[Papilloma excision. Scalpel or CO2 Laser? A case report].

A papilloma is a benign tumor arising from an epithelial surface. Mostly a papilloma appears as an asymptomatic intraoral lesion and is often associated with the human papilloma virus (HPV). In this case report two similar, verrucous papules, sessile bilateral on the back of the tongue, were surgically removed in a 65-year-old male patient. Thereby two different methods of treatment were compared. On the right side of the back of the tongue, excision by scalpel, as the gold standard treatment modality, was performed. On the left side a surgical removal by a CO2 laser was performed. In a photothermal procedure, without direct contact to the tissue, the laser beam is cutting through the mucosa. Secondary wound healing can take place. Both methods were compared in relation to their application, wound healing, quality of the biopsy and morbidity. Postoperative less discomfort and a slightly faster wound healing could be seen after scalpel removal. The histopathological examination was comparable for both methods.

Effect of orthodontic extraction of mandibular premolars on third molar angulation after treatment with fixed appliances : A cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Orthodontic treatment involving premolar extractions might improve the angulation of lower third molars, which are the teeth most often impacted. This study analyzes the impact of first/second lower premolar extraction during orthodontic therapy on the angulation of mandibular third molars. METHODS: A total of 120 patients treated non-extraction (n = 40), with extraction of first (n = 40), or second lower premolars (n = 40) were included. The mesiodistal angulation of lower third molars relative to the adjacent tooth and their developmental stage were evaluated from posttreatment orthopantomograms. Between-group differences were statistically evaluated at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: The orthopantomograms of 120 patients (51% female) with a median age of 15.2 years at the time of debonding were evaluated after a mean treatment duration time of 2.9 years. No difference (P > 0.05) was seen between the average angulation of the lower third molars of the right (mean = 24.4°, standard deviation [SD] 13.6°) and the left side (mean = 23.6°, SD 14.1°). No differences in the angulation of the lower third molar were found between the non-extraction and extraction groups for the right (P = 0.44) or the left side (P = 0.22). Likewise, no differences were found when comparing the first and second premolars for the right (P = 0.26) or the left side (P = 0.10). Premolar extraction was associated with an advanced root development stage of the right third molar (odds ratio 7.1; 95% confidence interval 1.1-48.1; P = 0.04), with no differences between extraction of the first or second premolar (P = 0.10). CONCLUSION: Orthodontic treatment involving premolars extractions might be associated with a small acceleration in root development, but not with the angulation, of lower third molars.

Interventions for dental fluorosis: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Dental fluorosis has considerable implications on the patients' quality of life. The present study assesses the comparative effectiveness of the various interventions for the treatment of fluorosed enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine databases were searched from inception to December 2016 for randomized trials. After duplicate study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment, mean differences (MD) or Relative Risks and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and assessed with the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Six trials with a total of 348 patients (at least 40% male/60% female) with a mean age of 17.7 years treated with bleaching, microabrasion, or resin infiltration were included. Evidence of low quality indicated that microabrasion resulted in smaller esthetic improvement compared to bleaching (MD = -2.9; 95% CI = -3.4 to -2.5). Evidence of moderate quality indicated that compared to bleaching a greater esthetic improvement was seen with resin infiltration (MD = 3.6; 95% CI = 2.7-4.6) or a combination of bleaching with resin infiltration (MD = 3.5; 2.8-3.7). However, all comparisons were supported from single trials and therefore caution is warranted. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the existing limited evidence, resin infiltration seems to be the most promising treatment for dental fluorosis, followed by bleaching and microabrasion. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: For this systematic review, which was registered beforehand in PROSPERO (CRD42016053492), we synthesized evidence from existing randomized clinical trals on humans to see which treatment is most effective for the esthetic rehabilitation of dental fluorosis, the prevalence of which is seeing a worldwide steady increase. We found that resin infiltration seems to be the most effective treatment approach for lesions of mild to moderate severity, followed by bleaching, and finally microabrasion. Our study's strengths are its a priori registration, wide search, quality check according to Cochrane guidelines, and the use of a new robust analytic method to provide valid clinical recommendations according to the principles of evidence-based medicine.