting that even small improvements in LPA, MVPA, and SED-time might be associated with significant improvement in cardiovascular risk profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01600937.

The Italian Diabetes and Exercise Study 2 (IDES-2): a long-term behavioral intervention for adoption and maintenance of a physically active lifestyle.

BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA)/exercise have become an integral part of the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, current guidelines are difficult to put into action in this population due to a number of barriers, especially the lack of acceptable, feasible, and validated behavioral intervention strategies. The present manuscript reports the rationale, study design and methods, and design considerations of the Italian Diabetes and Exercise Study (IDES)-2, a randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of a behavior change strategy in increasing total daily PA and reducing sedentary time (SED-time) in patients with T2DM. METHODS/DESIGN: Starting 7 January 2014, the IDES_2 began enrolling 300 patients with known T2DM of at least 1-year duration in three tertiary referral outpatient Diabetes Clinics in Rome. Additional requirements are age 40 to 80 years, body mass index 27 to 40 kg/m(2), sedentary lifestyle, and physically inactive for at least 6 months, ability to walk 1.6 km without assistance, and eligibility after cardiovascular evaluation. Patients are randomized by center and within each center, by age and type of diabetes treatment to either the intervention or the control group. Patients in the intervention (INT) group (n = 150) receive theoretical and practical exercise counseling consisting of aggregated behavior change techniques (one individual theoretical counseling session plus eight twice-a-week individual theoretical and practical exercise counseling sessions) once a year for 3 years. Patients in the control (CON) group (n = 150), receive standard care, including general physician recommendations for daily PA. The primary outcomes are total daily PA and SED-time, as measured objectively by the use of an accelerometer. Secondary outcomes include physical fitness, modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, musculoskeletal disturbances, well-being/depression, and health-related quality of life. DISCUSSION: The behavioral intervention strategy tested in the IDES_2 is based on solid theoretical grounds and uses several behavioral change techniques, two factors which were found to improve effectiveness of behavioral intervention. In addition, physicians and exercise specialists have been specifically trained for counselling/prescribing and supervising PA/exercise, respectively, in subjects suffering from metabolic disorders. Finally, the large sample size, the long study duration, and the objective measurement of PA allow statistically significant and scientifically robust conclusions to be drawn on the feasibility and efficacy of this intervention in T2DM patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01600937 ; 10 October 2012.

Neuromuscular dysfunction in diabetes: role of nerve impairment and training status.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of diabetes, motor nerve impairment, and training status on neuromuscular function by concurrent assessment of the torque-velocity relationship and muscle fiber conduction velocity (MFCV). METHODS: Four groups were studied (n = 12 each): sedentary patients with diabetes in the first (lower) and fourth (higher) quartile of motor nerve conduction velocity (D1 and D4, respectively), trained diabetic (TD) patients, and nondiabetic sedentary control (C) subjects. Maximal isometric and isokinetic contractions were assessed over a wide range of angular velocities for the elbow flexors and knee extensors to evaluate the torque-velocity relationship. Simultaneously, MFCV was estimated from surface electromyography of the vastus lateralis and biceps brachii. RESULTS: Isometric strength was similar among groups. The dynamic strength of elbow flexors was reduced in patients with diabetes at the higher contraction speeds. The strength of knee extensors was lower in sedentary patients with diabetes at all velocities considered, with significantly lower values in D1 than that in D4 at 60°, 90°, and 120°·s(-1), whereas it was similar between TD and C subjects, especially at low contraction velocities. At the vastus lateralis, but not the biceps brachii, MFCV was lower in D1 and D4 as compared with TD and C subjects, showing similar values. CONCLUSIONS: Muscle weakness in diabetes affects also the upper limb, although to a lower extent than the lower limb, is only partly related to motor nerve impairment, and is dependent on contraction velocity. Exercise training might counteract diabetes-induced alterations in muscle fiber contractile properties and MFCV.

Exercise training can modify the natural history of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is the most important cause of peripheral neuropathy (DPN). No definitive treatment for DPN has been established, and very few data on the role of exercise training on DPN have been reported. AIM OF THE STUDY: We sought to examine the effects of long-term exercise training on the development of DPN in both Types 1 and 2 diabetic patients. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight diabetic patients without signs and symptoms of peripheral DPN were enrolled, randomized, and subdivided in two groups: 31 diabetic participants [15 f, 16 m; 49+/-15.5 years old; body mass index (BMI)=27.9+/-4.7], who performed a prescribed and supervised 4 h/week brisk walking on a treadmill at 50% to 85% of the heart rate reserve (exercise group: EXE), and a control group of 47 diabetic participants (CON; 24 f, 23 m; 52.9+/-13.4 years old; BMI=30.9+/-8.4). Vibration perception threshold (VPT), nerve distal latency (DL), nerve conduction velocity (NCV), and nerve action potential amplitude (NAPA) in the lower limbs were measured. RESULTS: We found significant differences on Delta (delta) in NCV for both peroneal and sural motor nerve between the EXE and CON groups during the study period (P<.001, for both). The percentage of diabetic patients that developed motor neuropathy and sensory neuropathy during the 4 years of the study was significantly higher in the CON than the EXE group (17% vs. 0.0%, P<.05, and 29.8% vs. 6.45%, P<.05, respectively). In addition, the percentage of diabetic patients who developed increased VPT (25 V) during the study was significantly higher in the CON than the EXE group (21.3% vs. 12.9%, P<.05). Change on Hallux VPT from baseline to the end of the study was significantly different between the EXE and CON groups (P<.05); no significant change in Malleolus VPT between the two groups occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests, for the first time, that long-term aerobic exercise training can prevent the onset or modify the natural history of DPN.

Twenty-four-hour blood pressure monitoring in normoalbuminuric normotensive type 1 diabetic women during pregnancy.

UNLABELLED: We monitored blood pressure (BP) for a 24-h period in type 1 diabetic women at each trimester of pregnancy (10-13, 20-22, and 30-33 weeks of gestation) to identify early alterations of BP profile in pregnancies complicated by hypertension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 71 type 1 diabetic pregnant women and 48 nondiabetic pregnant women (homogeneous by age and pre-pregnancy BMI) consecutively recruited at 10+/-2 weeks of pregnancy in the space of 2 years (1999-2000). They were all normotensive (<130/80 mm Hg) and normoalbuminuric (AER<20 microg/min) at entry to the study. STATISTICS: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and simple regression and chi(2) were applied as appropriate by an Apple software program (Stat View). RESULTS: In diabetic women, we recorded higher levels of diastolic BP (even if within a normal range) at each time point; diabetic vs. nondiabetic women: first trim daytime diastolic BP: 71.35+/-8.75 vs. 67.7+/-9.7, P=.01; second trim nighttime diastolic BP: 62.15+/-6.45 vs. 58.05+/-6.7, P=.05; third trim nighttime diastolic BP: 66.03+/-8.72 vs. 60.7+/-6.5, P=.01. Among diabetics, those who later developed pregnancy-induced hypertension (36.6%) showed significantly higher values of BP at the first and third trimester compared to those who remained normotensive. In the two groups, there were no differences in age and pre-pregnancy BMI by contrast of diabetes duration (hypertensive vs. normotensive, 19.18+/-7.3 vs. 14.35+/-9.1 years, P=.03) and age of diagnosis (hypertensive vs. normotensive, 9.6+/-5.5 vs. 14.7+/-8.6 years, P=.01). Positive correlation was found between fasting blood glucose and diastolic BP at each trimester of pregnancy.