Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Posterior Quadratus Lumborum Block for Postoperative Analgesia after Caesarean Section: An Observational Closed Mixed Cohort Study.

ESP block (ESPB) and posterior Quadratus Lumborum Block (pQLB) have been proposed as opioid-sparing techniques for the management of pain after abdominal surgery. Between December 2021 and October 2022, we conducted a retrospective comparative study at the delivery suite of Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy, to compare the efficacy of ESPB and pQLB in preventing postoperative pain after an elective caesarean section (CS). The primary outcome was total morphine consumption in the first 24 h. Secondary outcomes were time to first opioid request; Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) at 0, 2, 6, 12 and 24 h; vital signs; adverse events. Fifty-two women were included. The total cumulative dose of morphine was not significantly different between the two groups of patients (p = 0.897). Time to first dose of morphine, NPRS values and haemodynamic parameters were not statistically different between the two groups. NPRS values significantly increased (p < 0.001) at the different time intervals considered. The need for rescue doses of morphine was lower in the ESPB group compared to the pQLB group (hazard ratio of 0.51, 95% CI (0.27 to 0.95), p = 0.030). No adverse event was reported. ESPB seems to be as effective as pQLB in providing analgesia after CS.

Blended (Combined Spinal and General) vs. General Anesthesia for Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Adequate pain management for abdominal hysterectomy is a key factor to decrease postoperative morbidity, hospital length of stay and chronic pain. General anesthesia is still the most widely used technique for abdominal hysterectomy. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of blended anesthesia (spinal and general anesthesia) compared to balanced general anesthesia in patients undergoing hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy for ovarian, endometrial or cervical cancer or for fibromatosis. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from adult ASA 1 to 3 patients scheduled for laparoscopic or mini-laparotomic hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy for ovarian, endometrial or cervical cancer or for fibromatosis. Exclusion criteria were age below 18 years, ASA > 3, previous chronic use of analgesics, psychiatric disorders, laparotomic surgery with an incision above the belly button and surgery extended to the upper abdomen for the presence of cancer localizations (e.g., liver, spleen or diaphragm surgery). The cohort of patients was retrospectively divided into three groups according to the anesthetic management: general anesthesia and spinal with morphine and local anesthetic (Group 1), general anesthesia and spinal with morphine (Group 2) and general anesthesia without spinal (Group 3). RESULTS: NRS was lower in the spinal anesthesia groups (Groups 1 and 2) than in the general anesthesia group (Group 3) for every time point but at 48 h. The addition of local anesthetics conferred a small but significant NRS decrease (p = 0.009). A higher percentage of patients in Group 3 received intraoperative sufentanil (52.2 ± 18 mcg in Group 3 vs. Group 1 31.8 ± 16.2 mcg, Group 2 44.1 ± 15.6, p < 0.001) and additional techniques for postoperative pain control (11.4% in Group 3 vs. 2.1% in Group 1 and 0.8% in Group 2, p < 0.001). Intraoperative hypotension (MAP < 65 mmHg) lasting more than 5 min was more frequent in patients receiving spinal anesthesia, especially with local anesthetics (Group 1 25.8%, Group 2 14.6%, Group 3 11.6%, p < 0.001), with the resulting increased need for vasopressors. Recovery-room discharge criteria were met earlier in the spinal anesthesia groups than in the general anesthesia group (Group 1 102 ± 44 min, Group 2 91.9 ± 46.5 min, Group 3 126 ± 90.7 min, p < 0.05). No differences were noted in postoperative mobilization or duration of ileus. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal administration of morphine with or without local anesthetic as a component of blended anesthesia is effective in improving postoperative pain control following laparoscopic or mini-laparotomic hysterectomy, in reducing intraoperative opioid consumption, in decreasing postoperative rescue analgesics consumption and the need for any additional analgesic technique. We recommend managing postoperative pain with a strategy tailored to the patient's physical status and the type of surgery, preventing and treating side effects of pain treatments.

A case report of an atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome in pregnancy: something wicked this way comes.

BACKGROUND: Atypical Haemolytic Uremic Syndrome is an acute life-threatening condition, characterized by the clinical triad of microangiopathic hemolytic anaemia, thrombocytopenia, kidney injury. Management of pregnants affected by Atypical Haemolytic Uremic Syndrome can be a serious concern for obstetric anesthesiologist in the delivery room and in the intensive care unit. CASE PRESENTATION: A 35-year-old primigravida with a monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy, presented with an acute haemorrhage due to retained placenta after elective caesarean section and underwent surgical exploration. In the postoperative period, the patient progressively developed hypoxemic respiratory failure and, later on, anaemia, severe thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury. A timely diagnosis of Atypical Haemolytic Uremic Syndrome was made. Non-invasive ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy sessions were initially required. Hypertensive crisis and fluid overload were aggressively treated with a combination of beta and alpha adrenergic blockers (labetalol 0,3 mg/kg/h by continuous intravenous infusion for the first 24 hours, bisoprolol 2,5 mg twice daily for the first 48 hours, doxazosin 2 mg twice daily), central sympatholytics (methyldopa 250 mg twice daily for the first 72 hours, transdermal clonidine 5 mg by the third day), diuretics (furosemide 20 mg three times daily), calcium antagonists (amlodipine 5 mg twice daily). Eculizumab 900 mg was administered via intravenous infusion once per week, attaining hematological and renal remissions. The patient also received several blood transfusion units and anti- meningococcal B, anti-pneumococcal, anti-haemophilus influenzae type B vaccination. Her clinical condition progressively improved, and she was finally discharged from intensive care unit 5 days after admission. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical course of this report underlines how crucial it is for the obstetric anaesthesiologist to promptly identify Atypical Haemolytic Uremic Syndrome, since early initiation of eculizumab, together with supportive therapy, has a direct effect on patient outcome.

Remdesivir plus Dexamethasone in COVID-19: A cohort study of severe patients requiring high flow oxygen therapy or non-invasive ventilation.

INTRODUCTION: Remdesivir and Dexamethasone represent the cornerstone of therapy for critically ill patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure caused by Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, clinical efficacy and safety of concomitant administration of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone (Rem-Dexa) in severe COVID-19 patients on high flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) or non-invasive ventilation (NIV) remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective cohort study that was performed in two medical Intensive Care Units (ICUs) of a tertiary university hospital. The clinical impact of Rem-Dexa administration in hypoxemic patients with COVID-19, who required NIV or HFOT and selected on the simplified acute physiology score II, the sequential organ failure assessment score and the Charlson Comorbidity Index score, was investigated. The primary outcome was 28-day intubation rate; secondary outcomes were end-of-treatment clinical improvement and PaO2/FiO2 ratio, laboratory abnormalities and clinical complications, ICU and hospital length of stay, 28-day and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: We included 132 patients and found that 28-day intubation rate was significantly lower among Rem-Dexa group (19.7% vs 48.5%, p<0.01). Although the end-of-treatment clinical improvement was larger among Rem-Dexa group (69.7% vs 51.5%, p = 0.05), the 28-day and 90-day mortalities were similar (4.5% and 10.6% vs. 15.2% and 16.7%; p = 0.08 and p = 0.45, respectively). The logistic regression and Cox-regression models showed that concomitant Rem-Dexa therapy was associated with a reduction of 28-day intubation rate (OR 0.22, CI95% 0.05-0.94, p = 0.04), in absence of laboratory abnormalities and clinical complications (p = ns). CONCLUSIONS: In COVID-19 critically ill patients receiving HFO or NIV, 28-day intubation rate was lower in patients who received Rem-Dexa and this finding corresponded to lower end-of-treatment clinical improvement. The individual contribution of either Remdesevir or Dexamethasone to the observed clinical effect should be further investigated.

Bilateral lumbar ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus local anesthetic infiltration for perioperative analgesia in lumbar spine surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain. We examined the analgesic efficacy of bilateral lumbar ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with ropivacaine compared with local infiltration. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective lumbar arthrodesis were randomly divided into two groups. Control group received 0.375% ropivacaine 40 mL through the wound, and ESPB group received preoperative bilateral ESPB with 0.375% ropivacaine 40 mL. Primary outcome was postoperative pain intensity at rest using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included difference in pain intensity between preintervention and defined timepoints, total amount of opioid analgesic requested by the patients at the same timepoints, the incidence of any adverse event, and the length of hospital stay (LOS) after surgery. RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled in the study. After surgery we detected a NRS value of 1.9±1.5 in ESPB group and 5.9±1.6 in control group (P<0.001). About the opioid consumption we found a total sufentanil tablets consumption of 17±6 and 10±3 at 48 hours for control group and ESPB group, respectively (P<0.001). Concerning LOS, 30 (100%) patients in the control group and 22 (73.3%) in ESPB group were discharged after 72 hours (P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB offers improved postoperative analgesia compared with local infiltration in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery.

Predicting Factors for Seizures after Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Retrospective Single Center Cohort Study.

Background: Seizures are a common complication of cerebral venous thrombosis. In this study, we intended to define clinical and neuroradiological factors associated with early and late seizures and predictors for seizure recurrence. Methods: The database of our high-volume tertiary stroke center was screened for patients diagnosed with cerebral venous thrombosis between April 2006 and July 2021. Demographics, clinical, imaging, and instrumental data were collected. Results: Out of a total of 80 patients, 30 had seizures, either within the first week after onset (22 patients) or after (8 patients). Speech impairment and intracerebral bleeding were statistically associated with seizures in univariate analysis, but in a logistic regression model, only brain damage with hemorrhagic infarct and/or presence of brain hematoma [OR 6.051; 95% CI 1.881−19.468] (p = 0.003) were predicting factors for seizures. Late seizures were significantly more frequent in younger age [OR 0.864; 95% CI 0.763−0.978] (p = 0.020). Early seizures resulted as protective factors for recurrence; an altered state of consciousness at baseline and late seizures resulted as predictive factors for relapses (0.0% vs. 81.0%, p = 0.005, and 100.0% vs. 19.0%, p < 0.005, respectively). Conclusions: Our study confirms brain bleeding as the strongest risk factor for seizures after cerebral venous thrombosis. Recurrence is unusual after early seizures, while the presence of late seizures seems to raise the risk of recurrence.